UC San Diego - WASC Exhibit 7.1 Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators

Similar documents
Natural Sciences, B.S.

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

The Ohio State University. Colleges of the Arts and Sciences. Bachelor of Science Degree Requirements. The Aim of the Arts and Sciences

INDIVIDUALIZED STUDY, BIS

EQuIP Review Feedback

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Undergraduate Program Guide. Bachelor of Science. Computer Science DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE and ENGINEERING

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO Transfer Credit Agreement Catalog

SOC 175. Australian Society. Contents. S3 External Sociology

Faculty of Social Sciences

2012 Transferable Courses BELLEVUE COLLEGE

American Studies Ph.D. Timeline and Requirements

Course Syllabus Art History II ARTS 1304

University of Alabama in Huntsville

Sociology. M.A. Sociology. About the Program. Academic Regulations. M.A. Sociology with Concentration in Quantitative Methodology.

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

URBANIZATION & COMMUNITY Sociology 420 M/W 10:00 a.m. 11:50 a.m. SRTC 162

Foreign Languages. Foreign Languages, General

Timeline. Recommendations

B.S/M.A in Mathematics

2011 Transferable Courses BELLEVUE COLLEGE

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES

EGRHS Course Fair. Science & Math AP & IB Courses

PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND KINESIOLOGY

GETTING READY FOR THE U A GUIDE FOR TRANSFERRING TO THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH FOR BYU-IDAHO STUDENTS

Wright State University

Palmetto College University of South Carolina Columbia, SC (803) BACHELOR OF ARTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF STUDY

Appendix. Journal Title Times Peer Review Qualitative Referenced Authority* Quantitative Studies

Inquiry Learning Methodologies and the Disposition to Energy Systems Problem Solving

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

BME 198A: SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT I Biomedical, Chemical, and Materials Engineering Department College of Engineering, San José State University

Program Change Proposal:

Partners in education!

College of Liberal Arts (CLA)

August 30, Dear Dean Clover:

Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse

Using Team-based learning for the Career Research Project. Francine White. LaGuardia Community College

Linguistics. Undergraduate. Departmental Honors. Graduate. Faculty. Linguistics 1

IMPLEMENTING THE EARLY YEARS LEARNING FRAMEWORK

DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS

School of Languages, Literature and Cultures

Linguistics. The School of Humanities

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

MAJORS, MINORS AND CERTIFICATES

College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science

Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

Taxonomy of the cognitive domain: An example of architectural education program

INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES FIELD MAJOR APPLICATION TO DECLARE

Fashion Design Program Articulation

English Policy Statement and Syllabus Fall 2017 MW 10:00 12:00 TT 12:15 1:00 F 9:00 11:00

Introduction to Psychology

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Objective Research? Information Literacy Instruction Perspectives

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Refer to the MAP website ( for specific textbook and lab kit requirements.

UW Colleges to UW Oshkosh

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

Doctor of Philosophy in Theology

1. Programme title and designation International Management N/A

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Majors, Minors & Certificate Programs 34 The Majors 35 The Minors & Certificate Programs 36

INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES FIELD MAJOR APPLICATION TO DECLARE

CERTIFICATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN CONTINUING EDUCATION. Relevant QAA subject benchmarking group:

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Anthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15)

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

GETTING READY FOR THE U A GUIDE FOR TRANSFERRING TO THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH FOR BYU-IDAHO STUDENTS. How To Use This Guide.

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Teaching Task Rewrite. Teaching Task: Rewrite the Teaching Task: What is the theme of the poem Mother to Son?

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

SYLLABUS: RURAL SOCIOLOGY 1500 INTRODUCTION TO RURAL SOCIOLOGY SPRING 2017

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

COSI Meet the Majors Fall 17. Prof. Mitch Cherniack Undergraduate Advising Head (UAH), COSI Fall '17: Instructor COSI 29a

Mini Lesson Ideas for Expository Writing

Monticello Community School District K 12th Grade. Spanish Standards and Benchmarks

MAJORS, OPTIONS, AND DEGREES

BSc (Hons) Marketing

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

Drs Rachel Patrick, Emily Gray, Nikki Moodie School of Education, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

THE WEB 2.0 AS A PLATFORM FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SKILLS, IMPROVE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND DESIGNER CAREER PROMOTION IN THE UNIVERSITY

Global Convention on Coaching: Together Envisaging a Future for coaching

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Biological Sciences (BS): Ecology, Evolution, & Conservation Biology (17BIOSCBS-17BIOSCEEC)

Health and Human Physiology, B.A.

Number/Type Term Minimum Contact Term Maximum Contact 11-Week Term Contact. Discussion, quiz, projects. Discussion, quiz, projects

CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING: ENG 200H-D01 - Spring 2017 TR 10:45-12:15 p.m., HH 205

Transcription:

What are these? Formal Skills A two-course requirement including any lower-division calculus, symbolic logic, computer programming and/or statistics from the following list: MATH 3C, 4C, 10A or 20A; 10B or 20B, 11; PHIL 10, 12; PYSC 60, 70; POLI 30; SOCI 60; LIGN 17; MAE 5; CSE 3, 5A, 8A, 8B, 11; COGS 3, 8, 14A, 14B; ECE 15, 25, 85; NANO/CENG 15. These courses may overlap with major, minor, or applicable Program of Concentration requirements. Successful completion of the two-course formal skills requirement will: Enable students to understand the use of mathematical, symbolic logic of statistical inference, and acquire a broad knowledge of technical education. Require students to develop skills in problem-solving and quantitative reasoning using mathematical or symbolic concepts and techniques. Outcomes for the formal skills requirement are assessed through: Several modes of evaluating the perceived success of the course are utilized: CAPE evaluations. Department faculty determines level of students academic performance and post a final grade based on grading procedures involving exams, assignments and other evaluative measures. To reevaluate the structure and effectiveness of course requirements and the tools of learning and to improve them to ensure more effectual learning results. web site

What are these? Ethics and Society A two -course requirement PHIL 27 or POLI 27 and PHIL 28 or POLI 28 that must be taken after completion of WCWP 10A-10B or WCWP 11A-B. The courses may not overlap with any other college GE or major requirements. Students who complete this course should be able to: Write clear, rigorous, and coherent essays on basic ethical issues in which different positions and arguments are explained, compared, and evaluated. Understand argumentative texts and put the key arguments into their own terms. Speak and converse with others, taking their own independent position on key issues such as abortion, professional ethics, affirmative action, and gender equity while learning to grasp and respect the positions of others. web site Graded essays in which students are required to explain and evaluate rival arguments on key issues and show that their knowledge is based upon references to the texts, not just lecture material. A program of exams and comprehension quizzes given in lecture and discussion sections. Oral presentation in discussion sections which measure students ability to present ideas and arguments verbally, and interact with others in a classroom setting. Several modes of evaluating the perceived success of the course are utilized: CAPE evaluations. End of course evaluations to determine if student writing and argumentation abilities have improved. Weekly instructor-led meetings with the teaching assistants to evaluate their effectiveness and the effectiveness of discussion sections. The evidence is evaluated by the course instructor, teaching assistants, and the Warren College Provost. Additionally, the Executive other periodic faculty review committees, such as those convened during an EPC review, evaluate the Ethics and Society courses. Process: Critical evaluation of student improvement and the effectiveness of the course in creating improved writing and speaking skills in critical argument. To reevaluate the structure and effectiveness of course requirements and the tools of learning and to improve them to ensure more effectual learning results.

What are these? Area Studies Students who are declared B.S. Engineering majors must complete two Area Studies, one in the humanities/fine arts and one in the social sciences. Each of these Area Studies consists of three courses, one lower-division and two upper division chosen from two disciplines. Expected will enable students to: Have exposure to two subject matter disciplines outside their primary area of study. Gain basic knowledge of the richness of our cultural heritage from a variety of educational perspectives including History, Literature, Music, Philosophy, Theatre and Dance, or Visual Arts. Develop appreciation and understanding of the complexities of the human experience through a variety of disciplines including: Anthropology, Communication, Ethnic Studies, Human Development, Linguistics, Political Science, Psychology, Sociology, and Urban Studies and Planning. Students enroll in any three courses from a single department or choose Interdisciplinary Programs (courses from a variety of departments and categories) Two of the three must be upper-division. Also, students have the option of choosing a department minor(s) if the classes selected meet the college s rule on non-contiguity. Outcomes for the requirement are assessed through: The Warren Executive Committee of the Faculty periodically reviews existing Area Studies offerings. The college s Provost and Executive Committee of the Faculty review all requests for GE petition exceptions, and take appropriate action as needed. The Educational Policy Committee periodically reviews all college requirements. The Warren academic advising staff has responsibility for: Monitoring student compliance with the college s non-contiguity rule. Reviewing and approving student course selections to ensure disciplinary breadth in the three required disciplines: Humanities & Fine Arts; Natural Sciences, Math & Engineering; and Social Sciences. Developing and maintaining a quarterly database of Area Studies by disciplinary areas. Generating Area Studies reports quarterly and annually. The Warren Executive other faculty periodically review all requirements to determine if changes are warranted. web site

What are these? Programs of Concentration Students pursuing majors other than a bachelor of science in engineering are required to complete two focused collection of courses (a total of twelve courses, six in each area) outside the areas of their majors. The major combined with the two Programs of Concentration must represent three disciplines: Humanities & Fine Arts, Natural Sciences, and Social Sciences to ensure that students: Have significant exposure to subject matter disciplines outside their primary area of study. Demonstrate basic knowledge of the richness of our cultural heritage from a variety of educational perspectives including History, Literature, Music, Philosophy, Theatre and Dance, or Visual Arts. Develop appreciation and understanding of the complexities of the human experience through a variety of disciplines including: Anthropology; Communication; Economics; Ethnic Studies; Human Development; Linguistics; Political Science; Psychology; Sociology; and Urban Studies and Planning. Students enroll in any six courses from a single department or choose Interdisciplinary Programs (courses from a variety of departments and categories). Three of the six must be upperdivision. Also, students have the option of choosing a department minor(s) if the classes selected meet the college s rule on non-contiguity. Outcomes for the requirement are assessed through: The Warren Executive Committee of the Faculty periodically reviews existing Programs of Concentration offerings. The college s Provost and Executive Committee of the Faculty review all requests for GE petition exceptions, and take appropriate action as needed. The Education Policy Committee periodically reviews all college requirements. The Warren academic advising staff has responsibility for: Monitoring student compliance with the college s rule non-contiguity rule. Reviewing and approving student course selections to ensure disciplinary breadth in the three required disciplines: Humanities & Fine Arts; Natural Sciences, Math & Engineering; and Social Sciences. Developing and maintaining a quarterly database of Programs of Concentration by disciplinary areas. Generating Programs of Concentration reports quarterly and annually. The college Executive other faculty periodically review all requirements to determine if changes are warranted. Comprehend and gain broad general knowledge of biological and natural sciences including: Chemistry, Physics, Environmental Sciences, and Oceanography; and the application of basic technical skills. web site

What are these? WARR 11A-B (Scholars Seminar) WARR 11A-B (Scholars Seminar) is a two-course sequence for first-year students in the Honors Program. The purpose of the sequence is to develop students critical thinking, reading, and writing skills and to prepare them for rigorous academic work across disciplines. More specifically, students learn to: Read challenging literary texts with sensitivity and care. Read complex academic texts critically and analytically. Understand the academic approaches of a variety of disciplines. Develop the skills of summary, interpretation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation, research, and response. Understand the construction of an academic argument by formulating thoughtful interpretations and tenable claims, and making convincing use of supporting evidence. Negotiate the writing process effectively from brainstorming for ideas to polishing a final draft. Graded essays. Modified portfolio assessment: includes all writing assignments. Oral presentation: measures students ability to present ideas and arguments verbally and to respond to questions and counter-arguments. Student conferences: one-on-one student meetings with the course instructor and student instructional assistants to discuss written work. Exit surveys: evaluation by students of the course and instructor. The course instructor holds weekly meetings with student instructional assistants to assess the effectiveness of writing exercises and class discussions. The course instructor works with the student instructional assistants on an ongoing basis to assess student engagement and improvement, and to review the effectiveness of the course in developing students critical thinking, reading, and writing skills. The course instructor and the Provost evaluate evidence of student achievement and course success. Additionally, faculty review committees such as those convened during a review may evaluate the course. The course instructor works with the Provost to revise the curriculum and course materials as might be indicated upon review. To promote more effective pedagogical approaches and to determine areas in which students may need additional support and instruction. To assist the course instructor and student instructional assistants in improving their methods of responding to student work. To provide direction for changes in the course curriculum: new course themes, appropriate reading materials, and the redesign of writing prompts. Honors Program website Scholars Seminar brochure Syllabus