New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Similar documents
NC Global-Ready Schools

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

Honors Mathematics. Introduction and Definition of Honors Mathematics

School Leadership Rubrics

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

EQuIP Review Feedback

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES

Concordia Language Villages STARTALK Teacher Program Curriculum

Annual Report Accredited Member

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

National Standards for Foreign Language Education

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

The SREB Leadership Initiative and its

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 143 ( 2014 ) CY-ICER Teacher intervention in the process of L2 writing acquisition

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

Sidney Sawyer Elementary School

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Reynolds School District Literacy Framework

Teacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover)

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

Teachers Guide Chair Study

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

The Site Visit: How to Prepare for It & What to Expect. STARTALK Conference Atlanta, GA May 3, 2012

Foreign Languages. Foreign Languages, General

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

An Introduction to LEAP

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

University of Massachusetts Lowell Graduate School of Education Program Evaluation Spring Online

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Executive Summary. Mt. Mourne School - An IBO World School

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Distinguished Teacher Review

Master Program: Strategic Management. Master s Thesis a roadmap to success. Innsbruck University School of Management

Creating Travel Advice

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Portfolio-Based Language Assessment (PBLA) Presented by Rebecca Hiebert

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

TRANSNATIONAL TEACHING TEAMS INDUCTION PROGRAM OUTLINE FOR COURSE / UNIT COORDINATORS

World Languages Unpacked Content for Classical Language Programs What is the purpose of this document?

Why OUT-OF-LEVEL Testing? 2017 CTY Johns Hopkins University

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

and Beyond! Evergreen School District PAC February 1, 2012

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Executive Summary. Gautier High School

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

A Guide to Student Portfolios

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Assessment. the international training and education center on hiv. Continued on page 4

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Pyramid. of Interventions

Request for Proposal UNDERGRADUATE ARABIC FLAGSHIP PROGRAM

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

Language Acquisition Chart

Practitioner s Lexicon What is meant by key terminology.

Transcription:

New Jersey Department of Education 2018-2020 World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document Please use this guidance document to help you prepare for your district s application submission to the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) for World Languages Model Program recognition. Review the entire document and prepare responses and gather support materials (documentation) before beginning the online application. (Once the online application has been started, it cannot be saved for completion at a later time.) One administrator in the district should be designated to complete/submit the online application. Deadline to complete online application and submit documentation: August 15, 2017. There are four sections to the online application: Section I- Contact Information Section II- Program Information and Instructional Time / Frequency Section III A. Learning Environment, B. Assessment, C. Professional Growth, and D. Program Section IV- Additional Information (Optional) Documentation for Sections I-IV Sections I and II: Contact Information and Program Information and Instructional Time / Frequency These sections are completed entirely through the online application. There is no additional documentation required. Section III - Part A: Learning Environment For this section, please provide a collection of 3-5 lesson plans for the program configuration that you are asking to be considered for model program designation that reflect: multiple grade levels (at least 3 per language); multiple proficiency levels (at least 3 per language); and ALL indicators (1-10) of the section. A lesson plan may span more than one day. All lesson plans and documentation must be submitted electronically as described in Online Application Submission Directions section (see below). Section III- Parts B - D: Assessment, Professional Growth, and Program For this section, some criteria request support materials and / or descriptions. Support materials must be submitted electronically as described in the Online Application Submission Directions section (see below) as a separate email. Descriptions, when requested, must be submitted via the online application according to character limits. Section IV Additional Information Please enter this information via the online application and limit your response to a maximum of 10,000 characters. 1

Online Application Submission Directions: 1. Complete the application using Survey Monkey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/wlapp. 2. Provide all documents / requested information either through a link to an online folder (preferred) OR attached to a single email to worldlang@doe.state.nj.us no later than August 15, 2017. 3. Identify your district name in subject line of the email. Any questions about the application process should be sent to: worldlang@doe.state.nj.us prior to August 7, 2017 to allow time for a response. Note: Pages 3-12 of this document are provided to assist you in preparing the responses and gathering the support materials (documentation) before you begin the online application 2

New Jersey Department of Education 2018-2020 World Languages Model Program Application Section I- Contact Information Name of District (County): District contact / Person responsible for completing the application: Address: Telephone number: E-mail address: Chief School Administrator: Section II- Program Information and Instructional Time / Frequency 1. Identify your district configuration (e.g., P-5, K-8, 9-12). 2. Are the proficiency level and grade level performance benchmarks indicated in the 2014 New Jersey Student Learning Standards for World Languages being met in your district? 3. Identify the grade level configuration / program you would like to have considered for 2018-2020 Model Program status (e.g., K-5, 4-5, 6-8, 9-12, specialized population). 4. Identify contact minutes per class period. a. Select the number of contact minutes per class period for every grade K-12. If no language instruction is offered in a specific grade, please select 0. b. Denote which language(s) are offered at each level in the textbox below the matrix. 5. Identify number of class periods per week. a. Select the number of class periods per week for every grade K-12. If no language instruction is offered in a specific grade, please select 0. b. Specify any information that you believe may not have been captured in the box below the matrix. 6. Describe your scheduling model (e.g., block schedule, traditional). 7. Describe how your program allows for multiple entry points. 3

Section III Learning Environment, Assessment, Professional Growth, Program The following rating scale should be used for self-assessing your program. When completing each section, please keep in mind the response selected should reflect what is happening at all grade and proficiency levels on a regular basis. Not Applicable Criteria is not applicable to this program Not Evident Evidence of criteria is apparent in a very limited capacity Emerging Evidence of criteria is apparent in some grade or proficiency levels Partially Evident Program has begun addressing criteria but outcomes are not yet fully evident at all grade or proficiency levels Clearly Evident Program has addressed criteria and outcomes are evident at all grade and proficiency levels *The Core Practices are noted with an asterisk. For more information about the Core Practices, please see http://www.langtalks.org/ (videos). 4

A. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Criteria At all grade and proficiency levels, the program strives to implement the following on a regular basis: 1. Target language is used as the vehicle and content of instruction at least 90% of the time.* Required Support Materials Rating 2. Lessons and tasks are designed with functional goals and objectives that clearly specify the language and activities needed to support and meet the communicative objective.* 3. A variety of instructional strategies are implemented to make language comprehensible (e.g., gestures, visuals, authentic materials, hands-on experiences). 4. Technology is leveraged (by teachers and students) for authentic purposes: communicating in target language, interacting with native speakers, accessing authentic materials and/or engaging in a real-world instructional task. 5. Students are engaged in interpersonal communicative tasks with partners, in small groups, and/or as part of whole class instruction.* 6. Learning experiences are designed to engage students in different levels of thinking (e.g., remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, creating). 7. Scaffolding and follow-up tasks that promote interpretation for language learning is provided through interactive reading and listening comprehension tasks using authentic cultural texts of various kinds.* 8. Tasks are adapted to meet the needs and interests of the students enabling them to engage in relevant, content-rich experiences that increase in complexity across grade and proficiency levels. 3-5 lesson plans (per language) from the program that you would like to be considered. The collection of lesson plans for each language must include: multiple grade and proficiency levels and address ALL criteria (1-10) of this section. 5

9. Opportunities are provided for students to explore their own culture and make comparisons with other cultures in a meaningful way. Interactions with global communities provide opportunities for students to know, understand, and appreciate people from other cultures along with the capacity to acknowledge other points of view. 10. Grammar is taught as concept and used in context. Students focus on meaning before form.* 6

B. ASSESSMENT Criteria At all grade and proficiency levels, the program strives to implement the following on a regular basis: 1. Students regularly identify and monitor their own goals for language proficiency and cultural competence using Can Do statements. Required Support Materials Rating 2. Multiple methods are used to check for understanding throughout a lesson. 3. A variety of feedback strategies (e.g., speech, written) are used to assist students in meeting performance objectives. Evidence from student performance is incorporated in feedback.* 4. Data (evidence of student performance) from formative and summative assessments are used to modify subsequent learning experiences to reach targeted performance objectives. 5. Performance-based assessments play a major role in the world languages program and involve tasks that are real-life, meaningful, and worthwhile. 6. Rubrics describing clear expectations for student performance based on proficiency levels and grade level benchmarks are an integral part of the world languages program. Rubrics are shared with students in advance. 7. Assessments are designed to reflect the expectations of the New Jersey Student Learning Standards. They allow students to demonstrate what they can do with what they know across the three modes of communication based on proficiency level and grade level benchmarks. 7

8. A process is established for students and teachers to document and review student growth over time (e.g., proficiency-based assessments, Can Do statements with student work examples, portfolios). 9. Grading systems weigh performance more heavily than language knowledge. 8

C. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Criteria At all grade and proficiency levels, the program strives to implement the following on a regular basis: 1. A process is in place in which educators self-assess their professional growth and identify areas in need of improvement (e.g. rubrics, Teacher Effectiveness for Language Learning TELL) 2. A plan is developed (and implemented) for districtwide professional development that includes a variety of experiences based on the input and experiences of its educators in combination with the needs and interests of its students. 3. Educators are provided with opportunities to engage in regular collegial discussions and interactions at the school, district, and global level (e.g., EdCamps, conferences, peer observations, online communities, professional organizations, professional learning communities). 4. Educators are reflective practitioners who regularly engage in professional learning experiences based on their individual needs and interests. 5. The district supports educators in their efforts to develop skills beyond their individual classroom and assume leadership roles in the school community (e.g., coach, mentor), professional organization, or other educational venues. Required Support Materials Provide evidence via email (online link to folder or attachment) Rating 9

D. PROGRAM Criteria At all grade and proficiency levels, the program strives to implement the following on a regular basis: 1. Belief that second language acquisition is essential in preparing students for the global economy and for becoming contributing members of local, national, and international communities. The belief is institutionalized in the district at all levels (e.g., administrators, educators, students, parents, community members). 2. Belief that all students are language learners. Effective language learning experiences are carefully orchestrated by teachers through building relationships with students giving consideration to their unique needs and interests and collaborating with them to create an environment where they are safe and can flourish as language learners. 3. Core practices of language learning are evident in all aspects of the world language program (e.g., curriculum design, learning experiences, resource selection and use, assessment design, course offerings, extracurricular experiences, professional learning experiences). 4. Standards-based curricula reflective of current research and best practices are used in all grade and proficiency levels. Vertical and horizontal articulation of curricula is evident by the use of instructional tasks which increase in complexity in all three modes of communication according to proficiency level and grade level performance benchmarks. Curricula reflect the 2014 New Jersey Student Learning Standards for World Languages. 5. The district educational community (e.g., administrators, educators, students, parents, community members) recognize the integral role the world languages program plays in preparing students to become productive members of a global society. Required Support Materials Rating 10

6. Multiple methods are used to expand perspectives and attitudes about language learning opportunities with stakeholders including highlighting the accomplishments of students (e.g., administrators, educators, students, parents, community members). 7. Community stakeholders (e.g., native speakers, organizations, agencies, businesses) are leveraged to provide support to the world languages program (e.g., serving as authentic audiences, sharing experiences and expertise, aiding students in real-world performance tasks). 8. Opportunities for students to engage in extracurricular activities related to world languages are provided (e.g., clubs, field trips, travel, exchange programs). 9. Students have opportunities to be recognized for their language proficiency (e.g., Seal of Biliteracy, AP courses, World Language Honor Society). 10. Elementary program has a mechanism for reporting student progress. 11. A process is established for stakeholders (e.g., administrators, teachers, students) to review the world languages program across all proficiency and grade levels for the purpose of identifying strengths and areas for program improvement. 12. A strong sense of community exists among educators at all grade and proficiency levels. The culture is supportive, collaborative, and values continual professional growth in support of student learning. 13. The district recognizes its important role of supporting the field of teaching by providing preservice teachers with meaningful field and clinical experiences through interactions with effective teachers. In addition, it has established a comprehensive induction program that supports novice teachers for multiple years in gaining the skills, knowledge, and dispositions to become effective world language teachers. 11

Section IV- Additional Information This section is optional. It is provided for you to describe aspects of your program that you do not believe were captured in the application. Please enter this information via the online application and limit your response to a maximum of 10,000 characters. 12