Environmental Literacy Indicator Tool (Self-Assessment) DRAFT

Similar documents
SECTION 12 E-Learning (CBT) Delivery Module

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013

Educating Georgia s Future gadoe.org. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. gadoe.

School Action Plan: Template Overview

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

Assessment and Evaluation for Student Performance Improvement. I. Evaluation of Instructional Programs for Performance Improvement

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES

Hokulani Elementary School

The Site Visit: How to Prepare for It & What to Expect. STARTALK Conference Atlanta, GA May 3, 2012

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

Many instructors use a weighted total to calculate their grades. This lesson explains how to set up a weighted total using categories.

Race to the Top (RttT) Monthly Report for US Department of Education (USED) NC RttT February 2014

+ Restorative Justice: An Anthology

INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE AT IVANHOE GRAMMAR SCHOOL. An Introduction to the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme For Students and Families

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

1 Use complex features of a word processing application to a given brief. 2 Create a complex document. 3 Collaborate on a complex document.

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

(2) GRANT FOR RESIDENTIAL AND REINTEGRATION SERVICES.

H2020 Marie Skłodowska Curie Innovative Training Networks Informal guidelines for the Mid-Term Meeting

USER ADAPTATION IN E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

USF Course Change Proposal Global Citizens Project

ED : Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Bloomsburg University Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania. Department of Teaching and Learning

Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Requesting Title II, Part A Services. A Guide for Christian School Administrators

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

IB Diploma Subject Selection Brochure

Welcome Parents! Class of 2021

FY11 Professional Development Expenditures And Learner Pre-post Test Score Gains

Livingston School District

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Developing, Supporting, and Sustaining Future Ready Learning

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Department of Research & Program Evaluation (DRPE) Office of Accountability. Requests for Flexibility Evaluation Approach APPENDIX A

Developing Quality Fieldwork Experiences for Teacher Candidates. A Planning Guide for Educator Preparation Programs and District Partners

APPROVAL AIDE MEMOIRE

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

District Advisory Committee. October 27, 2015

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

ACTIVITY INSIGHT FOR COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES FACULTY

Internship Program. Employer and Student Handbook

Inquiry Based Science Education in Europe: Setting the Horizon 2020 Agenda for Educational Research?

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

VIRTUAL LEARNING. Alabama Connecting Classrooms, Educators, & Students Statewide. for FACILITATORS

Bold resourcefulness: redefining employability and entrepreneurial learning

ED487: Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

Gr. 9 Geography. Canada: Creating a Sustainable Future DAY 1

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

State Parental Involvement Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Every curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.

ARTICULATION AGREEMENT

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

EXPO MILANO CALL Best Sustainable Development Practices for Food Security

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

SOUTH DOWNS PRIMARY SCHOOL 2017 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Librarian/Library Faculty Meeting

SCHOLARSHIP GUIDELINES FOR HISPANIC/LATINO STUDENTS

OHIO HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

6 Financial Aid Information

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Program Change Proposal:

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES

UW RICHLAND. uw-richland richland.uwc.edu

Punjab Education and English Language Initiative (PEELI) 1

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Earthsoft s EQuIS Database Lower Duwamish Waterway Source Data Management

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Guide to the Records of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Art Committee AC.0066

EQuIP Review Feedback

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Collegiate Academies Response to Livingston School Facility RFA Submitted January 23, 2015

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

DegreeWorks Advisor Reference Guide

Transcription:

Environmental Literacy Indicator Tool (Self-Assessment) DRAFT The purpose of the Environmental Literacy Indicator Tool is to identify and track the implementation of teacher-supported Meaningful Watershed Educational (MWEEs) and related environmental education efforts in school systems in the mid- Atlantic region. This tool provides local education agencies (LEAs) an opportunity to document the scope of existing programs, identify program strengths, and highlight areas requiring greater focus. The program areas and criteria within this tool are founded on research-based best practices in the field of environmental literacy. This self-assessment will measure LEA capacity, implementation, and efforts to provide MWEEs and related programming consistent with the goals outlined in the Mid-Atlantic Elementary and Secondary Environmental Literacy Strategy. Data from this tool will be compiled and provided to each state and its partners to assist with ongoing efforts to support development of high quality programming. The results of this self-assessment will provide valuable information to the state(s) and the Chesapeake Bay Program Education Workgroup about the progress LEAs are making toward the established goal to: Enable students in the region to graduate with the knowledge to use scientific evidence and citizenship skills to act responsibly to protect and restore their local watershed. Completing the Environmental Literacy Program Capacity Tool: Section I: Section II Section III: Section IV: Section V: Local Education Agency Information: LEA descriptive information Program Capacity Program Implementation Continuous Improvement LEA Summary Report: pre-populated from the data entered

SECTION I: Local Education Agency (LEA) Information - Districtwide State: Choose an item. LEA Name: Name of Individual Completing Assessment: Title of Individual Completing Assessment: E-mail address: School/Grade Level Elementary: Number of Schools Number of Certified Sustainable Schools Cumulative Number of USDE Green Ribbon Schools Nominated Awarded Middle: High: Other: (please specify):

Section II - Program Capacity - Please review the following elements and using the scale below make a determination about your LEAs capacity to address them. For those elements that are Partially or Fully in Place please provide (by commenting and/or uploading) supporting evidence demonstrating that the element is tangible, observable or measurable. Environmental Literacy Program Elements a. an established program leader for environmental education (providing effective, sustained and system leadership) Not in Place Planning Stage Partially in Place Fully in Place Evidence Point of contact identified but without authority/ understanding to coordinate development Program leader identified with appropriate skills, authority and knowledge to coordinate development of program and monitor implementation Program leader is a wellestablished member of administrative team and reports progress to Superintendent or Director of Curriculum Title, Job Description, # of hours dedicated to EE b. an established team that facilitates multigrade/multi-discipline curricular infusion environmental projects and practices Program leader identified EE team established but without multi-grade/multidiscipline representation EE team established with multi-grade/multidiscipline representation Agenda, meeting dates/notes, team description c. an integrated program infusing environmental concepts in appropriate curricular areas Connections with other LEA initiatives identified Several connections can be made between the EE curriculum and other LEA initiatives. EE connections can be found in many LEA initiatives in multiple disciplines PK-12 Lesson plans, examples of curriculum d. well-articulated plan to ensure opportunities for all students to engage in teachersupported meaningful watershed educational experiences at the elementary, middle and high school levels e. a system in place to support educators that fulfills essential elements of professional development to support meaningful watershed educational experiences (MWEEs) f. plan or initiative to maintain school buildings, grounds and operations as models of sustainability for students and the community including the use of school grounds as outdoor learning spaces g. established community partnerships for delivery of environmental education including implementation of teacher supported meaningful watershed educational experiences MWEEs are integrated into one curriculum and provided once in each grade band PD plan is established and approved by school system Plan /initiative has been identified Potential partnerships have been identified MWEEs are integrated across curricula and provided once in each grade band Professional development is scheduled and implemented Plan implemented in some schools Partner organizations provide onsite or schoolbased EE activities targeted to one grade band MWEEs are transdisciplinary, provided for students annually, and integrated within PK-12 curriculum Professional development is ongoing and adjusted based on participant feedback Plan implemented in all schools (districtwide) Partner programs are integral part of PK-12 student learning experiences which are enhanced by participating in partner programs delivered in natural or local community setting. Written plan, dedicated funding # of PD hours, certificates, designated days Copy of plan or policy MOU/MOA, list of partners,

SECTION III: Program Implementation Student Participation in Teacher-Supported Meaningful Watershed Educational Please provide data for your LEA about student participation in teacher-supported Meaningful Watershed Educational (MWEEs). For each grade level, indicate the number of students per grade, the number of students participating in Outdoor Learning, and the number of students participating in MWEEs (percentages will auto-populate for both). Please also indicate the Data Confidence Level : low, medium, or high about the information you are providing. Outdoor learning experiences are field experiences that do not fulfill all requirements of a teacher supported MWEE. Because these efforts also contribute to environmental literacy for students, it is important to document these efforts. Student Participation Elementary Level Data Confidence Level Students Outdoor Learning (OLEs) # of Unique Students in in OLEs Meaningful Watershed Educational (MWEEs) in MWEEs Low estimate (data not currently collected) Medium based on some available data (not systemic) High based on data collected systemically K 800 250 31 100 12.5 1 st 850 300 35 200 24 2 nd 900 450 50 250 28 3 rd Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample 4 th Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample 5 th Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Other Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Total 2550 1000 39 550 22 The Chesapeake Bay Program is responsible for reporting student participation in MWEES: every Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience (MWEE) qualifies as an Outdoor Learning Experience (OLE) but not every Outdoor Learning Experience (OLE) qualifies as a Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience (MWEE).

SECTION III: Program Implementation Student Participation in Teacher-Supported Meaningful Watershed Educational Please provide data for your LEA about student participation in teacher-supported Meaningful Watershed Educational (MWEEs). For each grade level, indicate the number of students per grade, the number of students participating in Outdoor Learning, and the number of students participating in MWEEs (percentages will auto-populate for both). Please also indicate the Data Confidence Level : low, medium, or high about the information you are providing. Outdoor learning experiences are field experiences that do not fulfill all requirements of a teacher supported MWEE. Because these efforts also contribute to environmental literacy for students, it is important to document these efforts. Student Participation Middle School Level Data Confidence Level Students Outdoor Learning (OLEs) # of Unique Students in in OLEs Meaningful Watershed Educational (MWEEs) in MWEEs Low estimate (data not currently collected) Medium based on some available data (not systemic) High based on data collected systemically 6 th 800 250 31 100 12.5 7 th 850 300 35 200 24 8 th 900 450 50 250 28 Other Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Total 2550 1000 39 550 22 The Chesapeake Bay Program is responsible for reporting student participation in MWEES: every Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience (MWEE) qualifies as an Outdoor Learning Experience (OLE) but not every Outdoor Learning Experience (OLE) qualifies as a Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience (MWEE).

SECTION III: Program Implementation Student Participation in Teacher-Supported Meaningful Watershed Educational Please provide data for your LEA about student participation in teacher-supported Meaningful Watershed Educational (MWEEs). For each grade level, indicate the number of students per grade, the number of students participating in Outdoor Learning (choose subject from drop-down), and the number of students participating in MWEEs (choose subject from dropdown). The percentages for both will auto-populate. Please also indicate the Data Confidence Level : low, medium, or high about the information you are providing. Outdoor learning experiences are field experiences that do not fulfill all requirements of a teacher supported MWEE. Because these efforts also contribute to environmental literacy for students, it is important to document such efforts. Student Participation High School Level Data Confidence Level Students Outdoor Learning (OLEs) # of Unique Students in in OLEs Meaningful Watershed Educational (MWEEs) in MWEEs Low estimate (data not currently collected) Medium based on some available data (not systemic) High based on data collected systemically 9 th 800 200 Drop down* 25 100 Drop down* 12.5 10 th 850 400 Drop down* 47 200 Drop down* 24 11 th 900 450 Drop down* 50 250 Drop down* 28 12 th Sample Sample Drop down* Sample Sample Drop down* Sample Other Sample Sample Drop down* Sample Sample Drop down* Sample Total 2550 1050 41 550 22 The Chesapeake Bay Program is responsible for reporting student participation in MWEES: every Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience (MWEE) qualifies as an Outdoor Learning Experience (OLE) but not every Outdoor Learning Experience (OLE) qualifies as a Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience (MWEE). *Drop-down menu will include list of course subjects (biology, environmental/earth science, government, history, other)

SECTION IIIA: Program Implementation Professional Development for Teacher-Supported Meaningful Watershed Educational Please provide data for your school system about the need for professional development for teacher-supported Meaningful Watershed Educational (MWEEs). For each grade level, indicate the number of educators per grade, the number of teachers providing instruction specific to environmental education, and the number of educators who need formal environmental education professional development. Elementary School Level Teacher PD Teachers Per Grade Providing Instruction Specific to Environmental Education Who Need Formal PD in Environmental Education of Teachers Who Need PD K 40 20 10 50 1 st 42 15 5 33 2 nd 45 15 3 20 3 rd Sample Sample Sample Sample 4 th Sample Sample Sample Sample 5 th Sample Sample Sample Sample Other Sample Sample Sample Sample Total 127 50 18 36

SECTION IIIA: Program Implementation Professional Development for Teacher-Supported Meaningful Watershed Educational Please provide data for your school system about the need for professional development for teacher-supported Meaningful Watershed Educational (MWEEs). For each grade level, indicate the number of educators per grade, the number of teachers providing instruction specific to environmental education, and the number of educators who need formal environmental education professional development. Middle School Level Teacher PD Teachers Per Grade Providing Instruction Specific to Environmental Education Who Need Formal PD in Environmental Education of Teachers Who Need PD 6 th 40 20 10 50 7 th 42 15 5 33 8 th 45 15 3 20 Other Sample Sample Sample Sample Total 127 50 18 36

SECTION IIIA: Program Implementation Professional Development for Teacher-Supported Meaningful Watershed Educational Please provide data for your school system about the need for professional development for teacher-supported Meaningful Watershed Educational (MWEEs). For each grade level, indicate the number of educators per grade, the number of teachers providing instruction specific to environmental education, and the number of educators who need formal environmental education professional development. High School Level Teacher PD Teachers Per Grade Providing Instruction Specific to Environmental Education Who Need Formal Environmental Education PD of Teachers Who Need Formal Environmental Education PD 9 th 40 20 10 50 10 th 42 15 5 33 11 th 45 15 3 20 12 th Sample Sample Sample Sample Other Sample Sample Sample Sample Total 127 50 18 36

SECTION IV: Continuous Environmental Education Improvement Efforts 1. What are the strongest elements of your environmental education program? What data or subjective assessments support this? 2. What are the greatest challenges related to establishing/implementing your environmental education program? 3. What are opportunities to grow your environmental education program? 4. What do you plan to do in the next three years? 5. Please share any success stories as exemplars and models of best practice: