How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

Similar documents
Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools

Students Understanding of Graphical Vector Addition in One and Two Dimensions

ASHMOLE ACADEMY. Admissions Appeals Booklet

Red Flags of Conflict

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

How to make an A in Physics 101/102. Submitted by students who earned an A in PHYS 101 and PHYS 102.

Exclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy

RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1

Lower and Upper Secondary

Idsall External Examinations Policy

What to Do When Conflict Happens

NCFE - Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

Virtually Anywhere Episodes 1 and 2. Teacher s Notes

Information Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge

Last Editorial Change:

London School of Economics and Political Science. Disciplinary Procedure for Students

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

School Complaints Policy

Eduroam Support Clinics What are they?

The Foundations of Interpersonal Communication

Planning a Dissertation/ Project

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

Solution Focused Methods RAYYA GHUL 2017

Developing Grammar in Context

The whole school approach and pastoral care

How to make successful presentations in English Part 2

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

Fair Measures. Newcastle University Job Grading Structure SUMMARY

EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT UNDER COMPETENCE BASED EDUCATION SCHEME

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

Initial English Language Training for Controllers and Pilots. Mr. John Kennedy École Nationale de L Aviation Civile (ENAC) Toulouse, France.

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

By Merrill Harmin, Ph.D.

Master of Statistics - Master Thesis

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

UK flood management scheme

Special Edition. Starter Teacher s Pack. Adrian Doff, Sabina Ostrowska & Johanna Stirling With Rachel Thake, Cathy Brabben & Mark Lloyd

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Diploma of Sustainability

Case study Norway case 1

Essential Guides Fees and Funding. All you need to know about student finance.

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

Writing a composition

TOPIC VN7 PAINTING AND DECORATING

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Practice Learning Handbook

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

NCSAC THE VOICE HANDBOOK. Student Administrative Council. Niagara College. student life defined

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

Pharmaceutical Medicine

Practice Learning Handbook

Hentai High School A Game Guide

A. True B. False INVENTORY OF PROCESSES IN COLLEGE COMPOSITION

PGCE Secondary Education. Primary School Experience

Video Marketing Strategy

Education and Training Committee, 19 November Standards of conduct, performance and ethics communications plan

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Grade 6: Module 2A: Unit 2: Lesson 8 Mid-Unit 3 Assessment: Analyzing Structure and Theme in Stanza 4 of If

PREVIEW LEADER S GUIDE IT S ABOUT RESPECT CONTENTS. Recognizing Harassment in a Diverse Workplace

Graduate Diploma in Sustainability and Climate Policy

How to Secure Five Offers

MADERA SCIENCE FAIR 2013 Grades 4 th 6 th Project due date: Tuesday, April 9, 8:15 am Parent Night: Tuesday, April 16, 6:00 8:00 pm

PUBLIC CASE REPORT Use of the GeoGebra software at upper secondary school

BISHOP BAVIN SCHOOL POLICY ON LEARNER DISCIPLINE AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES. (Created January 2015)

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

IN THIS UNIT YOU LEARN HOW TO: SPEAKING 1 Work in pairs. Discuss the questions. 2 Work with a new partner. Discuss the questions.

Planning a Webcast. Steps You Need to Master When

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

Briefing document CII Continuing Professional Development (CPD) scheme.

The Extend of Adaptation Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive Domain In English Questions Included in General Secondary Exams

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016

Topic 3: Roman Religion

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

Philosophy in Literature: Italo Calvino (Phil. 331) Fall 2014, M and W 12:00-13:50 p.m.; 103 PETR. Professor Alejandro A. Vallega.

Team Dispersal. Some shaping ideas

St Philip Howard Catholic School

Cuero Independent School District

PSYCHOLOGY 353: SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN SPRING 2006

European Association of Establishments for Veterinary Education. and the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe

Tutor Guidelines Fall 2016

E C C. American Heart Association. Basic Life Support Instructor Course. Updated Written Exams. February 2016

COMMUNICATING EFFECTIVELY WITH YOUR INSTRUCTOR

Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015

Spanish III Class Description

Writing the Personal Statement

Creating Travel Advice

How to make your research useful and trustworthy the three U s and the CRITIC

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Nevada Last Updated: October 2011

GCSE Results: What Next? Ü Ü. Norfolk County Council. Are your results better or worse than expected?

ROC Mondriaan Student Charter

Durham School NOW RECRUITING. Head of Business & Economics

Research Journal ADE DEDI SALIPUTRA NIM: F

Process improvement, The Agile Way! By Ben Linders Published in Methods and Tools, winter

Transcription:

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate We make final decisions about complaints that have not been resolved by the NHS in England, UK government departments and some other UK public organisations. We have a three-step process for dealing with complaints. An investigation is the final step in our process, but not all the complaints that come to us go through to this step. Our website includes lots of examples of complaints we ve investigated, if you would like to find out more about we can do. Step one When you first contact us Step two Deciding whether to investigate Step three Investigating your complaint This guide is about step three in our process - what happens when we investigate your complaint. If you have any questions about what we do, please get in touch. We also have guides to steps one and two of our process on our website. Go to www.ombudsman.org.uk or call us on 0345 015 4033.

What to expect: a quick guide to our investigations Once we have decided to investigate your complaint, we will pass it to one of our investigators as soon as possible. How we carry out an investigation may differ depending on what the complaint is about. But each investigation must follow these five key stages: 1. Starting our investigation. 2. Gathering the information we need. 3. Evaluating the information we ve gathered. 4. Explaining our initial conclusions. By the end of our investigation, you will: know exactly what we have been investigating and what information we have gathered have had the opportunity to comment on what we are seeing during our investigation have our final decision on your complaint and know how we reached it know what we expect the organisation you complained about to do to put right any mistakes or poor service we have found, and by when. How long will this take? We complete most of our investigations within three to six months. Some take longer, depending on the complexity of the issues, but we aim to complete 98% of all our investigations within a year. The rest of this guide has more details about what to expect at each stage of our investigation. 5. Communicating our final decision. Our job is to look at all of the facts and to be unbiased and fair to both you and the organisation.

A detailed guide to our investigations Stage 1 Starting our investigation We start by reading all the papers we already have on your complaint and will then contact you to go through your complaint in more detail. We will check our understanding of the complaint with you: what the key issues are, how these issues have affected you (or other people), and what you are expecting from our investigation. We will then let you know: exactly what issues we will look at, how we plan to gather the information we need, who we think we need to contact for an expert opinion on the issues (including any specialists such as medical professionals or legal advisers), how long we think our investigation will take. We will also check how you would like us to keep you updated during our investigation. We will talk to the organisation you have complained about too. We will explain what your concerns are and what we are investigating, and we will ask the organisation to give us all the relevant information. We will make sure that both you and the organisation understand what we will be investigating. We will look at any comments the organisation has given us. Occasionally we receive comments that may mean we decide to change what our investigation looks at, or we may decide not to investigate. For example, the organisation may give us information which shows it has now resolved your complaint. If this happens, our investigator will discuss this with you and explain what happens next. By the end of this stage, you will: know the name of your investigator, have spoken to your investigator, who will make sure they understand your complaint, know exactly what we will be investigating and how we plan to do that, know how long we expect things to take, know how we will keep you updated during our investigation.

Stage 2 Gathering the information we need At this stage we make sure we get all the information we need to fully cover the issues we are investigating. We will go through the information that you and the organisation have already given us. If we see any gaps, we will make sure we find the best way to get all the information we need. The way we do this varies from case to case. Mostly we will look at documents or carry out phone interviews, but sometimes we will carry out face-to-face interviews with you, staff at the organisation you have complained about, or other relevant people. We may also visit the organisation to make sure we get everything we need - for example, if we need to examine large files or get a better idea of how the organisation carries out its work. Our staff who investigate NHS complaints have a good level of knowledge about the NHS through their training and experience, but are not medically trained. That s why we speak to experts who are experienced medical professionals specialising in particular areas of care, and who have not been involved in your complaint before or have any connection to it. They work with our investigators to give them expert, informed advice to help us get a better understanding of the issues. Throughout this stage we will keep you updated about what information we are getting and what this means for our investigation. We will share facts with you and discuss what we are seeing. We will also let you know if we need to get more information and tell you when we think we will have all the information we need. By the end of this stage, you will know: what we have been doing to investigate your complaint, what information we have gathered, what it is telling us so far, and what other information we may need, our next steps and how long these might take.

Stage 3 Evaluating the information we ve gathered What should have happened To help us understand what should have happened, we look at how the organisation was expected to act at the time of the events. We look at any standards, legislation or established good practice that was in place at the time, and we use advice we have gathered from experts. We also refer to our Principles of Good Administration and Principles of Good Complaint Handling. These set out what we expect from organisations when they carry out their work and how they should reply when things go wrong. You can find them on our website. What did happen We will carefully consider whether the organisation has made mistakes or provided a poor service, or not acted properly or fairly. To do this, we will always take account of what information you have given us about what happened and the impact this had on you (or other people), and balance this with other information we have gathered and the organisation s comments. If we see that what happened fell below expectations for what should have happened, we then look at how that affected you. If we see that the organisation has fallen well short of what was expected of it, it is likely that we will say that the organisation got things wrong. However, if we can see that the organisation has only fallen slightly short of what was expected (for example, it did not respond to letters in the time expected but did respond soon after), we may decide that was not enough to mean that, overall, the organisation got things wrong. What the impact has been If we see that the organisation did get things wrong, we will then look at what affect this has had on you (or other people). Whether the organisation has already put things right If we find that you have suffered or been affected in some other way, we will then look at what the organisation may have already done to put this right. This is a really important part of our considerations. If we think that the organisation has already acknowledged and responded to some or all of the problems we have found, we will take this into account in our final decision. We will continue to keep you updated about our investigation. We may need to talk to you or the organisation to get more information or get your views as we evaluate the information we have gathered. When we have reached our initial conclusions on what we have seen during our investigation, we will begin to write a report about this. We will also let you know when we will be ready to share our report with you and the organisation. By the end of this stage, you will: know when we have gathered all the information we need to cover the issues in our investigation be up to date on what we are doing to reach our initial conclusions know when we are ready to start writing our report on our investigation, and what happens next

Stage 4 Explaining our initial conclusions We will write our report on our investigation and let you know when we will be ready to share it with you and the organisation, so you know when to expect it. If we need to get more information as we write our report, we will contact you. We call our report a draft report at this stage. This is because we don t finalise it until you, and the organisation you complained about, have had a chance to comment on it. Our draft report sets out the results of our investigation, the initial conclusions we have reached and what information we have used to come to that view. It will clearly explain: what happened, what should have happened, whether we believe the organisation got things wrong, whether we believe this affected you (or other people) negatively or caused suffering, whether or not this has been put right. We usually send you a copy of the report, but if you prefer we can explain our report to you over the phone before we send it to you. Occasionally, in investigations that cover very serious or complex issues, we may decide to visit you to go through our report in more detail. Our draft report will tell you if we propose to fully uphold, partly uphold or not uphold your complaint: If we fully uphold your complaint: this means we agree with your complaint. It means we found the organisation made mistakes or provided a poor service. This has caused you to suffer or affected you in other ways, and the organisation has not yet put this right. If we partly uphold your complaint: sometimes we may find that the organisation did get some things wrong, but not all the things you complained about. Or we might feel that the mistakes it made did not affect you negatively. If this is the case, we might partly uphold your complaint and we ll explain clearly why we have decided this. If we don t uphold your complaint: this means we found the organisation acted correctly in the first place, or that it did make mistakes but has already done what we would expect to put things right for you.

Stage 4 Explaining our initial conclusions continued If we fully or partly uphold your complaint, we can make recommendations to the organisation to put things right. This could include: acknowledging its mistakes, apologising to you, making a payment to you - for example, to pay you back if you have been left out of pocket because of its errors, or to acknowledge distress it has caused you, taking action to prevent the same mistakes happening to someone else, and to make services better for everyone. Our draft report will say whether we are making any recommendations. If we are, when we send the organisation our draft report, we will ask if it agrees to carry out those recommendations. 99% of the time, organisations agree to carry out our recommendations. Once we have shared our draft report with you, we normally ask you to get back to us with your feedback within two weeks. If you need more time, please let us know as soon as possible. When we get feedback from you and the organisation, we will decide whether we need to do more work on our investigation. If we do carry out more work, we will let you know what we are doing, and if necessary, we will share the draft report again. In any event we will make sure we respond to any feedback you gave us and say how we have taken it into account. By the end of this stage, you will: know when we will share our draft report with you, how we will share it with you, and how you can give us your feedback, have a clear understanding of what we investigated and what our initial conclusions are on your complaint, see what recommendations we have made, where appropriate, have the opportunity to feed back to us about our draft report, clearly see what we are doing to take all feedback into account.

Stage 5 Communicating our final decision Once we have considered all the feedback and carried out any more work we need to, we will finalise our investigation report and send it to you, the organisation, and any other person or organisation who was involved in the complaint. Occasionally, we share our reports with other organisations, such as a regulator, and we will let you know if we do this. We might do this, for example, if we have asked the organisation to make improvements to services which the regulator needs to keep a check on. If your complaint was about a government department or another public organisation (not the NHS), we will also send our report to the MP who referred your complaint to us. If we have made recommendations for the organisation to carry out, our report will clearly explain what action we expect and by when. We will check to make sure the organisation does what we have asked, and we will keep you updated about this. This is the end point of our investigation. We will invite you to give us your feedback on our investigation, so that we can see what we re doing well and how we might improve our service. This includes telling you how you can challenge our decision if you think we have got something wrong - for example, if you think we missed some important information when we were making our decision. By the end of this stage, you will: know our final decision on your complaint, have a clear understanding of how we made our decision, what information we used, and how we took into account any feedback we received on our draft report, know what action we may have asked the organisation to take and by when, know how you can give us feedback.