THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAM PROCESS

Similar documents
Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

AC : DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTRODUCTION TO INFRAS- TRUCTURE COURSE

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Mapping the Assets of Your Community:

IMGD Technical Game Development I: Iterative Development Techniques. by Robert W. Lindeman

THINKING SKILLS, STUDENT ENGAGEMENT BRAIN-BASED LEARNING LOOKING THROUGH THE EYES OF THE LEARNER AND SCHEMA ACTIVATOR ENGAGEMENT POINT

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

Using Team-based learning for the Career Research Project. Francine White. LaGuardia Community College

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Instructional Approach(s): The teacher should introduce the essential question and the standard that aligns to the essential question

Investing in Professional Learning & Development: What Motivates You?

THINKING TOOLS: Differentiating the Content. Nanci Cole, Michelle Wikle, and Sacha Bennett - TOSAs Sandi Ishii, Supervisor of Gifted Education

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Three Strategies for Open Source Deployment: Substitution, Innovation, and Knowledge Reuse

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

A. What is research? B. Types of research

University of Toronto

Academic Internships: Crafting, Recruiting, Supervising

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Note on the PELP Coherence Framework

Strategic Plan Revised November 2012 Reviewed and Updated July 2014

Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities Part 3: Referral & Evaluation Process; Documentation Requirements

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

GRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK Master of Science Programs in Biostatistics

VIA ACTION. A Primer for I/O Psychologists. Robert B. Kaiser

Strategy and Design of ICT Services

THREE-YEAR COURSES FASHION STYLING & CREATIVE DIRECTION Version 02

Personal Tutoring at Staffordshire University

Children need activities which are

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

The NH Parent Partner Program

R01 NIH Grants. John E. Lochman, PhD, ABPP Center for Prevention of Youth Behavior Problems Department of Psychology

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

ENGINEERING DESIGN BY RUDOLPH J. EGGERT DOWNLOAD EBOOK : ENGINEERING DESIGN BY RUDOLPH J. EGGERT PDF

1. M. Sc. Program objectives

Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur

Job Explorer: My Dream Job-Lesson 5

Teaching Architecture Metamodel-First

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

COVER SHEET. This is the author version of article published as:

Colorado Academic. Drama & Theatre Arts. Drama & Theatre Arts

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Roadmap to College: Highly Selective Schools

Academic Affairs Policy #1

SOC 175. Australian Society. Contents. S3 External Sociology

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

Digital Media Literacy

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

IMPACTFUL, QUANTIFIABLE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL?

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies

STABILISATION AND PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN NAB

What does Quality Look Like?

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

Date Re Our ref Attachment Direct dial nr 2 februari 2017 Discussion Paper PH

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Competency-Based Learning Series: Seminar #3 Habits of Work Slides

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

EXECUTIVE MASTER ONLINE MASTER S IN INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP

CIT Annual Update for

Incorporating Social and Emotional Learning Into Classroom Instruction and Educator Effectiveness

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

Title II, Part A. Charter Systems and Schools

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Teacher Development to Support English Language Learners in the Context of Common Core State Standards

CROSS COUNTRY CERTIFICATION STANDARDS

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

PERSONAL STATEMENTS and STATEMENTS OF PURPOSE

Essentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology

Passport to Your Identity

evans_pt01.qxd 7/30/2003 3:57 PM Page 1 Putting the Domain Model to Work

Planning a research project

ADDIE: A systematic methodology for instructional design that includes five phases: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.

SCHOOL WITHOUT CLASSROOMS BERLIN ARCHITECTURE COMPETITION TO

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

BEYOND THE BLEND. Getting Learning & Development Right. By Charles Jennings

Activities, Exercises, Assignments Copyright 2009 Cem Kaner 1

Copyright Corwin 2015

Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

ELLEN E. ENGEL. Stanford University, Graduate School of Business, Ph.D. - Accounting, 1997.

CREATING SAFE AND INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS: A FRAMEWORK FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT. Created by: Great Lakes Equity Center

Transcription:

THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAM PROCESS Key elements of engaging in effective teamwork These slides were created by Esther Sackett, PhD, for use by Duke University faculty. Dr. Sackett received her PhD in Management and Organizations from the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University in 2017 and is an expert in team processes.

Overview What makes for an effective team? (slides 3-4) Common challenges of teamwork? (slides 5-7) Team process (slides 8-12)

Google: What makes for an effective team? Set out to find the perfect mix of individual traits and skills necessary for a stellar team Conducted 200+ interviews Examined > 250 attributes of 180+ Google teams What do you think they discovered? Who is on a team matters less than how the team members interact, structure their work, and view their contributions Source: https://rework.withgoogle.com/blog/five-keys-to-a-successful-google-team/

Google: What makes for an effective team? 5 key dynamics of team process that set successful teams apart: Psychological safety: Can we take risks on this team without feeling insecure or embarrassed? Dependability: Can we count on each other to do high quality work on time? Structure & clarity: Are goals, roles, and execution plans on our team clear? Meaning of work: Are we working on something that is personally important for each of us? Impact of work: Do we fundamentally believe that the work we re doing matters? Source: https://rework.withgoogle.com/blog/five-keys-to-a-successful-google-team/

Discuss: What were your past team experiences like? How were teams beneficial for completing tasks? What were some challenges you experienced? How much time did you spend on team processes (setting goals and norms, discussing procedures, reflecting)?

If teams are so challenging, why do we use them? Teams enable division of labor (DOL) DOL ensures specialized information and expertise to improve individual performance But, DOL raises the questions of Are members motivated to work hard in their specialty? Can the efforts of different members be coordinated to serve the interests of the team? How can you bring diverse perspectives into alignment?

Managing Teams Three dimensions that must be attended to at the same time: Information who has the best information/expertise for a decision or a task? Motivation how can each individual be motivated to perform to the best of his/her abilities? Coordination how is the performance of different individuals put back together so that it serves the team s interests? Whether things go well or poorly is largely dependent on how effective a team s processes are

Aspects of Team Process Decision-Making Participation Influence Conflict Source: Hill, Linda A., and Maria Farkas. "A Note on Team Process." Harvard Business School Background Note 402-032, October 2001.

Team Decision Making Trap: The Common Knowledge Effect Commonly held information is more influential on group decisions, compared to unique information. Common information impacts the initial preferences of more team members before the meeting. Common information is more likely to be introduced at the meeting, simply because more people have this information. Common information is more likely to be repeated in conversation. As team converges on an answer, there is a norm of not bringing up new facts.

Fix: Use a rigorous decision-making process 1. Identify and explore the problem 2. Generate possible solutions 3. Refine and critique possible solutions 4. Implement the solution Pay attention to who is participating and who has a lot of influence Use breadth of team s knowledge and expertise Express your true opinions and don t just express what you think others are thinking and feeling Present solid justifications for your position and demand the same from others Create norms that foster differences in opinion

How else can we overcome (or prevent) teamwork challenges?

Developing good team process Team process must be actively created and monitored Goals Roles Norms Monitoring/Learning/Refining Evaluating Performance Team charters can be a useful tool