Course evaluations at Chalmers

Similar documents
H2020 Marie Skłodowska Curie Innovative Training Networks Informal guidelines for the Mid-Term Meeting

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

Parent Teacher Association Constitution

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

American College of Emergency Physicians National Emergency Medicine Medical Student Award Nomination Form. Due Date: February 14, 2012

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

Facilitating Difficult Dialogues in the Classroom. We find comfort among those who agree with us, growth among those who don t. Frank A.

BSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

General syllabus for third-cycle courses and study programmes in

ROLE DESCRIPTION. Name of Employee. Team Leader ICT Projects Date appointed to this position 2017 Date under review Name of reviewer

Student agreement regarding the project oriented course

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Graduate Program in Education

BSM 2801, Sport Marketing Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

Institutional repository policies: best practices for encouraging self-archiving

Faculty Meetings. From Dissemination. To Engagement. Jessica Lyons MaryBeth Scullion Rachel Wagner City of Tonawanda School District, NY

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

Group A Lecture 1. Future suite of learning resources. How will these be created?

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

Writing a Basic Assessment Report. CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Guidelines and additional provisions for the PhD Programmes at VID Specialized University

Poster Presentation Best Practices. Kuba Glazek, Ph.D. Methodology Expert National Center for Academic and Dissertation Excellence Los Angeles

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

OP-P 602 A-E Page 1 of 8. Operating Protocol-Procedure #: 602 (A-E) Category: Instruction Office of Primary Responsibility: Office of Academic Affairs

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

CREATING SAFE AND INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS: A FRAMEWORK FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT. Created by: Great Lakes Equity Center

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Extended Common Core Social Studies Lesson Plan Template

Title: Improving information retrieval with dialogue mapping and concept mapping

Shank, Matthew D. (2009). Sports marketing: A strategic perspective (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

2. Sibling of a continuing student at the school requested. 3. Child of an employee of Anaheim Union High School District.

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

Dowling, P. J., Festing, M., & Engle, A. (2013). International human resource management (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

New Center for Student Involvement and updated student organization policy. August 17, 2017

MODULE 4 Data Collection and Hypothesis Development. Trainer Outline

Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology

Specification of the Verity Learning Companion and Self-Assessment Tool

D.10.7 Dissemination Conference - Conference Minutes

Graduate Student Grievance Procedures

USER ADAPTATION IN E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

BalticSeaNow.info- Innovative participatory forum for the Baltic Sea.

College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science

PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE

Requesting Title II, Part A Services. A Guide for Christian School Administrators

August 22, Materials are due on the first workday after the deadline.

Training Evaluation and Impact Framework 2017/19

PROFESSIONAL INTEGRATION

May 2011 (Revised March 2016)

3. Examinations and final assessment of the degree programmes

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions in H2020

Work plan guidelines for the academic year

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

What does Quality Look Like?

Course Buyout Policy & Procedures

European Association of Establishments for Veterinary Education. and the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

How to make successful presentations in English Part 2

2 Research Developments

Hiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents

GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH

Examples of Individual Development Plans (IDPs)

Question bank for course evaluation

Early Childhood through Young Adulthood. (For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.)

CAPBLAT: An Innovative Computer-Assisted Assessment Tool for Problem Based Learning

EMAES THE EXECUTIVE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN EUROPEAN STUDIES, 60 HP

College of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions

9:30AM- 1:00PM JOHN PASSMORE L116

INCOMING [PEGASUS]² MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE FELLOWSHIPS 1

The IDN Variant Issues Project: A Study of Issues Related to the Delegation of IDN Variant TLDs. 20 April 2011

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLE WEB CONFERENCE OR ON-CAMPUS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Minutes. Student Learning Outcomes Committee March 3, :30 p.m. Room 2411A

PROJECT RELEASE: Towards achieving Self REgulated LEArning as a core in teachers' In-SErvice training in Cyprus

Intellectual Property

LLP NL-ERASMUS-ECDEM

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

PERSONAL STATEMENTS and STATEMENTS OF PURPOSE

NOVIA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES DEGREE REGULATIONS TRANSLATION

Faculty Feedback User s Guide

Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Tilea Doina Maria a, Vasile Bleotu b

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Career Checkpoint. What is Career Checkpoint? Make the most of your Marketable Skills

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

GALICIAN TEACHERS PERCEPTIONS ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF THE ODS PORTAL

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Transcription:

Common process from academic year 2007/08 Overview for teachers and students

Continuous course development Course evaluations are a part of fthe never-ceasing efforts to improve courses and programmes at Chalmers. Student experiences, as expressed and collected in course evaluations, form an essential input to this development of quality.

Which courses are affected? All courses at Chalmers are evaluated as described here with the possible exception of courses at the master level with few (< 20) students. These may adopt a simplified process, where teacher and students continuously discuss the course.

What does Swedish law say? According to Swedish law, the university shall give each student, who participates in a course, an opportunity to express his/her views on the course in a course evaluation organized by the university. The university shall put evaluations together and inform about the results and possible actions taken in response. Results shall be made available to the students.

Goals for the evaluation process The aim of the process is to develop the goals, contents and pedagogy of the courses, focusing on student learning. The process shall encourage a dialogue between teachers and students on how the education can be improved. The process shall profit from student experiences, in order to improve current and future courses, as well as the study programmes as a whole.

The process Three meetings between 2-6 student representatives and the teacher. In the final meeting, also representatives from the programme, the department and the student union may attend. Brief, web-based, anonymous questionnaire to all students. Minutes from the final meeting available in the student portal. Meeting 1 Course intro Meeting 2 Meeting 3 Questionnaire 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Exam 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 Exam Representatives presented Notes on course website Minutes Portal

Chalmers centrally, responsibilities Maintains and develops course evaluation process. Provides IT support (questionnaire system, minutes template, routines for linking from portal). Informs about process and tools.

Programme leadership, responsibilities Appoints (in collaboration with student union) student representantives; informs teacher. Assembles and distributes standard questionnaire. Puts questionnaire results together. Schedules and calls to final meeting. Chairs final meeting and archives minutes in Chalmers document system.

Teacher, responsibilites Informs briefly about process during course introduction and in course documents; presents student representantatives. Calls two first meetings together, publishes notes from 2nd meeting on course website. Presents his/her views and experiences at final meeting. Develops course for next year, according to departmental decisions and routines.

Student representantatives, responsibilities Inform themselves of their fellow students views on the course. Pass these views on at the meetings and participate in discussions in a personal capacity. May propose course-specific questions in questionnaire. Inform fellow students of discussions and recommendations at the meetings. Each representative is reimbursed with a voucher for 200 SEK, valid at Cremona.

Meetings 1 and 2 First meeting g( (week 1) is brief and will typically ytake place in connection with a teaching activity. Aims: to establish contact, clarify teacher s and students thoughts regarding the course and to decide on and publish time for meeting 2. The second meeting (week 3-4) discusses e.g. Changes in the course since last year. Study climate (communication, work load, supervision). i Problematic course items; can resources be used better? Course-specific specific questions in questionnaire; other material for final meeting? Notes are published on course website..

Final meeting Takes place in week 4 of the subsequent study period. Examination complete, questionnaire summarized. More attendees: representatives for programme, department and student union. Summarizing judgment. Goal fulfilment. Organisation and pedagogy. Study climate. Desirable changes for next year. Link to minutes from course plan in student portal.