Perspektif Pendidikan dan Keguruan, Vol V, No. 9, April 2014 ISSN

Similar documents
Dian Wahyu Susanti English Education Department Teacher Training and Education Faculty. Slamet Riyadi University, Surakarta ABSTRACT

THE EFFECT OF USING SILENT CARD SHUFFLE STRATEGY TOWARD STUDENTS WRITING ACHIEVEMENT A

Research Journal ADE DEDI SALIPUTRA NIM: F

COOPERATIVE LEARNING TIME TOKEN IN THE TEACHING OF SPEAKING

THE ROLES OF INTEGRATING INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) IN TEACHING SPEAKING AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF ENGLISH STUDENTS OF FKIP UIR

IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH SHOW AND TELL TECHNIQUE TO THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMPN 1 PADEMAWU-PAMEKASAN

TEACHING WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT BY COMBINING BRAINSTORMING AND Y CHART STRATEGIES AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

THE ROLE OF ENGLISH TEACHERS ON HELPING PASSIVE LEARNERS IN CLASSROOM (A Study at The Ninth Grade Students of SMP N 31 Andalas Padang)

INCREASING STUDENTS ABILITY IN WRITING OF RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH PEER CORRECTION

DESINGING TASK-BASED INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY ON RECYCLING NEWSPAPER IN READING PROCEDURE TEXT

Novi Riani, Anas Yasin, M. Zaim Language Education Program, State University of Padang

An Investigation into Teacher Practice of Jigsaw Technique in Teaching Narrative for Eight Graders of SMPN 1 Menganti

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEACHING ENGLISH TO THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMK NEGERI 8 SURAKARTA IN 2015/2016 ACADEMIC YEAR

Towards Teachers Communicative Competence Enhancement: A Study on School Preparation for Bilingual Programs

ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS FOUND IN HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE BY JOANNE KATHLEEN ROWLING

yang menghadapi masalah Down Syndrome. Mereka telah menghadiri satu program

Syamsul Rizal Vera Fitria

TEACHING ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION AT THE SIXTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI KAUMAN BLORA

Aas Samrotul Faidah¹ Metty Agustine Primary².

IMPROVING VOCABULARY ABILITY BY USING COMIC Randa Wijaksana banigau Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Udayana. Abstrak

Teachers Prior Knowledge Influence in Promoting English Learning Strategies in Primary School Classroom Practices

UNIVERSITY ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (UniAMS) CHE FUZIAH BINTI CHE ALI UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

Point Sheets/Behavior Report Cards

DEVELOPING STUDENTS UNDERSTANDING OF THE SIMPLE PAST TENSE BY USING NARRATIVE TEXT

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA TYPES OF WRITTEN FEEDBACK ON ESL STUDENT WRITERS ACADEMIC ESSAYS AND THEIR PERCEIVED USEFULNESS

POST-GRADUATE MASTER OF LANGUAGE STUDIES UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA 2016

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. A. Research Type and Design. questions. As stated by Moleong (2006: 6) who makes the synthesis about

SIMILARITY MEASURE FOR RETRIEVAL OF QUESTION ITEMS WITH MULTI-VARIABLE DATA SETS SITI HASRINAFASYA BINTI CHE HASSAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

USING STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) METHOD TO IMPROVE STUDENTS WRITING ABILITY

NEGOTIATION OF MEANING IN THE ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOM INTERACTION

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. A. Research Method. descriptive form in conducting the research since the data of this research

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING STYLES AND ENTREPRENEURIAL COMPETENCIES AMONG STUDENTS IN A MALAYSIAN UNIVERSITY

THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN S AND TRANSVESTITE S SPEAKING STYLE IN KINKY BOOTS MOVIE

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA SKEW ARMENDARIZ RINGS AND THEIR RELATIONS

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA IMPACT OF ASEAN FREE TRADE AREA AND ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ON INTRA-ASEAN TRADE

STUDENTS SATISFACTION LEVEL TOWARDS THE GENERIC SKILLS APPLIED IN THE CO-CURRICULUM SUBJECT IN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA NUR HANI BT MOHAMED

BODJIT KAUR A/P RAM SINGH

Flouting Maxims in Conversational Implicature in The Ellen Degeneres Talk Show

Ack now ledgem ents. Neverthless, any possible deficiency and laxity are the responsibility of the JEELL managements.

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK. five subheadings. The first part discusses the English teaching kits.

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNET MEDIA AS LEARNING SOURCE TO IMPROVE SELF-CONFIDENCE AND LEARNING INDEPENDENCE OF STUDENTS

English Education Journal

THE EFFECT OF DEMONSTRATION METHOD ON LEARNING RESULT STUDENTS ON MATERIAL OF LIGHTNICAL PROPERTIES IN CLASS V SD NEGERI 1 KOTA BANDA ACEH

THE USE OF SERIES PICTURE AS A TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS MASTERY SIMPLE PRESENT CONTINOUS TENSE OF SMP AL-HILAL AMBON. Saidna Zulfiqar Bin Tahir

education institutions able to anticipate and mengahadapi quantity and quality of supervisors practice and field

THE ACQUISITION OF WH QUESTION BY EFL STUDENTS LEARNING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE PUBLICATION ARTICLE. For Getting Master Degree of Education

PROBLEMS IN ADJUNCT CARTOGRAPHY: A CASE STUDY NG PEI FANG FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR

A STUDY OF REFUSAL STRATEGY USED BY ENGLISH TEACHERS IN MADIUN REGENCY IN DECLINING AN INVITATION, AN OFFER AND A SUGGESTION

THE EFFECTS OF ONE STAYS THE REST STRAY AND LOCKSTEP TECHNIQUES ON THE ENHANCEMENT OF STUDENTS READING ACHIEVEMENTS

IMPROVING STUDENTS DESCRIPTIVE WRITING THROUGH ROLE, AUDIENCE, FORMAT, AND TOPIC (RAFT) STRATEGY

E 31 The Innovative Reflective Thinking Process In Solving Calculus Problems

DEVELOPING MULTIPLICATIVE STRUCTURE OF MEASURING AREA OF RECTANGLES AND SQUARES MASTER THESIS. Anisa Fatwa Sari NIM

Assessing School-based Learning: A Developmental Framework for Student Teachers

IBAN LANGUAGE PARSER USING RULE BASED APPROACH

KONTRIBUSI GAYA KOGNITIF, KECERDASAN LINGUISTIK DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS SISWA KELAS VIII DI SMPN 2 KUBUTAMBAHAN

The Use of Consequences and Self-Monitoring to Increase Time in Seat and The Number of

ASSESSING THE READINESS OF STUDENT LEARNING ACTIVITY AND LEARNING OUTCOME

IMPROVING STUDENTS CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY THROUGH PROBLEM POSING-GEOGEBRA LEARNING METHOD

INSTRUCTION: This section consists of SIX (6) structured questions. Answer FOUR (4) questions only.

THE ANALYSIS OF PRAGMATIC STRATEGIES IN VARSITY ENGLISH DEBATE CONTEST (A Descriptive Study of Varsity English Debaters at IVED 2013)

1. Drs. Agung Wicaksono, M.Pd. 2. Hj. Rika Riwayatiningsih, M.Pd. BY: M. SULTHON FATHONI NPM: Advised by:

GARIS PANDUAN BAGI POTONGAN PERBELANJAAN DI BAWAH PERENGGAN 34(6)(m) DAN 34(6)(ma) AKTA CUKAI PENDAPATAN 1967 BAGI MAKSUD PENGIRAAN CUKAI PENDAPATAN

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH

Faculty Of Information and Communication Technology

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

The Journal of Educational Development

SULIT FP511: HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION/SET 1. INSTRUCTION: This section consists of SIX (6) structured questions. Answer ALL questions.

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA

Temper Tamer s Handbook

MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE. A Dedicated Teacher

KESAN DASAR PENGAJARAN MATEMATIK DAN SAINS DALAM BAHASA INGGERIS Dl SEKOLAH RENDAH

Written by: YULI AMRIA (RRA1B210085) ABSTRACT. Key words: ability, possessive pronouns, and possessive adjectives INTRODUCTION

INTEGRATING LOCAL CULTURE INTO ENGLISH TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS ABSTRACT

IMPROVING STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION USING FISHBONE DIAGRAM (A

Jurnal Kependidikan DISCOVERY Vol. 1 No. 3 September 2013 ISSN

DEVELOPMENT OF WORKSHEET STUDENTS ORIENTED SCIENTIFIC APPROACH AT SUBJECT OF BIOLOGY

Perception of Student about Character Teacher s Mathematics on Senior High School Semarang Central Java Indonesia

THE READABILITY LEVEL OF READING PASSAGES OF AN ENGLISH TEXTBOOK PATHWAY TO ENGLISH PUBLISHED BY ERLANGGA

SYARAT-SYARAT KEMASUKAN DI TATI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE

AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE FACTORS AFFECTING SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS CLASSROOM PARTICIPATION

Noor Chahaya Ngosman Sekolah Kebangsaan Rantau Panjang, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia

Synchronization Interfaces for Improving Moodle Utilization

TAHAP PERANCANGAN BAHAN SUMBER, KEMUDAHAN DAN PERALATAN PENGAJARAN DALAM KALANGAN GURU PENDIDIKAN JASMANI

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA

THE INFLUENCE OF ENGLISH SONG TOWARD STUDENTS VOCABULARY MASTERY AND STUDENTS MOTIVATION

SIJIL PELAJARAN MALAYSIA 2011

The ABCs of FBAs and BIPs Training

PENGGUNAAN ICT DALAM KALANGAN GURU PELATIH KEMAHIRAN HIDUP FAKULTI PENDIDIKAN, UTM

ISU KRITIKAL PENGGUNAAN TULISAN JAWI DALAM PELAKSANAAN KURIKULUM PENDIDIKAN ISLAM PERINGKAT SEKOLAH MENENGAH: PANDANGAN PAKAR

Corresponding Author, Phone Number: Accepted on April 25, 2013 Academic Journal

DEVELOPING A PROTOTYPE OF SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR VOCABULARY FOR THE THIRD GRADERS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

DFVBCPIft-m ASD (VALUATION OF A FIBRE OPTIC i.earning mudi.hi:: for iethnology-based. it mm. SVlViA t i s AI IIMS. i u»y I tuwv!...

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

see that few students made As or Bs on the test from C to F, that the median grade was an F and the top grade was a C

Changing User Attitudes to Reduce Spreadsheet Risk

IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK 17 AGUSTUS 1945 MUNCAR THROUGH DIRECT PRACTICE WITH THE NATIVE SPEAKER

Transcription:

AN ANALYSIS OF SCHOOL-WIDE TOKEN ECONOMY SYSTEM ON CHALLENGE BEHAVIOR OF MENTAL RETARDATION STUDENTS AT SLBN PENBINA PEKANBARU (Analisis School-Wide Token EconomySystem pada Tantangan Perilaku Siswa Keterbelakangan Mental 'di SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru) *) DosenProdi Bahasa Inggris FKIP UIR **) AlumniProdi Bahasa inggrisfkip UIR Oleh: Betty Sailun *), Miranti Eka Putri *),danpera Handayani **) ABSTRAK Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan: Bagaimana perilaku keterbelakangan mental 'siswa dengan sistem school-wide token economy di SLBN Pembina pekanbaru? Ada tiga Sampel dari penelitian ini di SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru. Penelitian ini dilakukan berdasarkan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Hanya ada satu variabel dalam penelitian yaitu menantang perilaku. Dalam penelitian ini, peneliti menggunakan wawancara dan observasi untuk mendapatkan data.pengamatan digunakan untuk mendapatkan beberapa data tentang aktivitas dan guru siswa aktivitas di perilaku mereka yang mengalami keterbelakangan mental 'siswa dengan sistem ekonomi Token. Ada 3 perilaku tantangan siswa retardasi mental ini seperti berteriak, menangis dan membenturkan kepala. Hasil pengamatan adalah school-wide token economy adalah perubahan perilaku tantangan mereka keterbelakangan mental 'siswa dari perilaku buruk menjadi perilaku yang baik.wawancara ini digunakan untuk mendapatkan informasi tentang perilaku mereka selama dalam proses belajar mengajar dosa kelas. Dengan demikian, peneliti dapat menyimpulkan bahwa School- Wide Token Economy System pada perilaku siswa keterbelakangan mental di SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru yang mengubah perilaku mereka dari perilaku buruk menjadi perilaku yang baik.. Katakunci:Analysis, School-Wide Token Economy System, Challenge, Behaviour economy to motivate students in the learning process. Token used as reinforcer in conditioned, it can countable and can used as a token. The important of token must be interesting, easy to bring it and also difficult to be false. Usually the material used such as chip poker, stickers, burbles, stamp or money. There are some problems on challenge behavior of mental retardation s students. Firstly, they have challenge behavior such as lay down under desk, head banging, yell, lay on the floor, disturb peers, rocking their body on the seat, and crying loudly in the learning process. Second, in the social interaction the students did not show verbal sign or gestures to interacting with teacher. The third, in learning attitude the students has difficulties such as lack interest on task. INTRODUCTION People with mental retardation are less efficient at learning than are other people. A student with mental retardation may have difficulty in both learning and social interaction. Some of them show challenge behavior.children with mental retardation learn more slowly than a typical child. Mental retardation (MR) is a generalized disorder appearing before adulthood, characterized by significantly impaired cognitive functioning and deficits in two or more adaptive behavior. Mental retardation is a disability characterized by significant limitations both in intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior as expressed in conceptual, social, and practical adaptive skills. The token economy used to exchange behavior on learning attitude and social interaction of the mental retardation. Therefore, the teacher uses a system positive reinforcement that is token A token economy system is a method used that could motivate students 1

to try harder. A study on mentally retarded African American students was conducted on four boys and three girls (Akande, 1997). The students received cents contingent upon a correct response. Cents were then used to buy backupreinforcer such as sweets or access to a video or listening to music. The token economy was established in order to increase appropriate responses, and decrease verbal outbursts. The results of the study indicated a positive outcome with the use of a token economy as well as selfmonitoring techniques to be useful with mild mentally retarded students. Based on the explanation above, the writer is positively would like to conduct research under the title An analysisschool-wide Token Economy System on Challenge Behavior of Mental Retardation at SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru. RESEARCHMETHODOLOGY The design of this research belongs to descriptive research. It only has one variable. It has been designed to describe school-wide token economy system on challenge behavior of mental retardation students at SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru. The location of this research was at SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru. It is on Jl.Segar no.46 Kulim. It was conducted from August to September 2012. The population of this research is the mental retardation students in SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru. According to Burn (2000:83), population is an entry group of people, or subject or event. Which all have at least one characteristic in common and must be defined specifically and unambiguously? The population is very important in a research because I will be impossible for a researcher to collect the data required in this research. According to Gay (1987:101), sample is the process of the selecting individual for a study. Since the number of the students is large and they are heterogeneous (the grade, the sex) the writer will observe in SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru, in the class of 2012. The writer is only 3 samples for experimental class and 3 samples for control class. So, total sample of this research are 6 students. The instruments that used by the writer in this research are observation and interview. 1. Observation Observation is an activity in collecting data, will do by perceiving the object. The purpose of observation is to describe the general situation. The first step is descriptive observation. The researcher tries to describe the object situation and condition. The second step is focused on observation.this step collect the data by recording. The last step is collecting selective observation. This step is more specifically. 2. Interview Interview is an activity in collecting data, it will be give information of the object to the researcher from teacher. The researcher will be interview to the teacher about mental retardation studentsof their challenge behavior in learning process from the teacher. The researcher analyzed the result of observation in form of description. The result of observation was described according to classroom observation. In the other hand, the result of observation was described according to the facts that occurred in the classroom. Afterthe writer asked some questions to the teachers. Then the writer described the situation and their behavior when they came into the classroom and while in learning process. The writer gave some questions to the teacher based on indicators. RESEARCHFINDINGS This research is a descriptive research that consist of only one variable, which describes school-wide token economy system on challenge behavior of mental retardation students at SLBN Pembina pekanbaru. 2

In this research, the writer used classroom observation in order to get data. Classroom observation used to get some data about How does behavior of mental retardation students challenge by school wide token economy system at SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru. The observation and interview are used to get some data about school-wide token economy system on challenge behavior of mental retardation students. The researcher chose 3 of challenge behavior from C class (mental retardation s class) as the participants of observation such as head banging, crying, and yelling. There were 3 oral questionsthat asked by teacher to students such as asked about part of body, ask about A, I, U, E, and O, and ask about noun is in the white board. 1 First Meeting 1). Head Banging In the first challenge behavior namely head banging, the teacher explain to students who did not show head banging and answer teacher s question the teacher will toys and there is no head banging. 2). Crying In the second challenge behavior namely crying, the teacher explain to students who did not show crying and toys and there is no crying. 3). Yelling In the third challenge behavior namely yelling, the teacher explain to students who did not show yelling and toys and there is no showed yelling. in Pre-activity teacher s activity was saying greeting and asked the student about condition one by one, and student mental retardation s activity are they answer the teacher and answer the teacher s question one by one. In while activityteacher give material and explained about part of body and teach about A, I,U,E O, teacher ask to the students about the material one by one, and the teacher give token economy system when she teach, and student mental retardation s activity are there are the student who attention and not attention to the teacher, the student 001 and 002 play his or her toys, the student 003 just silent and not answer and student 001, 002 and 003 interesting to get the reward and they must be answer what teacher s question and they try to answer. The students can answer teacher s question, only student 003 who false answer the question when token economy system gave by the teacher in teaching learning process. 2 Second Meeting 1). Head Banging In the first challenge behavior namely head banging, the teacher explain to students who did not show head banging and answer teacher s question the teacher will toys and there is no showed head banging 2). Crying In the second challenge behavior namely crying, the teacher explained to students who did not show crying and answer teacher s question the teacher gave point in form star. According to observation, only two students who responded teacher s question, but the two others did not respond and they only play her toys and there is no showed crying. 3). Yelling 3

In the third challenge behavior namely yelling, the teacher explain to students who did not show yelling and toys and there is no showed yelling. in Pre-activity teacher s activity is say greeting and ask to the student about condition one by one, and student mental retardation s activity are they answer the teacher and answer the teacher s question one by one. In while activity teacher give material and explained about part of body and things, teacher ask to the students about the material one by one, and the teacher give token economy system when she teach, and student mental retardation s activity are there are the student who attention and not attention to the teacher, the student 001 play his toys and student 002 answer the question, the student 003 just silent and not answer and student 001, 002 and 003 interesting to get the reward and they must be answer what teacher s question and they try to answer. The students can answer teacher s question, only student 003 who false answer the question when token economy system gave by the teacher in teaching learning process. 3 Third Meeting 1). Head Banging In the first challenge behavior namely head banging, the teacher explain to students who did not show head banging and answer teacher s question the teacher will give point in form star. According to observation, only one student who respond teacher s question, but the two others did not respond and they only play her or his toys and there is no showed head banging 2). Crying In the second challenge behavior namely crying, the teacher explain to students who did not show crying and observation, only two students who respond teacher s question, but the two others did not respond and they only play her toys and there is no showed crying. 3). Yelling In the third challenge behavior namely yelling, the teacher explain to students who did not show yelling and toys and there is no showed yelling. in Pre-activity teacher s activity is say greeting and ask to the student about condition one by one, and student mental retardation s activity are they answer the teacher and answer the teacher s question one by one. In while activity teacher give material and explained about part of body and things, teacher ask to the students about the material one by one, and the teacher give token economy system when she teach, and student mental retardation s activity are there are the student who attention and not attention to the teacher, student 001 and 002 play his or her toys, the student 003 just silent and not answer and student 001, 002 and 003 interesting to get the reward and they must be answer what teacher s question and they try to answer. The students can answer teacher s question, only student 003 who false answer the question when token economy system gave by the teacher in teaching learning process. 2 Finding Interview 1. Yelling Monday,3 rd September 2012 that sample 001 in high level teacher told that in the first time about two years ago, she likes yelling every come to the classroom. She always wants with her mother and didn t want to lives by her mother. She also 4

didn t want to learn with teacher and friends just yelling. Tuesday,4 th September 2012that sample 002 in high level teacher told that in the first time about two years ago, she likes yelling every come to the classroom. She always wants with her mother and didn t want to lives by her mother. She also didn t want to learn with teacher and friends just yelling. Wednesday,5 th September 2012 show that sample 003 in high level teacher told that in the first time about two years ago, He likes yelling every come to the classroom. He always wants with her mother and didn t want to lives by her mother. He also didn t want to learn with teacher and friends just yelling. 2. Crying Monday,3 rd September 2012 that sample 001 in high level teacher told that in the first time about two years ago, she likes Crying every come to the classroom. She always wants to with her mother and she didn t want to lives by her mother. She also didn t want to learn with teacher and friends just crying. Tuesday,4 th September 2012 show that sample 002 in high level teacher told that in the first time about two years ago, she likes crying every come to the classroom. She always wants with her mother and didn t want to lives by her mother. She also didn t want to learn with teacher and friends just crying. Wednesday,5 th September 2012 show that sample 003 in high level teacher told that in the first time about two years ago, He likes crying every come to the classroom. He always wants with her mother and didn t want to lives by her mother. He also didn t want to learn with teacher and friends just crying. 3. Head Banging Monday,3 rd September 2012 show that sample 001 in high level teacher told that in the first time about two years ago, she likes head banging every come to the classroom. She always wants to with her mother and she didn t want to lives by her mother. She also didn t want to learn with teacher and friends and just head banging. Tuesday,4 th September 2012 that sample 002 in high level teacher told that in the first time about two years ago, she likes head banging every come to the classroom. She always wants to with her mother and she didn t want to lives by her mother. She also didn t want to learn with teacher and friends and just head banging. Wednesday,5 th September 2012 show that sample 003 in high level teacher told that in the first time two years ago, He likes head banging every come to the classroom. He always wants to with her mother and she didn t want to lives by her mother. He also didn t want to learn with teacher and friends and just head banging. Data Interpretation of Observation The instrument in this research is observation. The observation is used to get some data about school-wide token economy system on challenge behavior of mental retardation students. The participants of observation were mental retardation students at SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru in C class as much as 3 students. The observation did in mental retardation class in august to September 2012. The researcher observed the participants by using camera recorder during the token economy system were doing. There were 3 challenge behaviors that observe by researcher such as head banging, crying, and yelling. While in the classroom three students did not showed challenge behavior because, they 5

interesting to get the point in form stars and collect it in answer teacher s question. The result of observation is the students did not showing challenge behavior. 1. First Meeting In Pre-activity teacher s activity is say greeting and ask to the student about condition one by one, and student mental retardation s activity are they answer the teacher and answer the teacher s question one by one. In while activity teacher give material and explained about part of body and teach about A, I,U,E O, teacher ask to the students about the material one by one, and the teacher give token economy system when she teach, and student mental retardation s activity are there are the student who attention and not attention to the teacher, the student 001 and 002 play his or her toys, the student 003 just silent and not answer and student 001, 002 and 003 interesting to get the reward and they must be answer what teacher s question and they try to answer. The students can answer teacher s question, only student 003 who false answer the question when token economy system gave by the teacher in teaching learning process. 1). Head Banging In the first challenge behavior namely head banging, the teacher explain to students who did not show head banging and answer teacher s question the teacher will toys and there is no head banging. 2). Crying In the second challenge behavior namely crying, the teacher explain to students who did not show crying and toys and there is no crying. After teacher gave token economy system, they can answer teacher s questions. They collect it. They didn t showed head banging more.after teacher gave token economy system, they can answer teacher s questions. They interested to token economy system and want to get the point in form of stars and collect it. They didn t showed more. 3). Yelling In the third challenge behavior namely yelling, the teacher explain to students who did not show yelling and toys and there is no showed yelling.after teacher gave token economy system, they can answer teacher question. They collect it. They didn t showed yelling more. 2. Second Meeting Table 4.2 showed that in Preactivity teacher s activity is say greeting and ask to the student about condition one by one, and student mental retardation s activity are they answer the teacher and answer the teacher s question one by one. In while activity teacher give material and explained about part of body and things, teacher ask to the students about the material one by one, and the teacher give token economy system when she teach, and student mental retardation s activity are there are the student who attention and not attention to the teacher, the student 001 play his toys and student 002 answer the question, the student 003 just silent and not answer and student 001, 002 and 003 interesting to get the reward and they must be answer what teacher s question and they try to answer. The students can answer teacher s question, only student 003 who false answer the question when token economy system gave by the teacher in teaching learning process. 6

1). Head Banging In the first challenge behavior namely head banging, the teacher explain to students who did not show head banging and answer teacher s question the teacher will toys and there is no showed head banging. After teacher gave token economy system, they can answer teacher question. They collect it. They didn t showed yelling more. 2). Crying In the second challenge behavior namely crying, the teacher explain to students who did not show crying and observation, only two students who respond teacher s question, but the two others did not respond and they only play her toys and there is no showed crying.after teacher gave token economy system, they can answer teacher question. They interested to token economy system and want to get the point in form of stars and collect it. They didn t showed yelling more. 3). Yelling In the third challenge behavior namely yelling, the teacher explain to students who did not show yelling and toys and there is no showed yelling.after teacher gave token economy system, they can answer teacher question. They collect it. They didn t showed yelling more. 3. Third Meeting In Pre activity is say greeting and ask to the student about condition one by one, and student mental retardation s activity are they answer the teacher and answer the teacher s question one by one. In while activity teacher give material and explained about part of body and things, teacher ask to the students about the material one by one, and the teacher give token economy system when she teach, and student mental retardation s activity are there are the student who attention and not attention to the teacher, student 001 and 002 play his or her toys, the student 003 just silent and not answer and student 001, 002 and 003 interesting to get the reward and they must be answer what teacher s question and they try to answer. The students can answer teacher s question, only student 003 who false answer the question when token economy system gave by the teacher in teaching learning process. 1). Head Banging In the first challenge behavior namely head banging, the teacher explain to students who did not show head banging and answer teacher s question the teacher will toys and there is no showed head banging. After teacher gave token economy system, they can answer teacher question. They collect it. They didn t showed yelling more. 2). Crying In the second challenge behavior namely crying, the teacher explain to students who did not show crying and observation, only two students who respond teacher s question, but the two others did not respond and they only play her toys and there is no showed crying. 7

After teacher gave token economy system, they can answer teacher question. They collect it. They didn t showed yelling more. 3). Yelling In the third challenge behavior namely yelling, the teacher explain to students who did not show yelling and toys and there is no showed yelling.after teacher gave token economy system, they can answer teacher question. They collect it. They didn t showed yelling more Data Interpretation of Interview 1. Yelling Based on interview, showed that after the teacher gave token economy system they didn t showed challenge behavior like yelling. So, the level of mental retardation students is middle level from high level. In the classroom observation the writer saw sample 001, 002,003 in middle level didn t showed yelling. So, the writer asked to the teacher. Why they didn t showed challenge behavior more like yelling?. The teacher answered because they gave guide to change her challenge behavior. And second question What guide do you give?. hmmmi gave stimulus like reward to the student teacher said. The third question Who the student will get the reward?. Teacher answered I will give reward to the student who didn t showed challenge behavior like yelling. The fourth question When the teacher give the reward? theteacher will give the reward to the student in teaching learning process teacher said. The fifth question Where is the teacher will give the reward?. the teacher will give the reward in the classroom teacher said. The last question How the result of giving stimulus like the reward?. The result of giving stimulus like reward or token economy is good to make them change challenge behavior. Here, the interview as additional information to know about change of challenge behavior s students likes yelling. The teacher makes the system in teaching learning process. The system that used is the stimulus or reinforcement in teaching process. The reward or token economy system made their challenge behavior become a good behavior, and didn t showed challenge behavior like yelling. 2. Crying Based on interview, showed that after token economy system gave by the teacher they didn t showed challenge behavior like Crying. So, the level of mental retardation students is middle level from high level. In the classroom observation the writer saw sample 001, 002, 003 in middle level didn t showed Crying. So, the writer asked to the teacher. Why they didn t showed challenge behavior more like yelling?. The teacher answered because they gave guide to change her challenge behavior. And second question What guide do you give?. hmmm I gave stimulus like reward to the student teacher said. The third question Who the student will get the reward?. Teacher answered I will give reward to the student who didn t showed challenge behavior like crying. The fourth question When the teacher give the reward? teacher will give the reward to the student in teaching learning process teacher said. The fifth question Where is the teacher will give the reward?. the teacher will give the reward in the classroom teacher said. The last question How the result of giving stimulus like the reward?. The result of giving stimulus like reward or token economy is good to make them change challenge behavior. 8

Here, the interview as additional information to know about change of challenge behavior s students likes crying. The teacher makes the system in teaching learning process. The system that used is the stimulus or reinforcement in teaching process. The reward or token economy system made their challenge behavior become a good behavior, and didn t showed challenge behavior like crying. 3. Head Banging Based on interview, showed that after teacher gave token economy system they didn t showed challenge behavior like head banging. So, the level of mental retardation students is middle level from high level. In the classroom observation the writer saw sample 001, 002, 003 in middle level didn t showed head banging. So, the writer asked to the teacher. Why they didn t showed challenge behavior more like yelling?. The teacher answered because they gave guide to change her challenge behavior. And second question What guide do you give.? hmmm I gave stimulus like reward to the student teacher said. The third question Who the student will get the reward?. Teacher answered I will give reward to the student who didn t showed challenge behavior like head banging. The fourth question When the teacher give the reward? teacher will give the reward to the student in teaching learning process teacher said. The fifth question Where is the teacher will give the reward?. the teacher will give the reward in the classroom teacher said. The last question How the result of giving stimulus like the reward?. The result of giving stimulus like reward or token economy is good to make them change challenge behavior. Here, the interview as additional information to know about change of challenge behavior s students such as yelling, crying, and head banging. The teacher makes the system in teaching learning process. Strategy that used is the stimulus or reinforcement in teaching process. The reward or token economy were makes their challenge behavior become a good behavior, and didn t showed challenge behavior such as yelling, crying and head banging. CONCLUSION As stated in the previous session, this is a descriptive qualitative research consists of one variable only. The research is about school-wide token economy system on challenge behavior of mental retardation student at SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru. The researcher used observation and interview to get the data. The observation is used to get some data about school-wide token economy system on challenge behavior of mental retardation students. The interview is used to get some information about school-wide token economy system on challenge behavior of mental retardation students. The research instruments are observation and interview. There are 3 challenge behaviors such as head banging, crying, and yelling. Before observation the researcher conduct interview to the teacher about changes challenge behavior of mental retardation students at SLBN Pembina Pekanbaru. After interview to the teacher, the researcher analyzes the data and obtains the result. The result of observation is some of the challenge behavior such ashead banging, crying, and yelling, they did not showed challenge behavior while they were learning process in the classroom. SUGGESTION According to the result of this research, the researcher would like to give the following suggestions: 1. The students are suggested to give token economy system more and more in order to get better their behavior and their learning. 2. The teachers are suggested to give more motivation to the students in order that they do not do challenge 9

behavior while they are learning process. 3. The teacher must choose token or stimulus that make the student interest to get it. The researcher realizes that this research is success, thus the researcher recommends to gives token economy system need more a lot of time to get better result. REFERENCES Desnizza, Wolfgang (2001) NeurowissenschaftlicheTheorie des SprachwandelsPeter Lang { EuropÄaischerVerlag der Wissenschaften, Frankfurt/M. Doll, Eugene E. 1962 A Historical Survey of Research and Management of Mental Retardation in the United States.Pages 21-68 in E. Philip Trapp and Philip Himelstein (editors), Readings on the Exceptional Child. New York: Appleton. Hatch, E and Farhady. 1982. Research Design and Statistic for Applied Linguistics. Heber, R. F. (1959).A manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation.american Journal of Mental Deficiency, 64(Monograph supplement). Heber, R. F. (1961).Modification in the manual on terminologyand classification in mental retardation.american Journal ofmental Deficiency, 65, 490-500. Houghton Mifflin Company. 2007. Mental Retardation. American Heritage Dictionary.http://www.answers.com/t opic/mentalretardation#ixzz1usexm5i0 Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(3), 343-372. Retrieved on March 12 th 2012. Los Angles: Newbury House Publisher. Kazdin and Bootzin, 1972. The Token Economy: An Evaluative Review. Linda A. LeBlanc, Louis P. Hagopian and Kristen A. Maglieri, 2000.Journal of Behavioral Interventions, 15: 135-143. Retrieved on march 20 th 2012. Luckasson, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntinx, W., Coulter, D.,Craig, E., & Reeve, A. et al. (2002).Mental retardation: Definition,classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington,DC: American Association on Mental Retardation. Luckasson, R., Coulter, D., Polloway, E., Reiss, S., Schalock, R.,Snell, M., Spitalnik, D., & Stark, J. (1992). Mental retardation:definition, classification, and systems of support (9th ed.).washington, DC: American Association on MentalRetardation. Luckasson, R., & Reeve, A. (2001).Naming, defining, and classifyingin mental retardation.mental Retardation, 39, 47-52.MacMillan, D. L., Gresham, F. M., &Siperstein, G. N. (1993).Conceptual and psychometric concerns over the 1992 AAMRdefinition of mental retardation.american Journal of MentalRetardation, 98, 325-335. Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivation function of stimulus. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149-155 Obler, L. &Gjerlow, K. (1999) Language and the Brain.Cambridge University Press Porter, S. M.(2007). The impact of a school-wide token economy.a Thesis of the degree of Master, Graduate schoolof Marietta College. ReMag Admin, 2011. Malaysian Students Learning Attitude and Style.vol 11/03 RobertPaulLiberman,, M.D,2000. The Token Economy.The American Journal of Psychiatry, VOL. 157, No. 9.Retrieved on February 20 2012. Sara McIntosh, 2008. How to Teach Behavior Modification.http://www.ehow.com/ 10

How-to-teach-behaviormodification.html#ixzz1oRjbwGgj.Re trieved on may 20 th 2012 Schmitt, N. (ed). 2010. Anintroductiontoappliedlinguistics.Ho ddereducation Simpson, J. (ed). 2011. TheRoutledgeHandbook of AppliedLinguistics. Routledge. Sudjana. 1966. MetodeStatistica. Tarsito Bandung. T.A. Workman, 2001. About Student Attitudes on Learning.http://www.ehow.com/about _4588540_student-attitudeslearning.html#ixzz1mzuCmNWI. Tyabji.1986. Mental Retardation. Retrieved April 10, 2012 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1g 2-3045000795.html 11