ANNUAL REPORT of the ACM Education Policy Committee For the Period: July 1, June 30, 2016 Submitted by Jeffrey Forbes, Chair

Similar documents
Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Changing the face of science and technology. DIVISION OF SOCIAL SCIENCES ISEE. Institute for Scientist & Engineer Educators

Sharing Information on Progress. Steinbeis University Berlin - Institute Corporate Responsibility Management. Report no. 2

Developing Regional Work-Based Learning

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

UH STEM Pathways Project

Designing Propagation Plans to Promote Sustained Adoption of Educational Innovations

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

Creating Collaborative Partnerships: The Success Stories and Challenges

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING. Version: 14 November 2017

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Regional Capacity-Building on ICT for Development Item 7 Third Session of Committee on ICT 21 November, 2012 Bangkok

Evaluating Progress NGA Center for Best Practices STEM Summit

SUPPORTING COMMUNITY COLLEGE DELIVERY OF APPRENTICESHIPS

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

University of Toronto

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

Open Sharing, Global Benefits The OpenCourseWare Consortium

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Interview on Quality Education

Strategic Plan Revised November 2012 Reviewed and Updated July 2014

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

DNV GL Joint Industry Project: Decision Support for Dynamic Barrier Management

Examples of Individual Development Plans (IDPs)

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

InTraServ. Dissemination Plan INFORMATION SOCIETY TECHNOLOGIES (IST) PROGRAMME. Intelligent Training Service for Management Training in SMEs

Final. Developing Minority Biomedical Research Talent in Psychology: The APA/NIGMS Project

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Supplemental Focus Guide

Texas Healthcare & Bioscience Institute

Rachel Edmondson Adult Learner Analyst Jaci Leonard, UIC Analyst

Upward Bound Program

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

DVANCING BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH TRAINING ADVANCING BIOMEDICAL Lead RESEARCH TRAINING

September 6-8. San Francisco, California 1

All Hands on Deck! Engaging Faculty Voices to Rise Above the Storm!

What It Means to Be a Professional Development School

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Purdue University Teacher Education Council (TEC) Meeting Minutes February 9, 2005

Duke University FACULTY HANDBOOK THE

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

BLACKBOARD & ANGEL LEARNING FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. Introduction... 2

The Policymaking Process Course Syllabus

JANIE HODGE, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Special Education 225 Holtzendorff Clemson University

Charlotte Chamber. Diversity/Inclusion

State Parental Involvement Plan

Summarizing Webinar Protocol and Guide for Facilitators

Developing skills through work integrated learning: important or unimportant? A Research Paper

Research Brief. Literacy across the High School Curriculum

Multidisciplinary Engineering Systems 2 nd and 3rd Year College-Wide Courses

EDELINA M. BURCIAGA 3151 Social Science Plaza Irvine, CA

Resume. Christine Ann Loucks Telephone: (208) (work)

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

Free online professional development course for practicing agents and new counsellors.

District Advisory Committee. October 27, 2015

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: WHAT WORKS? WHO BENEFITS? Harry J. Holzer Georgetown University The Urban Institute February 2010

NC Global-Ready Schools

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

ELIZABETH L. HAMEL, MSW BILINGUAL ENGLISH/SPANISH

Global Convention on Coaching: Together Envisaging a Future for coaching

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

EPA RESOURCE KIT: EPA RESEARCH Report Series No. 131 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN SCIENCE AND POLICY

EDUsummIT: A Global Knowledge Building Community for Educational Researchers, Practitioners, and Policy Makers

Xenia Community Schools Board of Education Goals. Approved May 12, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

BEYOND THE BLEND. Getting Learning & Development Right. By Charles Jennings

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

TENTH BOCCONI TRANSATLANTIC IP SUMMER ACADEMY. Bocconi University / University of Alicante / Magister Lvcentinvs. 5 9 September 2016

Internet Society Overview

JD Concentrations CONCENTRATIONS. J.D. students at NUSL have the option of concentrating in one or more of the following eight areas:

Internet Society (ISOC)

High School Equivalency Diploma Task Force Report & Recommendation

Adult Education ACCE Presentation. Neil Kelly February 2, 2017

Lied Scottsbluff Public Library Strategic Plan

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

NATIONAL AGENDA FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACROSS LIBRARIES, ARCHIVES, AND MUSEUMS

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

GOING GLOBAL 2018 SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

OKURA SETS UP GLOBAL BUSINESS HEADQUARTERS IN SINGAPORE

Strategic Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Measures

UNI University Wide Internship

Snipes Academy of Arts & Design School Improvement Team Meeting Agenda and Minutes Monday, February 6, 2017, at 3:00 p.m.

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Availability of Grants Largely Offset Tuition Increases for Low-Income Students, U.S. Report Says

Drs Rachel Patrick, Emily Gray, Nikki Moodie School of Education, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

International Business Principles (MKT 3400)

For Your Future. For Our Future. ULS Strategic Framework

Educational system gaps in Romania. Roberta Mihaela Stanef *, Alina Magdalena Manole

LEGO training. An educational program for vocational professions

Digital Transformation in Education. Future-Ready Skills

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Final Report: Task Force on High Impact Research. American University. May 26, 2015

Transcription:

ANNUAL REPORT of the For the Period: July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016 Submitted by Jeffrey Forbes, Chair 1. BASIC INFORMATION 1.1 COMMITTEE MEMBERS Jeffrey Forbes (Chair) Joanna Goode Susanne Hambrusch Elizabeth Hawthorne J Strother Moore Mark Nelson Kelly Powers Susan Rodger Deborah Seehorn Chris Stephenson Mark Stehlik, Senior Advisor Eugene H. Spafford (ACM U.S. Public Policy Council Chair), ex officio Fabrizio Gagliardi (ACM Europe Policy Committee Chair), ex officio Robert B. Schnabel (ACM Executive Director and CEO), ex officio Renee Dopplick (ACM Director of Public Policy), ex officio Two-year terms of current members expire June 30, 2016. 1.2 PURPOSE The (EPC) engages educators, industry, policymakers, and the public on public policy issues in computer science and computingrelated education. It focuses on steps to ensure that high-quality computer science education is identified as a critical component of education policy. It reviews, researches, and gathers data and information on issues that impact computer science and computingrelated education in primary, secondary, and higher education systems. It determines if current education policies and the education systems are adequately serving the Association for Computing Machinery 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701 New York, NY 10121-0701 Tel: +1-212-626-0500 www.acm.org acmpo@acm.org

computing field and recommends improvements. It comments on proposals before governmental bodies that impact computer science education and the computing field. It educates policymakers and the public on the foundational role and importance of computer science education, its importance as a core discipline within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, and its importance to the labor market and the economy. It provides expertise on key computer science education policy issues to education, industry, and policy leaders. 1.3 COMMITTEE MEETINGS The operates mainly through listserv discussions among the members. The held a meeting on June 24, 2016, in Washington, D.C. to discuss progress on current projects, future possible projects, and priorities for the year. Leadership from the ACM Education Board and ACM Europe participated in planning discussions for an ACM-sponsored global summit on education policy. The White House Senior Policy Advisor for Tech Inclusion provided an update on the Administration's efforts to advance computer science education, such as the Computer Science for All initiative aimed at expanding learning opportunities for students from kindergarten to high school. 2. PROJECT SUMMARY The used several strategies to achieve its mission and priorities this past year, including collaboration with other education policy stakeholders and outreach to the broader community. These actions raised the awareness of the importance of computer science and computing education. STEM Education Coalition ACM, through the Education Policy Committee, participated in the leadership Council of the STEM Education Coalition, which sets the policy agenda and overall objectives. The Coalition has 600+ affiliate members worldwide. The Coalition's Policy Forum raises awareness of the need for increased rigorous education and learning opportunities in computing and other STEM fields. This past year, the Coalition raised awareness through policy statements and reports, an e-newsletter, public events, roundtables, meetings with policy leaders, and media interviews. ACM participated in Coalition meetings with White 2

House officials. ACM participated in the Policy Forum's working group on integrating of informal education opportunities in career pathways and contributed to its report. Congressional STEM Education Caucus Advisory Committee This private-sector organization works with the Congressional STEM Education Caucus to inform policymakers about STEM education policy issues. It is comprised of public interest groups, trade associations, nonprofits, and corporations from a broad cross-section of the STEM community. It hosts regular debates for Congressional staff and the public. The Caucus also published and circulated a newsletter to Congressional Members, the Advisory Committee members, and additional relevant stakeholders. The served as a resource for speaker and topic recommendations, as well as information about computer science and computing education policy. Congressional STEM Education Caucus Briefing on the STEM Pipeline The Education Policy Committee co-organized and participated in a briefing on the "STEM Education Pipeline" hosted by the House STEM Education Caucus and attended by roughly 100 congressional staff. The briefing included speakers from ACM, the Computing Research Association, and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. The Council on Undergraduate Research moderated the discussion. The briefing explored how colleges and universities are bridging opportunity gaps and how government funding has helped to access to postsecondary education and research opportunities, expand diversity and inclusiveness, and leverage innovative initiatives and public-private collaborations to advance opportunities for students, faculty, and researchers. Comments to the National Institute of Standards and Technology on U.S. Participation in International Cybersecurity Standardization, the ACM Education Board, the ACM Education Council, and the ACM Task Force on Cybersecurity Education contributed to comments submitted by the ACM U.S. Public Policy Council to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Security Council's Cyber Interagency Policy Committee. The comments resulted in the addition of "computing" as a major academic area of technical, undergraduate, and graduate educational programs in the final interagency report on strategic U.S. participation in international cybersecurity standards. The final report also included several of our suggestions and recommendations, such as 3

including mobile technologies and explicitly recognizing professional societies as among the key stakeholders. Computer Science Education Week 2015 ACM helped promote Computer Science Education Week and the Hour of Code to its members and to the public. ACM's engagement in K-12 computer science education led to the original U.S. House of Representatives Resolution in 2009, H. Res. 558, endorsing a national Computer Science Education Week. K-12 Computer Science Framework Committee members serves as advisors to a proposed high-level framework of computer science concepts and practices for K-12 students. The effort, led by ACM, CSTA, Code.org, CIC, and NMSI, has involved more than 100 advisors within the computing community, several states and large school districts, technology companies, and other organizations. The goal of the process is to develop conceptual guidelines for states and districts creating K-12 pathways in computer science. The framework is scheduled for release in September 2016. Code.org Advisory Group ACM, through the Education Policy Committee, participated in the computing community advisory group of Code.org. The vision of Code.org is to expand access to computer science courses, improve the quality of computer science education, and train teachers to deliver engaging and quality computer science courses. Computer Science for All Steering Committee ACM participated in the steering committee for a new proposed effort to enable expanded access to computer science and support for computer science teachers. 3. PROPOSED PROJECTS The will continue its efforts on current progress and evaluate the merits of possible engagement in additional policy activities: Global Workshop on Pre-University Education Policy Continue the planning to convene a group of educators in 2017 to discuss education policy approaches in selected countries. 4

Best Practices for Diversity and Inclusiveness in Computing Education Publish best practices and guidelines for enabling diversity and inclusiveness in formal & informal educational opportunities. Community Colleges in the United States Review, research, and gather data and information on how current education systems serve students transitioning from 2- year community colleges to computing-related degree programs at 4-year colleges and universities. Policy Research Project Conduct research on the connection between computing education and jobs. Outreach Continue efforts to keep policy leaders and the ACM community informed through publications and talks. 3.1 DIVERSITY The is composed of computer scientists, educators, practitioners, researchers, and managers from industry, nonprofit organizations, and academia. The Committee engages with a broad range of stakeholders within the STEM community, the broader education community, and the policy sector. The Committee is dedicated to furthering policy approaches to promote inclusiveness at all levels of the educational pipeline and within the computing workforce. APPENDIX Address list of committee members responsible for projects. Name: Jeffrey Forbes Address: Associate Professor of the Practice Department of Computer Science Duke University Levine Science Research Center D235 Box 90129 Durham, NC 27708 USA Phone: +1 (919) 660-6550 Email: jforbes@duke.edu Responsibility within the Committee: Chair 5