Project Leadership in the Future

Similar documents
Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Intellectual Property

Software Maintenance

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SLAM

LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

Virtual Teams: The Design of Architecture and Coordination for Realistic Performance and Shared Awareness

IMGD Technical Game Development I: Iterative Development Techniques. by Robert W. Lindeman

Personal Tutoring at Staffordshire University

Average Daily Membership Proposed Change to Chapter 8 Rules and Regulations for the Wyoming School Foundation Program

AGENDA Symposium on the Recruitment and Retention of Diverse Populations

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Action Learning Facilitator Accreditation

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

BOLOGNA DECLARATION ACHIEVED LEVEL OF IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE ACTIVITY PLAN

CHAPTER 2: COUNTERING FOUR RISKY ASSUMPTIONS

CERTIFIED PROJECT MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST (CPMS) STUDY GUIDE

Interview on Quality Education

An Industrial Technologist s Core Knowledge: Web-based Strategy for Defining Our Discipline

CMST 2060 Public Speaking

SHARED LEADERSHIP. Building Student Success within a Strong School Community

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Math 1313 Section 2.1 Example 2: Given the following Linear Program, Determine the vertices of the feasible set. Subject to:

Journalism 336/Media Law Texas A&M University-Commerce Spring, 2015/9:30-10:45 a.m., TR Journalism Building, Room 104

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

WMO Global Campus: Frequently Asked Questions and Answers, July 2015 V1. WMO Global Campus: Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Sustainable Software Development: Evolving Extreme Programming

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

The Role of Architecture in a Scaled Agile Organization - A Case Study in the Insurance Industry

MINUTES OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF SIR WILLIAM RAMSAY SCHOOL HELD AT THE SCHOOL ON WEDNESDAY 23 FEBRUARY 2017 AT 7.00 P.M.

PRINCE2 Practitioner Certification Exam Training - Brochure

Nurturing Engineering Talent in the Aerospace and Defence Sector. K.Venkataramanan

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Expert Reference Series of White Papers. Mastering Problem Management

IMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM

ADAPTIVE PLANNING. 1 Powered by POeT Solvers Limited

Student-Athlete. Code of Conduct

School Leadership Rubrics

Post-Master s Certificate in. Leadership for Higher Education

CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY James J. Nance College of Business Administration Marketing Department Spring 2012

Process improvement, The Agile Way! By Ben Linders Published in Methods and Tools, winter

Collegiate Academies Response to Livingston School Facility RFA Submitted January 23, 2015

CAFE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS O S E P P C E A. 1 Framework 2 CAFE Menu. 3 Classroom Design 4 Materials 5 Record Keeping

THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE ECVCP

Mike Cohn - background

TIM: Table of Summary Descriptors This table contains the summary descriptors for each cell of the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

Leveraging MOOCs to bring entrepreneurship and innovation to everyone on campus

Your Partner for Additive Manufacturing in Aachen. Community R&D Services Education

PROJECT RELEASE: Towards achieving Self REgulated LEArning as a core in teachers' In-SErvice training in Cyprus

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

COURSE TITLE: FOOD & BEVERAGE OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT COURSE CODE: HP FB OM DESCRIPTION

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

Conceptual Framework: Presentation

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

22/07/10. Last amended. Date: 22 July Preamble

Mission and Teamwork Paul Stanley

MSE 5301, Interagency Disaster Management Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives

SAMPLE AFFILIATION AGREEMENT

ESC Declaration and Management of Conflict of Interest Policy

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

Course and Examination Regulations

Designing for Visualization & Communication

Three Strategies for Open Source Deployment: Substitution, Innovation, and Knowledge Reuse

University of Toronto

A CASE STUDY FOR THE SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR DEVELOPING CURRICULA DON T THROW OUT THE BABY WITH THE BATH WATER. Dr. Anthony A.

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Economics 201 Principles of Microeconomics Fall 2010 MWF 10:00 10:50am 160 Bryan Building

IT4305: Rapid Software Development Part 2: Structured Question Paper

DSTO WTOIBUT10N STATEMENT A

This course may not be taken for a Letter Grade. Students may choose between these options instead:

A GENERIC SPLIT PROCESS MODEL FOR ASSET MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING

Program Assessment and Alignment

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

TRANSNATIONAL TEACHING TEAMS INDUCTION PROGRAM OUTLINE FOR COURSE / UNIT COORDINATORS

The Consistent Positive Direction Pinnacle Certification Course

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Team Report

Behaviors: team learns more about its assigned task and each other; individual roles are not known; guidelines and ground rules are established

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

EDU 614: Advanced Educational Psychology Online Course Dr. Jim McDonald

Class Numbers: & Personal Financial Management. Sections: RVCC & RVDC. Summer 2008 FIN Fully Online

November 17, 2017 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY. ADDENDUM 3 RFP Digital Integrated Enrollment Support for Students

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Anglia Ruskin University Assessment Offences

An Introduction to LEAP

March 28, To Zone Chairs and Zone Delegates to the USA Water Polo General Assembly:

Transcription:

Project Leadership in the Future Todd Little and Ole Jepsen The story behind the Agile Project Leadership Network (APLN) and the Declaration Of Interdependence (DOI) Introduction Over the past couple of years a group of thought leaders in the agile and project management communities have discussed the need to examine ways for managing and leading projects that have produced reliable results. In January 2005 this group came up with a statement of their philosophy for project management the Declaration Of Interdependence for Agile Project Leadership (DOI) (http://pmdoi.org). Shortly thereafter the group formed the Agile Project Leadership Network (APLN) (www.apln.org), a non-profit organization to forward this movement. The APLN offers members guidance and networking with other members. This group intends to work closely with other organizations such as the Agile Alliance. The APLN will work closely with the software community and also work with people and companies outside of software and IT. Several of the founding members of the APLN come from the general project management and new product development communities. The Declaration of Interdependence Agile and adaptive approaches for linking people, projects and value. We are a community of project leaders that are highly successful at delivering results. To achieve these results: We increase return on investment by making continuous flow of value our focus. We deliver reliable results by engaging customers in frequent interactions and shared ownership.

We expect uncertainty and manage for it through iterations, anticipation, and adaptation. We unleash creativity and innovation by recognizing that individuals are the ultimate source of value, and creating an environment where they can make a difference. We boost performance through group accountability for results and shared responsibility for team effectiveness. We improve effectiveness and reliability through situationally specific strategies, processes, and practices. [ 2005 David Anderson, Sanjiv Augustine, Christopher Avery, Alistair Cockburn, Mike Cohn, Doug DeCarlo, Donna Fitzgerald, Jim Highsmith, Ole Jepsen, Lowell Lindstrom, Todd Little, Kent McDonald, Pollyanna Pixton, Preston Smith and Robert Wysocki.] The title "Declaration of Interdependence" has multiple meanings. It means that project team members are part of an interdependent whole. It also means that the set of values are interconnected and that effective leadership techniques must recognize this interdependence. For example, Teams are dependent upon Individuals and Customers, and must deal with Uncertainty according to the Context of the project in order to maximize Value delivery. Each of the value statements has a distinct form what we desire to accomplish followed by how we have seen that result achieved. These six statements convey what the authors have witnessed to be the most important aspects of modern project management, which they have identified as an agile style of project leadership. These statements are discussed in more detail. Value We increase return on investment by making continuous flow of value our focus. By continuous flow we mean leading the project in a way that is consistent with how real value is generated. We have witness many examples where Value is not maximized by conformance to a plan. Often it is the case that during the course of the project new value creating opportunities may arise, and project leadership needs to be ready to take advantage of those value opportunities. One way to focus on continuous flow of value is through early and frequent delivery of incremental improvements in the product. Frequency is dependent upon the context in software development we expect to deliver working software on the order of weeks or months, while in the area of new product development it may mean the delivery of prototypes which may take longer. Experience has shown us that it takes a real product or a tangible prototype rather than detailed documentation to get real and reliable feedback from the customer on the anticipated business value that the product will give. Customers

We deliver reliable results by engaging customers in frequent interactions and shared ownership. Our experience has shown that a close relationship with customers typically leads to better project results. The way to achieve this close relationship and trust is by interacting with the customers on a regular basis. Face-to-face communication is preferred as it provides the richest interaction. The exchange of written documentation is generally a poor form of interaction, yet can be valuable to supplement face-to-face communication. Most agile teams prefer to have a customer representative co-located with the team every day others find other ways of interacting with the customers on a daily or at least weekly basis. Once you have established a high level of mutual trust it is common that customers start taking on ownership of the project. Other contractual ways to create shared ownership (like risk sharing) exist, but are seldom needed in these teams with close relationships and mutual trust. Uncertainty We expect uncertainty and manage for it through iterations, anticipation, and adaptation. The creation of a detailed plan leads to the mentality that success will occur through conformance to plan. We aim for a new definition of success maximizing value creation. In the face of uncertain circumstances, removal of uncertainty almost invariably reduces value. Again, it depends on context--if a project does not have uncertainty, then it may makes sense to work up a detailed plan and to follow it. We have seen that teams that know what they are building at a high level and that rely upon frequent feedback actually have better real project control than those teams that rely on detailed plans. Detailed plans give the illusion of control, but we experience that real control is better obtained through iterations, anticipation, and adaptation. Iterations provide the opportunity for feedback and correction. Anticipation means that we spend time looking forward at the appropriate level. We don t recommend making a detailed plan in advance, yet we do see value in an overall high level plan along with just-in-time planning for the iteration. During the iteration we learn and have the opportunity for adaptation to improve the product or the process. Individuals We unleash creativity and innovation by recognizing that individuals are the ultimate source of value, and creating an environment where they can make a difference. We believe that great products are built by skilled and motivated people. Therefore an important part of project leadership is to build a highly motivating working climate by: Envisioning a clear common goal Enabling communication between all parties Empowering people to have personal influence on project success Establishing a high level of trust

Ensuring that people have the tools to do their job Project Leaders who know how to balance guidance with freedom are much more likely to succeed in motivating each individual to do their best. People are only creative and innovative when their leaders give them the room to be creative and innovative. Teams We boost performance through group accountability for results and shared responsibility for team effectiveness. Great results are created by teams who dedicate their collaborative efforts to a common purpose. Likewise, teams interested in accomplishing a common purpose, depend on leaders who focus on developing the group environment in which great results can be accomplished. Relying on individual accountability often falls short when items fall into the gaps, or leads to finger pointing or excuses rather than results. We do not believe that a great collaborative team spirit happens by coincidence. We have seen highly effective teams built deliberately by individuals who take the responsibility not only for their own parts but also for the product as a whole. We also have experienced that effective teams take ownership and responsibility for being an effective team. We believe that teambuilding is an individual skill, and that great teams understand the importance of team dynamics. Great project leaders will motivate and guide each individual person to be a great team-player. The ultimate shame is when a project fails and someone says, "But my part worked." Context We improve effectiveness and reliability through situationally specific strategies, processes, and practices. As has been mentioned several times, project leadership approaches depend on the context and the interrelationships of the people, the project, and the product. It is clear that a one-size-fits all approach is non-optimal. Highly complex and uncertain projects demand different approaches than required by simpler, more static projects. Some of the project attributes that can be considered in the project context include: Team co-location/distribution Customer-supplier relationship Experience (or lack of) with new technology Level of domain knowledge Project duration Team size Severity of consequence of errors The leadership approach corresponds to this context. For example, projects with large distributed teams will likely require more written documentation to compensate for limited face-to-face communication.

The Agile Project Leadership Network (APLN) In February 2005 Jim Highsmith wrote: The intention of this group is to form a membership organization to support agile, adaptive project and general management. Although this group is separate from the Agile Alliance, our intention is to work closely with that group within the software community, but also work with people and companies outside of software and IT. Since then the founders have incorporated the APLN organization as a non-profit 501(c)6 organization with a professional board and officers. We have a web-site at www.apln.org where new members can register. At the Agile 2005 Conference in Denver in July we launched the organization and signed up more than 100 charter members during the week. We also held the first APLN members meeting. The core group and the programs A core group consisting of the 15 founders and a few more people are currently working on forming programs with the main purpose of creating value for the members. We want APLN to be an open organization and we accept new core group members and program participants on a regular basis. We invite everyone to provide us with input and participation in the individual programs and we encourage you to propose new programs, that are not already on the list. We continue to add to our website. Eventually we expect it to be the primary conduit to support the programs. If you wish to contact the APLN you can do so at info@apln.org.