raıs Factors affecting word learning in adults: A comparison of L2 versus L1 acquisition /r/ /aı/ /s/ /r/ /aı/ /s/ = individual sound

Similar documents
Phonological and Phonetic Representations: The Case of Neutralization

The Perception of Nasalized Vowels in American English: An Investigation of On-line Use of Vowel Nasalization in Lexical Access

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Improved Effects of Word-Retrieval Treatments Subsequent to Addition of the Orthographic Form

Teacher: Mlle PERCHE Maeva High School: Lycée Charles Poncet, Cluses (74) Level: Seconde i.e year old students

English Language and Applied Linguistics. Module Descriptions 2017/18

Effects of Open-Set and Closed-Set Task Demands on Spoken Word Recognition

Effect of Word Complexity on L2 Vocabulary Learning

Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience

Different Task Type and the Perception of the English Interdental Fricatives

Inhibitory control in L2 phonological processing

Learners Use Word-Level Statistics in Phonetic Category Acquisition

THE INFLUENCE OF TASK DEMANDS ON FAMILIARITY EFFECTS IN VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION: A COHORT MODEL PERSPECTIVE DISSERTATION

**Note: this is slightly different from the original (mainly in format). I would be happy to send you a hard copy.**

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

Language Acquisition Chart

Effects of Vocabulary and Phonotactic Probability on 2-Year-Olds Nonword Repetition

Speech Perception in Dyslexic Children. With and Without Language Impairments. Franklin R. Manis. University of Southern California.

Presentation Format Effects in a Levels-of-Processing Task

5/26/12. Adult L3 learners who are re- learning their L1: heritage speakers A growing trend in American colleges

The influence of orthographic transparency on word recognition. by dyslexic and normal readers

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Automatization and orthographic development in second language visual word recognition

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

Universal contrastive analysis as a learning principle in CAPT

Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage?

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

DEPARTMENT OF JAPANESE LANGUAGE AND STUDIES

Linguistics 220 Phonology: distributions and the concept of the phoneme. John Alderete, Simon Fraser University

Beeson, P. M. (1999). Treating acquired writing impairment. Aphasiology, 13,

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

Exploring Dyslexics Phonological Deficit I: Lexical vs Sub-lexical and Input vs Output Processes

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

Dyslexia/dyslexic, 3, 9, 24, 97, 187, 189, 206, 217, , , 367, , , 397,

Revisiting the role of prosody in early language acquisition. Megha Sundara UCLA Phonetics Lab

Pobrane z czasopisma New Horizons in English Studies Data: 18/11/ :52:20. New Horizons in English Studies 1/2016

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

Age Effects on Syntactic Control in. Second Language Learning

On the nature of voicing assimilation(s)

A joint model of word segmentation and meaning acquisition through crosssituational

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

Falling on Sensitive Ears

Stages of Literacy Ros Lugg

21st Century Community Learning Center

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

The ABCs of O-G. Materials Catalog. Skills Workbook. Lesson Plans for Teaching The Orton-Gillingham Approach in Reading and Spelling

Special Education December Count Webinar Training Colorado Department of Education

LEXICAL CATEGORY ACQUISITION VIA NONADJACENT DEPENDENCIES IN CONTEXT: EVIDENCE OF DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGE AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES.

An Evaluation of the Interactive-Activation Model Using Masked Partial-Word Priming. Jason R. Perry. University of Western Ontario. Stephen J.

MD, USA Published online: 03 Jan 2014.

Probabilistic principles in unsupervised learning of visual structure: human data and a model

L1 and L2 acquisition. Holger Diessel

Intervening to alleviate word-finding difficulties in children: case series data and a computational modelling foundation

Perceptual foundations of bilingual acquisition in infancy

ABSTRACT. Some children with speech sound disorders (SSD) have difficulty with literacyrelated

Demonstration of problems of lexical stress on the pronunciation Turkish English teachers and teacher trainees by computer

Ling/Span/Fren/Ger/Educ 466: SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. Spring 2011 (Tuesdays 4-6:30; Psychology 251)

1. REFLEXES: Ask questions about coughing, swallowing, of water as fast as possible (note! Not suitable for all

DIRECT CERTIFICATION AND THE COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY PROVISION (CEP) HOW DO THEY WORK?

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Paul Nation. The role of the first language in foreign language learning

Eli Yamamoto, Satoshi Nakamura, Kiyohiro Shikano. Graduate School of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science & Technology

Rhythm-typology revisited.

Communicative signals promote abstract rule learning by 7-month-old infants

Recommended Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Children with Learning Disabilities

NAME: East Carolina University PSYC Developmental Psychology Dr. Eppler & Dr. Ironsmith

Sensitivity to second language argument structure

Linguistics. The School of Humanities

Tears. Measurement - Capacity Make A Rhyme. Draw and Write. Life Science *Sign in. Notebooks OBJ: To introduce capacity, *Pledge of

5. Margi (Chadic, Nigeria): H, L, R (Williams 1973, Hoffmann 1963)

A Cross-language Corpus for Studying the Phonetics and Phonology of Prominence

Language Acquisition by Identical vs. Fraternal SLI Twins * Karin Stromswold & Jay I. Rifkin

STUDIES WITH FABRICATED SWITCHBOARD DATA: EXPLORING SOURCES OF MODEL-DATA MISMATCH

To appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING. Kazuya Saito. Birkbeck, University of London

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Journal of Phonetics

Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers

Investigating speech perception in children with dyslexia: is there evidence of a. consistent deficit in individuals? Abstract

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

MASTER OF SCIENCE (M.S.) MAJOR IN COMPUTER SCIENCE

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

The Bruins I.C.E. School

Levels of processing: Qualitative differences or task-demand differences?

Learning Methods in Multilingual Speech Recognition

Linguistics. Undergraduate. Departmental Honors. Graduate. Faculty. Linguistics 1

Phonetic imitation of L2 vowels in a rapid shadowing task. Arkadiusz Rojczyk. University of Silesia

The Representation of Concrete and Abstract Concepts: Categorical vs. Associative Relationships. Jingyi Geng and Tatiana T. Schnur

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

The Acquisition of English Intonation by Native Greek Speakers

Perceptual processing of partially and fully assimilated words in French

Quarterly Progress and Status Report. Voiced-voiceless distinction in alaryngeal speech - acoustic and articula

NCU IISR English-Korean and English-Chinese Named Entity Transliteration Using Different Grapheme Segmentation Approaches

Transcription:

1 Factors affecting word learning in adults: A comparison of L2 versus L1 acquisition Junko Maekawa & Holly L. Storkel University of Kansas Lexical raıs /r/ /aı/ /s/ 2 = meaning Lexical raıs Lexical raıs = word as a whole unit /r/ /aı/ /s/ /r/ /aı/ /s/ 3 4 = meaning Lexical raıs Lexical raıs = word as a whole unit /r/ /aı/ /s/ = individual sound /r/ /aı/ /s/ = individual sound 5 6

7 L2 acquisition level L2 acquisition level Lexical level /raıs/ or /laıs/?? level /r/ or /l/?? Lexical level /raıs/ or /laıs/?? level /r/ or /l/?? 8 and Lexical Levels (L1) L1 studies of English speaking children Word learning strongly related to phonological knowledge vs. sounds correctly produced sounds incorrectly produced sounds Word learning Early Stage: > (Leonard et al. 1981) Later Stage: < (Storkel, 2004) and Lexical Levels (L2) L2 lexical representations are constrained by familiarity with L2 phonological pattern short-term memory Nonword repetition (e.g., Speciale et al., 2004) Perceptual difficulties (Cutler et al., 2006) Mapping between phonetic information and word recognition Eye-tracking /r-l/ for L1J-L2E 9 10 L2-L1 Mapping Non-native sound discrimination Language-universal Language-specific L1 influence e.g., Best et al. (1988), Goto (1971), Trehub (1976), Werker & Tees (1983, 1984) L2-L1 Mapping L1 Japanese L2 English speakers (Guion et al., 2000) Identification of English consonants in terms of Japanese categories : categorized as a single Japanese consonant : categorized as more than one Japanese consonant /t, s, w, v, b/ /r, l, θ/ 11 12

13 Question Is L2 word learning influenced by the speaker s phonological knowledge of the target sounds ( vs. ) in the word? Participants L1 Japanese L2 English N = 24 Ages: 19-33 Native English (control) N = 24 Ages: 18-32 High English proficiency English monolingual Normal speech, hearing, and cognition Normal speech, hearing, and cognition 14 Target Consonants vs. : s t w : r l θ Target Verification Perception and production of target sounds L1 Japanese: > NE English: = Substitution patterns for sounds recorded for each participant 15 16 Auditory stimuli Visual stimuli (Kroll & Potter, 1984) 4 CVC nonwords for each target consonant sig ruk Type s, t, w r, l, θ Nonwords suz, sig, seb, saıp tid, top, tut, tok wat, wεn, wıd, wis rog, ris, rem, ruk lεf, lut, las, lop θæk, θıp, θεd, θæt 17 18

19 Exposure Exposure script This is a ruk. Say ruk. Find the ruk. Yes, that s the ruk. Referent Identification Measure Picture choice 4 pictures (target + 3 foils) Scoring correct / incorrect 1 2 representations 3 4 23

25 Picture Naming Measure Scoring Correct if 3/3 phonemes are produced correctly words: mispronunciation accepted as correct if followed the substitution patterns in the production probe for each participant Lexical representations Repeated exposure-test paradigm Referent ID vs. Baseline 3 cycles 1 week post L1 Japanese Native English Exposure Test (RefID, Naming) Retention 1 week post-exposure test (RefID, Naming) 27 28 Picture Naming vs. Results by task L1 Japanese Native English Ref ID: L1 Japanese = Native English Type: = (L1 J & NE) : cycle 1 < cycle 2 < cycle 3 > 1-week post Picture Naming: L1 Japanese Native English Type: > (L1 J) = (NE) : cycle 1 < cycle 2 < cycle 3 > 1-week post 29 30

31 Group comparisons Ref ID (semantic) : L1 Japanese = Native English : L1 Japanese = Native English Picture Naming (lexical) : L1 Japanese = Native English : L1 Japanese < Native English (p =.001) Conclusion knowledge influences L2 word learning. Group difference only for picture naming words L1 Japanese: > only for picture naming Affects lexical representations (picture naming) Does not affect semantic representations (RefID) 32 Implications L2-L1 phonological mapping can be extended to L2 word learning. Assessment/Instruction Use of perceptual information to predict L2 vocabulary learning Perceptual training to improve L2 word learning Monitor retention Thank you! NIDCD 06545 Joan Sereno, Alison Gabriele, Sanae Eda Word and Sound Learning Lab staff Contact information: Junko Maekawa: junko@ku.edu www.ku.edu/~wrdlrng 33 34