Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico

Similar documents
GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology

What does Quality Look Like?

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Senior Project Information

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

Anthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15)

EVALUATION PLAN

NC Global-Ready Schools

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Undergraduate Program Guide. Bachelor of Science. Computer Science DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE and ENGINEERING

MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL

Administrative Master Syllabus

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

- COURSE DESCRIPTIONS - (*From Online Graduate Catalog )

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

The DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Programme

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

new research in learning and working

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

B. Outcome Reporting Include the following information for each outcome assessed this year:

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

We are strong in research and particularly noted in software engineering, information security and privacy, and humane gaming.

The Proposal for Textile Design Minor

Program Assessment and Alignment

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

2010 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

ED : Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

Kinesiology. Master of Science in Kinesiology. Doctor of Philosophy in Kinesiology. Admission Criteria. Admission Criteria.

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY HANDBOOK

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

Department of Geography, University of Delaware Graduate Program Policy Handbook

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

ED487: Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

Department of Rural Sociology Graduate Student Handbook University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources

August 30, Dear Dean Clover:

Understanding University Funding

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Last Editorial Change:

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science

Integral Teaching Fellowship Application Packet Spring 2018

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

University of New Hampshire Policies and Procedures for Student Evaluation of Teaching (2016) Academic Affairs Thompson Hall

UW Colleges to UW Oshkosh

Oregon Institute of Technology Computer Systems Engineering Technology Department Embedded Systems Engineering Technology Program Assessment

Inquiry Learning Methodologies and the Disposition to Energy Systems Problem Solving

UMass CS Departmental Honors Overview

School Leadership Rubrics

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

Developing skills through work integrated learning: important or unimportant? A Research Paper

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

Biological Sciences, BS and BA

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY and BELLEVUE COLLEGE

Department of Education School of Education & Human Services Master of Education Policy Manual

College of Liberal Arts (CLA)

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

Leveraging MOOCs to bring entrepreneurship and innovation to everyone on campus

ELA Grade 4 Literary Heroes Technology Integration Unit

INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES FIELD MAJOR APPLICATION TO DECLARE

EQuIP Review Feedback

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM

Medical Terminology - Mdca 1313 Course Syllabus: Summer 2017

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Interdisciplinary Ph.D. in Education Sciences College of Education, University of Kentucky

D direct? or I indirect?

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Transcription:

Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico A. College, Department and Date 1. College: College of Arts & Sciences 2. Department: Department of Geography and Environmental Studies 3. Date: 19 December 2013 B. Academic Program of Study B.A. Geography C. Contact Person for the Assessment Plan Chris Duvall, Associate Professor, duvall@unm.edu D. Broad Program Goals & Measurable Student Learning Outcomes 1. Broad Program Learning Goals for this Degree Program A. Students will develop an ability to see meaning in the arrangement of things in space. B. Students will become geographical problem-solvers capable of using qualitative, quantitative and/or spatial methods of research appropriate to their level of training. C. Students will develop an ability to see meaningful relationships between people, places, and the environment. D. Students will become clear and effective communicators. E. Students will gain preparedness for professional careers in geography and allied fields. 2. List of Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) for this Degree Program A.1. Students will be able to interpret geographic patterns using core geographic concepts. A.2. Students will be able to locate major physical and human geographic features on a world map. B.1. Students will be able to identify the geographic contexts relevant to an inquiry. B.2. Students will be able to acquire and manipulate data relevant to a geographic inquiry. B.3. Students will be able to assess the results of a data-driven geographical inquiry. C.1. Students will be able to analyze human-environment interaction(s) for a specific case and for specified social and/or environmental conditions. C.2. Students will be able to recognize spatial meanings of social and cultural processes. D.1. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively in an oral format. D.2. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively in a written format. D.3. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively with geovisualization methods, including map composition. E.1. Students will be able to prepare an acceptable, entry-level professional résumé. UNM Department of Geography Page 1 of 10

E. Assessment of Student Learning Three-Year Plan 1. Priority Student Learning Outcomes Over the next three years (AY 2014-2015 through AY 2016-2017), the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies will assess all of the learning outcomes listed above. These program outcomes are responsive to UNM s broad student learning goals, as shown in the following table. University of New Mexico Student Learning Goals Program SLOs Knowledge Skills Responsibility Program SLO is conceptually different from UNM goals. A.1. Students will be able to interpret geographic patterns using core geographic concepts. A.2. Students will be able to locate major physical and human geographic features on a world map. B.1. Students will be able to identify the geographic contexts relevant to an inquiry. B.2. Students will be able to acquire and manipulate data relevant to a geographic inquiry. B.3. Students will be able to assess the results of a data-driven geographical inquiry. C.1. Students will be able to analyze human-environment interaction(s) for a specific case and for specified social and/or environmental conditions. C.2. Students will be able to recognize spatial meanings of social and cultural processes. D.1. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively in an oral format. D.2. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively in a written format. D.3. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively with geovisualization methods, including map composition. E.1. Students will be able to prepare an acceptable, entry-level professional résumé. UNM Department of Geography Page 2 of 10

2. How will learning outcomes be assessed? Learning outcomes under goals A, B, C, D, and E will be assessed using course assignments from specific, required courses as evidence of learning. Although there are two Bachelor s programs (B.S. and B.A.) within the department, most assessment measures will not differentiate students in the two programs. Note: Program Assessment for the B.A. in Geography will include evidence from all students who graduate from the program during each three-year assessment cycle. MEASUREMENT PROCESS #1 Outcomes: A.1. Students will be able to interpret geographic patterns using core geographic concepts. A.2. Students will be able to locate major physical and human geographic features on a world map. i. Assessment of these outcomes will use a multiple-choice pre-test administered at the beginning of Geog 471, the senior capstone that is required of all undergraduate majors at the beginning of the senior academic year. This pre-test will be embedded in the regular grade structure of Geog 471 to provide a standard performance incentive. ii. Responses for each assessment question will be evaluated independently, because each question pertains to specific disciplinary topics. Both B.S. and B.A. students will be evaluated using this measurement process, and assessment results will not differentiate B.S. and B.A. students. iv. The program performance target for these outcomes is defined as correct answers given by 75% of students for each test question, which will be evaluated independently. MEASUREMENT PROCESS #2 Outcomes: B.1. Students will be able to identify the geographic contexts relevant to an inquiry. B.2. Students will be able to acquire and manipulate data relevant to a geographic inquiry. B.3. Students will be able to assess the results of a data-driven geographical inquiry. i. Assessment of these outcomes will use an exam administered in Geog 381L, which is required of all undergraduate majors. This exam will be embedded in the regular grade structure of Geog 381L to provide a standard performance incentive. ii. Both B.S. and B.A. students will be evaluated using this measurement process, and assessment results will not differentiate B.S. and B.A. students. iv. The program performance target for these outcomes is defined as correct answers given by 75% of students for each test question, which will be evaluated independently. MEASUREMENT PROCESS #3 Outcomes: C.1. Students will be able to analyze human-environment interaction(s) for a specific case and for specified social and/or environmental conditions. C.2. Students will be able to recognize spatial meanings of social and cultural processes. i. Assessment of this outcome will use a written assignment selected by each student, from any of the following courses: Geog 461, Geog 462, Geog 463, Geog 464, Geog 466, or Geog 467. (At least three of these courses are required of all B.A. students.) The Undergraduate Advisor will annually inform all B.A. students that each student must identify and retain a completed, written assignment from any of these courses. At the beginning of Geog 471, which is normally taken at the beginning of a student s senior year, the instructor will explain the assessment process and purpose, and collect the written UNM Department of Geography Page 3 of 10

assignments from all B.A. students. Once collected, these assignments will be provided to the Assessment Coordinator. ii. The Assessment Coordinator will be responsible for evaluating the student work as evidence of progress toward these two SLOs. iii. Only B.A. students will be evaluated using this measurement process. iv. The program performance target for this outcome is defined as acceptable or better performance by 75% of graduating students. The standard for acceptable is defined in the attached rubric #2. The Undergraduate Advisor and the instructor of Geog 471 will provide this rubric #2 to students to assist their selection of completed, written assignments. MEASUREMENT PROCESS #4 Outcome: D.1. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively in an oral format. i. Assessment of this outcome will use each student s oral presentation of the applied research project in Geog 471 as evidence of student learning. This oral presentation will be embedded in the regular grade structure of Geog 471 to provide a standard performance incentive. ii. Both B.S. and B.A. students will be evaluated using this measurement process, and assessment results will not differentiate B.S. and B.A. students. iv. The program performance target for this outcome is defined as acceptable or better performance by 75% of graduating students. The standard for acceptable is defined in the attached rubric #1, which will be given to students in advance. MEASUREMENT PROCESS #5 Outcome: D.2. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively in a written format. i. Assessment of this outcome will use each student s written response to an assigned question in Geog 471 as evidence of student learning. Each student will be given one week to write a response to an assigned question shared by all students. This written response will be embedded in the regular grade structure of Geog 471 to provide a standard performance incentive. ii. Both B.S. and B.A. students will be evaluated using this measurement process, and assessment results will not differentiate B.S. and B.A. students. iv. The program performance target for this outcome is defined as acceptable or better performance by 75% of students in Geog 471. The standard for acceptable is defined in the attached rubric #1, which will be given to students in advance. MEASUREMENT PROCESS #6 Outcome: D.3. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively with geovisualization methods, including map composition. i. Assessment of this outcome will use each student s response to an assigned problem in Geog 471 as evidence of student learning. Each student will be given one week to produce a geovisualization in response to an assigned problem shared by all students. This response will be embedded in the regular grade structure of Geog 471 to provide a standard performance incentive. ii. Both B.S. and B.A. students will be evaluated using this measurement process, and assessment results will not differentiate B.S. and B.A. students. UNM Department of Geography Page 4 of 10

iv. The program performance target for this outcome is defined as acceptable or better performance by 75% of students in Geog 471. The standard for acceptable is defined in the attached rubric #1, which will be given to students in advance. MEASUREMENT PROCESS #7 Outcome: E.1. Students will be able to prepare an acceptable, entry-level professional résumé. i. Assessment of this outcome will be conducted in Geog 471. Each student in this course will be required to locate an announcement entry-level professional position for which the student is qualified. The student will be required to prepare a professional résumé for this position, and submit the résumé and the announcement. The instructor of Geog 471 and one other departmental faculty member (by default, the Assessment Coordinator) will evaluate the résumé for its acceptability relative to the job announcement. This assignment will be embedded in the regular grade structure of Geog 471 to provide a standard performance incentive. ii. Both B.S. and B.A. students will be evaluated using this measurement process, and assessment results will not differentiate B.S. and B.A. students. Students will not be required to apply for the jobs they have identified through this assignment. ii. This is a direct measurement. iii. The program performance target for this outcome is defined as acceptable or better performance by 75% of students in Geog 471 as evaluated by both faculty readers. The standard for acceptable is defined in the attached rubric #4, which will be given to students in advance. 3. When will learning outcomes be assessed? When and in what forum will the results of the assessment be discussed? Assessment of student learning in the B.S. program will be conducted every semester that the senior capstone course (Geog 471) is offered, typically once per year in the fall semester. All outcomes will be assessed each time Geog 471 is offered. Additionally, outcomes may be assessed every semester that Geog 461, Geog 462, Geog 463, Geog 464, Geog 466, or Geog 467 is offered, depending upon whether students select to submit assignments as described for Measurement Process #3, described above. Course instructor for Geog 471 will be responsible for completing assessment rubrics for each student, and supplying completed rubrics to the outcomes Assessment Coordinator. The instructor of Geog 471 and the Assessment Coordinator will be responsible for evaluating student résumés. If the Assessment Coordinator is unavailable or simultaneously the instructor of Geog 471, the Assessment Coordinator will be responsible for identifying other faculty members who will evaluate student résumés. Completed rubrics will be placed in an assessment file to be administered by the departmental Assessment Coordinator. The Assessment Coordinator will produce an annual report on the number of students assessed and the scores recorded for each SLO. The annual report for the prior academic year will be discussed in a faculty meeting during the fall semester. Prior to this meeting, the departmental Assessment Coordinator will identify important results of SLO assessment, and propose possible modifications to the assessment instruments and/or methods. The faculty will discuss the results and proposed modifications; the annual report and any modifications shall be approved by consensus of the faculty. UNM Department of Geography Page 5 of 10

At the beginning of the third fall semester in the assessment period, the Assessment Coordinator will synthesize the annual reports for the three prior academic years. The report for the three-year assessment period will be discussed in a faculty meeting prior to the deadline for submitting the report to the CARC. The content of the three-year report and proposed modifications will be discussed, as well as possible changes in program curriculum/pedagogy. The discussion of curriculum/pedagogy was conducted in fall 2013, and will occur again in fall 2016. The final, approved version of the three-year report will be distributed directly to part-time instructors, and made available to students by posting an announcement in a public location in the department, at the same location where SLOs are also posted. (Results based on the Geog 471 pre-test will be generalized to prevent students from accessing correct answers to the assessment questions.) The annual report for AY 2012-2013 will be distributed and posted during fall 2013. TIMELINE Spring 2013 o Appoint new Assessment Coordinator Fall 2013 o Discuss of annual report for AY 2012-2013 o Discuss of modifications to assessment plan and procedures o Discuss of curriculum/pedagogy for the B.S. program o Distribute report for AY 2012-2013 to part-time instructors and the department Advisory Board, and post announcement of report availability for student review AY 2013-2014 through AY 2015-2016 o Rolling assessment of SLOs (as described above) Fall semesters 2014 and 2015 o Annual report compiled and distributed to faculty o Faculty discussion of report contents and possible modifications to assessment procedures Fall 2016 o Three-year report compiled and distributed to faculty o Discuss three-year report contents and possible modifications to assessment procedures and plan o Submit final report to CARC o Distribute three-year report to part-time instructors and the department Advisory Board, and post announcement of report availability for student review Spring 2017 o Appoint new Assessment Coordinator UNM Department of Geography Page 6 of 10

4. What is the unit s process to analyze/interpret assessment data and use results to improve student learning? All members of the departmental faculty will participate in the assessment process at various levels: a) The Assessment Coordinator will have primary responsibility for collecting or compiling, and analyzing all assessment data. b) The Assessment Coordinator and the instructor of Geog 471 will collect data relative to SLO E.1. Other faculty may participate in this measurement process, as described above. c) The Undergraduate Advisor will encourage students to collect completed, written assignments that will be used to evaluate progress toward SLOs C.1 and C.2. The instructor of Geog 471 will collect written assignments and transfer these assignments to the Assessment Coordinator, who will be responsible for evaluating these assignments as evidence of progress toward SLOs. d) Annual reports and the three-year report will be prepared by the Assessment Coordinator, who will also be responsible for distributing reports as described above. The Assessment Coordinator will also be responsible for developing initial interpretations of assessment results, and proposing changes to assessment procedures (annually) and the assessment plan (every three years). e) The faculty as a whole will discuss and approve contents of annual reports, as well as any proposed changes to assessment procedures. The faculty as a whole will be responsible for proposing and approving changes to program curriculum and pedagogy at the end of the three-year assessment period. f) The entire faculty will approve the final versions of all reports before circulation to part-time instructors, students, and the CARC UNM Department of Geography Page 7 of 10

RUBRIC #1: This rubric will be used to evaluate student work in Geog 471 as described in the assessment plan. All students in the B.S. and B.A. programs will be assessed using this rubric. Program Outcomes B.1. Students will be able to identify the geographic contexts relevant to an inquiry. BA and BS programs B.2. Students will be able to acquire and B.3. Students will be able to assess the results of a data-driven geographical inquiry. BA and BS programs D.1. Students will be able to communicate D.2. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively in a written format. B.A. and B.S. programs D.3. Students will be able to communicate clearly and effectively with geovisualization methods, including map composition. Criteria for Acceptable Performance 1. Describes an issue or problem. 2. Explains how the topic is relevant to geography. 3. Uses relevant literature to explain the context of the issue or problem. 1. States a clear research question. 2. Identifies data sources needed to address the research question. 3. Relevance of the data sources is explained. 4. Data is analyzed in ways appropriate for addressing the research question. 1. Identifies meaningful patterns in research results. 2. Draws conclusions based on research results. 3. Assesses limitations of the research and its conclusions. 1. Presentation style is appropriate. 2. Presentation includes appropriate visual aids. 3. Presentation is well organized. 4. The presentation adheres to the stated time limits without rushing. 1. The report is clearly written. 2. The report is well organized. 3. The text is adequately illustrated with appropriate maps, other graphics, and tables. 1. Provides a complete map or other standard form of geovisualization. 2. The geovisualization uses appropriate and effective symbology. 3. The geovisualization uses appropriate and effective text. Assessment Superior Good Acceptable Not Acceptable UNM Department of Geography Page 8 of 10

RUBRIC #2: This rubric will be used to evaluate completed, written assignments identified and collected by students, as described in the assessment plan. All students in the B.A. program will be assessed using this rubric. Program Outcomes C.1. Student will be able to analyze human-environment interaction(s) for a specific case and for specified social and/or environmental conditions. B.A. program only Criteria for Acceptable Performance 1. Describes a human-environment interaction. 2. Identifies possible social and/or environmental causes of this interaction. 3. Identifies possible social and/or environmental effects of this interaction. 4. Assesses the significance of possible effects. Assessment Superior Good Acceptable Not Acceptable C.2. Student will be able to recognize spatial meanings of social and cultural processes. 5. Recognizes the legitimacy of differences of opinion about the management of human-environment interaction(s). 1. Identifies spatial causes or effects of a specific social or cultural process. 2. Explains why a specific social or cultural process has spatial meaning. UNM Department of Geography Page 9 of 10

RUBRIC #3: This rubric will be used to evaluate student work in Geog 471 as described in the assessment plan. All students in the B.S. and B.A. programs will be assessed using this rubric. Program Outcome E.1. Students will be able to prepare an acceptable, entry-level professional résumé. Criteria for Acceptable Performance 1. Résumé includes necessary information. 2. Format and layout or résumé are appropriate and effective. 3. Content of résumé matches job announcement specifications. Assessment Superior Good Acceptable Not Acceptable UNM Department of Geography Page 10 of 10