Is M-learning versus E-learning or are they supporting each other?

Similar documents
Using interactive simulation-based learning objects in introductory course of programming

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 136 ( 2014 ) LINELT 2013

A study of the capabilities of graduate students in writing thesis and the advising quality of faculty members to pursue the thesis

Introduction to Mobile Learning Systems and Usability Factors

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) WCES 2012

DISTANCE LEARNING OF ENGINEERING BASED SUBJECTS: A CASE STUDY. Felicia L.C. Ong (author and presenter) University of Bradford, United Kingdom

Connect Communicate Collaborate. Transform your organisation with Promethean s interactive collaboration solutions

From Virtual University to Mobile Learning on the Digital Campus: Experiences from Implementing a Notebook-University

M-Learning. Hauptseminar E-Learning Sommersemester Michael Kellerer LFE Medieninformatik

Study of Social Networking Usage in Higher Education Environment

USER ADAPTATION IN E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

Educational system gaps in Romania. Roberta Mihaela Stanef *, Alina Magdalena Manole

K 1 2 K 1 2. Iron Mountain Public Schools Standards (modified METS) Checklist by Grade Level Page 1 of 11

Speak Up 2012 Grades 9 12

CWIS 23,3. Nikolaos Avouris Human Computer Interaction Group, University of Patras, Patras, Greece

The Acceptance of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) among Post Graduate ESL Students in UKM

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 209 ( 2015 )

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 143 ( 2014 ) CY-ICER Teacher intervention in the process of L2 writing acquisition

ScienceDirect. Noorminshah A Iahad a *, Marva Mirabolghasemi a, Noorfa Haszlinna Mustaffa a, Muhammad Shafie Abd. Latif a, Yahya Buntat b

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 ( 2015 )

Institutional repository policies: best practices for encouraging self-archiving

COSCA COUNSELLING SKILLS CERTIFICATE COURSE

Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Tilea Doina Maria a, Vasile Bleotu b

Five Challenges for the Collaborative Classroom and How to Solve Them

Mobile Learning to Support Teaching English as a Second Language

Quality Framework for Assessment of Multimedia Learning Materials Version 1.0

Enter the World of Polling, Survey &

Computer Software Evaluation Form

ICT A learning and teaching tool By Sushil Upreti SOS Hermann Gmeiner School Sanothimi Sanothimi, Bhaktapur, Nepal

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 ( 2015 ) WCES Why Do Students Choose To Study Information And Communications Technology?

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141 ( 2014 ) WCLTA Using Corpus Linguistics in the Development of Writing

What motivates mathematics teachers?

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 ( 2014 )

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 ( 2015 ) WCES 2014

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSIONS, CONTRIBUTIONS, AND FUTURE RESEARCH

Diploma of Building and Construction (Building)

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

An Introduction and Overview to Google Apps in K12 Education: A Web-based Instructional Module

Protocol for using the Classroom Walkthrough Observation Instrument

Learning, Communication, and 21 st Century Skills: Students Speak Up For use with NetDay Speak Up Survey Grades 3-5

Busuu The Mobile App. Review by Musa Nushi & Homa Jenabzadeh, Introduction. 30 TESL Reporter 49 (2), pp

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 93 ( 2013 ) rd World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership WCLTA 2012

ISSN X. RUSC VOL. 8 No 1 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Barcelona, January 2011 ISSN X

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 ( 2014 ) International Conference on Current Trends in ELT

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

Education the telstra BLuEPRint

Teachers development in educational systems

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141 ( 2014 ) WCLTA 2013

Safe & Civil Schools Series Overview

Development of a scoring system to assess mind maps

Teachers Attitudes Toward Mobile Learning in Korea

Technology in the Classroom: The Impact of Teacher s Technology Use and Constructivism

Capturing and Organizing Prior Student Learning with the OCW Backpack

Prototype Development of Integrated Class Assistance Application Using Smart Phone

Building a Synchronous Virtual Classroom in a Distance English Language Teacher Training (DELTT) Program in Turkey

STUDENTS' RATINGS ON TEACHER

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

The Open University s repository of research publications and other research outputs

Vodcasting: A case study in adaptability to meet learners needs and preferences

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies

Environment Josef Malach Kateřina Kostolányová Milan Chmura

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

LIBRARY AND RECORDS AND ARCHIVES SERVICES STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 to 2020

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

A sustainable framework for technical and vocational education in malaysia

COVER SHEET. This is the author version of article published as:

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 237 ( 2017 )

E-Learning project in GIS education

Implementing cross-disciplinary learning environment benefits and challenges in engineering education

ScienceDirect. Malayalam question answering system

FAU Mobile App Goes Live

September June 2012

EVALUATE E-LEARNING IN IRAQ APPLYING ON AVICENNA CENTER IN ERBIL

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

FY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

Course Syllabus p. 1. Introduction to Web Design AVT 217 Spring 2017 TTh 10:30-1:10, 1:30-4:10 Instructor: Shanshan Cui

Beginning to Flip/Enhance Your Classroom with Screencasting. Check out screencasting tools from (21 Things project)

Multimedia Courseware of Road Safety Education for Secondary School Students

Beveridge Primary School. One to one laptop computer program for 2018

Europeana Creative. Bringing Cultural Heritage Institutions and Creative Industries Europeana Day, April 11, 2014 Zagreb

IMPROVING ICT SKILLS OF STUDENTS VIA ONLINE COURSES. Rozita Tsoni, Jenny Pange University of Ioannina Greece

Participant Report Form Call 2015 KA1 Mobility of Staff in higher education - Staff mobility for teaching and training activities

Podcasting and Pedagogy. Workshop Objectives

Metadiscourse in Knowledge Building: A question about written or verbal metadiscourse

Corporate learning: Blurring boundaries and breaking barriers

Louisiana Free Materials List

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

EdX Learner s Guide. Release

Process improvement, The Agile Way! By Ben Linders Published in Methods and Tools, winter

SYSTEM QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS FOR SELECTING MOBILE LEARNING APPLICATIONS

New Patterns of Digital Content Use in Higher Education

GALICIAN TEACHERS PERCEPTIONS ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF THE ODS PORTAL

Circuit Simulators: A Revolutionary E-Learning Platform

TEACHING IN THE TECH-LAB USING THE SOFTWARE FACTORY METHOD *

PSIWORLD Keywords: self-directed learning; personality traits; academic achievement; learning strategies; learning activties.

Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning

Introduction to Moodle

Innovation and new technologies

Transcription:

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 299 305 WCES 2012 Is M-learning versus E-learning or are they supporting each other? Nilcan Ciftci Ozuorcun a *, Feride Tabak b a European University of Lefke,Department of Computer Engineering,Lefke,Cyprus b European Univerisity of Lefke,Department of Computer Engineering,Lefke, Cyprus Abstract The massive changes in society and development of technology have an important effect on education. These changes affect all areas of education and this education continues, and is everywhere, at all times, using new technology. Mobile devices bring big opportunities to learners, to learn at all times, with no boundaries for education. Before M-learning, E-learning gave many advantages for learners while they were living faraway from school. In this study we try to explain the basic definitions of M- learning and E-learning, and try to find answers for is M-learning derived from E-learning and if it is derived, does M-learning support E-learning, or is M-learning in opposition to E-learning? Is M-learning supporting E-learning, or are they in opposition?? 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Uzunboylu Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. Keywords: M-learning, E-learning 1. Introduction People try to keep changing the way that they communicate and do business. The use of web enabled devices is gradually increasing and affects every sector of education. Usage of web enabled devices on the Internet is now changing the way that people learn. Mobile Learning has growing visibility and significance, and it affects the traditional methods of teaching and learning. The traditional methods of teaching and learning are where the professor stands in the front of a classroom, copying a derivation from his/her notes onto the blackboard, and the students are copying passively from the board.(rugarcia,2009; Keser, Uzunboylu & ). The changes start from classrooms, instead of blackboard teachers have started to use projectors, laptops, and intelligent boards to teach. With technology, computer aided education has started. The learning/teaching system extends out of the classroom with the use of mobile technology devices such as PDAs, smart phones, laptops, and notebooks. Students can reach lecture notes, assignments, and homeworks by using mobile technological devices, which promises continued extension towards anywhere and anytime learning. It is commonly known as mobile learning (Mlearning), and has been considered as the future of learning or as an integral part of any other from of educational process. M-learning derives from E-learning (a way of learning that benefits on the support and improvement brought by the computer and by diverse communication techniques) E-learning derives from d-learning (Uzunboylu, Bicen & Cavus, 2011; Bicen & Cavus; 2011; Marghescu, 2007). Technology is still growing and that development changes the education. To understand how it changes, we look at the literature to find there are many articles about * Nilcan Ciftci Ozuorcun. Tel.: +0-392-660-2000 Ext: 2506 E-mail address: cynilcan@hotmail.com 1877-0428 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Uzunboylu Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.110

300 Nilcan Ciftci Ozuorcun and Feride Tabak / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 299 305 M-learning and E-learning. Those publication numbers increase day by day. In this paper, we try to find answer what are the differences M-learning and E-learning? Does M-learning use different techniques to learn/teach from E-learning? such as collaborative or situated learning, Is M-learning versus E-learning? Or is M-learning supporting E-learning 2. M-Learning Development in technology has resulted in changes in education. M-learning is the amazing art of using mobile technologies to develop the learning experience. According to this, we can do many explanations of m-learning. M- learning as a kind of learning model is allowing learners to obtain learning materials anywhere and anytime using mobile technologies and the Internet.(Lan&Sie,2010; Girgin, Kurt & Odbasi, 2011; Ozdamli&Cavus,2011) Webenabled devices such as PDAs, notebooks, and laptops, let students to learn anytime, anywhere they want. Student use those technologies to download any documents that are related to their work and they can send e-mail to their teachers. It is a way to keep student in touch for learning. M-learning technologies eliminate geographic boundaries and provide a collaborative learning environment between foreign groups. Furthermore, advances in handheld devices have facilitated the use of multimedia in mobile applications, which allows mobile learners to have access to a wide variety of richly diversified learning resources (Huang et al.,2010; Ozdamli&Cavus2011) 2.1. Designing M-learning M-learning is a relatively recent innovation, made possible through advances in operating system design, lower cost hardware, and the community acceptance of mobile phone technology (Peter,2005; Hashemi&Ghasemi,2011). s the portable devices which are used for M-learning. To design M-learning tools, according to Sharples et al.,(2000) the first requirement is portability. If it is portable, it supports learning anywhere and anytime. Another requirement is its connection to an individual. This means that learning occurs as an individually study. Moreover, a learner should be able to retrieve knowledge without the technology becoming a deterrent. Communication must be available with friend, teachers and experts. When design an M-learning tool, it must adapt to the learners development in their skills and knowledge. Persistency is another requirement, as there must be persistence of learning despite the technological development. To be useful is another important requirement for M-learning. The last requirement is to be user-friendly. 2.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of M-Learning M-learning has many advantages. The main advantage arising from mobile learning characteristics is that the study can be done by anyone, in any place, at any time when the user willing to learn. M-learning has a focus on sharing information. All learners, through the interactive system, can interact with each other and they can share knowledge and experience anytime and at any place. M-learning should take advantage of the mobile communication devices it uses as its basis (e.g. mobile phones and wifi enabled PDAs) and promote collaborative learning as much as possible. The collaboration can be achieved through the use of SMS or e-mail (V. Garaj,2009). Anytime Anyone Anywhere Anything Figure 1. Advantage of M-learning

Nilcan Ciftci Ozuorcun and Feride Tabak / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 299 305 301 On the other hand, M-learning has limitations. The teacher and student relationship can be destroyed. The teacher cannot interfere with the students studying, or affect the student motivation. It is very difficult to create a very accurate way of evaluation, because the student is always next to the information source that can affect the test result. That is M-learning speaks mainly to students at the universities/colleges, and speaks less to the student that attends high school (G. Marghescu at al., 2007; Hussein, 2010). 3. E-Learning Before M-learning, E-learning became possible in education and it changed the style of education to be more learner-centered. Education was teacher-centered before E-learning. According to some researchers, E-learning is the delivery of teaching materials via electronic media, such as the Internet, intranets, extranets, satellite broadcast, audio/video tape, interactive TV and CD-ROM. E-learning is commonly defined as using technological devices and the Internet for teaching and learning. 3.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of E-learning Advantages of E-learning: Class work can be scheduled around personal and professional work, resulting in flexible learning Reduces travel cost and time Learner may have the option to select learning materials that meets their level of knowledge and interest Learners can study whenever they have access to a computer and the Internet. Self-paced learning modules allow learners to work at their own pace. Successfully completing online or computer-based courses builds self-knowledge and self-confidence and encourages students to take responsibility of their learning. (05/01/2012) Motivation is the biggest advantages of E-learning. The student tries to learn when he/she has a good motivation to learn. Disadvantages of E-learning: E-learning is a different teaching/learning model, and it has limitations; E-learning decreases the relationship between the student with other students and the teacher with other teachers. Student and teacher must know how they will use computers for E-learning, and computers must be available. E-learning can be done anywhere in the world, in different cultures, students may access E-learning. Culture is a limitation for E-learning. Technical limitation. E-learning is different teaching/learning process. Therefore, some teachers have less experience and acquaintance with this process. Lack of face-to-face interaction with a teacher (Mohammedi,et all, 2010). 4. Is M-learning versus E-learning? Is M-learning versus E-learning? To find answer of this question first of all, we should find commonality and differences of both of process.

302 Nilcan Ciftci Ozuorcun and Feride Tabak / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 299 305 M-learning derives from E-learning (a way of learning that benefits on the support and improvement brought by the computer and by diverse communication techniques); and in turn e-learning derives from d-learning (distance learning (G. Marghescu at al., 2007). Educational Environment Traditional Education Distance Learning E-learning Distance Learning On-line M-learning Figure 2. Ways of Learning In E-learning, there is a specific intent to learn something in fact the selection of E-learning is generally based on a desire to acquire a specific set of knowledge or skills. For E-learning we generally add some phrases like tethered (connected to something) as well as learning that is offered in a formal and structured manner. For M-learning, the first major difference is that it is untethered. It also is defined by learning that is more informal and opportunistic. M-learning is more private, situational and unstructured (05/01/2012). In E-learning; the process of learning is enabled by the use of software and Internet tools (K.Nagi). In M-learning; the process of learning is enabled by the use of mobile devices such as smart phones, PDAs and ipods (K.Nagi). 4.1 Common and Different Features of M-Learning and E-learning When we try to find the common features between E-learning and M-learning, we can say that there are common features in both the learning process and the teaching process. First of all, M-learning and E-learning are studentcentered teaching/learning process. Both of them use technological devices for the teaching/learning process such as PDA, wireless laptop, notebook. Table1 Differences E-learning and M-Learning E-Learning Collaborative Media rich Distance Learning Formal M-Learning Networked Lightweight Situated Learning Informal Table1(K.Nagi), E-learning is collaborative and lets learners converse with contemporaries, present as well as defend ideas and perspectives, exchanging diverse beliefs, question other conceptual frameworks and get actively engaged. Learning in a collaborative environment can take place at any time. It can happen when individuals are in discussion or in a group or over the Internet. On the other hand, M-learning is networked. It uses wireless networks. In fact, E-learning can use a wireless network for the teaching/learning process. Furthermore, learners are also in cooperation with M-learning. E-Learning uses media rich; while M-learning uses lightweight devices. Nowadays,

Nilcan Ciftci Ozuorcun and Feride Tabak / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 299 305 303 mobile devices have the capacity to do many operations as well as a computer; so there are not really any differences between both learning processes. E-learning derives from distance learning and according to many researchers M-learning derives from E-learning. Both of them happen away from school, both of them use wireless networks. M-learning, as its name suggests, is mobile, portable learning and M-learning situated learning. And according to table 1 above, E-learning is distance learning. M-learning is also distance learning. Therefore, both of them use distance learning, and at the M-learning side, the learner learns themselves and they develop their learning skills. E-learning can get support from M-learning because of situated learning. According to table 1, the last comparison is formal and informal. E-learning is everything driven by an external entity such as an individual, a school, a college, a company etc. The process of formal learning is governed by stakeholders who define the system and the desired outcome. Otherwise, M-learning happens informally; research points that almost 70% of the learning is on-the-job and is acquired in an informal setting. So, informal learning happens naturally and is a consequence of a person being motivated and wanting to learn. In that sense, informal learning is driven by the individual his/herself. The individual is intrinsically motivated and wants to learn and creates or utilizes the right environment to trigger this learning. Formal and informal is the important difference between E-learning and M-learning. As the situated learning learner improves their application of E-learning and M- learning, both of them use audio, video-teleconference, e-mail to teacher and peers, no geographic boundaries, no need to travel school, if a wireless connection exists it is enough to learn. There are differences between e-and m- learning environments with respect to method of evaluation shown in table2 below (Korucu&Alkan, 2011). Table2 E-learning, M-learning Assignments &Test E-Learning Dedicated time Restricted amount of time Standard test Usually delay Feedback Fixed-length test M-Learning 24/7 Instantaneous Any amount of time possible Individualized test Instant feedback possible Flexible-length/number of questions According to all comparison and explanations of M-learning and E-learning know the question come in front of us -learning versus to E- Figure 1 show E-learning and Figure 2 show M-Learning (Cobcraft, 2006). Figure 1E-learning (Wired Virtual Learning Environment)

304 Nilcan Ciftci Ozuorcun and Feride Tabak / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 299 305 Figure 2 M-learning (Wireless Virtual Learning Environment) M-learning, and its perceived relation to E-learning; namely: M-learning is a sub-set of E-learning needs to be considered within a blended learning strategy in the same way that any education institution or corporate training department needs to view all other learning delivery methods. M-learning is a means to enhance the broader learning experience, not (as we predicted for e-learning) a primary method for delivering courses/distance learning; M- learning is a powerful method for engaging learners on their own terms especially for those who could be classed as nontraditional learners or for those groups of students who cannot participate in classroom learning for whatever reason (Mellow,2005). M-learning is not versus to E-learning, because they have mainly same features and techniques. Another question is -learning supporting E- and in practical terms it is. M-learning is situated learning and E-learning is collaborative learning. Learner develop his/her learning skills according to situations. According to situated learning, as espoused by Lave and Wenger (2001), knowledge skills are created in contexts which reflect how knowledge is obtained and applied in everyday situations. Situated learning occ in the flow of routine daily performance and the learner reflects on the current situation, resolves to address a problem, to share an ide (Sharples,2000, Cobcraft,2006). Below, the M-learning benefits are listed including those benefits should entegrate to E-learning. The appropriate of M-learning have many recognised benefits: M-learning helps learners to improve their literacy and numeracy skills and to recognise their existing abilities; M-learning can be used to encourage both independent and colloborative learning experiences; M-learning helps learners to identify areas where they need assistance and support M-learning helps to combat resistance to use of ICT and can help bridge the gap between mobile phone literacy and ICT literacy; M-learning helps to remove some of the formality from the learning exprience and engages reluctant learners; M-learning helps learners to remain more focused for longer periods; Mobile learnimg helps to raise self-esteem; M-learning helps to raise self-confidence (Attewell,2005).

Nilcan Ciftci Ozuorcun and Feride Tabak / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 299 305 305 5. Conclusion As a conclusion, when we investigate M-learning and E-learning, both of them are new trends in the learning/teaching process. The use of distance learning is also important. E-learning and M-learning derives from distance learning. Moreover, the learner starts to use and prefer these technological education models. According -learning versus E-, we realize that M-learning and E learning are mainly the same and there is no opposition. Both of them use the same technological devices nowadays because of technological development of technology. When we look at the differences between M- learning and E-learning, it seems there are two major differences. The first difference is E-learning is formal and M-learning is informal. The formal model is everything driven by external entity such as an individual, a school, a college, a company etc. On the other hand, informal learning happens naturally and as a consequence of a person being motivated and wanting to learn. In that sense, informal learning is driven by the individual his/herself. The second difference is that E-learning is collaborative and M-learning is situated learning. M- learning can support E-learning with situated learning. Because situated learning lets the learner develop their learning skills and the learner can learn according to their own motivation. Therefore, according to our research, M-learning can support E-learning with situated learning. Acknowledgements References 34(1) Attewell, J. (2005). From Research and Development to Mobile Learning : Tools for Education and Training Providers and their Learners. Proceedings of mlearn 2005. Retrieved December 20,2005, from http://www.mlearn.org.za/papers-full.html Bicen, H. & Cavus, N. (2011). "Social network sites usage habits of undergraduate students: case study of Facebook" Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 943-947. - EUROCON 2007. Girgin, U., Kurt, A., & Odabasi, F. (2011). Technology integration issues in a special education school in Turkey. Cypriot Journal Of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 13-21. Hashemi M.& Ghasemi B(2011). Using Mobile Phones in Language Learning/Teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 15(2011)2947-2951 http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/proceedings.shtml. Hussein, G., (2010). The Attitudes of Undergraduate Students Towards Motivation and Technology in a Foreign Language Classroom. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. 2(2).14-24. The trends in technology supported collaborative learning studies in 21st century.world Journal on Educational Technology.3(2). 103-119. Korucu A.T & Alkan A.(2011). Differences between m-learning(mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Mellow, P. (2005). The media generation: Maximise learning by getting mobile. Proceedings of ASCILITE 2005. N.Mohammadi, V Ghorbani, F. Hamidi (2010).Effect of e-learning on Language Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 3(2011) 464-468 Ozdamli F.& Cavus N.(2011). Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 28(2011)937-942 Retrieved January 12, 2006, from Sharples, M.(2000). The design of Personal Mobile Technologies for Lifelong Learning in Computers and Education 34:177-93. Online, available at www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu(accessed 28 February 2009) Uzunboylu, H., Bicen, H., and Cavus, N. (2011). "The efficient virtual learning environment: A case study of web 2.0 tools and windows live spaces" Computers & Education, 56(3), 720-726. - www.about-elearning.com www.openeducation.net,2007)