Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Similar documents
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

KAHNAWÀ: KE EDUCATION CENTER P.O BOX 1000 KAHNAW À:KE, QC J0L 1B0 Tel: Fax:

CONTRACT TENURED FACULTY

4a: Reflecting on Teaching

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Seven Keys to a Positive Learning Environment in Your Classroom. Study Guide

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Geographical Location School, Schedules, Classmates, Activities,

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS BUS 261 BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS. 3 Credit Hours. Prepared by: Cindy Rossi January 25, 2014

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

November 2012 MUET (800)

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

PARIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL AUDIT

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Coaching Others for Top Performance 16 Hour Workshop

Practice Learning Handbook

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

School Leadership Rubrics

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION Personnel Commission

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

Office: Bacon Hall 316B. Office Phone:

Initial English Language Training for Controllers and Pilots. Mr. John Kennedy École Nationale de L Aviation Civile (ENAC) Toulouse, France.

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

IMPLEMENTING THE EARLY YEARS LEARNING FRAMEWORK

One Stop Shop For Educators

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

SY 6200 Behavioral Assessment, Analysis, and Intervention Spring 2016, 3 Credits

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Practice Learning Handbook

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

ST PHILIP S CE PRIMARY SCHOOL. Staff Disciplinary Procedures Policy

SMALL GROUPS AND WORK STATIONS By Debbie Hunsaker 1

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Standards for Professional Practice

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

MPA Internship Handbook AY

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

2. CONTINUUM OF SUPPORTS AND SERVICES

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALIST PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL

Special Education Paraprofessional Handbook

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM PROCEDURES MANUAL

Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Monticello Community School District K 12th Grade. Spanish Standards and Benchmarks

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

All Professional Engineering Positions, 0800

University of Toronto

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

THE FIELD LEARNING PLAN

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Transcription:

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year: 2014-2015 Name Evaluator Contributing Evaluator Program Grade Site Observat ion Date: Observation Date Post-Conference Date Additional Observation Date-As Needed Post-Conference Date Additional Observation Date--As Needed Post-Conference Date

Knowledge of Content Conveys knowledge of content that is inaccurate and out of date, does not correct errors made by students. Does not access recourses available to increase knowledge of content Domain 1 - Planning and Preparation Unsatisfactory - 1 Basic - 2 Proficient - 3 Distinguished - 4 Conveys knowledge of content that is accurate and current, correct errors made by students. Does not have a broad base of knowledge to answer questions. Occasionally accessed recourses available to increase knowledge of content. Conveys knowledge that is accurate and current, corrects errors made by students. Does have a broad base of knowledge to answer questions. Makes real-life connections with curriculum. Conveys knowledge that is accurate and current, corrects errors made by students. Does have a broad base of knowledge to answer questions. Makes real-life connections with curriculum as well as interdisciplinary connections. Instructional Technology Inclusion and Best Practices Has limited awareness of the definition of instructional and assistive technology, where appropriate. Has no understanding of inclusion as it relates to the students in various educational settings. Through collaboration with educational team, is able to define instructional and assistive technology, where appropriate, and identify the differences between the two, give examples of instructional technology and suggest ways in which technology could be used effectively. Brings observations and concerns to the educational team where technology, instructional and assistive, where appropriate, may be beneficial. Knows and can identify: What is meant by Can implement best practices and inclusion, laws and purpose, best practices strategies to facilitate inclusion of and strategies to facilitate inclusion of students with disabilities. students with disabilities. Stays current on best practices for instructional and assistive technology, where appropriate and shares knowledge with educational team. Can serve as a resource and model what encourages collaboration when including students in general education classrooms. Promoting Student Independence Is unable to use best practices and/or inclusive strategies that promote student independence. Knows best practices and/or inclusive strategies which can promote student independence. Knows and implements best practices and/or inclusive strategies which can promote student independence. Can implement and encourage collaboration of educational team on promoting student independence. The Instructional Plan Has limited knowledge and understanding of the roles and responsibilities of preparing, implementing, and evaluating the instructional plan Has knowledge and understanding of the roles and responsibilities of preparing, implementing, and evaluating the instructional plan Has knowledge and understanding of the roles and responsibilities of preparing, implementing, and evaluating the instructional plan, and can monitor and adjust the instructional plan based on student needs. Seeks out additional information and resources to provide training and support to others as it relates to the instructional process.

Environment: Respect and Rapport Interactions, both between the Para and the students, and among students, are negative, inappropriate, or insensitive to the students' cultural backgrounds, and/or characterized by sarcasm, putdowns, or conflict. Domain 2 - Supports Classroom Environment Interactions, both between the Para and Interactions, both between the Para and the students, and among students, are the students, and among students, generally appropriate and free from reflect general warmth and caring, and conflict, but may be characterized by are polite and respectful of the cultural occasional displays of insensitivity or lack and developmental differences among of responsiveness to cultural backgrounds. groups of students. Interactions, both between the Para and the students, and among students, are highly respectful, and reflect genuine warmth/caring toward individual. As a result of the direct support from the Para, students maintain high levels of civility among themselves. A Culture of Learning Para contributes to a negative culture for learning, characterized by a low commitment to content, low expectations for student achievement, and little or no student pride in work. Para does not engage the students in work. Para assists the teacher's attempts to create a culture of learning with partial success, characterized by little interaction with students. Para has limited knowledge of materials or content and modest reinforcement of expectation for student achievement and pride. Para has an understanding and is able to assist in the implementation of a variety of strategies that reinforces a culture of high expectations and genuine commitment to content, with students demonstrating pride in their work. Para supports high levels of student engagement by demonstrating passion for content & reinforcing a culture of learning in which all share a belief of the importance of learning. Classroom Procedures Unsatisfactory - 1 Para fails to assist the teacher and students in the implementation of the classroom routines and procedures. Basic-2 Proficient - 3 Distinguished - 4 Para occasionally assists the teacher and students with implementing classroom routines and procedures. Para assists the teacher and student with implementing classroom routines and procedures that allow for little instructional time to be lost. Para assists the teacher and student with the seamless operation of classroom routines and procedures. Managing Student Behavior Para has limited knowledge and is unable to demonstrate a variety of strategies that reinforce positive student behavior. Para does not assist to resolve any behavioral issues which may arise. Para has some knowledge, and with support, is able to implement some strategies that reinforce positive student behavior. While having this knowledge, the Para fails to consistently use this knowledge and these skills to manage student behavior. Para demonstrates knowledge of strategies that reinforce positive student behavior, using a student's or a class's behavior support plan. Implements behavior plans appropriately and consistently. The Para's response to student misbehavior is appropriate and respectful to students. Para is constantly monitoring student behavior and intervenes in a positive manner before behaviors escalate. Para's response to a student's misbehavior is sensitive to individual student needs. Para demonstrates a variety of strategies which reinforce positive student behavior. Standards of conduct are clear.

Use of Assessment Instructional Delivery Unsatisfactory - 1 Para does not utilize assessment in Para assists the teacher occasionally in assisting instruction. Does not monitor monitoring students' progress and student process. Does not ensure that providing students with feedback. students are aware of assessment criteria Occasionally, checks for student used to evaluate their work. Does not understanding when they work with check for understanding when working students using basic "yes/no" questions. with students. Para is fully aware of students' assessment criteria and ensures that students are fully aware. Para frequently monitors students' understanding by collecting and utilizing assessment data to enhance student learning. Distinguished - 4 Para facilitates students' self-monitoring and self-assessment of their own learning. Para provides students and teachers with high quality feedback from a variety of sources. Para has limited knowledge and understanding of roles and responsibility of implementing the instructional plan. Basic-2 Proficient - 3 Para has basic knowledge and understanding of roles and responsibility of implementing the instructional plan. Domain 3 - Instruction Para is clear about the purpose of the lesson or unit, implements it effectively and collaborates with the teacher to implement the instructional plan. Students demonstrate understanding of the instructional purpose of the lesson. Para makes the purpose of the lesson or unit clear, implements it effectively, and collaborates with the teacher to implement and enhance the instructional plan. Students age able to identify and articulate the instructional purpose and how it is applicable to the real world. Instructional Techniques Oral & Written Language Para does not vary instructional techniques to accommodate the variety of student learning styles. Para's spoken and written language is not clear and concise. Spoken or written language may contain grammar errors. Vocabulary is not appropriate to student's ages. Para offers minimal variation in instructional techniques to accommodate the variety of student learning styles. Para's spoken and written language is not always clear and concise. Vocabulary is not always appropriate to students' ages. Para consistently varies instructional techniques to accommodate the variety of student learning styles. Instructional delivery is differentiated for students. Para's spoken and written language is clear and concise. Vocabulary is appropriate to student's ages and interests. Para varies instructional techniques, materials, and/or resources to best meet all student learning styles. Instructional delivery is differentiated for students. Para uses an extensive repertoire of strategies and seeks additional resources from the school. Para's spoken and written language is concise and expressive, with well-chosen vocabulary that enriches the lesson.

Professional Relationships Participation in School Activities Unsatisfactory - 1 Para avoids participation in school based projects and activities. Para refuses or is unable to perform the duties and responsibility for which he/she was originally hired based on program needs. Domain 4 - Professionalism and Self Reflection Para's professional relationships with colleagues and administration are negative or self-serving. Para maintains basic relationships with colleagues and administrations in order to fulfill required duties. Para participates in school based projects and activities when specifically asked. Para minimally performs the duties and responsibility for which he/she was originally hired based on program needs. Para's professional relationships with colleagues and administration are characterized by mutual support and cooperation to meet the needs of the students. Para demonstrates a desire to participate in school projects and activities, including school based professional development opportunities. Para willingly performs the duties and responsibility for which he/she was originally hired based on program needs. Para's professional relationships with colleagues and administration are characterized by mutual support and cooperation. Para takes initiative in assuming a supportive and leadership role among faculty. Basic-2 Proficient - 3 Distinguished - 4 Para takes a leadership role in school projects and activities and school based professional development and makes a substantial contribution in the development and outcome of these activities. Para willingly and successfully performs the duties and responsibility for which he/she was originally hired based on program needs. Integrity and Ethical Conduct Knowledge of Educational State & District Regulations & Policies Reflection & Professional Development Para does not display appropriate standards of ethical behavior in interactions with colleagues, students, administration, and community. Disregards confidentiality requirements. Para is unable to explain various laws and relevant district policies and relate it to the everyday aspects of the position. Para displays appropriate standards of ethical behavior in interactions with colleagues, students, administration, and community. Is aware of confidentiality requirements. Para understands and can explain the importance of various laws and relevant district policies, and the responsibilities that come with each and using examples from the day-to-day practice of the position. Para displays high standards of ethical behavior in interactions with colleagues, students, administration, and community and remains confidential at all times. Para knows, understands, and can explain the guidelines of the law and the responsibilities of each of they relate to their everyday experiences as a paraprofessional. Para is a model for other team members. Para takes a leadership role in the maintenance of the highest standards of ethical behavior in interactions with colleagues, students, administration and community. Para is very knowledgeable about the laws and relevant district policies and the responsibilities as a paraprofessional. Para does not reflect on their own professional practice and resists feedback regarding performance. Does not participate in District Professional Development opportunities. Para reflects on their own professional practice and does participate in District Professional Development opportunities. Reluctantly accepts feedback regarding performance. Para documents reflection on their own professional practice and maintains all mandated District Documentation. Welcomes feedback from others and uses such feedback to modify instruction. Para documents reflection on their own professional practice and maintains all mandated District Documentation. Seeks professional development opportunities independently to enhance their own learning and to stay abreast of trends in education. Seeks out feedback from a variety of sources, uses the information to improve instruction, and provides information on the effectiveness of the changes.

Evaluation 1 - Summative Domain 1 Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 4 1.00 1.85 Your Summative Rating 2.65 3.50 4.00 Summative Rating Ineffective Partially Effective Effective Highly Effective Practitioner Comments (Optional) Evaluator Comments (Optional) Evaluator Signature Practitioner Signature Evaluator Date Practitioner Date Version 1.3 - August 19, 2014