How To: Structure Classroom Data Collection for Individual Students

Similar documents
Tools and. Response to Intervention RTI: Monitoring Student Progress Identifying and Using Screeners,

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

Data-Based Decision Making: Academic and Behavioral Applications

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Clarkstown Central School District. Response to Intervention & Academic Intervention Services District Plan

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

PROVIDING AND COMMUNICATING CLEAR LEARNING GOALS. Celebrating Success THE MARZANO COMPENDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Pyramid. of Interventions

Comprehensive Progress Report

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Using CBM to Help Canadian Elementary Teachers Write Effective IEP Goals

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

School Action Plan: Template Overview

Interpretive (seeing) Interpersonal (speaking and short phrases)

Texas First Fluency Folder For First Grade

Evidence-Based Intervention Manual. T. Chris Riley-Tillman. Katie McDuffy. Leigh McCulloch. Jessica Nimocks. Albee Ongsuco.

Edexcel GCSE. Statistics 1389 Paper 1H. June Mark Scheme. Statistics Edexcel GCSE

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

Daily Assessment (All periods)

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

1.11 I Know What Do You Know?

Prevent Teach Reinforce

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

Academic Intervention Services (Revised October 2013)

Writing a Basic Assessment Report. CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

Publisher Citations. Program Description. Primary Supporting Y N Universal Access: Teacher s Editions Adjust on the Fly all grades:

Research Design & Analysis Made Easy! Brainstorming Worksheet

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

INCORPORATING CHOICE AND PREFERRED

Characteristics of Functions

Grade 5 + DIGITAL. EL Strategies. DOK 1-4 RTI Tiers 1-3. Flexible Supplemental K-8 ELA & Math Online & Print

Running head: DEVELOPING MULTIPLICATION AUTOMATICTY 1. Examining the Impact of Frustration Levels on Multiplication Automaticity.

Evidence-based Practice: A Workshop for Training Adult Basic Education, TANF and One Stop Practitioners and Program Administrators

Experience Corps. Mentor Toolkit

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES

Probability and Statistics Curriculum Pacing Guide

MODULE 4 Data Collection and Hypothesis Development. Trainer Outline

Grade 3: Module 2B: Unit 3: Lesson 10 Reviewing Conventions and Editing Peers Work

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESSING THE HANDOUTS AND THE POWERPOINT

Critical Decisions within Student Learning Objectives: Target Setting Model

Focused on Understanding and Fluency

Workshop 5 Teaching Writing as a Process

Van Andel Education Institute Science Academy Professional Development Allegan June 2015

Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

RI.2.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases in a text relevant to a grade 2 topic or subject area.

BSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Student Packets and Teacher Guide. Grades 6, 7, 8

Students of the week. Living & Learning Together.

Person Centered Positive Behavior Support Plan (PC PBS) Report Scoring Criteria & Checklist (Rev ) P. 1 of 8

Cal s Dinner Card Deals

Learning Microsoft Publisher , (Weixel et al)

Holy Family Catholic Primary School SPELLING POLICY

PROMOTING QUALITY AND EQUITY IN EDUCATION: THE IMPACT OF SCHOOL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring SOSCA. Feedback Information

Text: envisionmath by Scott Foresman Addison Wesley. Course Description

Assessing Functional Relations: The Utility of the Standard Celeration Chart

The Effects of Super Speed 100 on Reading Fluency. Jennifer Thorne. University of New England

Mooresville Charter Academy

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

DELAWARE CHARTER SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

Common Core Standards Alignment Chart Grade 5

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

Community Power Simulation

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

The State and District RtI Plans

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Science Fair Rules and Requirements

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

TOPICS LEARNING OUTCOMES ACTIVITES ASSESSMENT Numbers and the number system

Classroom Activities/Lesson Plan

WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO PAY ATTENTION?

36TITE 140. Course Description:

Aimsweb Fluency Norms Chart

Language and Literacy: Exploring Examples of the Language and Literacy Foundations

Title: George and Sam Save for a Present By: Lesson Study Group 2

Class Numbers: & Personal Financial Management. Sections: RVCC & RVDC. Summer 2008 FIN Fully Online

MADERA SCIENCE FAIR 2013 Grades 4 th 6 th Project due date: Tuesday, April 9, 8:15 am Parent Night: Tuesday, April 16, 6:00 8:00 pm

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

PARIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL AUDIT

Modified Systematic Approach to Answering Questions J A M I L A H A L S A I D A N, M S C.

Teacher Action Research Multiple Intelligence Theory in the Foreign Language Classroom. By Melissa S. Ferro George Mason University

Tun your everyday simulation activity into research

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

Lesson Overview: This lesson will introduce what a possessive pronoun is by reviewing

Grade Band: High School Unit 1 Unit Target: Government Unit Topic: The Constitution and Me. What Is the Constitution? The United States Government

Fundamental Accounting Principles, 21st Edition Author(s): Wild, John; Shaw, Ken; Chiappetta, Barbara ISBN-13:

Career Checkpoint. What is Career Checkpoint? Make the most of your Marketable Skills

Implementing Response to Intervention (RTI) National Center on Response to Intervention

PRESENTED BY EDLY: FOR THE LOVE OF ABILITY

Transcription:

How the Common Core Works Series 2013 Jim Wright www.interventioncentral.org 1 How To: Structure Classroom Data Collection for Individual Students When a student is struggling in the classroom, the teacher will often implement an intervention matched to the student's deficient academic skills. However, classroom interventions are incomplete if the teacher is not also collecting data to document whether those interventions are actually benefiting students. Indeed, an intervention can be viewed as fatally flawed (Witt, VanDerHeyden & Gilbertson, 2004) if it lacks any one of these 4 data elements: Problem definition. The teacher clearly and specifically defines the presenting student problem(s) needing intervention. If the student problem is not clearly defined, the teacher cannot accurately measure or fix it. Baseline performance. The teacher assesses the student s current skill or performance level (baseline performance) in the identified area(s) of concern. If the teacher lacks baseline information, he or she cannot judge at the end of the intervention how much progress was actually made. Intervention goal. Before starting the intervention, the teacher sets a specific outcome goal for student improvement. Without a goal in place before the start of the intervention, the teacher cannot judge at the end of the intervention whether it has in fact been a success. Ongoing progress-monitoring. The teacher selects a method to monitor the student s progress formatively during the intervention. Without ongoing monitoring of progress, the teacher is 'flying blind', unable to judge to judge whether the intervention is effective in helping the student to attain the outcome goal. Bringing Structure to Classroom Data-Collection. The Student Intervention: Monitoring Worksheet. As teachers take on the role of first responder interventionist, they are likely to need guidance at least initially in the multi-step process of setting up and implementing classroom data collection, as well as interpreting the resulting data. A form designed to walk teachers through the data-collection process-- The Student Intervention: Progress-Monitoring Worksheet appears at the end of this document, along with a completed example. The Worksheet is a 7-step wizard form to show teachers how to structure their progress-monitoring to ensure that their data collection is adequate to the task of measuring the impact of their classroom interventions: Identify the student problem. The teacher defines the student problem in clear, specific terms that allow the instructor to select an appropriate source of classroom assessment to measure and monitor the problem. Decide on a data collection method. The teacher chooses a method for collecting data that can be managed in the classroom setting and that will provide useful information about the student problem. Examples of data collection methods are curriculum-based measurement (e.g., oral reading fluency; correct writing sequences), behavior-frequency counts, and daily behavior report cards. When selecting a data collection method, the teacher also decides how frequently that data will be collected during intervention progress-monitoring. In some cases, the method of data collection being used will dictate monitoring frequency. For example, if homework completion and accuracy is being tracked, the frequency of data collection will be equal to the frequency of homework assignments. In other cases, the level of severity of the student problem will dictate monitoring frequency. In schools implementing Response to Intervention (RTI), students on Tier 2 (standardprotocol) interventions should be monitored 1-2 times per month, for example, while students on Tier 3 (intensive problemsolving protocol) interventions should be monitored at least weekly (Burns & Gibbons, 2008).

How the Common Core Works Series 2013 Jim Wright www.interventioncentral.org 2 Collect data to calculate baseline. The teacher should collect 3-5 data-points prior to starting the intervention to calculate the student s baseline, or starting point, in the skill or behavior that is being targeted for intervention. The student s baseline performance serves as an initial marker against which to compare his or her outcome performance at the end of the intervention. (Also,--because baseline data points are collected prior to the start of the intervention--they collectively can serve as an prediction of the trend, or rate of improvement, if the student s current academic program were to remain unchanged with no additional interventions attempted.). In calculating baseline, the teacher has the option of selecting the median, or middle, data-point, or calculating the mean baseline performance. Determine the timespan of the intervention. The length of time reserved for the intervention should be sufficient to allow enough data to be collected to clearly demonstrate whether that intervention was successful. For example, it is recommended that a high-stakes intervention last at least 8 instructional weeks (e.g., Burns & Gibbons, 2008). Set an intervention goal. The teacher calculates a goal for the student that, if attained by the end of the intervention period, will indicate that the intervention was successful. Decide how student progress is to be summarized. A decision that the teacher must make prior to the end of the intervention period is how he or she will summarize the actual progress-monitoring data. Because of the variability present in most data, the instructor will probably not elect simply to use the single, final data point as the best estimate of student progress. Better choices are to select several (e.g. 3) of the final data points and either select the median value or calculate a mean value. For charted data with trendline, the teacher may calculate the student s final performance level as the value of the trendline at the point at which it intercepts the intervention end-date. Evaluate the intervention outcome. At the conclusion of the intervention, the teacher directly compares the actual student progress (summarized in the previous step) with the goal originally set. If actual student progress meets or exceeds the goal, the intervention is judged to be successful. References Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. A. (2008). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools. Routledge: New York. Witt, J. C., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Gilbertson, D. (2004). Troubleshooting behavioral interventions. A systematic process for finding and eliminating problems. School Psychology Review, 33, 363-383.

How the Common Core Works Series 2013 Jim Wright www.interventioncentral.org 3 Student Intervention: Progress-Monitoring Worksheet Student: Brian Jones Teacher: Mrs. Braniff Classroom or Course: Gr 3 PROGRESS-MONITORING BASELINE SET-UP A. Identify the Student Problem: Describe in clear, specific terms the student academic or behavioral problem: Need to Become Fluent in Multiplication Facts: 0 to B. Select a Data Collection Method: Choose a method of data collection to measure whether the classroom intervention actually improves the identified student problem (e.g., curriculum-based measurement, etc.). Curriculum-Based Measurement: 2-Minute Timed Math Computation Probes How frequently will this data be collected?: 1 times per Week C. Collect Data to Calculate Baseline: What method from the choices below will be used to estimate the student s baseline (starting) performance? (NOTE: Generally, at least 3-5 baseline data points are recommended.) From a total of 3 observations, select the median value. From a total of observations, calculate the mean value. Baseline 1. Date: _11_/_14_/2011 Obsv: _31 2. Date: _11_/_17_/2011 Obsv: _28 Other: Baseline Performance: Based on the method selected above, it is calculated that the student s baseline performance is: 31 Correct Digits in 2 minutes D. Determine Intervention Timespan: The intervention will last 6 instructional weeks and end on _1_/_13_/2012 E. Set a Performance Goal: What goal is the student expected to achieve if the intervention is successful? At the end of the intervention, it is predicted that the student will reach this performance goal: 40 Correct Digits in 2 minutes F. Decide How Student Progress is to Be Summarized: Select a method for summarizing student progress ( outcome ) attained when the intervention ends. Student progress at the end of the intervention is to be summarized by: Selecting the median value from the final data-points (e.g.,3). Computing the mean value from the final 2 data-points (e.g.,3). [For time-series graphs]: Calculating the value on the graph trend line at the point that it intercepts the intervention end date. Progress-Monitoring 1. Date: _12_/_02_/2011 Obsv: _2 2. Date: _12_/_0_/2011 Obsv: _34 3. Date: _12_/_16_/2011 Obsv: _35 3. Date: _11_/_21_/2011 Obsv: _34 4. Date: / / Obsv: 5. Date: / / Obsv: G. Evaluate the Intervention Outcome: At the end of the intervention, compare student progress to goal. If actual progress meets or exceeds goal, the intervention is judged successful. The student s ACTUAL Progress (Step F) is: The PERFORMANCE GOAL for improvement (Step E) is: 5. Date: _01_/_06_/2012 Obsv: _41 6. Date: _01_/_13_/2012 Obsv: _43 7. Date: / / Obsv: 8. Date: / / Obsv: 42 40 4. Date: _12_/_22_/2011 Obsv: _3. Date: / / Obsv:

PROGRESS-MONITORING BASELINE SET-UP How the Common Core Works Series 2013 Jim Wright www.interventioncentral.org 4 Student Intervention: Progress-Monitoring Worksheet Student: Teacher: Classroom or Course: A. Identify the Student Problem: Describe in clear, specific terms the student academic or behavioral problem: B. Select a Data Collection Method: Choose a method of data collection to measure whether the classroom intervention actually improves the identified student problem (e.g., curriculum-based measurement, etc.). How frequently will this data be collected?: times per C. Collect Data to Calculate Baseline: What method from the choices below will be used to estimate the student s baseline (starting) performance? (NOTE: Generally, at least 3-5 baseline data points are recommended.) From a total of observations, select the median value. Other: From a total of observations, calculate the mean value. Baseline 1. Date: / / Obsv: 2. Date: / / Obsv: Baseline Performance: Based on the method selected above, it is calculated that the student s baseline performance is: D. Determine Intervention Timespan: The intervention will last instructional weeks and end on / /. E. Set a Performance Goal: What goal is the student expected to achieve if the intervention is successful? At the end of the intervention, it is predicted that the student will reach this performance goal: F. Decide How Student Progress is to Be Summarized: Select a method for summarizing student progress ( outcome ) attained when the intervention ends. Student progress at the end of the intervention is to be summarized by: Selecting the median value from the final data-points (e.g.,3). Computing the mean value from the final data-points (e.g.,3). [For time-series graphs]: Calculating the value on the graph trend line at the point that it intercepts the intervention end date. Progress-Monitoring 1. Date: / / Obsv: 2. Date: / / Obsv: 3. Date: / / Obsv: 4. Date: / / Obsv: 3. Date: / / Obsv: 4. Date: / / Obsv: 5. Date: / / Obsv: G. Evaluate the Intervention Outcome: At the end of the intervention, compare student progress to goal. If actual progress meets or exceeds goal, the intervention is judged successful. The student s ACTUAL Progress (Step F) is: The PERFORMANCE GOAL for improvement (Step E) is: 5. Date: / / Obsv: 6. Date: / / Obsv: 7. Date: / / Obsv: 8. Date: / / Obsv:. Date: / / Obsv:

How the Common Core Works Series 2013 Jim Wright www.interventioncentral.org 5 Student: Grade: Teacher: School Year: Progress-Monitoring (Cont.) 10. Date: / / Obsv: 11. Date: / / Obsv: 12. Date: / / Obsv: 13. Date: / / Obsv: 14. Date: / / Obsv: 15. Date: / / Obsv: 16. Date: / / Obsv: 17. Date: / / Obsv: 18. Date: / / Obsv: 1. Date: / / Obsv: 20. Date: / / Obsv: 21. Date: / / Obsv: 22. Date: / / Obsv: 23. Date: / / Obsv: 24. Date: / / Obsv: 25. Date: / / Obsv: 26. Date: / / Obsv: 27. Date: / / Obsv: 28. Date: / / Obsv: 2. Date: / / Obsv: Progress-Monitoring (Cont.) 30. Date: / / Obsv: 31. Date: / / Obsv: 32. Date: / / Obsv: 33. Date: / / Obsv: 34. Date: / / Obsv: 35. Date: / / Obsv: 36. Date: / / Obsv: 37. Date: / / Obsv: 38. Date: / / Obsv: 3. Date: / / Obsv: 40. Date: / / Obsv: 41. Date: / / Obsv: 42. Date: / / Obsv: 43. Date: / / Obsv: 44. Date: / / Obsv: 45. Date: / / Obsv: 46. Date: / / Obsv: 47. Date: / / Obsv: 48. Date: / / Obsv: 4. Date: / / Obsv: