Table 4 presents the information in the IPD format and is consistent with the findings in tables 1-3.

Similar documents
California State University, Chico College of Business Graduate Business Program Program Alignment Matrix Academic Year

MANAGEMENT, BS. Administration. Policies Academic Policies. Admissions & Policies. Termination from the Major. . University Consortium

Quantitative Research Questionnaire

Instructional Approach(s): The teacher should introduce the essential question and the standard that aligns to the essential question

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Annual Report Accredited Member

Curricular Innovations Outcomes Assessment and ABET 2000

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Program in Linguistics. Academic Year Assessment Report

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Sociology 521: Social Statistics and Quantitative Methods I Spring Wed. 2 5, Kap 305 Computer Lab. Course Website

What does Quality Look Like?

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

Writing an Effective Research Proposal

Introduction to Questionnaire Design

Van Andel Education Institute Science Academy Professional Development Allegan June 2015

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

MASTER OF ARTS IN APPLIED SOCIOLOGY. Thesis Option

ACBSP Related Standards: #3 Student and Stakeholder Focus #4 Measurement and Analysis of Student Learning and Performance

THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Department of Economics. ECON 1012: PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS Prof. Irene R. Foster

Appendix. Journal Title Times Peer Review Qualitative Referenced Authority* Quantitative Studies

Course Selection for Premedical Students (revised June 2015, with College Curriculum updates)

Lecture 15: Test Procedure in Engineering Design

Office: Gallagher Hall 3406

Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology in Construction Management Technology with Co-op

AC : PREPARING THE ENGINEER OF 2020: ANALYSIS OF ALUMNI DATA

Master of Philosophy (MPhil) and Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Programs in Information Systems

Instructor: Mario D. Garrett, Ph.D. Phone: Office: Hepner Hall (HH) 100

Evaluation of Teach For America:

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

2010 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ACCT 100 Introduction to Accounting Course Syllabus Course # on T Th 12:30 1:45 Spring, 2016: Debra L. Schmidt-Johnson, CPA

Aalya School. Parent Survey Results

Abu Dhabi Indian. Parent Survey Results

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

Dyersburg State Community College Austin Peay State University

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

TREATMENT OF SMC COURSEWORK FOR STUDENTS WITHOUT AN ASSOCIATE OF ARTS

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

North Carolina Teacher Corps Final Report

Critical Thinking in the Workplace. for City of Tallahassee Gabrielle K. Gabrielli, Ph.D.

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Course specification

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

Essentials of Ability Testing. Joni Lakin Assistant Professor Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology

Secondary English-Language Arts

Geo Risk Scan Getting grips on geotechnical risks

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Fall Semester Year 1: 15 hours

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

Connecting Academic Advising and Career Advising. Advisory Board for Advisor Training

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

NC Global-Ready Schools

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

A&S/Business Dual Major

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

CHEM 6487: Problem Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry Spring 2010

LibQUAL+ Spring 2003 Survey

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Research Design & Analysis Made Easy! Brainstorming Worksheet

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Application Guidelines for Interventional Radiology Review Committee for Radiology

Articulation Agreement between Life University & Atlanta Technical College

IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES

Process to Identify Minimum Passing Criteria and Objective Evidence in Support of ABET EC2000 Criteria Fulfillment

Value Creation Through! Integration Workshop! Value Stream Analysis and Mapping for PD! January 31, 2002!

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

Monitoring and Evaluating Curriculum Implementation Final Evaluation Report on the Implementation of The New Zealand Curriculum Report to

12-WEEK GRE STUDY PLAN

Evolution of the core team of developers in libre software projects

Social Media Marketing BUS COURSE OUTLINE

Improvement of Writing Across the Curriculum: Full Report. Administered Spring 2014

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

GRADUATE CURRICULUM REVIEW REPORT

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

Advancing the Discipline of Leadership Studies. What is an Academic Discipline?

COOPERATIVE WORK EXPERIENCE - OVERVIEW

ADVANCED PLACEMENT STUDENTS IN COLLEGE: AN INVESTIGATION OF COURSE GRADES AT 21 COLLEGES. Rick Morgan Len Ramist

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

AST Introduction to Solar Systems Astronomy

Career Checkpoint. What is Career Checkpoint? Make the most of your Marketable Skills

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Inquiry Learning Methodologies and the Disposition to Energy Systems Problem Solving

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Heavy Diesel Service Technician

Transcription:

California tate University, Chico College of Business Business Administration (BAD) Assurance of Learning Program Alignment atrix Academic Year 2004-2005 Introduction An online survey was conducted November - December 2004. Invitations for participation were sent out to all faculty that teach the BAD core courses. The final sample included 51 faculty members from the College of Business and 5 from the Economics Department (Econ 002 and 003 required courses in the BAD prebusiness core.). The survey served two purposes. The primary objective was to get a sense for the experience a student has taking the BAD core courses and provide a baseline measure for our assurance of learning effort. (Detailed findings from the survey are summarized elsewhere. The qualitative data is lengthy and has been omitted for the sake of brevity.). The data was also used to generate a program alignment matrix which summarizes the degree to which the BAD core classes are contributing to particular learning goals, and the degree of consistency between multiple sections of the course. Two matrices are presented here. The first, table 1, is what the College of Business Undergraduate Curriculum Committee (UCC) agreed to use for its program alignment assessment effort. The final rating within each cell is based on an analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data from the survey (see appendix for the basic quantitative results). Table 2 and 3 summarize the information in table 1. The second alignment matrix, table 4, is based upon a request from the All University Responsibility for Assessment (AURA) committee to utilize an assurance of learning alignment matrix that relies on determining if a learning goal has been Introduced (I), Practiced (P), or Demonstrated astery (D) within a course. (AURA is responsible for developing and implementing a university-wide assessment effort that meets AC standards.) ummary of Findings Table 1 summarizes the quantitative and qualitative data from the survey. The highlighted cells indicate where courses strongly or very strongly contributed to learning goals and were at least moderately consistent between sections. The qualitative data asked instructors to note any assignments or exams that relate to a learning goal. Courses were only given a strong or very strong contribution score if the course had assignments or exam material related to the learning goal. Thus, any highlighted cell also means this course could be used to assess the particular learning goal. The information in Table 1 can be analyzed by learning goal and by course. The summary by course is presented in table 2 and by learning goal in table 3. Table 4 presents the information in the IPD format and is consistent with the findings in tables 1-3. Degree of Alignment and Contribution of BAD Core Curriculum to Learning Goals ritten Communication oderate. Oral Communication It appears that the BAD core is not contributing much to students oral presentation skills. However, assessment of students presentations suggest otherwise. Either students are learning this ability in their option classes or are innately good at oral presentations. Data from students (EBI, NE) would suggest students are doing a lot of presentations and learning good presentation skills from their option classes. Information Technology Contribution appears to be a bit weak.

Critical Thinking Contribution a bit ambiguous. The alignment data would suggest that students are getting a lot of critical thinking skills in the BAD curriculum. However, when asked about students strengths and weaknesses, professors stated they believe students critical thinking skills are weak. Diversity Contribution appears to be a bit weak. Ethics- oderate. Teamwork oderate to a strong contribution. External Forces on Business Knowledge oderate to strong contribution. International Business Knowledge Contribution appears weak. Functional Area Knowledge- Contribution appears moderate to strong. orkforce and Customer Diversity Knowledge Contribution appears weak. Consistency Across ections Compared to other courses that offer multiple sections, Accounting 15 and arketing 170 appear to have the least consistent curriculum and pedagogy across the sections being taught. Compared to other courses that offer multiple sections, BAD 001 and GT 129 appear to have a more consistent curriculum and pedagogy across the sections being taught.

Table 1: Program Alignment atrix The following table represents the degree to which individual core classes are contributing to particular learning goals, and the degree of consistency between multiple sections of the course. This table summarizes data collected from the program review survey. Key for Degree of Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goals: V Very trong Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal trong Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal oderate Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal eak Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal N No Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal Key for Consistency between ections: High Consistency (about 80% consistency) oderate Consistency (about 51-80% consistency) Low Consistency (less than 51% consistency) NC No Consistency Learning Goals ritten communication skills ACCT 015 (n= 6) ACCT 016 (n=5) BAD 001 (n=4) BAD 003/ath 47 (n=1) BLA 100 (n=4) GT 129 (n=3) V GT 131 (n=5) GT 180 (n=4) KTG 170 (n=7) FIN 150 (n=2) /N POG 143 (n=4) /N IN 110 (n=2) BAD 295 (n=2) Oral communication skills Information technology skills V Critical thinking skills V V Diversity skills Ethical skills Teamwork skills External forces on business International business Functional areas orkforce and customer diversity (Note- Highlighted cells indicate courses that had at least strong contribution to a learning goal and at least moderate consistency between sections. These highlighted cells also indicate courses that have assignments and/or exams that could be used to assess that particular learning goal.)

Program Alignment atrix (cont.) Non-BAD Courses, yet part of our pre-business requirements. Learning Goals ritten communication skills ECON 002 (n=4) ECON 003 (n=1) ATH 45 (n=1) Oral communication skills Information technology skills Critical thinking skills Diversity skills Ethical skills Teamwork skills External forces on business International business Functional areas orkforce and customer diversity

Table 2: Program Alignment atrix BAD ummary: Contribution and Consistency per Course The following table represents the degree to which individual core classes are contributing to particular learning goals, and the degree of consistency between multiple sections of the course. This table summarizes data collected from the program review survey. Key for Degree of Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goals: V Very trong Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal - trong Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal - oderate Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal - eak Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal N No Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal Key for Consistency between ections: High Consistency oderate Consistency Low Consistency NC No Consistency Aggregate for BAD Courses, across Goals ACCT 015 (n= 6) ACCT 016 (n=5) BAD 001 (n=4) BAD 003/ath 47 (n=1) BLA 100 (n=4) GT 129 (n=3) GT 131 (n=5) GT 180 (n=4) KTG 170 (n=7) FIN 150 (n=2) POG 143 (n=4) IN 110 (n=2) N 8 3 5 BAD 295 (n=2) 6 4 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 5 7 3 4 3 4 4 5 5 6 7 5 3 4 2 4 2 2 5 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 V 1 1 1 Consistency Ratings 7 2 3 NA 2 1 4 3 2 2 3 8 3 NA 7 6 7 8 5 4 8 4 1 1 5 NA 4 5 2 2 2 1 1 6 5 (How to read table: Off the eleven learning goals, arketing 170 makes a strong contribution to three and has significant inconsistencies across sections on four of the eleven goals.)

Table 3: Program Alignment atrix ummary: Contribution to Learning Goals Across BAD Courses The following table represents the degree to which individual core classes are contributing to particular learning goals, and the degree of consistency between multiple sections of the course. This table summarizes data collected from the program review survey. Key for Degree of Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goals: V Very trong Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal - trong Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal - oderate Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal - eak Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal N No Alignment and Contribution to Program Learning Goal Aggregate for Learning Goal, across BAD Courses Contribution to Learning Goal N V ritten communication skills 1 2 5 2 1 Oral communication skills 2 5 4 1 Information technology skills 6 5 1 Critical thinking skills 7 3 2 Diversity skills 1 6 3 2 Ethical skills 4 5 3 Teamwork skills 1 2 4 4 External forces on business 1 1 5 5 International business 1 7 4 Functional areas 1 1 5 5 orkforce and customer diversity 2 6 4

Table 4: I-P-D Alignment atrix I-aterial introduced. P-aterial practiced. D-Demonstrated mastery. Learning Goals ACCT 015 (n= 6) ACCT 016 (n=5) BAD 001 (n=4) BAD 003/ath 47 (n=1) BLA 100 (n=4) GT 129 (n=3) GT 131 (n=5) GT 180 (n=4) KTG 170 (n=7) FIN 150 (n=2) POG 143 (n=4) IN 110 (n=2) BAD 295 (n=2) ritten communication skills P P I P I I P D Oral communication skills I I P I I I Information technology skills I I I I I P D Critical thinking skills P P I P P I I I I P I D Diversity skills I P P I I Ethical skills P P I I P P I I P P I Teamwork skills I P P P P I I P External forces on business I I P P I P P I I D International business I I I I Functional areas P P I P I P P I I I D orkforce and customer diversity I I I I

Appendix: Quantitative Responses from Faculty urvey Alignment with Learning Goals and ection Consistency: riting BAD Core Classes * Paper in class? Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes Paper in class? Yes no Total BAD 001 4 0 4 BAD 003 0 1 1 ACCT 015 2 4 6 ACCT 016 4 1 5 ECON 002 3 1 4 ECON 003 1 0 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 1 1 BLA 100 4 0 4 GT 129 3 0 3 GT 131 5 0 5 GT 180 3 1 4 KTG 170 7 0 7 FIN 150 1 1 2 IN 110 0 2 2 POG 143 1 3 4 BAD 295 2 0 2 Total 40 16 56 BAD Core Classes * Provide paper rubric/standards outline? Crosstabulation Provide paper rubric/standards outline? BAD Core Classes yes no Total BAD 001 3 1 4 ACCT 015 0 2 2 ACCT 016 1 3 4 ECON 002 2 1 3 ECON 003 0 1 1 BLA 100 2 2 4 GT 129 2 1 3 GT 131 2 3 5 GT 180 2 1 3 KTG 170 5 2 7

FIN 150 1 0 1 POG 143 0 1 1 BAD 295 0 2 2 Total 20 20 40 BAD Core Classes * Paper assignments individual? Crosstabulation Paper assignments individual? BAD Core Classes yes no Total BAD 001 4 0 4 ACCT 015 2 0 2 ACCT 016 4 0 4 ECON 002 3 0 3 ECON 003 1 0 1 BLA 100 2 2 4 GT 129 3 0 3 GT 131 3 2 5 GT 180 3 0 3 KTG 170 5 2 7 FIN 150 1 0 1 POG 143 0 1 1 BAD 295 1 1 2 Total 32 8 40 BAD Core Classes * Assign significant term project? Crosstabulation Assign significant term project? BAD Core Classes Yes No Total BAD 001 1 3 4 BAD 003 0 1 1 ACCT 015 0 6 6 ACCT 016 1 4 5 ECON 002 0 4 4 ECON 003 1 0 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 1 1 BLA 100 1 3 4 GT 129 2 1 3 GT 131 1 4 5

GT 180 1 3 4 KTG 170 5 2 7 FIN 150 0 2 2 IN 110 0 2 2 POG 143 0 4 4 BAD 295 2 0 2 Total 15 41 56 BAD Core Classes * written comm skills Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes written comm skills Not at all Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant Total BAD 001 0 0 1 3 0 4 ACCT 015 1 3 1 0 1 6 ACCT 016 0 1 2 1 1 5 ECON 002 0 1 2 0 0 3 ECON 003 1 0 0 0 0 1 ATH 45 0 0 0 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 1 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 0 0 3 1 0 4 GT 129 0 0 0 0 3 3 GT 131 0 0 3 2 0 5 GT 180 0 1 2 1 0 4 KTG 170 0 0 4 1 2 7 FIN 150 0 0 1 0 0 1 IN 110 0 2 0 0 0 2 POG 143 2 1 1 0 0 4 BAD 295 0 0 2 0 0 2 Total 4 10 22 9 8 53 eans Report riting core: um(q2, 3, 4, 27, 40a1) BAD Core Classes ean N td. Deviation BAD 001 6.5000 4 1.29099 BAD 003 0.0000 1. ACCT 015 2.5000 6 3.01662 ACCT 016 5.0000 5 3.16228 ECON 002 3.2500 4 0.95743 ECON 003 3.0000 1.

ATH 45 6.0000 1. ATH 47 1.0000 1. BLA 100 4.7500 4 1.50000 GT 129 9.3333 3 0.57735 GT 131 5.0000 5 1.00000 GT 180 4.5000 4 2.88675 KTG 170 6.5714 7 1.81265 FIN 150 2.5000 2 3.53553 IN 110 1.0000 2 0.00000 POG 143 1.0000 4 1.41421 BAD 295 4.5000 2 0.70711 Total 4.3750 56 2.81271 Program Alignment and ection Consistency: Oral Presentations BAD Core Classes * Require student oral presentations? Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes Require student oral presentations? Yes No Total BAD 001 4 0 4 BAD 003 0 1 1 ACCT 015 1 5 6 ACCT 016 4 1 5 ECON 002 1 3 4 ECON 003 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 1 1 BLA 100 3 1 4 GT 129 3 0 3 GT 131 4 1 5 GT 180 2 2 4 KTG 170 1 6 7 FIN 150 0 2 2 IN 110 0 2 2 POG 143 1 3 4 BAD 295 1 1 2 Total 25 31 56 BAD Core Classes * Provide presentation rubric/standards outline? Crosstabulation

BAD Core Classes Provide presentation rubric/standards outline? Yes No Total BAD 001 4 0 4 ACCT 015 0 1 1 ACCT 016 1 3 4 ECON 002 0 1 1 BLA 100 2 1 3 GT 129 2 1 3 GT 131 2 2 4 GT 180 2 0 2 KTG 170 1 0 1 POG 143 1 0 1 BAD 295 1 0 1 Total 16 9 25 BAD Core Classes * Require individual oral presentations? Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes Require individual oral presentations? Yes No Total BAD 001 0 4 4 ACCT 015 1 0 1 ACCT 016 4 0 4 ECON 002 1 0 1 BLA 100 0 3 3 GT 129 1 2 3 GT 131 1 3 4 GT 180 1 1 2 KTG 170 0 1 1 POG 143 0 1 1 BAD 295 0 1 1 Total 9 16 25 BAD Core Classes * oral comm skills Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes oral comm skills Not at all Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant Total BAD 001 0 1 1 2 0 4 BAD 003 1 0 0 0 0 1 ACCT 015 1 3 1 0 0 5

ACCT 016 1 1 3 0 0 5 ECON 002 1 2 0 0 0 3 ATH 45 0 0 0 0 1 1 ATH 47 1 0 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 0 1 2 1 0 4 GT 129 0 0 0 1 2 3 GT 131 1 1 2 0 0 4 GT 180 0 3 0 1 0 4 KTG 170 0 2 3 0 1 6 FIN 150 1 1 0 0 0 2 IN 110 1 0 1 0 0 2 POG 143 1 1 2 0 0 4 BAD 295 0 1 0 0 1 2 Total 9 17 15 5 5 51 eans Report Oral_Comm_core BAD Core Classes ean N td. Deviation BAD 001 4.7500 4 1.50000 BAD 003 0.0000 1. ACCT 015 1.1667 6 1.47196 ACCT 016 3.2000 5 1.92354 ECON 002 1.0000 4 1.41421 ECON 003 0.0000 1. ATH 45 6.0000 1. ATH 47 0.0000 1. BLA 100 3.5000 4 2.08167 GT 129 7.3333 3 0.57735 GT 131 2.4000 5 2.07364 GT 180 3.0000 4 2.82843 KTG 170 2.2857 7 2.62769 FIN 150 0.5000 2 0.70711 IN 110 1.0000 2 1.41421 POG 143 1.7500 4 1.70783 BAD 295 4.5000 2 4.94975 Total 2.6250 56 2.49044 Program Alignment and ection Consistency: IT

BAD Core Classes * tudents use Excel in course? Crosstabulation tudents use Excel in course? BAD Core Classes Yes No Total BAD 001 4 0 4 BAD 003 1 0 1 ACCT 015 6 0 6 ACCT 016 4 1 5 ECON 002 1 3 4 ECON 003 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 1 0 1 BLA 100 0 4 4 GT 129 0 3 3 GT 131 4 1 5 GT 180 0 4 4 KTG 170 2 5 7 FIN 150 0 2 2 IN 110 2 0 2 POG 143 3 1 4 BAD 295 2 0 2 Total 30 26 56 BAD Core Classes * tudents use ord in course? Crosstabulation tudents use ord in course? BAD Core Classes Yes No Total BAD 001 4 0 4 BAD 003 0 1 1 ACCT 015 4 2 6 ACCT 016 4 1 5 ECON 002 2 2 4 ECON 003 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 1 1 BLA 100 2 2 4 GT 129 3 0 3 GT 131 5 0 5

GT 180 1 3 4 KTG 170 6 1 7 FIN 150 2 0 2 IN 110 2 0 2 POG 143 2 2 4 BAD 295 2 0 2 Total 39 17 56 BAD Core Classes * tudents use PowerPoint in course? Crosstabulation tudents use PowerPoint in course? BAD Core Classes Yes No Total BAD 001 4 0 4 BAD 003 0 1 1 ACCT 015 5 1 6 ACCT 016 2 3 5 ECON 002 1 3 4 ECON 003 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 1 1 BLA 100 1 3 4 GT 129 3 0 3 GT 131 2 3 5 GT 180 1 3 4 KTG 170 1 6 7 FIN 150 0 2 2 IN 110 1 1 2 POG 143 2 2 4 BAD 295 1 1 2 Total 24 32 56 BAD Core Classes * tudents use Access in course? Crosstabulation tudents use Access in course? BAD Core Classes Yes No Total BAD 001 0 4 4 BAD 003 0 1 1 ACCT 015 0 6 6 ACCT 016 0 5 5

ECON 002 0 4 4 ECON 003 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 1 1 BLA 100 0 4 4 GT 129 0 3 3 GT 131 0 5 5 GT 180 0 4 4 KTG 170 1 6 7 FIN 150 0 2 2 IN 110 2 0 2 POG 143 0 4 4 BAD 295 0 2 2 Total 3 53 56 BAD Core Classes * tudents use Internet in course? Crosstabulation tudents use Internet in course? BAD Core Classes Yes No Total BAD 001 4 0 4 BAD 003 0 1 1 ACCT 015 4 2 6 ACCT 016 5 0 5 ECON 002 4 0 4 ECON 003 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 1 1 BLA 100 4 0 4 GT 129 3 0 3 GT 131 5 0 5 GT 180 3 0 3 KTG 170 6 1 7 FIN 150 2 0 2 IN 110 2 0 2 POG 143 3 1 4 BAD 295 1 1 2 Total 46 9 55 BAD Core Classes * tudents use library e- resources in course? Crosstabulation

BAD Core Classes tudents use library e- resources in course? Yes No Total BAD 001 4 0 4 BAD 003 0 1 1 ACCT 015 1 5 6 ACCT 016 2 3 5 ECON 002 1 3 4 ECON 003 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 1 1 BLA 100 2 2 4 GT 129 2 1 3 GT 131 3 2 5 GT 180 3 1 4 KTG 170 5 2 7 FIN 150 1 1 2 IN 110 0 2 2 POG 143 1 3 4 BAD 295 1 1 2 Total 26 30 56 BAD Core Classes BAD Core Classes * IT skills Crosstabulation IT skills Not at all Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant Total BAD 001 0 1 0 2 1 4 BAD 003 0 1 0 0 0 1 ACCT 015 0 1 3 1 1 6 ACCT 016 0 1 3 1 0 5 ECON 002 0 1 2 0 0 3 ECON 003 1 0 0 0 0 1 ATH 45 0 0 0 1 0 1 ATH 47 0 1 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 1 3 0 0 0 4 GT 129 0 2 0 0 1 3 GT 131 1 3 1 0 0 5 GT 180 0 4 0 0 0 4 KTG 170 0 3 2 1 0 6 FIN 150 0 1 1 0 0 2 IN 110 0 0 0 1 1 2

POG 143 1 0 0 3 0 4 BAD 295 0 1 0 1 0 2 Total 4 23 12 11 4 54 eans Report IT_core BAD Core Classes ean N td. Deviation BAD 001 8.7500 4 2.06155 BAD 003 2.0000 1. ACCT 015 6.1667 6 1.83485 ACCT 016 5.6000 5 1.51658 ECON 002 3.5000 4 0.57735 ECON 003 0.0000 1. ATH 45 4.0000 1. ATH 47 2.0000 1. BLA 100 3.0000 4 0.81650 GT 129 6.3333 3 3.21455 GT 131 4.8000 5 0.83666 GT 180 3.0000 4 0.81650 KTG 170 4.5714 7 1.71825 FIN 150 4.0000 2 0.00000 IN 110 9.5000 2 2.12132 POG 143 5.7500 4 4.03113 BAD 295 6.0000 2 4.24264 Total 5.0536 56 2.56139 Program Alignment and ection Consistency: Critical Thinking BAD Core Classes * tudent do case analysis writeup in course? Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes tudent do case analysis write-up in course? no yes Total BAD 001 3 1 4 BAD 003 1 0 1 ACCT 015 6 0 6 ACCT 016 2 3 5 ECON 002 4 0 4

ECON 003 1 0 1 ATH 45 1 0 1 ATH 47 1 0 1 BLA 100 0 4 4 GT 129 3 0 3 GT 131 3 2 5 GT 180 2 2 4 KTG 170 4 3 7 FIN 150 1 1 2 IN 110 2 0 2 POG 143 4 0 4 BAD 295 0 2 2 Total 38 18 56 BAD Core Classes * Project involve student research? Crosstabulation Project involves student research? BAD Core Classes no yes Total BAD 001 0 1 1 ACCT 016 0 1 1 ECON 003 0 1 1 BLA 100 0 1 1 GT 129 0 2 2 GT 131 1 0 1 GT 180 0 1 1 KTG 170 1 4 5 BAD 295 1 1 2 Total 3 12 15 BAD Core Classes * tudents perform quantitative analysis? Crosstabulation tudents perform quantitative analysis? BAD Core Classes no yes Total BAD 001 2 2 4 BAD 003 0 1 1 ACCT 015 4 2 6 ACCT 016 1 4 5 ECON 002 3 1 4 ECON 003 1 0 1

ATH 45 1 0 1 ATH 47 0 1 1 BLA 100 4 0 4 GT 129 3 0 3 GT 131 0 5 5 GT 180 3 1 4 KTG 170 4 3 7 FIN 150 1 1 2 IN 110 0 2 2 POG 143 0 4 4 BAD 295 0 2 2 Total 27 29 56 BAD Core Classes * tudent do mathematical calculations? Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes tudents do mathematical calculations? no yes Total BAD 001 0 4 4 BAD 003 0 1 1 ACCT 015 0 6 6 ACCT 016 0 5 5 ECON 002 0 4 4 ECON 003 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 1 1 BLA 100 4 0 4 GT 129 3 0 3 GT 131 1 4 5 GT 180 3 1 4 KTG 170 1 6 7 FIN 150 0 2 2 IN 110 0 2 2 POG 143 0 4 4 BAD 295 0 2 2 Total 12 44 56 BAD Core Classes * critical thinking skills Crosstabulation critical thinking skills Total

BAD Core Classes Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant BAD 001 0 3 1 0 4 BAD 003 0 0 0 1 1 ACCT 015 0 1 2 3 6 ACCT 016 0 0 1 4 5 ECON 002 0 0 4 0 4 ECON 003 0 0 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 0 0 1 1 ATH 47 0 0 0 1 1 BLA 100 0 0 1 3 4 GT 129 0 1 1 1 3 GT 131 0 1 2 2 5 GT 180 0 2 0 2 4 KTG 170 0 1 2 3 6 FIN 150 0 0 0 2 2 IN 110 1 1 0 0 2 POG 143 0 2 1 1 4 BAD 295 0 0 1 1 2 Total 1 12 16 26 55 eans Critical_Thinking_core Report BAD Core Classes ean N td. Deviation BAD 001 4.5000 4 1.73205 BAD 003 8.0000 1. ACCT 015 6.0000 6 1.78885 ACCT 016 8.2000 5 1.92354 ECON 002 5.2500 4 0.50000 ECON 003 8.0000 1. ATH 45 7.0000 1. ATH 47 8.0000 1. BLA 100 6.7500 4 1.25831 GT 129 4.6667 3 2.08167 GT 131 6.6000 5 2.30217 GT 180 5.2500 4 3.59398 KTG 170 6.2857 7 2.21467 FIN 150 8.0000 2 0.00000 IN 110 3.5000 2 0.70711 POG 143 5.5000 4 1.91485

BAD 295 8.5000 2 2.12132 Total 6.2143 56 2.13809 Program Alignment and ection Consistency: Diversity BAD Core Classes BAD Core Classes * diversity skills Crosstabulation diversity skills Not at all Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant Total BAD 001 0 1 1 2 0 4 BAD 003 1 0 0 0 0 1 ACCT 015 1 2 2 0 1 6 ACCT 016 2 1 1 0 1 5 ECON 002 0 0 3 1 0 4 ECON 003 0 0 0 1 0 1 ATH 45 0 0 1 0 0 1 ATH 47 1 0 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 0 0 3 1 0 4 GT 129 0 0 1 1 1 3 GT 131 0 0 2 2 1 5 GT 180 0 0 3 1 0 4 KTG 170 0 1 5 0 1 7 FIN 150 1 0 1 0 0 2 IN 110 0 2 0 0 0 2 POG 143 1 1 2 0 0 4 BAD 295 0 0 2 0 0 2 Total 7 8 27 9 5 56 eans Report diversity skills BAD Core Classes ean N td. Deviation BAD 001 2.75 4 1.500 BAD 003 0.00 1. ACCT 015 2.00 6 2.098 ACCT 016 1.80 5 2.490 ECON 002 2.50 4 1.000 ECON 003 4.00 1.

ATH 45 2.00 1. ATH 47 0.00 1. BLA 100 2.50 4 1.000 GT 129 4.00 3 2.000 GT 131 3.60 5 1.673 GT 180 2.50 4 1.000 KTG 170 2.43 7 1.618 FIN 150 1.00 2 1.414 IN 110 1.00 2 0.000 POG 143 1.25 4 0.957 BAD 295 2.00 2 0.000 Total 2.29 56 1.637 Program Alignment and ection Consistency: Ethics BAD Core Classes * ethical skills Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes ethical skills Not at all Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant Total BAD 001 0 1 1 1 1 4 BAD 003 0 1 0 0 0 1 ACCT 015 0 1 1 2 2 6 ACCT 016 0 1 1 1 2 5 ECON 002 0 1 2 1 0 4 ECON 003 0 0 0 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 0 1 0 0 1 ATH 47 0 1 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 0 0 2 2 0 4 GT 129 0 0 2 0 1 3 GT 131 0 0 3 2 0 5 GT 180 0 0 2 1 1 4 KTG 170 0 1 4 1 1 7 FIN 150 1 0 0 1 0 2 IN 110 0 1 1 0 0 2 POG 143 0 1 3 0 0 4 BAD 295 0 1 1 0 0 2 Total 1 10 24 12 9 56 eans ethical skills Report

BAD Core Classes ean N td. Deviation BAD 001 3.25 4 2.217 BAD 003 1.00 1. ACCT 015 3.83 6 2.041 ACCT 016 3.80 5 2.280 ECON 002 2.25 4 1.258 ECON 003 6.00 1. ATH 45 2.00 1. ATH 47 1.00 1. BLA 100 3.00 4 1.155 GT 129 3.33 3 2.309 GT 131 2.80 5 1.095 GT 180 3.50 4 1.915 KTG 170 2.71 7 1.704 FIN 150 2.00 2 2.828 IN 110 1.50 2 0.707 POG 143 1.75 4 0.500 BAD 295 1.50 2 0.707 Total 2.86 56 1.731 Program Alignment and ection Consistency: Teamwork BAD Core Classes * Paper assignments groups? Crosstabulation Paper assignments groups? BAD Core Classes no yes Total BAD 001 0 4 4 ACCT 015 2 0 2 ACCT 016 4 0 4 ECON 002 3 0 3 ECON 003 1 0 1 BLA 100 1 3 4 GT 129 1 2 3 GT 131 0 5 5 GT 180 3 0 3 KTG 170 1 6 7 FIN 150 1 0 1 POG 143 0 1 1 BAD 295 1 1 2

Total 18 22 40 BAD Core Classes * Require group oral presentations? Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes Require group oral presentations? no yes Total BAD 001 0 4 4 ACCT 015 1 0 1 ACCT 016 3 1 4 ECON 002 1 0 1 BLA 100 0 3 3 GT 129 1 2 3 GT 131 1 3 4 GT 180 0 2 2 KTG 170 0 1 1 POG 143 0 1 1 BAD 295 0 1 1 Total 7 18 25 BAD Core Classes * tudents work in groups? Crosstabulation tudents work in groups? BAD Core Classes no yes Total BAD 001 0 4 4 BAD 003 1 0 1 ACCT 015 5 1 6 ACCT 016 2 3 5 ECON 002 4 0 4 ECON 003 1 0 1 ATH 45 0 1 1 ATH 47 1 0 1 BLA 100 0 4 4 GT 129 1 2 3 GT 131 0 5 5 GT 180 1 3 4 KTG 170 1 6 7 FIN 150 2 0 2 IN 110 2 0 2 POG 143 2 2 4 BAD 295 0 2 2

Total 23 33 56 BAD Core Classes * tudent group work on ungraded assigns? Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes tudent group work on ungraded assigns? no yes Total BAD 001 4 0 4 ACCT 015 0 1 1 ACCT 016 0 3 3 ATH 45 0 1 1 BLA 100 3 1 4 GT 129 2 0 2 GT 131 2 3 5 GT 180 0 3 3 KTG 170 3 3 6 POG 143 1 1 2 BAD 295 2 0 2 Total 17 16 33 BAD Core Classes * Hours in class in groups on ungraded assign Crosstabulation Hours in class in groups on ungraded assign < 1 hour about 1-2 hours about 2-4 hours about 4-6 hours about 6-8 hours about 14-16 hours Total BAD Core Classes ACCT 015 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ACCT 016 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 ATH 45 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 GT 131 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 GT 180 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 KTG 170 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 POG 143 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Total 2 5 4 3 1 1 16 BAD Core Classes * teamwork skills Crosstabulation teamwork skills Not at all Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant Total BAD Core Classes BAD 001 0 1 0 2 1 4

BAD 003 1 0 0 0 0 1 ACCT 015 3 1 2 0 0 6 ACCT 016 2 0 3 0 0 5 ECON 002 2 1 0 0 0 3 ECON 003 1 0 0 0 0 1 ATH 45 0 0 1 0 0 1 ATH 47 1 0 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 0 0 3 1 0 4 GT 129 0 1 0 0 2 3 GT 131 0 0 1 2 2 5 GT 180 1 1 1 0 1 4 KTG 170 1 0 2 1 3 7 FIN 150 2 0 0 0 0 2 IN 110 2 0 0 0 0 2 POG 143 1 1 1 1 0 4 BAD 295 0 0 1 1 0 2 Total 17 6 15 8 9 55 Crosstabs BAD Core Classes * understanding ext forces Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes understanding ext forces Not at all Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant Total BAD 001 0 0 1 3 0 4 BAD 003 1 0 0 0 0 1 ACCT 015 1 0 2 2 1 6 ACCT 016 0 0 2 1 2 5 ECON 002 0 1 0 0 3 4 ECON 003 0 0 0 0 1 1 ATH 45 0 0 1 0 0 1 ATH 47 1 0 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 0 0 0 2 2 4 GT 129 0 1 1 1 0 3 GT 131 0 2 1 1 1 5 GT 180 0 0 1 2 1 4 KTG 170 0 0 1 2 4 7 FIN 150 0 0 0 2 0 2 IN 110 0 0 2 0 0 2 POG 143 0 0 2 2 0 4 BAD 295 0 0 0 1 1 2

Total 3 4 14 19 16 56 BAD Core Classes * understanding Int'l business Crosstabulation understanding Int'l business Not at all Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant Total BAD Core Classes BAD 001 0 1 1 1 1 4 BAD 003 1 0 0 0 0 1 ACCT 015 0 3 2 1 0 6 ACCT 016 1 3 0 0 1 5 ECON 002 0 2 1 0 1 4 ECON 003 0 0 1 0 0 1 ATH 45 0 1 0 0 0 1 ATH 47 1 0 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 0 2 2 0 0 4 GT 129 0 3 0 0 0 3 GT 131 0 5 0 0 0 5 GT 180 0 1 3 0 0 4 KTG 170 0 1 4 2 0 7 FIN 150 0 1 1 0 0 2 IN 110 0 0 2 0 0 2 POG 143 0 1 1 2 0 4 BAD 295 0 0 2 0 0 2 Total 3 24 20 6 3 56 BAD Core Classes * understanding bus func areas Crosstabulation BAD Core Classes understanding bus func areas Very Not at all Little oderate ignificant ignificant Total BAD 001 0 0 1 3 0 4 BAD 003 1 0 0 0 0 1 ACCT 015 0 0 3 1 2 6 ACCT 016 0 0 2 1 2 5 ECON 002 1 1 1 0 1 4 ECON 003 0 0 1 0 0 1 ATH 45 0 1 0 0 0 1 ATH 47 1 0 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 0 1 0 1 2 4 GT 129 0 1 2 0 0 3 GT 131 0 0 2 3 0 5 GT 180 0 0 0 1 3 4

KTG 170 0 0 0 4 3 7 FIN 150 0 0 1 0 1 2 IN 110 0 0 1 0 1 2 POG 143 0 0 2 0 2 4 BAD 295 0 0 0 0 2 2 Total 3 4 16 14 19 56 BAD Core Classes * understanding of diversity Crosstabulation understanding of diversity Not at all Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant Total BAD Core Classes BAD 001 0 0 3 1 0 4 BAD 003 1 0 0 0 0 1 ACCT 015 2 1 2 1 0 6 ACCT 016 2 1 1 0 1 5 ECON 002 0 2 1 0 1 4 ECON 003 0 1 0 0 0 1 ATH 45 0 1 0 0 0 1 ATH 47 1 0 0 0 0 1 BLA 100 0 2 1 1 0 4 GT 129 0 0 2 1 0 3 GT 131 0 0 2 3 0 5 GT 180 0 1 2 1 0 4 KTG 170 1 2 2 1 1 7 FIN 150 2 0 0 0 0 2 IN 110 0 2 0 0 0 2 POG 143 0 1 3 0 0 4 BAD 295 0 1 1 0 0 2 Total 9 15 20 9 3 56 Frequencies written comm skills oral comm skills IT skills Not at all Little oderate ignificant Very ignificant 4 10 22 9 8 9 17 15 5 5 4 23 12 11 4

critical thinking skills diversity skills ethical skills teamwork skills understanding ext forces understanding Int'l business understanding bus func areas understanding of diversity 1 12 16 26 7 8 27 9 5 1 10 24 12 9 17 6 15 8 9 3 4 14 19 16 3 24 20 6 3 3 4 16 14 19 9 15 20 9 3 Descriptives written comm skills oral comm skills IT skills critical thinking skills diversity skills ethical skills teamwork skills understanding ext forces understanding Int'l business Descriptive tatistics N ean td. Deviation 53 2.60 1.812 51 1.90 1.746 54 2.13 1.660 55 4.45 1.665 56 2.29 1.637 56 2.86 1.731 55 2.22 2.140 56 3.64 1.892 56 1.89 1.397

understanding bus func areas understanding of diversity 56 3.68 1.992 56 1.95 1.566