Handout #8. Neutralization

Similar documents
Phonological and Phonetic Representations: The Case of Neutralization

On the nature of voicing assimilation(s)

English for Life. B e g i n n e r. Lessons 1 4 Checklist Getting Started. Student s Book 3 Date. Workbook. MultiROM. Test 1 4

Linguistics 220 Phonology: distributions and the concept of the phoneme. John Alderete, Simon Fraser University

ENGBG1 ENGBL1 Campus Linguistics. Meeting 2. Chapter 7 (Morphology) and chapter 9 (Syntax) Pia Sundqvist

The analysis starts with the phonetic vowel and consonant charts based on the dataset:

Language Acquisition by Identical vs. Fraternal SLI Twins * Karin Stromswold & Jay I. Rifkin

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

Replace difficult words for Is the language appropriate for the. younger audience. For audience?

Lexical phonology. Marc van Oostendorp. December 6, Until now, we have presented phonological theory as if it is a monolithic

INTRODUCTION TO MORPHOLOGY Mark C. Baker and Jonathan David Bobaljik. Rutgers and McGill. Draft 6 INFLECTION

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

Sample Goals and Benchmarks

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

Using a Native Language Reference Grammar as a Language Learning Tool

Dear Teacher: Welcome to Reading Rods! Reading Rods offer many outstanding features! Read on to discover how to put Reading Rods to work today!

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order *

Books Effective Literacy Y5-8 Learning Through Talk Y4-8 Switch onto Spelling Spelling Under Scrutiny

Stages of Literacy Ros Lugg

Basic concepts: words and morphemes. LING 481 Winter 2011

Context Free Grammars. Many slides from Michael Collins

On the Notion Determiner

Picture It, Dads! Facilitator Activities For. The Mitten

J j W w. Write. Name. Max Takes the Train. Handwriting Letters Jj, Ww: Words with j, w 321

2017 national curriculum tests. Key stage 1. English grammar, punctuation and spelling test mark schemes. Paper 1: spelling and Paper 2: questions

Developing Grammar in Context

Consonant Worksheets

Underlying Representations

Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes in Pak-Pak Language

Portuguese Vowel Harmony: A Comparative Analysis and the Superiority of Autosegmental Representations

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

UKLO Round Advanced solutions and marking schemes. 6 The long and short of English verbs [15 marks]

Universal Grammar 2. Universal Grammar 1. Forms and functions 1. Universal Grammar 3. Conceptual and surface structure of complex clauses

Aspectual Classes of Verb Phrases

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

Ch VI- SENTENCE PATTERNS.

Chapter 3: Semi-lexical categories. nor truly functional. As Corver and van Riemsdijk rightly point out, There is more

Formulaic Language and Fluency: ESL Teaching Applications

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Considerations for Aligning Early Grades Curriculum with the Common Core

Syntactic types of Russian expressive suffixes

The Bruins I.C.E. School

P a g e 1. Grade 5. Grant funded by:

Pobrane z czasopisma New Horizons in English Studies Data: 18/11/ :52:20. New Horizons in English Studies 1/2016

Linguistic Variation across Sports Category of Press Reportage from British Newspapers: a Diachronic Multidimensional Analysis

Natural Language Processing. George Konidaris

Rhode Island College

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

2 months: Social and Emotional Begins to smile at people Can briefly calm self (may bring hands to mouth and suck on hand) Tries to look at parent

Word Stress and Intonation: Introduction

Improved Effects of Word-Retrieval Treatments Subsequent to Addition of the Orthographic Form

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

Consonants: articulation and transcription

Quarterly Progress and Status Report. Voiced-voiceless distinction in alaryngeal speech - acoustic and articula

DOWNSTEP IN SUPYIRE* Robert Carlson Societe Internationale de Linguistique, Mali

Common Core ENGLISH GRAMMAR & Mechanics. Worksheet Generator Standard Descriptions. Grade 2

P a g e 1. Grade 4. Grant funded by: MS Exemplar Unit English Language Arts Grade 4 Edition 1

The Indian English of Tibeto-Burman language speakers*

The Acquisition of Person and Number Morphology Within the Verbal Domain in Early Greek

MUSICAL CHEERS Songs Grammar Objectives:

Program in Linguistics. Academic Year Assessment Report

Part I. Figuring out how English works

Lexia Skill Builders: Independent Student Practice

Joan Bybee, Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001,

Quantitative Reasoning in Linguistics

Parallel Evaluation in Stratal OT * Adam Baker University of Arizona

Participate in expanded conversations and respond appropriately to a variety of conversational prompts

Key stage 2. English grammar, punctuation and spelling test mark schemes. Paper 1: questions and Paper 2: spelling national curriculum tests

Presentation Exercise: Chapter 32

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

National University of Singapore Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Centre for Language Studies Academic Year 2014/2015 Semester 2

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

ELM Higher Education Workshops. I. Looking for work around the globe. What does it entail? Because careers no longer stop at the border, students will

MARK¹² Reading II (Adaptive Remediation)

We've All Been There Title

UNIT PLANNING TEMPLATE

CHILDREN S POSSESSIVE STRUCTURES: A CASE STUDY 1. Andrew Radford and Joseph Galasso, University of Essex

Adjectives tell you more about a noun (for example: the red dress ).

GRAMMATICAL MORPHEME ACQUISITION: AN ANALYSIS OF AN EFL LEARNER S LANGUAGE SAMPLES *

The Use of Inflectional Suffixes by Third Year English Undergraduates at the College of Education, University of Mosul Adday Mahmood Adday (1)

5 Day Schedule Paragraph Lesson 2: How-to-Paragraphs

Vocabulary Cycle B. Teacher s Notes

Iraqi EFL Students' Achievement In The Present Tense And Present Passive Constructions

California Treasures Combination Classrooms. A How-to Guide with Weekly Lesson Planners

NAPLAN State report: Year 3

Written by: YULI AMRIA (RRA1B210085) ABSTRACT. Key words: ability, possessive pronouns, and possessive adjectives INTRODUCTION

An Acoustic Phonetic Account of the Production of Word-Final /z/s in Central Minnesota English

Intensive English Program Southwest College

Introduction to the Revised Mathematics TEKS (2012) Module 1

(3) Vocabulary insertion targets subtrees (4) The Superset Principle A vocabulary item A associated with the feature set F can replace a subtree X

Approaches to control phenomena handout Obligatory control and morphological case: Icelandic and Basque

Hindi Aspectual Verb Complexes

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO NEW AND OLD INFORMATION IN TURKISH LOCATIVES AND EXISTENTIALS

ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES MODELING IMPROVED AMHARIC SYLLBIFICATION ALGORITHM

Transcription:

Handout #8 Neutralization

German obstruents ([-son]) [-cont, -delrel] [+lab, - cor, -back] p, b [-lab, +cor, -back] t, d [-lab, -cor, +back] k, g [-cont, +delrel] pf ts, ts [+cont, +delrel] f, v s, z, S, Z, C x

German German has voiced and voiceless obstruents, which are in contrastive distribution: taob dove (Taube) daob stave (Daube) laet n to lead (leiten) laed n to suffer (leiden) bunt colorful (f.sg.) (bunte) bund associations (Bunde)

German However, at the end of a syllable, only voiceless obstruents occur. There are words ending in voiceless obstruents. laup leaf (Laub) lit song (Lied) lik lie! (lieg) But there are no words ending in voiced obstruents.

German (Wiese 1996) This restriction leads to alternations (Period marks a syllable boundary): {at wheel (Rad) {a.d s wheel s (Rades) bunt association (Bund) bun.d associations (Bunde) lop praise (Lob) lo.b s of praise (Lobes)

German ak.tif active (aktiv) ak.ti.v active (f.sg.) (aktive) g{as grass g{a.z n graze, cut grass ja k.t n hunts (noun) ja.g n hunt (verb) {e.g n rain (noun) {ek.n n rain (verb)

German The morpheme alternants in these examples are the following: {at ~ {ad, bunt ~ bund, lop ~ lob, aktif ~ aktiv, g{as ~ g{az, ja k ~ ja g, {eg n ~ {ekn The alternant with the final voiceless obstruent (e.g. {at) occurs only before a consonant or a pause. The alternant with the final voiced obstruent (e.g. {ad) occurs only elsewhere.

German Other morphemes have nonalternating voiceless obstruents. {at advice (Rat) {a.t s of advice (Rates) bunt colorful (bunt) bun.t colorful (fem.) (bunte) There are no morphemes with nonalternating voiced obstruents.

German The distribution of voiced and voiceless obstruents in German is as follows: Voiced obstruents do not occur at the end of a syllable, but do occur elsewhere. Voiceless obstruents occur at the end of a syllable, as well as elsewhere. This is not a complementary distribution, since the two classes have overlapping distribution.

Neutralization This is a neutralization distribution. Two classes of sounds are in neutralization distribution if they are in contrastive distribution, but there is a context where one class can occur and the other can t occur. The class that can t occur in that context is the restricted class (e.g. voiced obstruents in German) The other class is the unrestricted one (e.g. voiceless obstruents in German)

Analysis of neutralization If two sounds are in neutralization distribution, they must belong to different phonemes, since they are in contrastive distribution. But there is a restriction on distribution, so there must also be a rule that affects one of the two sounds without affecting the other. The rule changes the restricted class to the unrestricted one in the context where the restricted class is disallowed.

Analysis of the German pattern Both voiced and voiceless obstruents must be included among the phonemes: /p, t, k, b, d, g, ts, ts, f, v, s, z, S, Z, C/ There is a rule (which we will call Final devoicing) neutralizing the contrast: [-son] --> [-voice]/. This rule changes the restricted class of voiced obstruents to the unrestricted class of voiceless ones at the end of a syllable.

Analysis of the German pattern The alternating morphemes are ones that end in the restricted class (voiced obstruents) in their underlying form. / {ad, bund, lob, aktiv, g{az, ja g / The nonalternating morphemes are ones ending in the unrestricted class (voiceless obstruents) in their underlying form. / {at, bunt /

Derivation Underlying representation Final devoicing /{ad/ /{ad- s / /{at/ /{at- s / /{at/ Surface representation [{at] (Rad) [{ad s] (Rades) [{at] (Rat) [{at s] (Rates)

English obstruents ([-son]) [-cont, -delrel] [+lab, - cor, -back] p, b [-lab, +cor, -back] t, d [-lab, -cor, +back] k, g [-cont, +delrel] ts, dz [+cont, +delrel] f, v T, D, s, z, S, Z

English There is a contrast between voiced and voiceless obstruents: sqp (sap) - zqp (zap) thu (too, two) - du (due) beis (base) - beiz (bays) bet / (bet) - bed (bed)

English Both voiced and voiceless obstruents occur at the end of a word after a voiced sound: belt / (belt) beld (belled) phl`s (pulse) phl`z (pulls) ba t / (Bart) ba d (bard) khç s (coarse) khç z (cores)

English Both voiced and voiceless obstruents occur at the word-medially after a voiceless sound: QfgQn (Afghan) nqp / khin (napkin) khqt / b `d (catbird) khqt / theil (cattail)

English But at the end of a word after a voiceless sound, only the voiceless obstruents occur: kh k / s (crux) is possible, but no word ends with *kz#. Qp / s (apse) is possible, but no word ends with *pz# Qk / t / (act), laft / (loft), khast / (cost) are possible, but not *kd#, *fd#, or *sd#.

English This restriction leads to alternations in various inflectional morphemes: The plural marker -(e)s: bqk / s (backs) bqgz (bags) d fs (duffs) d vz (doves) The genitive marker or verbal contraction s: dik / s (Dick s) d gz (Doug s) khqt / s (cat s) dagz (dog s)

English The past tense marker -ed: bqk / t / (backed) bqg d (bagged) khaft / (coughed) l vd (loved) The perfect marker -ed: l mp / t / (lumped) b d (rubbed)

Alternation The alternations are -s ~ -z and -t / ~ -d. The alternants with the voiceless obstruents occur only word-finally after a voiceless sound, and the other alternants occur only elsewhere. More generally: Voiced obstruents do not occur at the end of a word after a voiceless consonant, but do occur elsewhere (Restricted). Voiceless obstruents occur there, as well as elsewhere (Unrestricted).

Analysis Both voiced and voiceless obstruents must be included among the phonemes: /p, t, k, b, d, g, ts, dz, f, v, T, D, s, z, S, Z/ Rule (Final devoicing): [-son] --> [-voice] / [-voice] # The underlying representation of the alternating morphemes must be the ones with restricted sounds (the voiced obstruents). /-z, -d/

Derivations Underlying representation /lqf - z/ /l v - z/ Final devoicing /lqfs/ Surface representation [lqfs] [l vz]

Complementary and neutralization distribution Both complementary and neutralization distribution involve two sets of sounds - one restricted and one unrestricted. The restricted class of sounds in a complementary distribution does not occur anywhere except one position. For the restricted class in a neutralization distribution, there is just one position where it does not occur.

Complementary and neutralization distribution The unrestricted class of sounds in a complementary distribution is subject to one restriction - it can t occur in the context that the restricted sounds occur in. So in a complementary distribution the unrestricted class is less restricted than the restricted class - it occurs in a broader range of contexts. In a neutralization distribution the unrestricted class is truly unrestricted.

Complementary and neutralization distribution In either kind of distribution, a phonological rule expresses the restriction, by changing a class of sounds that doesn t occur in a context into the class that does occur there. In a complementary distribution, the change is from the unrestricted class (the default) to the restricted class. In a neutralization distribution, the change is from the restricted class to the unrestricted.

References Wiese, R. (1996). The Phonology of German. Oxford University Press, Oxford.