Rubrics Review RUBRICS FOR MAJOR PROJECT EVALUATION Review # Agenda Assessment Review Over all Assess Weightage ment Weight age Review 1 Review 2 Project Synopsis/ Rubric R1 Proposal (30) 25% Evaluation Mid-Term Project Rubric R2 Evaluation (30) AVG Review 3 End Semester Rubric R3 Project Evaluation (30) (R1,R2,R3, R4,R5) Review 4 Project Report Rubric R4 Evaluation (30) (50) Review 5 Evaluation by Rubric R5 Guide (30) External Evaluation (150) (150) Total 100% 100% (200) (200)
Rubrics for Project Evaluation Rubric #R1: Project Synopsis/ Proposal Evaluation Maximum Marks * : 30 Level of Achievement a Identificatio n of Problem Domain and Detailed Analysis Excellent (10) Good (8) Average Acceptable Unacceptable Score (6) (4) (2) Detailed and extensive explanation of the purpose and need of the project Good Average Moderate Minimal explanation explanation explanation explanation of of the of the of the the purpose purpose and purpose purpose and and need of need of the and need of need of the the project project the project; project b Study of the Detailed and Collects a Mopderate Explanation Minimal Existing extensive great deal of study of the of the explanation of Systems and explanation information existing specifications the Feasibility of of the and good systems; and the specifications specifications Project study of the collects limitations of and the and the Proposal limitations of existing some basic the existing limitations of the existing systems; information systems not the existing systems very systems; satisfactory; incomplete limited information information c Objectives All and Methodology of the Proposed Work using SPEED (student platform for Engineering education development ) format objectives of the proposed work are well defined; Steps to be followed to solve the defined problem are clearly specified Good justification to the objectives; Methodology to be followed is specified but detailing is not done Incomplete justification to the objectives proposed; Steps are mentioned but unclear; without justification to objectives Only Some objectives of the proposed work are well defined; Steps to be followed to solve the defined problem are not specified properly Objectives of the proposed work are either not identified or not well defined; Incomplete and improper specification
Rubrics for Project Evaluation Maximum Marks * : 30 Rubric #R2: Mid-term Project Evaluation Level of Achievement Excellent (10) Good (8) Average (6) Acceptabl Unacceptab e l Sco (4) e (2) re a Design Divison of Divison of Divison of Partial Modular Methodolo problem into problem into problem into divison of approach not gy modules and modules and modules but problem adopted good selection good selection inappropriat e into Design of computing of computing selection of modules methodolog y framework framework computing and not defined Appropriate Design framework inappropria design methodology Design te selection methodology not properly methodology of and properly justified not defined computing justification properly framework Design methodolo gy not defined properly project work work inappropriat e Planning of Time frame Time frame Time frame Time Time frame Project properly properly properly frame not properly Work and specified and specified and specified, but properly specified Team being being not being specified, In- Structure followed followed followed but not appropriate Appropriate Distribution Distribution being distribution distribution of of project of project followed of project work uneven Un-even work distributio n of project work and no synchroni z ation
Rubrics for Project Evaluation c Demonstar Objectives Objectives Objectives No Objectives objectives tion and achieved as achieved as achieved as not achieved Presentatio per time per time per time achieved Contents of n frame frame frame as per time presentations Contents of Contents of Contents of frame are not Contents presentations presentations presentations of appropriate are are are presentatio and not well appropriate appropriate appropriate ns are not delivered and well but not well but not well appropriat e Poor delivery arranged arranged arranged Eye contact of Proper eye Satisfactory Presentation with few presentation contact with demonstratio n not people and audience and, clear voice satisfactory unclear clear voice with good and average voice with good spoken demonstratio n spoken language but language eye contact not proper
Rubrics for Project Evaluation Maximum Marks * : 30 Rubric #R3: End Semester Internal Project Evaluation Level of Achievement Excellen Good Averag Unacceptab t (8) e Accepta l (10) (6) ble (4) e (2) a Incorporation Changes Changes All major Few Suggestions of Suggestions are made are made changes changes during mid as per as per are made are made term modificat i modificat i as per as per evaluation are ons ons modificat modifica not suggeste suggeste d d ions tions incorporated during during suggested suggeste mid term mid term during d during evaluatio n evaluatio n mid term mid term and new and good evaluatio evaluati o innovatio justificati n n ns added on b Project All All All Some of Defined Demonstratio n defined defined defined the objectives objective s objective s objective defined are not are are s are objectiv e achieved achieved achieved achieved s are Modules are Each Each Modules achieved not in proper module module are Modules working working working working are form that well and well and well in working further leads properly properly isolation well in to failure of demonstr a demonstr a and isolation integrated ted ted properly and system All Integrati o demonst r properly demonst modules n of all ated r Score
of project modules Modules ated are well not done of project Modules integrate d and are not of and system properly project system working integrate are not working is not d properl y is veey integrat accurate satisfacto r ed y
Rubrics for Project Evaluation c Presentation Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents of of of of of presentations presenta presentati presentati presentat t are not ons are ons are ions are ions are appropriate appropria appropria appropri not and not well te and te and ate but appropri delivered well well not well ate Poor delivered delivered delivered Eye delivery of Proper Clear Eye contact presentation eye voice contact with contact with good with few few with spoken people people audience language and and and clear but less unclear unclear voice eye voice voice with contact good with spoken audience language
Maximum Marks * : 30 Rubric #R4: Project Report Evaluation Rubrics for Project Evaluation Excellent (10) Good (8) Average (6) Acceptable Unacceptable Score (4) (2) a Project Project report Project report Project report Project Project report Report is according to is according is according to report is not prepared the specified to the the specified not fully according to format specified format but according the specified References and format some mistakes to the format citations are References In-sufficient specified References appropriate and citations references and format and citations and well are citations In- are not mentioned appropriate sufficient appropriate but not references mentioned and well citations b Descript Complete Complete Complete All key Inapproiate ion of explanation of explanation explanation concepts explanation Concept the key of the key of the key are not of the key s and concepts concepts concepts but explained concepts Technic Strong In-sufficient little and very Poor al description of description relevance to little description of Details the technical of the literature relevance the technical requirements technical In-sufficient to requirements of the project requirements description of literature of the project of the the technical Inproject requirements sufficient of the project description of the technical requireme nts of the project c Conclusi Results are Results are Results Results Results are not on and presented in presented in presented are presented presented Discussi very good manner not much are not properly on appropriate Project work satisfactory much Project work manner summary and Project work satisfactory is not Project work is conclusion summary and Project summarized well not very conclusion not work and concluded summarized appropriate very summary Future and concluded Future appropriate and extensions in
Future extensions in Future conclusion the project extensions in the project extensions in not very are not the project are are specified the project are appropriate specified well specified specified Future extensions in the project are not specified
Maximum Marks * : 30 Rubric #R5: Evaluation by Guide Level of Achievement Rubrics for Project Evaluation Excellent (15) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score (10) (5) a Self Approaches the Completes Lacks self Motivation project with self- the project motivation and and motivation and but determination Determination follows it through to sometimes completion lacks self- motivation b Working Collaborates and Exchanges Makes little or within a Team communicates in a some views no attempt to group situation and but requires collaborate in a integrates the views guidance to group situation of others collaborate with others. c Technical Extensive knowledge Fair Lacks Knowledge related to the project knowledge sufficient and related to knowledge Awareness the project related to the Project Level of Achievement Excellent Good (12) Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Score (15) (10) (6) d Regularity Reports Not very Reports to Irregular in to the regular the guide attendance and guide but but lacks inconsistent in regularly consistent consistency work and in the consistent work in work