EXAMPLES OF SPEAKING PERFORMANCES AT CEF LEVELS A2 TO C2. (Taken from Cambridge ESOL s Main Suite exams)

Similar documents
Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Sign languages and the Common European Framework of References for Languages

FCE Speaking Part 4 Discussion teacher s notes

Creating Travel Advice

English. (Swiss Adult Learners) Brian North (Eurocentres) Gareth Hughes (Migros Club Schools)

Merbouh Zouaoui. Melouk Mohamed. Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy. 1. Introduction

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

Cambridge English Empower: bringing Learning Oriented Assessment into the classroom

Virtually Anywhere Episodes 1 and 2. Teacher s Notes

Dragonwings by Laurence Yep

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Language Center. Course Catalog

This publication is also available for download at

Information for Candidates

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

Making Sales Calls. Watertown High School, Watertown, Massachusetts. 1 hour, 4 5 days per week

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Formative Assessment in Mathematics. Part 3: The Learner s Role

INTRODUCTION TO TEACHING GUIDE

CEF, oral assessment and autonomous learning in daily college practice

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

2014 Free Spirit Publishing. All rights reserved.

RESPONSE TO LITERATURE

EQuIP Review Feedback

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Mini Lesson Ideas for Expository Writing

PRESENTED BY EDLY: FOR THE LOVE OF ABILITY

Classroom Activities/Lesson Plan

CAN PICTORIAL REPRESENTATIONS SUPPORT PROPORTIONAL REASONING? THE CASE OF A MIXING PAINT PROBLEM

Written by: YULI AMRIA (RRA1B210085) ABSTRACT. Key words: ability, possessive pronouns, and possessive adjectives INTRODUCTION

Handbook for Teachers

Master s Degree Programme in East Asian Studies

Working on the Bay Bridge.

1 3-5 = Subtraction - a binary operation

Measurement. When Smaller Is Better. Activity:

To the Student: ABOUT THE EXAM

Author: Fatima Lemtouni, Wayzata High School, Wayzata, MN

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR BASIC EDUCATION STANDARD I AND II

GCSE Media Studies. Mark Scheme for June Unit B322: Textual Analysis and Media Studies Topic (Moving Image)

TeachingEnglish Seminars. Live and Unplugged - a Dogme Lesson and Discussion Report by Scott Sherriff

Anticipation Guide William Faulkner s As I Lay Dying 2000 Modern Library Edition

Polish (JUN ) General Certificate of Secondary Education June 2014

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

GCSE Mathematics B (Linear) Mark Scheme for November Component J567/04: Mathematics Paper 4 (Higher) General Certificate of Secondary Education

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

Example answers and examiner commentaries: Paper 2

DOES RETELLING TECHNIQUE IMPROVE SPEAKING FLUENCY?

ENG 111 Achievement Requirements Fall Semester 2007 MWF 10:30-11: OLSC

PART C: ENERGIZERS & TEAM-BUILDING ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT YOUTH-ADULT PARTNERSHIPS

Vicente Amado Antonio Nariño HH. Corazonistas and Tabora School

Learning to Think Mathematically with the Rekenrek Supplemental Activities

A PRIMER FOR HOST FAMILIES

COURSE NUMBER: COURSE NUMBER: SECTION: 01 SECTION: 01. Office Location: WSQ 104. (preferred contact)

Explorer Promoter. Controller Inspector. The Margerison-McCann Team Management Wheel. Andre Anonymous

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

One Stop Shop For Educators

Effective Practice Briefings: Robert Sylwester 03 Page 1 of 12

Bobbi Misiti 2201 Market Street Camp Hill, PA befityoga.com. Mysore Classes

Concept Acquisition Without Representation William Dylan Sabo

IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK 17 AGUSTUS 1945 MUNCAR THROUGH DIRECT PRACTICE WITH THE NATIVE SPEAKER

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Getting Started with Deliberate Practice

HOW DO PUPILS ExPERIENCE SETTING IN PRIMARY MATHEMATICS?

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

LEXICAL COHESION ANALYSIS OF THE ARTICLE WHAT IS A GOOD RESEARCH PROJECT? BY BRIAN PALTRIDGE A JOURNAL ARTICLE

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

To appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING. Kazuya Saito. Birkbeck, University of London

IN THIS UNIT YOU LEARN HOW TO: SPEAKING 1 Work in pairs. Discuss the questions. 2 Work with a new partner. Discuss the questions.

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY 2012)

1.11 I Know What Do You Know?

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

Five Challenges for the Collaborative Classroom and How to Solve Them

LEGO MINDSTORMS Education EV3 Coding Activities

EDEXCEL FUNCTIONAL SKILLS PILOT. Maths Level 2. Chapter 7. Working with probability

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

Multi-genre Writing Assignment

Social Activities. Social Activities. Social Activities

Cognitive Thinking Style Sample Report

November 2012 MUET (800)

Guided Reading with A SPECIAL DAY written and illustrated by Anne Sibley O Brien

Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY (AETC)

CLIL across Contexts: A scaffolding framework for CLIL teacher education

Genevieve L. Hartman, Ph.D.

Teaching Literacy Through Videos

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 143 ( 2014 ) CY-ICER Teacher intervention in the process of L2 writing acquisition

Transcription:

EXAMPLES OF SPEAKING PERFORMANCES AT CEF LEVELS A2 TO C2 (Taken from Cambridge ESOL s Main Suite exams) MARKS AND COMMENTARIES BEN: LEVEL C1/C1+ ALISER: LEVEL C2

Foreword This document accompanies the recorded speaking performances of Ben (CEF level C1/C1+) and Aliser (CEF level C2). The two candidates are taking a Cambridge ESOL Certificate in Proficiency of English test. This speaking test performance was originally recorded for examiner training purposes, and is here used to provide speaking exemplars of CEF levels. The speaking exemplars used here are an additional resource (to the existing one on the Council s website) that Cambridge ESOL would like to share with other language testing and teaching professionals. The persons shown on these recordings have given their consent to the use of these recordings for research and training purposes only. Permission is given for the use of this material for examiner and teacher training in non-commercial contexts. No part of this recording may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or sold without prior written permission. Written permission must also be sought for the use of this material in fee-paying training programmes. Further information on the content and exams exemplified in these sample tests is available in the Exam Handbooks, reports, and past papers, which can be obtained via the Cambridge ESOL website, http://www.cambridgeesol.org/ or by contacting: University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom Tel. +44 (0) 1223 553355 Fax. +44 (0) 1223 460278 e-mail: ESOL.helpdesk@ucles.org.uk

Ben (Level C1/C1+) and Aliser (Level C2) Ben (from China) and Aliser (from Latvia) are taking a CPE exam. At CPE candidates are required to carry out three tasks, which are outlined below. Part Response format 1 Interview Part 1 gives candidates the opportunity to show their ability to use general interactional and social language. The interlocutor asks each candidate a series of questions, starting with general information about themselves and moving on to more open questions requiring speculation or an opinion. The interlocutor encourages the candidates to give information about themselves and to express personal opinions. 2 Collaborative task In Part 2, candidates are given the opportunity to show their range of language (speculating, evaluating, giving opinions, eliciting, negotiating etc) and their ability to manage a discussion. Following an initial question which focuses their reaction to aspects of one or more pictures, the candidates are given visual and spoken prompts, which are used in a decision-making task. 3 Individual long turn followed by discussion In Part 3, candidates are given the opportunity to speak for 2 minutes without interruption. Each candidate in turn is given a written question to respond to. This is followed by the interlocutor asking a series of further questions, which allows the candidates to engage in a discussion to explore further the topics of the long turns. Ben: Level C1/C1+ Ben contributes to the interaction all though the test, but cannot be said to show the spontaneity and fluency required at C2. He also struggles with coherence and accuracy, where his performance does not always reach the standard required for C2. Overall, he is at the C1/C1+ level. Range (C1): Ben has command of some precise and colloquial language ( coping quite well here, get along very well, although I disagree with her, I see where she s coming from ), but at times he seems to struggle to find the precise language he needs to express finer shades of meaning ( it s very nice to have friends when you re travelling. If you don t wear, like, the same clothes as them you might feel that you are left alo.left out. ). The filler like seems to be used when Ben can t find the exact word he needs to describe precise meaning. Accuracy (C1): There is a considerable amount of accurate language, ( stopping us from showing off, in a way [. ] it shows us we are the same as others ), but Ben does not have the consistent control required for C2, and demonstrates a C1 level of accuracy, making a few errors ( you can help out each other, it brings unique into our school, when I was young, I used to like computer games a lot, but then now as I grow older I found computer games not as exciting as it used to be.). Fluency (C1/C1+): Although Ben plays a full part in the interaction, his contributions could not be said to demonstrate the spontaneous, natural flow which is a feature of C2 command of language. His contributions demonstrate a C1/C1+ level. For example, a conceptually difficult topic hinders fluency ( Art can um give some can draw people s attention to..er.. one particular person s emotions, or what they feel about certain aspects, that they cannot express simply in words. I think um.. that s ones of the major beauty of art. It can it s like a language in a way, it s communicating to other people, and different people will see this message differently.

I think that s very important. ). The expression of ideas and supposition is not always effortless ( those two are relatives, maybe. um [. ] yeah, a daughter and a father and they are having a very.um I think a very they are enjoying a nice conversation and I think..). Interaction (C1+): Ben generally responds appropriately, but not effortlessly. For example in the first joint task, he tends to let Aliser take over at times, echoing her or agreeing with her ( yeah ) rather than developing the discussion, and does not always interact with ease in this section. He passes the questions on art and uniforms to Aliser to answer first, but then responds effectively. On cars, at the end of the test, he again passes the question to Aliser using body language, and doesn t intervene even when she stops and looks at him, but only when the interlocutor asks him directly. Coherence (C1): Ben seems to be struggling for coherence in his long turn on fashion, although he starts with effective use of a rhetorical question ( Is it simply just what people wear, is this, like, fashion? ). Although he structures his talk, he does not make full use of connectors and cohesive devices, meaning his talk lacks C2 level of coherence ( what you wear gives other people a feeling of what you re like, so if you wear some dark clothes like I am here wearing, so might give the people opinion that um... I I am a uh...how I say...i m quite formal in a way, or I m very mature in a way, whereas people who wear like like say multicoloured clothes, like very bright red or bright yellow clothes, people think that they re very happy? And I think that different clothes, again, it s a bit like art in a way. It gives people the message of how you feel and what your emotion is towards different things. ). He is in real difficulty with coherence when answering the question on uniforms in Part 4. There is perhaps over use of the filler like, and a lack of other cohesive devices. Aliser: Level C2 Aliser expresses herself spontaneously and very fluently throughout the test; she uses extensive linguistic resources to structure her turns well and communicate with ease, demonstrating a strong C2 performance. Range (C2): Aliser s language is very natural, using colloquial expressions and complex constructions ( Quite competitive, to a certain extent [. ] if I know there s no way we can achieve the goal, I ll just give in, it might even bring you closer, togetherness in a family is really important as well, which I think might appeal to the readers, get together and express their opinions, industrialised, deforestation, the everlasting question, just a bunch of squiggles, on the dark side, personally I wouldn t approach Goths. ). She is able to adjust register different stuff er things. ). Accuracy (C2): Aliser produces a generally extremely accurate performance at C2 ( as you gradually grow up and your inner world changes, so do your tastes, for example when I was little I liked Harry Potter. I think now I d enjoy more serious books, without art, life would be more boring, just more dull, I think We wouldn t know about famous painters.). There are a very few slips: said a joke a good relationship between each other, manifestation, frescs ). Fluency (C2): Aliser demonstrates the spontaneous, natural flow associated with C2 on a wide range of topics, both in short and long turns. She easily overcomes any linguistic difficulties she may have. Interaction (C2): Aliser uses language very skilfully to discuss the issues, weaving her ideas into her partner s comments. She supports her partner by supplying the words he seems to be hesitating over ( it looks like a daughter and a father, or something. ), but her desire to move the discussion on means she interrupts him (about togetherness and teamwork, and at the end of Part 2), finishing his sentences for him, and talking over him. However, her skill puts her clearly into the C2 band here. Coherence (C2): Aliser speaks coherently all though the test, making effective use of a wide range of cohesive devices ( as a matter of fact, first of all because,.as well.., but also.., in various ways,. ). She uses

rhetorical devices such as rhetorical questions and repetition to enhance coherence ( the beautiful portraits, the beautiful landscapes, some people say this.., some people say that ). Her talk on art loses some coherence at the end, but she is still well within the C2 band.