International Advanced level examinations

Similar documents
Guide to the Uniform mark scale (UMS) Uniform marks in A-level and GCSE exams

Edexcel Gcse Maths 2013 Nov Resit

Lismore Comprehensive School

Idsall External Examinations Policy

QUEEN S UNIVERSITY BELFAST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DENTISTRY AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES ADMISSION POLICY STATEMENT FOR MEDICINE FOR 2018 ENTRY

WOODBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL

Information for Private Candidates

EXAMINATIONS POLICY 2016/2017

GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales

Idaho Public Schools

Have earned IB, AP, A-Level, French Baccalaureate or Equivalent

Material Safety Data Sheet Fisher Sci

Sixth Form Admissions Procedure

Changes to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents

DEPARTMENT OF EXAMINATIONS, SRI LANKA GENERAL CERTIFICATE OF EDUCATION (ADVANCED LEVEL) EXAMINATION - AUGUST 2016

A journey to medicine: Routes into medicine

e a c h m a i d e n h e a d. c o. u k

Opening up Opportunities for year olds

Examinations Officer Part-Time Term-Time 27.5 hours per week

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS

(English translation)

Exam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy

Year 11 Banana Schedule 2017

UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX UNDERGRADUATE RULES OF ASSESSMENT

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

IB Diploma Subject Selection Brochure

Past Year Papers For Pyc1501

Assessment booklet Assessment without levels and new GCSE s

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

LEAFLET FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS

Job Description for Virtual Learning Platform Assistant and Staff ICT Trainer

QUEEN S UNIVERSITY BELFAST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DENTISTRY AND BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES ADMISSION POLICY STATEMENT FOR DENTISTRY FOR 2016 ENTRY

BIRMINGHAM INDEPENDENT COLLEGE Examination Contingency Plan. Centre Number: 20635

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

Known knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns The Six Dimensions Project Report 2017 Nick Allen

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Specification. BTEC Specialist qualifications. Edexcel BTEC Level 1 Award/Certificate/Extended Certificate in Construction Skills (QCF)

Appendix A (Mental Arithmetic): Level Category Test Question Standard # of Questions Time Limit

GCSE Mathematics B (Linear) Mark Scheme for November Component J567/04: Mathematics Paper 4 (Higher) General Certificate of Secondary Education

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

LOUISIANA HIGH SCHOOL RALLY ASSOCIATION

Admission and Readmission

Junior Scheduling Assembly. February 22, 2017

University of Exeter College of Humanities. Assessment Procedures 2010/11

International Student Prospectus 2015/2016. EduSpiral Consultant Services For more info call

COLLEGE OF INTEGRATED CHINESE MEDICINE ADMISSIONS POLICY

Business Studies A Level Past Exam Papers Pdf

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA No.HHC/Admn.2(31)/87-IV- Dated:

SECTION 2 APPENDICES 2A, 2B & 2C. Bachelor of Dental Surgery

Zimsec Geography Past Exam Papers Pdf O Level

Biomedical Sciences (BC98)

M.SC. BIOSTATISTICS PROGRAMME ( ) The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda

WEST HATCH HIGH SCHOOL THE BEST THAT I CAN BE. Exams Policy

22/07/10. Last amended. Date: 22 July Preamble

DIPLOMA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE PROGRAMME

Steps for Thesis / Thematic Paper Process (Master s Degree Program)

ADMISSION OF STUDENTS INFORMATION AND GUIDELINES/PROCEDURE

Examination Timetables Series to Series

3. Examinations and final assessment of the degree programmes

Information Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge

Language learning in primary and secondary schools in England Findings from the 2012 Language Trends survey

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

DIPLOMA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE PROGRAMME

Bachelor of International Hospitality Management, BA IHM. Course curriculum National and Institutional Part

Math-U-See Correlation with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Content for Third Grade

Wright State University

May 2011 (Revised March 2016)

University of North Dakota

ADVANCED PLACEMENT STUDENTS IN COLLEGE: AN INVESTIGATION OF COURSE GRADES AT 21 COLLEGES. Rick Morgan Len Ramist

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ACCESS AGREEMENT

Dated Shimla-1 the 4 th December,2015. To All the Deputy Directors of Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh

University of Richmond Teacher Preparation Handbook

Application for Admission to Postgraduate Studies

Level 6. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) Fee for 2017/18 is 9,250*

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

Perioperative Care of Congenital Heart Diseases

O.C.G. Oiriúnú le haghaidh Cáilíochta sa Ghaeilge (Adaptation Period) Guide

INTRODUCTION TO TEACHING GUIDE

Conditions of study and examination regulations of the. European Master of Science in Midwifery

ELP in whole-school use. Case study Norway. Anita Nyberg

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Further & Higher Education Childcare Funds. Guidance. Academic Year

HONG KONG INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Frequently Asked Questions

I. General provisions. II. Rules for the distribution of funds of the Financial Aid Fund for students

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

POST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013

Stafford Sri Lankan School - Doha List of Textbooks for Academic Year 2017/2018

Anglia Ruskin University Assessment Offences

Answer Key Applied Calculus 4

Degree Regulations and Programmes of Study Undergraduate Degree Programme Regulations 2017/18

Personal Tutoring at Staffordshire University

Math Placement at Paci c Lutheran University

TESL/TESOL Certification

Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools

Montana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education

Research Training Program Stipend (Domestic) [RTPSD] 2017 Rules

Grading Policy/Evaluation: The grades will be counted in the following way: Quizzes 30% Tests 40% Final Exam: 30%

Stafford Sri Lankan School - Doha List of Textbooks for Academic Year 2017/2018

Transcription:

International Advanced level examinations Entry, Aggregation and Certification Procedures and Rules Effective from 2014 onwards Document running section

Contents Introduction 3 1. Making entries 4 2. Receiving results 5 3. Re-sits 6 4. Cashing in awards the options and actions 7 5. To cash in or not to cash in? 8 6. Enquiries about results and access to scripts 9 7. Arrangements for GCE AS candidates transferring between specifications 10 or awarding bodies midway through an A-level course (having completed and certificated a GCE AS award) Appendices 1. Uniform mark scales 11 2. Grading of IAL Law 12

Introduction This document sets out the rules and principal administrative requirements for International Advanced Level (IAL) qualifications, apart from Mathematics. The guidance for mathematics is set out in the document titled ial-mathematics-rules-guidance-for-centres on the maths web page here. IAL qualifications are available in these subjects: Accounting; Business Studies; Economics; Law; Biology; Chemistry; Physics; Mathematics; English Language; English Literature; History; Psychology; Geography; French; German; Spanish; Arabic; Greek and Applied ICT. The document is designed for use by all those responsible (particularly schools and colleges) for the administration of International Advanced Level examinations. The aim is to explain and provide a commentary on the main activities and terms involved, and to offer guidance on the application of the rules for International Advanced Level qualifications. In International Advanced Level specifications, students generally take units at Advanced Subsidiary level (IAS) for an IAS qualification, which is a free standing qualification and may be awarded separately. Students may choose to take further IA2 units to complete the full IAL qualification. Accounting, Arabic and Greek each consists of a one unit at IAS, and an additional unit at IA2 for the full IAL qualification. Business Studies, Economics, Geography, History, Psychology, English Language, English Literature, French, German, Spanish each consists of two IAS units and two IA2 units. Biology, Chemistry and Physics - each consist of three IAS units and three IA2 units. Mathematics - There are 12 units available in the IAL specification, including the combined Core Mathematics units. Combinations of these 12 units can lead to IAL qualification awards in Mathematics, Further Mathematics and Pure Mathematics. There is a separate Entry, Aggregation and Certification document that is specific to Mathematics, which explains in more detail the ways in which the 12 units can be combined to achieve the three qualification award options. IAL Law, has a linear assessment model and does not include an Advanced Subsidiary award option. The IAL in Law consists of two papers which must both be completed in the same examination session to receive an IAL Law qualification. Unlike other IALs, it is not possible to reuse the results of the individual assessments in later examination series.

1. Making entries Edexcel International Advanced Level qualifications are not available to centres in the UK, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. Additionally, British Armed Forces schools based overseas are not able to make entries for these qualifications. Students who have Edexcel GCE unit results from 2013 or earlier Edexcel GCE unit results achieved in examination series up to, and including, summer 2013 will be available for use in the certification of IAL qualifications until summer 2015, when used in a valid combination with IAL unit results. Key issue: Entries can lead either to unit results or to qualification awards. (i) Entries for individual units An entry is required for each unit which a student intends to take in any given examination series. This is necessary so that students are provided with the correct examination paper(s) and receive the correct result(s) at the end of the process. See Pearson s current International Information Manual for final entry dates. http://www.edexcel.com/iwantto/pages/international-information-manual.aspx Entries should be made by the student s school or college for the unit(s) for which the student has been prepared. Units can be taken in any order. When entries are made for units, there is no requirement for the student to declare the level or title of the qualification which he/she is intending to complete. Some units, for example in IAL Mathematics, are common to more than one title. (ii) Entries for qualification awards ( cashing in or aggregation) Once the student has gained or has entered for the appropriate set of units, an entry may then be made for the qualification award. This is known as cashing in or aggregation, and is the indication to the awarding body that the student wishes to complete the qualification and receive certification. Cashing in or aggregation is not automatic. It can only be applied for when the student has entered for, or gained the appropriate set of units for his/her chosen qualification. Applying to cash in or aggregate does not indicate an entry for any particular unit or combination of units. Specific entries must still be made for any units which the student wishes to take in the respective examination series, with a separate entry for the overall qualification. Cashing in or aggregation is normally applied for at the same time that entries are made for the student s final units. It may also be applied for in the period immediately following receipt of unit results. Candidates who have sufficient unit results for an award but have not cashed in or aggregated may do so retrospectively through their centre. The centre must submit the request to Pearson (InternationalEO@pearson.com).

2. Receiving results Key issue: Unit results are reported as uniform marks and unit grades; qualification results are reported as grades. For all IAL units, grade boundaries are determined at awarding meetings in terms of the raw marks for the unit. These raw mark grade boundaries are then translated on to a uniform mark scale (UMS) which has fixed grade boundaries. A student s unit results are reported as uniform marks. The maximum uniform mark for IAL units depends on the weighting of the unit. The uniform mark allows a grade equivalent to be calculated for each unit, which may also be shown on the results slip. Uniform mark scales are given in Appendix 1. Results slips will include for each unit, as a minimum: the unit title; the candidate s UMS mark for the unit; and the examination series in which the unit was taken; Information enabling UMS marks to be equated to IAL grades will also be provided. If a student has applied to cash in or aggregate, a qualification result will also be issued. The result will be reported as a grade which is calculated by adding up the best uniform marks for each unit required. Students will be awarded Grade A* if they achieve Grade A for the full IAL (i.e. at least 160, 320 or 480 uniform marks in the 2, 4 or 6 unit A-levels respectively) and 90% or more of the available uniform marks from their IA2 units (i.e. 90, 180 or 270 uniform marks for the IA2 units in the 2, 4 or 6 unit A-levels respectively). Special rules apply to Mathematics please see Appendix 1. IAL Law IAL Law is a linear qualification and therefore is not awarded in the same way as outlined above. The grading process for IAL Law is set out in Appendix 2. Certificates Certificates will show for each subject: the subject title; the qualification; the subject grade; and the examination series in which the award was made;

3. Re-sits Key issue: cashed in. Any unit can be re-sat irrespective of whether the qualification is to be Only the better of the two most recent non-absent attempts at an IAL unit will be available for aggregation to a qualification grade. If a student has claimed IAS certification, he/she may still re-sit one or more IAS units in addition to IA2 units prior to cashing in for an IAL award. 4. Cashing in awards the options and actions This section considers the options and actions available to a student who wishes either to finish his/her qualification or intends to take the qualification further. (i) Options and actions for the student intending to finish the qualification This information applies to a student who has completed the units for an IAS or IAL qualification and who has no intention of proceeding to a further award. If the student is satisfied with his/her grade (cashing in being applied for at the time the entry was made) no further action is necessary. If cashing in was not applied for at the time of entry, it can be applied for retrospectively after the issue of results. If the student is not satisfied with his/her grade and wishes to improve it, one or more of the units may be re-sat and certification requested again in a future examination series. Where a unit consists of more than one option, the candidate may take a new optional unit. The better of the two most recent results for a unit will count towards the new award. (ii) Options and actions for the student intending to take the qualification further This information applies to a student who has completed the units for an IAS or IAL qualification and who wishes to take that qualification further. The student can proceed to a further qualification whether or not the first award is cashed in or aggregated. Individual units may be re-sat at a future series and count towards the further qualification. If the student is satisfied with his/her grade (cashing in being applied for at the time the entry was made) no further action is necessary. If cashing in was not applied for at the time of entry, it can be applied for retrospectively after the issue of results. If the student is not satisfied with his/her grade and wishes to improve it, one or more of the units may be re-sat and certification requested again in a future examination series. Where a unit consists of more than one option, the candidate may take a new optional unit. The better of the two most recent results for a unit will count towards the new award.

Figures 2a and 2b summarise the courses of action available to a student who applied to cash in when entries were made and to a student who did not apply to cash in at that stage. Each box represents a stage of the process, and each arrow represents a choice that can be made at that stage. Figure 2a Options for those who have requested to cash in follow any route through Unit entries made and Results received Accept grade (no further action necessary) Retake one or more units Unit entries made and Finish course Results received Continue to further award Figure 2b through Options for those who have not requested to cash in follow any route Unit entries made but Results received Request late cash in Finish course Cash in Retake one or more units 5. To cash in or not to cash in? Continue to further award

The decision on whether or not to cash in should be taken in the light of an individual student s requirements. There are implications for either course of action, and these are outlined below. (i) (ii) If the student requests to cash in the qualification He/she will receive a grade and a certificate. Individual units can still be re-sat and count towards the next level of award. The student may attempt to improve the grade by re-taking one or more units (and applying to cash in again). If the student does not cash in the qualification No grade or certificate is issued. The individual unit results can be improved. The unit results remain in the bank. This means he/she can have a change of mind and cash in at a later date to claim the grade to which he/she is entitled. There is no requirement to sit any further units.

6. Enquiries about results and access to scripts If there is concern about the result of a unit following the publication of results, the centre can submit an application for an enquiry about results to Pearson. Dates by which applications have to be made are given in Pearson s current International Information Manual http://www.edexcel.com/iwantto/pages/international-information-manual.aspx and full details of the services available are given in the JCQ publication Post Results Services Information and guidance to centres - http://www.jcq.org.uk/exams-office/post-results-services Centres must submit applications for enquiries about results within the enquiry period immediately following the publication of results. It is not possible to make an enquiry about a unit taken in a previous series. An enquiry made in relation to an overall qualification grade is limited to a clerical check, ensuring that the aggregation of the unit marks has been correctly carried out. The outcome of an enquiry can lead to the uniform mark being confirmed, raised or lowered. If cashin has been requested, the qualification grade may be confirmed, raised or lowered. Centres may also submit applications to Pearson for the return of examination scripts to support teaching and learning, or to request a priority copy of a script before deciding whether to submit an enquiry about results. All information relating to this service is available on our website here: http://qualifications.pearson.com/en/support/support-topics/results-certification/post-resultsservices.html

7. Arrangements for candidates transferring between specifications or awarding bodies midway through an A level course (having completed and certificated a GCE AS award) Candidates who have completed an Ofqual-regulated GCE AS who move to another centre or who, for other reasons, have to change their programme of study part way through a GCE A-level course may be eligible to transfer to a Pearson Edexcel IAS award. Details of this transfer of credit process is given in the JCQ document Information for centres Arrangements for GCE AS candidates transferring between specifications or awarding bodies midway through a GCE A-level course (having completed and certificated a GCE AS award). - http://www.jcq.org.uk/exams-office/entries/gce-entry-information-incltransfer-of-credit

Uniform mark scales Appendix 1 IAL UNIT RESULTS The minimum uniform marks required for each grade equivalent: Unit grade equivalent A B C D E where maximum uniform mark is 60 48 42 36 30 24 where maximum uniform mark is 78 62 55 47 39 31 where maximum uniform mark is 80 64 56 48 40 32 where maximum uniform mark is 90 72 63 54 45 36 where maximum uniform mark is 100 80 70 60 50 40 where maximum uniform mark is 105 84 74 63 53 42 where maximum uniform mark is 110 88 77 66 55 44 where maximum uniform mark is 111 89 78 67 56 44 where maximum uniform mark is 120 96 84 72 60 48 where maximum uniform mark is 140 112 98 84 70 56 where maximum uniform mark is 200 160 140 120 100 80 where maximum uniform mark is 300 240 210 180 150 120 IAL QUALIFICATION GRADES The maximum uniform mark for the qualification and the minimum uniform mark required for each grade: Qualification grade A B C D E Advanced Subsidiary (AS) where maximum uniform mark is 100 80 70 60 50 40 Advanced Subsidiary (AS) where maximum uniform mark is 200 160 140 120 100 80 Advanced Subsidiary (AS) where maximum uniform mark is 300 240 210 180 150 120 Qualification grade A* A B C D E Advanced (A-level) see where maximum uniform mark is 200 note 160 140 120 100 80 Advanced (A-level) see where maximum uniform mark is 400 note 320 280 240 200 160 Advanced (A-level) see where maximum uniform mark is 600 note 480 420 360 300 240 Note The general rule for the award of A* is: a grade A overall at A-level and 90% of the maximum uniform mark on the aggregate of the A2 units The rule in Mathematics is: a grade A overall at A-level and 90% of the maximum uniform mark on Unit Core Mathematics 34 The rule in Further Mathematics is: a grade A overall at A-level and 90% of the maximum uniform mark on the aggregate of the three best A2 units Appendix 2

Grading of IAL Law IAL Law qualification grading Grade boundary marks for each component will be determined judgementally for the key boundaries: E/U A/B After key grade boundaries for each component have been set, provisional boundaries for the qualification as a whole will be established for the key judgemental grades. The boundary mark for each component is scaled as necessary to reflect the weighting for that component as detailed in the specification. The other grade boundaries are determined arithmetically. The grade B/C, C/D and D/E boundary marks are calculated by dividing the mark interval between the A/B and E/U boundaries by four. The A* boundary is set as follows: the A* boundary is set the same number of marks above the A boundary as the B boundary is below the A boundary If the mark interval between the A/B boundary and the maximum mark is less than or equal to twice the mark interval between A/B and B/C, then the A* boundary is set halfway between the A/B boundary and the maximum mark, rounded down where necessary to the nearest whole number (e.g. 78.5 is rounded to 78).