Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada

Similar documents
Abu Dhabi Indian. Parent Survey Results

Aalya School. Parent Survey Results

DOES OUR EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ENHANCE CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION AMONG GIFTED STUDENTS?

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

PROFESSIONAL TREATMENT OF TEACHERS AND STUDENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. James B. Chapman. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia

Effective Pre-school and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11)

Application Form for a Provisional License

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

GradinG SyStem IE-SMU MBA

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Verification Program Health Authority Abu Dhabi

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

Post-intervention multi-informant survey on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) on disability and inclusive education

National Survey of Student Engagement

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

Probability and Statistics Curriculum Pacing Guide

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Australia s tertiary education sector

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2

What effect does science club have on pupil attitudes, engagement and attainment? Dr S.J. Nolan, The Perse School, June 2014

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

UNESCO Bangkok Asia-Pacific Programme of Education for All. Embracing Diversity: Toolkit for Creating Inclusive Learning-Friendly Environments

Simple Random Sample (SRS) & Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: A Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: Systematic Sample Best Used When

Cooking Matters at the Store Evaluation: Executive Summary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report

Opinion on Private Garbage Collection in Scarborough Mixed

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Inquiry Learning Methodologies and the Disposition to Energy Systems Problem Solving

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

OPAC and User Perception in Law University Libraries in the Karnataka: A Study

Summary results (year 1-3)

NTU Student Dashboard

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Textbook Evalyation:

Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition

2. 20 % of available places are awarded to other foreign applicants.

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

ScienceDirect. Noorminshah A Iahad a *, Marva Mirabolghasemi a, Noorfa Haszlinna Mustaffa a, Muhammad Shafie Abd. Latif a, Yahya Buntat b

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

Information Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Team Dispersal. Some shaping ideas

ACBSP Related Standards: #3 Student and Stakeholder Focus #4 Measurement and Analysis of Student Learning and Performance

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Strategy for teaching communication skills in dentistry

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Personal Tutoring at Staffordshire University

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Rwanda. Out of School Children of the Population Ages Percent Out of School 10% Number Out of School 217,000

Upward Bound Program

STA 225: Introductory Statistics (CT)

Enhancing Students Understanding Statistics with TinkerPlots: Problem-Based Learning Approach

Soulbus project/jamk Part B: National tailored pilot Case Gloria, Soultraining, Summary

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Spiritual and Religious Related

School Uniform Policy. To establish guidelines for the wearing of school uniforms.

National Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

WHY GRADUATE SCHOOL? Turning Today s Technical Talent Into Tomorrow s Technology Leaders

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PARTICIPATION OF LEARNERS IN ADULT AND CONTINUING EDUCATION: THE CASE OF MATINYANI SUB-COUNTY, KITUI COUNTY, KENYA

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

A GENERIC SPLIT PROCESS MODEL FOR ASSET MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM

FULBRIGHT MASTER S AND PHD PROGRAM GRANTS APPLICATION FOR STUDY IN THE UNITED STATES

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Examinee Information. Assessment Information

2016 Annual Report to the School Community

Milton Keynes Schools Speech and Language Therapy Service. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust. Additional support for schools

Youth Mental Health First Aid Instructor Application

Irtiqa a Programme: Guide for the inspection of schools in The Emirate of Abu Dhabi

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015

Pathways to College Preparatory Advanced Academic Offerings in the Anchorage School District

Rural Education in Oregon

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Executive Summary. Colegio Catolico Notre Dame, Corp. Mr. Jose Grillo, Principal PO Box 937 Caguas, PR 00725

A LIBRARY STRATEGY FOR SUTTON 2015 TO 2019

Transcription:

Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada Parent Survey Results 2016-2017

Parent Survey Results Academic Year 2016/2017 September 2017

Research Office The Research Office conducts surveys to gather qualitative and quantitative data for research projects. Therefore, in order to collect objective, unbiased information from a representative group of stakeholders, the Research office conducts routine surveys on student, parent, teacher and principal satisfaction in addition to adhoc surveys by request from internal and external sources. Although the surveys are usually conducted to gather input and data for research projects, they may also be used as stand-alone output. This report is useful for the policy and decision makers to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the schools from the parents perspective, which will help identify the various causal forces that influence parents satisfaction with their child s schooling. We strive to make the survey results available in a variety of formats and in a language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences. If you have any comments or suggestions about this report, we would like to hear from you. Please direct your comments to the following address: Research Office, Tel: 02 6150 000 Email: adec_survey@adec.ac.ae Website: http://www.adec.ac.ae

Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the respondents and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of. The parents responses are presented the way they were received. Caution should be exercised when generalizing the results to all parents and students in the school if the response rate is low.

Table of Content Report Summary 6 Strengths and Challenges 7 Participants' Profile 8 Parent's Overall Impression 10 School Leadership 11 Quality of Learning 12 Student Academic Achievement 13 Parental Engagement 14 School Safety 15 School Health 16 School code of conduct 17 Other Issues 18 Appendix 19

P49 Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada School Type School Location Total Number of Students Total Responses Registered Confidence level* Private Abu Dhabi 1068 283 90% - 99% Confidence Level Summary Measure Overall Average Scores out of 5 Overall Relative Scores* Parent's Overall Impression 4.05 64.3% Strong Academic Achievement 4.06 36.0% Weak Quality of Learning 4.15 72.2% Strong Parental Engagement 4.12 66.8% Strong Average Score (Out of 5)* School Safety 4.29 75.4% Strong School Health 3.71 48.6% Moderate 4.04 School Code of Conduct 4.03 64.1% Strong 0.609623 Strong School Leadership 3.90 60.3% Strong How does your average score compare to similar schools?* Color Your average score is higher than: 61.0% Range 0%-19% 20%-39% 40%-59% 60%-79% 80%-100% of the similar schools Class Very Weak Weak Moderate Strong Very Strong *Given the improvement of participation rate and other factors (Refer to the appendix), schools should be cautious when comparing the overall relative scores with those of last year. 6 of 23

Strengths and Challenges This section shows the participants' top and lowest rated aspects about their child's school: Strengths 1 LRN_TCHLIK Student's feeling about his/her teachers 2 PAR_ESYCNT Communication level between parents and teachers 3 SFT_TRV Level of transportation safety to/from school 4 SFT_BULL School's role in handling bullying issues 5 LRN_TCHREL Teacher and student relationship Challenges Performance in Islamic education course 45 ACH_ISLM Performance in Arabic course 44 ACH_ARB Reporting student's absenteeism 43 PAR_ABSNT Performance in art courses 42 ACH_ART Affordability of meal price 41 HLT_PRIC 7 of 23

13 Grade Number of Parents Grade 9 35 Grade 3 32 Grade 2 24 Grade 6 23 Grade 8 23 Grade 5 Number 22 of Participants Grade 10 22 Grade 11 22 Number of Parents Grade 35 4 20 32 Grade 7 19 Grade 1 24 18 23 23 Grade 12 12 22 22 22 20 19 18 KG2 11 KG1 0 12 11 Participants' Profile Participants Distribution by Gender Male Female 112 131 The charts in this section present some demographic features of parents who participated in the survey as parent satisfaction of the school is often associated with these demographics. It is important that the readers bear this in mind when they go through this report. 8 of 23

Participants' Profile Less than 2 5 20-29 yea 3 Below high 1 30-39 yea Participants 79 Distribution by Age High schoo 13 40-49 yea 135 Diploma af 34 50 years ol 24 5, 2% 3, 1% Bachelor 109 24, 10% High Diplom PhD 29 2 Master deg 57 Master degree Less than 20 years old PhD 2 79, 32% 20-29 years old High Diploma (after 30-39 years old Bachelor 40-49 years old 135, 55% 50 years old or more Diploma after high school High school degree Participants Distribution by Education Level 57 29 34 13 109 Below high school 1 Number of Parents The table below shows the participants distribution based on the number of year their children have been in the school (The table might contain some outliers) No. Years in the same school Number of Parents Less than 1 year 32 1 year 19 2 years 43 3 years 26 More than 3 years 112 9 of 23

Parent's Overall Impression This measure discusses the general level of confidence, attitude, and perceptions of parents about the image and reputation of their child's school. The higher the level of parent morale and loyalty, the more likely parents would keep their child in the school. Q Code Topics N Your School's Your School's Relative Your School's Relative Average Score Score Rating Average Sco MRL_RECO 1 Parent's recommendation of the school 265 4.18 71.4% Strong 3.95 MRL_SELEC 2 Level of parent's loyalty to the school 263 3.94 62.7% Strong 3.79 MRL_ENJO 3 Child's passion for the school 262 4.16 69.5% Strong 3.97 MRL_REPU 4 The school's reputation 263 4.07 58.1% Moderate 3.98 MRL_SKLEX 5 Relative school's performance rating 263 3.91 57.5% Moderate 3.83 MRL_MRLS 6 Overall parent's impression 263 4.05 66.6% Strong 3.87 4.05 64% Your School's Average Score Average Score for The Similar Schools 4.18 4.16 3.95 3.94 3.79 4.07 3.97 3.98 3.91 3.83 4.05 3.87 Parent's Level of parent's recommendation of loyalty to the school the school Child's passion for the school The school's reputation Relative school's performance rating Overall parent's impression 10 of 23

School Leadership Effective leadership and management can contribute the school overall improvement by enhancing teacher working conditions, maintaining an effective partnership with students parents, monitoring students achievement and enhancing the overall school climate. The survey sought parents opinions about the school's principal and administration staff and their instructional role in the school. Q Code Topics N Your School's Your School's Relative Your School's Relative Average Score Score Rating Average Sco PRN_COM 7 The principal's relationship with parents 257 3.61 45.2% Moderate 3.67 PRN_PAR 8 The principal's accessibility 255 4.01 66.5% Strong 3.84 PRN_STUBH 9 The principal's management of students' behavior 257 4.07 69.1% Strong 3.88 3.90 60% Your School's Average Score Average Score for The Similar Schools 4.01 4.07 3.84 3.88 3.61 3.67 The principal's relationship with parents The principal's accessibility The principal's management of students' behavior 11 of 23

Quality of Learning This satisfaction measure is constructed based on parents' response to questions concerning various aspects of the quality of learning, including teachers' instructional behaviors and strategies, student-teacher relationship, the provision of extracurricular activities. Q Code Topics N Your School's Your School's Relative Your School's Relative Average Score Score Rating Average Sco LRN_TCHEX 10 Teachers rating 257 4.15 74.6% Strong 3.92 LRN_TCHRE 11 Teacher and student relationship 256 4.30 77.0% Strong 4.08 LRN_TCHLI 12 Student's feeling about his/her teachers 256 4.34 80.6% Very Strong 4.11 LRN_LRNSA 13 Satisfaction with teaching quality 257 4.10 71.4% Strong 3.87 EXT_VAREX 14 Extracurricular activities variety 257 3.84 57.3% Moderate 3.76 4.15 72% Your School's Average Score 4.30 4.34 Average Score for The Similar Schools 4.15 4.08 4.11 4.10 3.92 3.87 3.84 3.76 Teachers rating Teacher and student relationship Student's feeling about his/her teachers Satisfaction with teaching quality Extracurricular activities variety 12 of 23

Academic Achievement One of the things that parents care about the most is their child's academic performance at school. Parent's satisfaction with student's academic achievement in Arabic, Islamic Studies, English, Mathematics, Science, and Art is shown below and when compared to similar schools. Q Code Topics N Your School's Your School's Relative Your School's Relative Average Score Score Rating Average Sco ACH_ISLM 15 Performance in Islamic education course 221 3.77 14.2% Very Weak 4.37 ACH_ARB 16 Performance in Arabic course 242 3.67 15.0% Very Weak 4.03 ACH_EN 17 Performance in English course 247 4.41 75.2% Strong 4.23 ACH_MATH 18 Performance in mathematics course 246 4.19 48.3% Moderate 4.21 ACH_SCI 19 Performance in science courses 235 4.18 36.2% Weak 4.35 ACH_ART 20 Performance in art courses 240 4.11 27.2% Weak 4.28 4.06 36% Your School's Average Score Average Score for The Similar Schools 4.37 4.41 4.03 4.23 4.19 4.21 4.18 4.35 4.11 4.28 3.77 3.67 Parents' perception about their children's academic performance Performance in Islamic education course Performance in Arabic course Performance in English course Performance in mathematics course Performance in science courses Performance in art courses Level Number of parents Poor 0 Below average 3 Average 41 Above average 103 Excellent 99 13 of 23

Parental Engagement The constructive communication between parents and schools as well as the active participation in schools activities are shown to be crucial factors for higher student achievement outcomes, which consequently lead to higher satisfaction among parents. Effective parental involvement entails a mutual sense of responsibility from both parents and schools towards the students educational attainment. Q Code Topics N Your School's Your School's Relative Your School's Relative Average Score Score Rating Average Sco PAR_HOM 21 Level of educational support at home 257 3.65 52.4% Moderate 3.62 PAR_SKCN 22 Level of communication about behavioral issues. 252 4.10 63.6% Strong 4.00 PAR_FRND 23 Level of friendliness of school administration. 252 4.13 64.2% Strong 4.00 PAR_WLCO 24 The feeling of being welcomed 251 4.16 63.6% Strong 4.04 PAR_ESYC 25 Communication level between parents and teachers 252 4.35 80.3% Very Strong 4.03 PAR_OVRL 26 School's effective communication with parents 245 4.31 76.8% Strong 4.11 4.12 67% Your School's Average Score Average Score for The Similar Schools 4.35 4.31 4.10 4.13 4.16 4.00 4.00 4.04 4.03 4.11 3.65 3.62 Level of educational support at home Level of communication about behavioral issues. Level of friendliness of school administration. The feeling of being welcomed Communication level between parents and teachers School's effective communication with parents 14 of 23

School Safety Q Code Topics N Your School's Your School's Relative Your School's Relative Average Score Score Rating Average Sco SFT_TRV 27 Level of transportation safety to/from school 265 4.42 79.0% Strong 4.20 SFT_SUP 28 Safety supervision during school day 264 4.24 70.6% Strong 4.06 SFT_SKL 29 Safety at school 264 4.36 74.7% Strong 4.16 SFT_BULL 30 School's role in handling bullying issues 263 4.14 77.5% Strong 3.89 4.29 75% Percentage of parents who reported that their children suffered the following bullying types once every week or more in 6 month: Bullying Form: N % SFT_FZCAL Level of physical bullying 265 3% SFT_VRBL Level of verbal bullying 262 12% SFT_SOL Level of social bullying 264 7% SFT_CYB Level of cyberbullying 263 1% SFT_TCR Level of teacher violence against students 260 3% 4.42 4.20 Level of transportation safety to/from school Your School's Average Score Average Score for The Similar Schools 4.24 4.06 4.36 4.16 Safety Safety at school supervision during school day 4.14 3.89 School's role in handling bullying issues 15 of 23

School Health While the focus on academic rigor and relevance remains essential to student achievement, an improvement in academic performance also requires increased support and the consideration of the health of students in attendance. Q Code Topics N Your School's Your School's Relative Your School's Relative Average Score Score Rating Average Sco HLT_CAFE 31 Meals nutrition level 257 3.42 39.6% Weak 3.53 HLT_DLC 32 Meals likeness level 252 3.56 64.4% Strong 3.41 HLT_PRIC 33 Affordability of meal price 254 3.13 33.7% Weak 3.31 HLT_MEAL 34 School and healthy food habits 253 3.87 46.1% Moderate 3.91 HLT_CLINIC 35 School clinic and child wellbeing 256 3.99 46.9% Moderate 4.01 HLT_SPORT 36 School and participation in sports 253 4.02 57.8% Moderate 3.96 HLT_CLEAN 37 School cleanliness 256 3.95 51.6% Moderate 3.94 3.71 49% Your School's Average Score 3.42 3.53 3.56 3.41 3.31 3.13 Average Score for The Similar Schools 3.87 3.91 3.99 4.01 4.02 3.96 3.95 3.94 Meals nutrition level Meals likeness level Affordability of meal price School and healthy food habits School clinic and child wellbeing School and participation in sports School cleanliness 16 of 23

School Code of Conduct Parents satisfaction and judgments of the school quality is strongly tied to its disciplined environment, students attitude and behavior, students interaction, school-community relationship and others. Parents were asked to rate these issues about their children s school. Q Code Topics N Your School's Your School's Relative Your School's Relative Average Score Score Rating Average Sco CDC_STUBH 38 Students' behaviors at school 263 3.84 56.0% Moderate 3.79 CDC_DISPL 39 School's discipline 262 4.04 61.4% Strong 3.95 CDC_RUL 40 Parent's awareness about rules and policies 264 4.21 74.8% Strong 3.96 4.03 64% Your School's Average Score Average Score for The Similar Schools 4.21 3.84 3.79 4.04 3.95 3.96 Students' behaviors at school School's discipline Parent's awareness about rules and policies 17 of 23

Other Issues Private Lessons: The following table lists the percentage of parents who reported that their children required private tutorials in the following subjects: Q Code Topics N Percentage of Parents* PVT_ARB 41 Needs for private lessons in Arabic 218 PVT_EN 42 Needs for private lessons in English 218 PVT_MATH 43 Needs for private lessons in Mathematics 219 PVT_SCI 44 Needs for private lessons in science courses 216 * The high scores indicate a strong need for private lessons. 12% 4% 8% 3% Other topics: Q Code Topics OTR_VRCU 45 Variety of Cultural activities 252 4.17 64.8% Strong OTR_UAEC 46 Promotion of UAE culture and values 250 4.22 51.4% Moderate OTR_VLNT 47 Encouragement of volunteer works. 251 4.01 51.0% Moderate N Your School's Average Score Your School's Relative Score Your School's Relative Rating 18 of 23

Appendix: Frequently Asked Questions Q1. How Scores Are Calculated? Average Score For Questions The average score for a question is simply the weighted average that is computed as: For Measures Where N is the total number of responses for a single category (i.e., Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, and Strongly Agree), i is the scale weight, and T was the total number of responses per question. The scores are on a score of 1-5 The measure scores are the average of all of the questions scores for that measure. These scores are also on a 1-5 scale. Relative Score For Questions The school s score represents the standardized/normalized average score. The calculation step: X: The average of question (Q) is computed for each school Y: The overall mean of schools averages is computed for question (Q) for similar schools Z: The standard deviation of schools averages is computed for question (Q) for similar schools The normalized score (z-score) is computed as: (X-Y)/Z To compare the school s standard score to other similar schools, we find the cumulative probability associated with the z-score. These scores are also on a 0-100 19 of 23

For Measures The measure scores are the average of all of the questions scores for that measure. These scores are also on a 0-100 scale. Q2. How to interpret the score? Example: Q3. What do colors mean? The relative score is NOT intended to rate the parents' opinion about the school. It is a useful indicator to compare the views of the parent's at your school with other parents in schools with similar settings. If the school s score in Performance in Arabic course is 93%, it means that the school scored higher than 93% of all similar schools. Q4. How the similarity between the schools is computed? Color Range Class 0%-19% Very Weak 20%-39% Weak 40%-59% Moderate 60%-79% Strong 80%-100% Very Strong We used k-mean clustering to group similar schools based on the following parameters: o Total number of registered students o School Capacity o School Gender o School Type o School Zone o Included Grades 20 of 23

Q5. What is the schools response rate? The percentage of collected responses to the number of invited parents or students in the school Q6. How the sample size was calculated This year the sample size is calculated with 90% confidence interval and 5% of error margin: CI=90% and ME= 5% Y =(0.5*(1-0.5))/((0.05/1.645)^2) Y= 270.6025 School Sample Size = (Y*Total number of students) / (Y+ Total number of students -1) Q7. How the confidence level is classified We computed four intervals for the sample size Less than 80% of confidence level If the number of responses will yield a confidence level less than 80% 80% - 89% of confidence level If the number of responses will yield a confidence level between 81% to 89% 90% - 99% of confidence level If the number of responses will yield a confidence level between 90%-99% Large Sample Size If the number of responses is very high or close to the total population size 21 of 23

h h h h h h h h h h h h h h Q7. What to consider when I want to compare the results with the previous year's? Consider the following when you want to compare the results with the previous year: Total number of registered responses: The total number of parents who responded this year might be higher or lower than the previous year. This would affect the average score and the relative score as well. The similar schools' average rating This year, there is a large number of parents who participated. Thus, the similar schools' ratings is different from the previous year. Hence, the average score of the cluster that the school belongs to will affect your relative averge score. 22 of 23

Research Office Tel.: 02 6150 000 / Email: adec_survey@adec.ac.ae 23 of 23