Course INTRODUCTION TO DEGREE PROGRAM EXPECTATIONS: WHAT FACULTY NEED TO KNOW NOW

Similar documents
Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index


MASTER OF ARTS IN APPLIED SOCIOLOGY. Thesis Option

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document.

Copyright Corwin 2015

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

WHY SOLVE PROBLEMS? INTERVIEWING COLLEGE FACULTY ABOUT THE LEARNING AND TEACHING OF PROBLEM SOLVING

NC Global-Ready Schools

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Writing Effective Program Learning Outcomes. Deborah Panter, J.D. Director of Educational Effectiveness & Assessment

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Internet Journal of Medical Update

School Leadership Rubrics

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

PROGRAM PRESENTATION

EQuIP Review Feedback

THREE-YEAR COURSES FASHION STYLING & CREATIVE DIRECTION Version 02

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Innovative Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math

and Beyond! Evergreen School District PAC February 1, 2012

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

IMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM

Program Change Proposal:

CAFE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS O S E P P C E A. 1 Framework 2 CAFE Menu. 3 Classroom Design 4 Materials 5 Record Keeping

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Slam Poetry-Theater Lesson. 4/19/2012 dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx. Lindsay Jag Jagodowski

Master Program: Strategic Management. Master s Thesis a roadmap to success. Innsbruck University School of Management

Strategic Plan Dashboard

Student Experience Strategy

MAINTAINING CURRICULUM CONSISTENCY OF TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS THROUGH TEACHER DESIGN TEAMS

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

Ministry of Education General Administration for Private Education ELT Supervision

School for Graduate Studies Application Essays

TRANSNATIONAL TEACHING TEAMS INDUCTION PROGRAM OUTLINE FOR COURSE / UNIT COORDINATORS

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Global MBA Master of Business Administration (MBA)

Interpretive (seeing) Interpersonal (speaking and short phrases)

The recognition, evaluation and accreditation of European Postgraduate Programmes.

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

Exemplar Grade 9 Reading Test Questions

What s in Your Communication Toolbox? COMMUNICATION TOOLBOX. verse clinical scenarios to bolster clinical outcomes: 1

Presentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland.

Systematic Assessment and Monitoring leading to Improving Quality of Education

Running Head: Implementing Articulate Storyline using the ADDIE Model 1. Implementing Articulate Storyline using the ADDIE Model.

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

THE ALLEGORY OF THE CATS By David J. LeMaster

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Selling Skills. Tailored to Your Needs. Consultants & trainers in sales, presentations, negotiations and influence

Bold resourcefulness: redefining employability and entrepreneurial learning

Harvesting the Wisdom of Coalitions

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

B. How to write a research paper

Concordia Language Villages STARTALK Teacher Program Curriculum

DOCTORAL SCHOOL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus

Common Performance Task Data

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

Evaluation of Learning Management System software. Part II of LMS Evaluation

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Ohio Valley University New Major Program Proposal Template

Introduce yourself. Change the name out and put your information here.

Can Money Buy Happiness? EPISODE # 605

The One Minute Preceptor: 5 Microskills for One-On-One Teaching

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Writing an Effective Proposal for Teaching Grant: Focusing on Student Success & Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

THE 2016 FORUM ON ACCREDITATION August 17-18, 2016, Toronto, ON

Monique Somma, MEd. Department of Graduate and Undergraduate. Studies in Education. Submitted in partial fulfillment

What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION POSTGRADUATE STUDIES INFORMATION GUIDE

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

An ICT environment to assess and support students mathematical problem-solving performance in non-routine puzzle-like word problems

White Paper. The Art of Learning

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Transcription:

Course INTRODUCTION TO DEGREE PROGRAM EXPECTATIONS: WHAT FACULTY NEED TO KNOW NOW Office of Curriculum, Learning Design, and Academic Assessment & Faculty Professional Development Presentation, September 24, 2015

Introductions Please introduce yourself. If you know and if relevant, where is your program currently at in terms of the Degree Program Expectations (DPEs)? If relevant, how have you been involved in developing the degree program expectations for your program? What do you hope to learn from this session?

Session Learning Goals Explain the rationale for the DPEs and how these best practices of curriculum, learning design, and assessment can improve teaching and learning. Relate the history of NAU s DPEs. Describe the DPEs.

Warm-up Activity You each have an index card with the name of a DPE. In your own words, what does the DPE mean and how could this DPE be relevant/useful to enhancing student learning or faculty collaboration?

Why the DPEs? Assessment, pedagogy, and curriculum are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they should work hand in hand, yet most institutions have yet to intentionally connect them effectively (Fulcher et al., 2014)

Why the DPEs? As best practices in curriculum, learning design, and assessment, NAU s DPEs provide A structure for improving student learning at the course, degree program, and university levels An opportunity for faculty to collaboratively reflect on, discuss, and take action to improve student learning

History of DPEs Impetus for Change Disconnected curriculum and assessment processes Few consequences for doing/not doing continual improvement efforts Gap between accredited and non-accredited programs Momentum to make positive changes

History of DPEs Summer Working Group Ad hoc group of faculty with support from Office of Curriculum, Learning Design, and Academic Assessment staff Mutually committed to guiding principle Reviewed curriculum, learning design, and assessment models Collaboratively developed a proposal Working group members answered the question: What are the characteristics related to curriculum, assessment, and student learning that define a quality academic program? Final six DPEs based on current theory and best practices in curriculum, learning, design, and assessment

Overview of DPEs 1. Degree Program Purpose Identifies the overall goals or aims of the degree program, as collectively understood by faculty teaching in the degree program What is studied in this degree program How it is studied Why it is studied

Overview of DPEs 2. Degree Program Intended Learning Outcomes Define the scope (breath and depth) of what students will know and be able to do upon completion of degree program Are explicit Are learning-centered Align with the degree program purpose Are appropriate to the level of the degree offered If the degree program has emphases, the outcomes capture both common and unique curricular requirements of the degree

Overview of DPEs 3. Coherent Curriculum Design and Degree Program Curriculum Matrix Curriculum has coherent course sequencing and structure designed to achieve the intended student learning outcomes and distributed to students and faculty in a manner that both students and faculty can articulate the rationale behind the sequencing and structure of the degree program A basic curriculum matrix visually demonstrates the courses covering each intended degree program student learning outcome A written description of how the courses and their sequence relate to students achievement of intended learning outcomes

Overview of DPEs 4. Systematic Assessment of Intended Student Learning Outcomes Information about student learning is collected and analyzed by program faculty or their designates to determine the extent students achieve degree program student learning outcomes Systematically conducts direct assessment of intended student learning outcomes Processes and methodologies to assess student learning reflect good practice Identifies what was discovered about student learning for each intended learning outcome

Overview of DPEs 5. Use of Assessment Findings for Continual Improvement of Student Learning Assessment findings are evaluated and used by program faculty for decision making and continual improvement of student learning in an on-going, systematic fashion Program faculty analyze and discuss the significance of findings about student learning and plan and implement changes to improve student learning

Overview of DPEs 6. Strategic Course Design The purpose, goal, or aim of the course The intended course learning outcome(s) and their connection to course purpose The intentional sequencing of instructional materials, course activities, learner interactions with peers and instructors, and other educational tools and technologies to achieve course learning outcomes The assignments/assessments faculty and students will use to gauge learning throughout the course

Application Activity Pair & Share Review one of the DPE examples. What are strengths of the DPE? What are your suggestions for next steps for the DPE?

Closing Activity Minute Paper On the back on your index card, please take a minute to answer the following questions: What was the most important thing you learned in this session today? What important question remains unanswered?

Resources Fulcher, K. H., Good, M. R., Coleman, C. M., & Smith, K. L. (2014). A simple model for learning improvement: Weigh pig, feed pig, weigh pig. Retrieved from http://learningoutcomesassessment.org/occasionalp apertwentythree.html.

Contact Information Gerald Wood College of Education Educational Leadership Associate Professor Gerald.wood@nau.edu Sue Pieper Office of Curriculum, Learning Design, and Academic Assessment Coordinator for Assessment Sue.pieper@nau.edu