BSID-II-NL project. Heidelberg March Selma Ruiter, University of Groningen

Similar documents
Bayley scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third edition

Preschool assessment takes places for many reasons: screening, GENERAL MEASURES OF COGNITION FOR THE PRESCHOOL CHILD. Elizabeth O.

USING THE VERBAL BEHAVIOR MILESTONES ASSESSMENT AND PLACEMENT PROGRAM (VB-MAPP) TO ASSESS LANGUAGE AND GUIDE PROGRAMMING

Lancaster Lane CP School. The Importance of Motor Skills

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK

VB-MAPP Guided Notes

NEALE ANALYSIS OF READING ABILITY FOR READERS WITH LOW VISION

Session 2B From understanding perspectives to informing public policy the potential and challenges for Q findings to inform survey design

Practical Research. Planning and Design. Paul D. Leedy. Jeanne Ellis Ormrod. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Columbus, Ohio

EXAMINER PROMPTS. 10 Places (Can be used with three candidates) 18

Tracy Dudek & Jenifer Russell Trinity Services, Inc. *Copyright 2008, Mark L. Sundberg

Dyslexia/dyslexic, 3, 9, 24, 97, 187, 189, 206, 217, , , 367, , , 397,

Non-Secure Information Only

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Procedures for Administering Leveled Text Reading Passages. and. Stanines for the Observation Survey and Instrumento de Observación.

Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers

Interpreting ACER Test Results

24 months. Maryhan Baker (1, 2) * Graham Schafer (1) Katie J Alcock (3) Shelley Bartlett (1, 4)

Examinee Information. Assessment Information

Developmental coordination disorder DCD. Overview. Gross & fine motor skill. Elisabeth Hill The importance of motor development

Recommended Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Children with Learning Disabilities

Millersville University Testing Library Complete Archive (2016)

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

A Pilot Study on Pearson s Interactive Science 2011 Program

Module 12. Machine Learning. Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

PREDICTING GLOBAL MEASURES OF DEVELOPMENT AT 18-MONTHS OF AGE FROM SPECIFIC MEASURES OF COGNITIVE ABILITY AT 10-MONTHS OF AGE. Tasha D.

Why OUT-OF-LEVEL Testing? 2017 CTY Johns Hopkins University

Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Utrecht Early Mathematical Competence Test (Scale A)

TRAVEL TIME REPORT. Casualty Actuarial Society Education Policy Committee October 2001

WHY SOLVE PROBLEMS? INTERVIEWING COLLEGE FACULTY ABOUT THE LEARNING AND TEACHING OF PROBLEM SOLVING

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Prof. dr. H.A.M. Middelkoop

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

Mathematical learning difficulties Long introduction Part II: Assessment and Interventions

Study Abroad Housing and Cultural Intelligence: Does Housing Influence the Gaining of Cultural Intelligence?

Development of the Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) test to assess key markers of specific language and literacy difficulties in young children

NORMAL AND ABNORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF BRAIN AND BEHAVIOUR

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Tele-Intervention: A Model Program of Service Delivery

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENCY EDUCATION IN DEVELOPMENTAL-BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS

Essentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology

Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities Part 3: Referral & Evaluation Process; Documentation Requirements

Assessing Children s Writing Connect with the Classroom Observation and Assessment

An ICT environment to assess and support students mathematical problem-solving performance in non-routine puzzle-like word problems

THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR MODEL IN ELECTRONIC LEARNING: A PILOT STUDY

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse

Purdue Data Summit Communication of Big Data Analytics. New SAT Predictive Validity Case Study

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Occupational Therapy and Increasing independence

I N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017

Kindergarten Iep Goals And Objectives Bank

INSTRUCTOR USER MANUAL/HELP SECTION

Special Educational Needs Assessment for Learning. Phil Dexter, British Council, Teacher Development Adviser

Knowledge management styles and performance: a knowledge space model from both theoretical and empirical perspectives

Computerized Adaptive Psychological Testing A Personalisation Perspective

AGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016

Riverside County Special Education Local Plan Area Orthopedic Impairment Guidelines Table of Contents

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

2 months: Social and Emotional Begins to smile at people Can briefly calm self (may bring hands to mouth and suck on hand) Tries to look at parent

Inclusion in Music Education

The Timer-Game: A Variable Interval Contingency for the Management of Out-of-Seat Behavior

Program Alignment CARF Child and Youth Services Standards. Nonviolent Crisis Intervention Training Program

- COURSE DESCRIPTIONS - (*From Online Graduate Catalog )

THE IMPACT OF STATE-WIDE NUMERACY TESTING ON THE TEACHING OF MATHEMATICS IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS

Learning Lesson Study Course

Elizabeth R. Crais, Ph.D., CCC-SLP

Lilavatibai Podar High School, Mumbai & Jan Van Brabant College, Helmond.

Process Evaluations for a Multisite Nutrition Education Program

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Physical Education in Kindergarten Promotes Fundamental Motor Skill Development

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

CDTL-CELC WORKSHOP: EFFECTIVE INTERPERSONAL SKILLS

Special Education Program Continuum

THE IMPACT OF DYSLEXIA ON LEARNING SIGN LANGUAGE

Students from abroad who are enrolled in other law faculty s can participate in the master European Law which has the following tracks:

The Efficacy of PCI s Reading Program - Level One: A Report of a Randomized Experiment in Brevard Public Schools and Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Alpha provides an overall measure of the internal reliability of the test. The Coefficient Alphas for the STEP are:

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

COACHING A CEREMONIES TEAM

Gridlocked: The impact of adapting survey grids for smartphones. Ashley Richards 1, Rebecca Powell 1, Joe Murphy 1, Shengchao Yu 2, Mai Nguyen 1

On Human Computer Interaction, HCI. Dr. Saif al Zahir Electrical and Computer Engineering Department UBC

A Correlation of Teacher Understanding of the Nature of Science (NOS) with Student Understanding

Evidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness

Treebank mining with GrETEL. Liesbeth Augustinus Frank Van Eynde

Evaluation pilot Bilingual Primary Education

Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study

faculty of science and engineering Appendices for the Bachelor s degree programme(s) in Astronomy

Starting primary school

Model of Human Occupation

Longitudinal family-risk studies of dyslexia: why. develop dyslexia and others don t.

Milton Public Schools Special Education Programs & Supports

International Economics & Business Track of the Bachelor degree Economics and Business Economics. Radboud University Nijmegen

SLINGERLAND: A Multisensory Structured Language Instructional Approach

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

From understanding perspectives to informing public policy the potential and challenges for Q findings to inform survey design

UNESCO Bangkok Asia-Pacific Programme of Education for All. Embracing Diversity: Toolkit for Creating Inclusive Learning-Friendly Environments

Revisiting the role of prosody in early language acquisition. Megha Sundara UCLA Phonetics Lab

Transcription:

BSID-II-NL project Heidelberg March 2006 Selma Ruiter, University of Groningen

BSID-II-NL project Dutch standardization and validation project Important alterations Two results of psychometric studies Adapted versions Premature Non-verbal Low Vision (experimental) Low Motor (experimental) Discussion about the applicability of these adapted versions worldwide

Dutch standardisation and validation 1998: translation 1999: pilot study 2000 2002: standardization study (publication of the practical manual)

Dutch manual

Dutch Record form

Important alterations 1. Basal Ceiling Rules 2. Day norms 3. Factor structure of the BRS

Comparison of the original (US) and adjusted (NL) basal and ceiling rules Original (US) Adjusted (NL) Mental scale Motor scale Mental scale Motor scale Basal 5 items 4 items 8 items 5 items positive positive positive positive Ceiling 3 items 2 items 5 items 3 items negative negative negative negative

Test results comparing original (US) vs. adjusted (NL) basal and ceiling rules No Raw Mental Mental Item Set Credit Credit Score Index Index US NL Case 2: Lauren 23-25 mo 14 22 126 61 73 (29 mo) 26-28 mo 8 24 130 69 78 29-31 mo 5 23 135 79 - Case 3: Daren 26-28 mo 16 16 138 <50 <55 (40 mo) 29-31 mo 10 18 140 50 55 32-34 mo 7 24 142 54-35-37 mo 5 24 144 58-38-42 mo 4 29 146 - - Case 4: Ian 20-22 mo 9 20 115 <50 61 (33 mo) 23-25 mo 11 25 123 51 66 26-28 mo 8 24 130 58 73 29-31 mo 5 23 135 68-32-34 mo 5 26 140 78 - From: Washington et al. (1998): Table 1: Multiple Possible Outcomes for Cases 2, 3, and 4 (Mental Scale), slightly adjusted

Dutch standardisation and validation 1998: translation 1999: pilot study 2000 2002: standardization study (publication of the practical manual) 2002-2004: validation and reliability studies (publication of the technical manual)

Two results Correlation n BSID-II-NL - Mental scale.55** 28 SON 2,5-7 BSID-II-NL 18 months Mental scale.58** 62 versus BSID-II--NL 30 months Motor scale.33** 61

Dutch standardisation and validation 1998: translation 1999: pilot study 2000 2002: standardization study (publication of the practical manual) 2002-2004: validation and reliability studies (publication of the technical manual) 2003-2005: adaptations for special groups 2005-2006: dissertation

ADAPTIVE USE OF THE BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT II A STANDARDISED DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT 1-42 MONTHS S.A.J. Ruiter; B.F. van der Meulen; H. Nakken; H.C. Lutje Spelberg Contact: s.a.j.ruiter@rug.nl Research goal The development of adaptive versions of the BSID-II for use with specific groups of children To address concerns of test bias for children with physical, visual, or speech and/or hearing problems, we established adapted procedures, item instructions and play material of a standard instrument. The changes provide the children with the unbiased item, but with the original content and difficulty so that the norms of the standard BSID-II are still applicable. Premature Goal Group Age level Mental and Motor developmental Index Premature infants 1 42 months Norms Standardized 1 42 months Adjusted material Testprocedure

ADAPTIVE USE OF THE BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT II A STANDARDISED DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT 1-42 MONTHS S.A.J. Ruiter; B.F. van der Meulen; H. Nakken; H.C. Lutje Spelberg Contact: s.a.j.ruiter@rug.nl Research goal The development of adaptive versions of the BSID-II for use with specific groups of children To address concerns of test bias for children with physical, visual, or speech and/or hearing problems, we established adapted procedures, item instructions and play material of a standard instrument. The changes provide the children with the unbiased item, but with the original content and difficulty so that the norms of the standard BSID-II are still applicable. Goal Group Age level Norms Premature Mental and Motor developmental Index Premature infants 1 42 months Standardized 1 42 months Adjusted material Testprocedure Non Verbal Mental developmental Index Children with speech and hearing problems 12 30 months Standardized 12 30 months Test procedure and item instructions

ADAPTIVE USE OF THE BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT II A STANDARDISED DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT 1-42 MONTHS S.A.J. Ruiter; B.F. van der Meulen; H. Nakken; H.C. Lutje Spelberg Contact: s.a.j.ruiter@rug.nl Research goal The development of adaptive versions of the BSID-II for use with specific groups of children To address concerns of test bias for children with physical, visual, or speech and/or hearing problems, we established adapted procedures, item instructions and play material of a standard instrument. The changes provide the children with the unbiased item, but with the original content and difficulty so that the norms of the standard BSID-II are still applicable. Goal Group Age level Norms Premature Mental and Motor developmental Index Premature infants 1 42 months Standardized 1 42 months Adjusted material Testprocedure Non Verbal Mental developmental Index Children with speech and hearing problems 12 30 months Standardized 12 30 months Test procedure and item instructions Low Motor Mental developmental index Children with physical impairments 12 42 months Standardized 12 42 months Test procedure, item instructions and play material

ADAPTIVE USE OF THE BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT DEVELOPMENT II A STANDARDISED DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT 1-42 MONTHS S.A.J. Ruiter; B.F. van der Meulen; H. Nakken; H.C. Lutje Spelberg Contact: s.a.j.ruiter@rug.nl Research goal The development of adaptive versions of the BSID-II for use with specific groups of children To address concerns of test bias for children with physical, visual, or speech and/or hearing problems, we established adapted procedures, item instructions and play material of a standard instrument. The changes provide the children with the unbiased item, but with the original content and difficulty so that the norms of the standard BSID-II are still applicable. Goal Group Age level Norms Premature Mental and Motor developmental Index Premature infants 1 42 months Standardized 1 42 months Adjusted material Testprocedure Non Verbal Mental developmental Index Children with speech and hearing problems 12 30 months Standardized 12 30 months Test procedure and item instructions Low Motor Mental developmental index Children with physical impairments 12 42 months Standardized 12 42 months Test procedure, item instructions and play material Low Vision Mental and Motor developmental index Children with visual impairments 1 42 months Standardized 1 42 months Test procedure, item instructions and play material

BSID-II-NL and prematurity correction Three questions 1. Where to start? 2. How to administer? 3. How to interpret the scores?

Three answers 1. Start in the chronological age item set 2. Administer both the chronological age item set and the corrected age item set 3. Matching raw scores with norm table: 1. Index score chronological age 2. Index score corrected age

Further research 1. Empirical justification for alternative testprocedure 2. Determining to what age correction for prematurity can be recommended

Non-verbal version Mental scale 12 30 months Non-verbal items are a selection of the original Emphasizing natural gestures or pantomime instruction Assess the overall cognitive developmental functioning without the use of spoken language.

Selection of items Unchanged (non-verbal) items e.g. item 82 Suspends ring by string Items with emphasizing natural gestures e.g. item 60 Attends to scribbling Items with pantomime instructions e.g. item 89 Puts six beads in box

Low Motor and Low Vision (experimental) Aim: Gain insight in the developmental course of low motor / low vision children Facilitate effective interventions and follow up Enables better research on the specific development of these groups of children.

Starting point Only compensate for the child s impairment Item content remain unchanged Item difficulty remain unchanged Original (BSID-II-NL) index scores are applicable

Adaptations (experimental) Low Motor Mental scale 12 42 months Low Vision Mental and Motor scale 1 42 months Test procedure Item instruction Play material

Focus group Low Vision 1 42 months (developmental) age Visual ability about 1/20 to 1/3 and/or Reduced range of vision between 10 and 30 degrees

Low Vision

Low Vision

Low Vision Examples of Adaptations: Test procedure Directions for the child s positioning and intensity of artificial light

Low Vision Examples of Adaptations: Test procedure Directions for the child s positioning and intensity of artificial light Item instruction Directions for extending the exploring time and broaden the time limit Place the pegs in the child s hands instead of on the table (pegboard, sorting)

Low Vision Examples of Adaptations: Test procedure Directions for the child s positioning and intensity of artificial light Item instruction Directions for extending the exploring time and broaden the time limit Place the pegs in the child s hands instead of on the table (pegboard, sorting) Play material Colour contrast, clearer lines

Low Motor

Low Motor

Focus group Low Motor General: children with motor impairments in the age level 12 42 months (developmental) age Inclusion criteria 1. The child should be able to sit or stand up in its (wheel)chair. 2. The child should be able to see 3. The child should be able to use and (roughly) coordinate at least one hand

Low Motor Examples of Adaptations: Test procedure Allow the child ample time to explore the material and to perform

Low Motor Examples of Adaptations: Test procedure Allow the child ample time to explore the material and to perform Item instruction Eliminate all time limits Allowing the child to point with his eyes (glance direction)

Low Motor Examples of Adaptations: Test procedure Allow the child ample time to explore the material and to perform Item instruction Eliminate all time limits Allowing the child to point with his eyes (glance direction) Play material Enlarged materials: blocks, puzzleboard, pegboard en pegs

Applicability worldwide Applicable to standard sets worldwide Combination with the standard set Item content unchanged

Further research Finish validity and reliability studies Develop the final versions Implement the adapted versions