Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Similar documents
Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

University of Toronto

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Transportation Equity Analysis

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

NCEO Technical Report 27

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Principal vacancies and appointments

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WOULD THE ELIMINATION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFFECT HIGHLY QUALIFIED MINORITY APPLICANTS? EVIDENCE FROM CALIFORNIA AND TEXAS

1. Conclusion: Supply and Demand Analysis by Primary Positions

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Access Center Assessment Report

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

html

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

(ALMOST?) BREAKING THE GLASS CEILING: OPEN MERIT ADMISSIONS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION IN PAKISTAN

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

08-09 DATA REVIEW AND ACTION PLANS Candidate Reports

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says

Australia s tertiary education sector

Educational Attainment

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Report on Academic Recruitment, Hiring, and Attrition

EARNING. THE ACCT 2016 INVITATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: GETTING IN THE FAST LANE Ensuring Economic Security and Meeting the Workforce Needs of the Nation

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy. Graduate Student Handbook

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

SOCI 625D1/D2: Professional Development Seminar in Sociology Fall 2016 and Winter 2017

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

Western Australia s General Practice Workforce Analysis Update

GRADUATE SCHOOL DOCTORAL DISSERTATION AWARD APPLICATION FORM

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Department of Rural Sociology Graduate Student Handbook University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources

Biomedical Sciences. Career Awards for Medical Scientists. Collaborative Research Travel Grants

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

WHY GRADUATE SCHOOL? Turning Today s Technical Talent Into Tomorrow s Technology Leaders

Florida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

Global Television Manufacturing Industry : Trend, Profit, and Forecast Analysis Published September 2012

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

FTE General Instructions

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Lucintel. Publisher Sample

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. GRADUATE HANDBOOK And PROGRAM POLICY STATEMENT

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

Shelters Elementary School

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

1GOOD LEADERSHIP IS IMPORTANT. Principal Effectiveness and Leadership in an Era of Accountability: What Research Says

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

A Diverse Student Body

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results


CLA+ Analytics: Making Data Relevant Through Data Mining in Real Time

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

Bellevue University Bellevue, NE

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Transcription:

Graduate Division 2010 2011 Annual Report Key Findings Trends in Admissions and Enrollment 1 Size, selectivity, yield UCLA s graduate programs are increasingly attractive and selective. Between Fall 2001 and Fall 2010, the number of applicants increased 19%, admits increased 10%, and new enrollees increased 7%. New enrollment has held steady for the past five years. The total of 2,604 new enrollees in 2010 was exceeded only in 2002 (2,663), 2003 (2,647) and 2007 (2,618). [Figure 1-1] The selectivity (percent of applicants who are admitted) of UCLA graduate programs was 26% in 2010, which is within 1% of our ten-year average. Theater, Film & Television (TFT) continued to be the most selective, admitting fewer than one-in-eight applicants, and a substantial number of programs admitted fewer than one-in-five. For comparison, the International Institute, Education & Information Studies, Public Affairs and Public Health admitted more than 40% of their applicants. 2 Overall, UCLA s yield (% offers of admission that are accepted, a.k.a. enrollment success ) was 47% in 2010-11, comparable to our ten-year average. The yields in Nursing, TFT, Education & Information Studies, and Life Sciences topped 60%. [Table 1-12] Program size The total enrollment in Graduate Division programs in 2010 was 8,360, comparable to the ten-year average. When Law, Dentistry, Medicine and special fee programs are included, the total is 11,898, about 4% higher than the ten-year average. The increase in headcount over the past ten years occurred almost entirely in new and growing special fee programs. [Table 2-1] These programs, which represented only 7.9% of total enrollment in 2001-02, grew to 12.4% ten years later. [Table 2-6] Proportionally, the enrollments in academic doctoral programs (38%) and professional degree programs (23%) were close to their ten-year averages. The percent enrolled in academic master s degree programs declined to 9.1% in 2010-11, the lowest point in ten years, but still close to the five-year average of 10.1%. [Table 2-6] Underrepresented minorities Table 1-2 shows the trends in applications, admissions and enrollment of underrepresented minorities (URM). In 2010, for the first time, applicants were allowed to choose multiple ethnicities and racial categories. The dramatic increases in URM applications (29%), admissions (27%) and new enrollment (15%) are at least partly attributable to this change in reporting methodology. The enrollment numbers 1 The trends reported in this summary are for Graduate Division programs: that is, all graduate degree programs except the DDS in Dentistry, the JD, LLM and SJD in Law, and the MD in Medicine. See Overview pp 1-4 for a list of all degree programs. 2 This synopsis does not capture the often- substantial variability between programs within a school or division. Also note that percentages can fluctuate significantly for small programs. For details by program, please see Appendix I.

UCLA Graduate Programs Annual Report 2010-2011 2 reported in Table 2-3 pre-date this change. The number of enrolled domestic URM students did not change significantly from 2006 through 2010. Notably, in 2010, the enrollment of Black/African American and Chicano/Mexican American students combined increased more than 8% over the preceding year, while that of Latino/Other Hispanic students declined 13%. Women Women continue to make up roughly half (49%) of Graduate Division 1 new enrollment, virtually unchanged from 2001. At 20.5% of total enrollment, women are most underrepresented in Engineering, where their representation has increased only 2.5% since 2001. Women are most overrepresented in Nursing, at 88% of new enrollment; this represents a nearly 8% decrease since 2001. [Table 1-6] International In 2010, international students made up 34% of applicants, 23% of admits and 21% of new registrants. The yield rate is very high and substantially higher than for domestic students. Engineering had the highest percent international applications (65%), followed by Management (46%) and Physical Sciences (43%). [Table 1-7] The percent international students among new enrollees increased steadily from 14% in 2004 to 21% in 2010, but remains below the peak of about 24% in the late 1990s. Compared with 2009-10, Life Sciences had the largest single-year increase (+41%), followed by Engineering (+19%). The International Institute, Education & Information Studies and Physical Sciences had the largest singleyear decreases (-23, -15 and -11%, respectively). [Table 1-10] The number of new and continuing international graduate students reached an all-time high of 1,747 in 2010, capping a steady recovery from the dip in 2004-05. International students represented 21% of enrollment, significantly higher than the national average of 16%. [Tables 1-7, 2-7] Of these, 72% were from Asia, including 29% from China alone. [Table 2-5] Time-to-degree The Degree Progress data section of the Annual Report contains longitudinal time-to-degree data. The aggregation by division and school can mask important trends. Data for individual degree programs are provided in the Appendix Tables 3 and 4 (master s degrees) and 7 (doctoral degrees). Floating bar charts comparing time-to-degree across fields, along with program-specific time-to-degree histograms and tables, were provided at the Fall 2012 department chairs meetings and are available upon request. Campus-wide, the median time-to-degree for doctoral programs is 6.00 years, and has been exactly the same since 2002-03. Differences between 2009-10 and 2010-11 appear to be consistent with year-toyear fluctuations around the ten-year average. [Table 3-5] The median time for women (6.33) exceeds that of men (6.00). The median for URM students (6.33 yrs.) is also higher than the overall average. [Table 3-6] 2

UCLA Graduate Programs Annual Report 2010-2011 3 Support Merit-based support includes fellowships, teaching and research assistantships, and excludes loans, need-based aid and other employment. In 2010-11, UCLA graduate students received $196.5M in merit-based support, a more than 10% increase over the previous year. This amount corresponded to $26,823 per person (+3% per capita). Of this, $166.5M went to doctoral students, amounting to $32,981 per person, or 4% more per capita than the previous year [Table 4-1]. The relative amounts of merit- and need-based support differ significantly by field [Figures 4.4 4.7]. Overall, approximately 49% of graduate student support is merit-based. The percentage is lower for URM students (43%) and women (48%), and higher for international students (86%) and men (50%). Loans represent a slightly higher fraction of the financial support for URM students than for other domestic students (45 vs. 43%). [Table 4-3] At the campus level, these differences likely reflect demographic differences in the disciplines coupled with differences in the availability of extramural support. Field-based data are provided in the Appendix (Table 8). To ensure that support packages are equitable, departments are encouraged to contact the Graduate Division to request a more detailed analysis of student support by gender, ethnicity and citizenship. Students in the College and Engineering represented 51% of the Graduate Division enrollment in 2010-11, but held more than 70% of all teaching assistantships. In Graduate Division programs, 35% of students held teaching appointments. Not surprisingly, the percentage was highest in the Humanities (65%), followed by Physical Sciences (58%), Social Sciences (55%), Arts & Architecture (47%), Life Sciences and TFT (both 45%). [Table 4-8 and 4-9] The following table shows that the availability of TAships relative to the number of enrolled graduate students has increased since 2004-05, but has been fairly stable over the last three years. The Life Sciences represent the only area in which there has been a significant net decline relative to 2004-05. Number of TA-ships as % enrollment Division or school 2010-11 2008-09 2006-07 2004-05 Humanities 65% 64% 62% 64% Physical Sciences 58% 63% 62% 57% Social Sciences 55% 54% 54% 52% Arts & Architecture 47% 46% 48% 37% Life Sciences 45% 47% 47% 51% Theater, Film, & Television 45% 46% 45% 37% Engineering & Applied Science 33% 32% 29% 26% Management 24% 21% 18% 12% Public Health 15% 16% 18% 14% 3

UCLA Graduate Programs Annual Report 2010-2011 4 The availability of graduate research apprenticeships varies substantially by field, with Engineering and the Life, Physical and Academic Health Sciences accounting for 77% of graduate student researcher (GSR) positions in 2010-11. As the table below shows, the percent of students supported at least partly as GSRs has not changed significantly over the past eight years. [Tables 4-8 and 4-9 and prior annual reports; note the Humanities 2004-05 number is atypical] Number of grad researchers as % enrollment Division or school 2010-11 2008-09 2006-07 2004-05 Academic Health Sciences 68% 68% 65% 68% Physical Sciences 62% 61% 59% 59% Life Sciences 52% 53% 53% 56% Engineering 50% 52% 54% 53% Public Health 32% 33% N/A N/A Humanities 30% 30% 26% 43% Social Sciences 30% 28% 27% 30% Education & Information Studies 23% 22% 23% 24% Public Affairs 21% 21% 24% 22% As the table below shows, the percent of students awarded fellowships has increased steadily over the past seven years. More than 70% of students in eight broad fields received some type of fellowship (Graduate Division, Departmental, Federal or Private). Together the Life Sciences and Social Sciences account for more than 27% of all fellowships awarded, about equally divided between the two fields. [Table 4-8] Number of students awarded fellowships as % enrollment Division or school 2010-11 2008-09 2006-07 2004-05 Academic Health Sciences 87% 85% 60% 54% Physical Sciences 80% 83% 78% 65% Life Sciences 79% 50% 52% 43% Engineering 78% 80% 76% 75% Public Health 78% 76% 78% 72% Humanities 77% 55% 57% 51% Social Sciences 76% 74% 69% 64% Education & Information Studies 72% 56% 64% 59% Public Affairs 56% 72% 67% 48% 4

UCLA Graduate Programs Annual Report 2010-2011 5 Degrees Awarded UCLA awarded 4,045 graduate and professional degrees in 2010-11, about the same as in the three previous years. The 681 Ph.D. degrees awarded is comparable to the number awarded in 2005-06 and 2006-07, but is well below the 719 that were awarded on average over the past three years. [Figure 5-1] Professional master s degrees, the most popular, represented approximately 40% of all degrees awarded, a consistent percentage since 2003. 2010-11 showed a continued decline in the percent of doctoral degrees awarded to international students. At 21.8 %, it was well below the peak of 38.7% in 2004-05. Although it is close to the 24.4% awarded in 2001-02, it represents the lowest percentage since 1998-99 (19.0%). [Table 5-2, Figure 5-5 and archived Annual Reports] Comparison of 2009-10 UCLA data with the 2009-10 U.S. Survey of Earned Doctorates shows that women were equally represented among doctoral degree recipients nationally (47%) and locally (46%). UCLA awarded a smaller percent of doctoral degrees to international students (24% vs. 30% nationally), but larger percentages to Asian Americans (18% vs. 9% nationally, and 21% at UCLA in 2010-11) and to Chicano/Hispanic students (9% vs. 6%). [Table 5-15] Placement A positive finding was that the employment prospects of our doctoral recipients have not diminished since the ongoing economic recession began in 2008. Table 5-6 shows that the percent of graduates hired at 4-year colleges or universities, at other academic institutions, at private non-academic institutions, and at non-academic public institutions has not changed significantly over the past four years. Unemployment remains very low (2%). There have been two significant shifts: an increase in the percent who are employed in postdoctoral fellow or trainee appointments, from 16% in 2006-07 to an all-time high of 34% in 2010-11, and a decrease in the percent whose employment status is "unknown."[table 5-6] Doctoral Exit Survey The UCLA doctoral exit survey asks students to characterize their graduate experience. If they were to start their graduate careers over, 71% said they would choose UCLA again and 79% would choose the same field of study; both are higher than any time in the past 10 years. 72% percent would choose the same dissertation advisor, slightly ahead of the ten-year average and 4% higher than the previous year. [Fig. 5-7] Postdoctoral Fellows & Visiting Scholars The 1,144 postdoctoral scholars in 2010-11 is 1.4% fewer than in the previous year. Nearly 58% were from outside the U.S., 17% from China alone. The Professional Health Sciences (primarily Medicine and Dentistry), Academic Health Sciences, Life Sciences, and Basic Biomedical Sciences together accounted for 56% of all postdoctoral fellows. Research Centers hosted 19%, Physical Sciences 14%, and Engineering 9%. 5

UCLA Graduate Programs Annual Report 2010-2011 6 The demographics of the 389 Visiting Scholars were similar to those of postdocs, but there were 18% more of them in 2010-11 than in 2009-10. [Table 6-1] Approximately one third were hosted by research centers, including the Center for the Study of Women, the Center for Korean Studies, and the Center for Latin American Studies, among others. [Tables 6-1 and 6-2] 6