Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Similar documents
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium:

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Teachers Guide Chair Study

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - WRITING THIRD GRADE FIFTH GRADE

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

November 2012 MUET (800)

Secondary English-Language Arts

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

With guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

Program Report for the Preparation of Journalism Teachers

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Graduate Program in Education

Loveland Schools Literacy Framework K-6

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Pearson Longman Keystone Book D 2013

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

Summer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Unit of Study: STAAR Revision and Editing. Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District Elementary Language Arts Department, Grade 4

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Pearson Longman Keystone Book F 2013

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Epping Elementary School Plan for Writing Instruction Fourth Grade

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Technical Manual Supplement

Exemplar Grade 9 Reading Test Questions

Not the Quit ting Kind

Generic Project Rubrics 4th Grade

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Fears and Phobias Unit Plan

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

Scoring Notes for Secondary Social Studies CBAs (Grades 6 12)

Tap vs. Bottled Water

RUBRICS FOR MAJOR PROJECT EVALUATION

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

A. True B. False INVENTORY OF PROCESSES IN COLLEGE COMPOSITION

CHEM 591 Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry

Chemistry Senior Seminar - Spring 2016

RESPONSE TO LITERATURE

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

Teaching Literacy Through Videos

Cognitive Thinking Style Sample Report

South Carolina English Language Arts

Sample Goals and Benchmarks

Lucy Caulkins Writing Rubrics

MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE

1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document.

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

FREE COLLEGE Can Happen to You!

2006 Mississippi Language Arts Framework-Revised Grade 12

GTPS Curriculum English Language Arts-Grade 7

PERSONAL STATEMENTS and STATEMENTS OF PURPOSE

Grade 6: Module 4: Unit 3: Overview

Challenging Texts: Foundational Skills: Comprehension: Vocabulary: Writing: Disciplinary Literacy:

Grade 6 Intensive Language Arts - Collection 1 Facing Fear

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

COLLEGE WRITING: HOW TO TRANSFORM A HIGH SCHOOL WRITING PROGRAM INTO REAL COLLEGE PREPARATION

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

UNIT 3: Research & Methodology

MGMT3403 Leadership Second Semester

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Quantitative Research Questionnaire

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

AGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016

Handout 2.10a: 24 Operating Principles and the Verbal Behaviors That Go with Them Cultivating Classroom Discourse to Make Student Thinking Visible

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Lecturing in the Preclinical Curriculum A GUIDE FOR FACULTY LECTURERS

Assessment. the international training and education center on hiv. Continued on page 4

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Transcription:

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics October 2015

Target 1 Narrative (Organization Opening) provides an adequate opening or introduction to the narrative that may establish setting and/or point of view,* set up the action to come, establish the mood/tone,** and/or introduce the narrator and/or other characters for audience and purpose adequately connects to or sets up the body of the narrative provides an opening or introduction to the narrative that may partially establish setting and/or point of view,* or partially set up the action to come, partially establish the mood/tone,** and/or partially introduce the narrator and/or other characters provides a limited and/or awkward connection to the body of the narrative provides a minimal opening or introduction to the narrative that may fail to establish setting and/or point of view,* and/or fail to set up the action to come, fail to establish the mood/tone,** and/or fail to introduce the narrator and/or other characters provides no connection to the body of the narrative * point of view = begins in Grade 7 ** establish the mood/tone = begins in Grade 11

Target 3 Informational/Explanatory (Organization Introduction) introduces an adequate statement of the main idea/controlling idea/thesis* that reflects the body of writing as a whole provides adequate information to put the main idea/controlling idea/thesis* into context does more than list points/reasons to support main idea/controlling idea/thesis* not formulaic connects smoothly to the body paragraph provides a partial or limited main idea/controlling idea/thesis* provides a main idea/controlling idea/thesis* that partially reflects the body of writing as a whole may provide limited and/or extraneous information to put the main idea/controlling idea/thesis* into context may list supporting points/reasons formulaic provides a limited and/or awkward connection to the body paragraph provides no main idea/controlling idea/thesis* or provides a main idea/controlling idea/thesis* that is not appropriate for the body of writing as a whole provides irrelevant or no information to put the main idea/controlling idea/thesis* into context provides no connection to the body paragraph * main idea/controlling idea = only in grades 3-5 thesis/controlling idea = only in grades 6-8 thesis = only in grade 11

Target 6 Opinion (Organization Introduction) establishes an adequate opinion that reflects the body of writing as a whole provides adequate information to frame the opinion about the topic to put it into context does more than list reasons to support opinion not formulaic connects smoothly to the body paragraph provides a partial or limited opinion provides an opinion that partially reflects the body of writing as a whole may provide limited and/or extraneous information to frame the opinion about the topic to put it into context may just list supporting reasons formulaic provides a limited and/or awkward connection to the body paragraph provides no opinion or provides an opinion that is not appropriate based on the body of writing as a whole provides irrelevant or no information to frame to opinion about the topic to put it into context provides no connection to the body paragraph

Target 6 Argumentative (Organization Introduction) establishes an adequate claim that articulates the argument(s) presented in the body of writing as a whole provides adequate information to frame the argument to put the claim into context does more than list arguments to support claim not formulaic provides a logical connection to the body paragraph provides a partial or limited claim provides a claim that partially reflects the argument(s) presented in the body of writing as a whole provides limited and/or extraneous information to frame the argument to put the claim into context may list arguments formulaic provides a limited and/or awkward connection to the body paragraph provides no claim or provides a claim that is not appropriate for the body of writing as a whole provides irrelevant or no information to frame the argument to put the claim into context provides no connection to the body paragraph

Target 1 Narrative (Organization Conclusion) provides an adequate ending to the narrative that provides a sense of closure provides an adequate connection that follows from the events or experiences in the narrative provides an awkward or partial ending to the narrative that may provide a limited sense of closure provides a limited and/or awkward connection that somewhat follows from the events or experiences in the narrative provides an unclear or incomplete ending to the narrative that provides little or no closure provides a connection that does not follow from or contradicts the events or experiences in the narrative; or the ending relies on summary, repetition of details, or addition of extraneous details

Target 3 Informational/Explanatory (Organization Conclusion) provides an adequate conclusion that follows from and supports the preceding information in the body of writing as a whole or provides a so what statement (or provides an answer as to why this information is important or what should happen) does more than restate or summarize the points/reasons not formulaic provides adequate connections and/or progression of ideas to contribute to coherence provides a limited conclusion that is partially related to the information in the body of writing as a whole lists, restates, or summarizes the points/reasons formulaic provides an awkward or partial connection and/or limited progression of ideas provides no conclusion or a conclusion that is minimally related to the information in the body of writing may restate random and/or incorrect details from the preceding information provides no connections or progression of ideas

Target 6 Opinion (Organization Conclusion) provides an adequate conclusion that follows from and supports the opinion presented in the body of writing as a whole or provides an answer as to why this opinion is important or what should happen does more than restate or summarize the reasons not formulaic provides adequate connections and/or progression of ideas to contribute to coherence provides a limited conclusion that is partially related to the opinion presented in the body of writing as a whole lists, restates, or summarizes the reasons formulaic provides an awkward or partial connection and/or limited progression of ideas provides no conclusion or a conclusion that is minimally related to the opinion and the body of writing as a whole may restate random and/or incorrect reasons or just restate the opinion provides no connection or progression of ideas

Target 6 Argumentative (Organization Conclusion) provides an adequate conclusion that follows logically from and supports the claim presented in the body of writing as a whole or provides a call-to-action statement (or provides an answer as to why the claim is important or what should happen) does more than restate or summarize the arguments not formulaic provides adequate connections and/or progression of ideas to contribute to coherence provides a limited conclusion that is partially related to the claim presented in the body of writing as a whole lists, restates, or summarizes the arguments formulaic provides an awkward or partial connection and/or limited progression of ideas provides no conclusion or a conclusion that is minimally related to the claim and the body of writing as a whole may restate random and/or incorrect arguments or just restate the claim provides no connection or progression of ideas

Target 1 Narrative (Elaboration) provides appropriate and mainly specific descriptive details and/or dialogue provides adequate development of experiences, characters, setting, action, and/or events uses adequate sensory, concrete, and/or figurative language is mostly shown provides mostly general descriptive details and/or little or no dialogue, and may include extraneous details that are unrelated or only loosely related provides limited development of experiences, characters, setting, action, and/or events uses limited sensory, concrete, and/or figurative language is somewhat told includes few if any descriptive details and/or little or no dialogue. Details that are included may be vague, repetitive, incorrect, or interfere with the meaning of the narrative provides minimal, if any, development of experiences, characters, setting, action, and/or events uses little or no sensory, concrete, and/or figurative language is mostly told

Target 3 Informational/Explanatory (Elaboration) develops adequate supporting points/ideas/reasons/details and/or evidence from the student notes does more than list supporting details or ideas adequately elaborates ideas/reasons using precise words/language. provides mostly general and/or limited supporting points/ideas/reasons/details and/or evidence (which may be extraneous or loosely related) from the student notes lists supporting details or ideas with limited elaboration/evidence partially elaborates ideas/reasons using general words/language provides minimal or no supporting points/ideas/reasons/details and/or evidence from the student notes provides supporting points/ideas/reasons/details and/or evidence that may be unclear, repetitive, incorrect, contradictory to, or interfere with the meaning of the text provides no appropriate elaboration and/or may use poor word choice for audience and purpose * main idea/controlling idea = only in grades 3-5 thesis/controlling idea = only in grades 6-8 thesis = only in grade 11

Target 6 Opinion (Elaboration) develops adequate supporting reasons/details and/or evidence from the student notes does more than list supporting reasons or details adequately elaborates opinion/reasons using precise words/language. provides mostly general and/or limited supporting reasons/details and/or evidence, which may be extraneous or loosely related lists supporting reasons/details and/or evidence with limited elaboration partially elaborates opinion/reasons using general words/language provides minimal or no supporting reasons/details and/or evidence from the student notes provides supporting reasons/details and/or evidence that may be unclear, repetitive, incorrect, contradictory to, or interfere with the meaning of the text provides no appropriate elaboration and/or may use poor word choice for audience and purpose

Target 6 Argumentative (Elaboration) develops adequate supporting arguments and/or relevant evidence based on the student notes does more than list supporting arguments develops adequate counterargument(s) (if question calls for this)* adequately elaborates arguments using precise words/language provides mostly general and/or limited supporting arguments/evidence, which may be extraneous or loosely related lists supporting arguments with limited elaboration/evidence partially develops counterargument(s) (if question calls for this)* partially elaborates arguments using general words/language provides minimal or no supporting arguments and/or evidence from the student notes provides supporting arguments and/or evidence that may be unclear, repetitive, incorrect, contradictory to, or interfere with the meaning of the text does not develop counterargument(s) (if question calls for this)* provides no appropriate elaboration and/or may use poor word choice for audience and purpose *counterargument begins at Grade 7