TEACHING INTENSIVE READING THROUGH DIFFERENT SCAFFOLDING STRATEGIES IN THE BILINGUAL CLASSROOM CONTEXT

TEACHING INTENSIVE READING THROUGH DIFFERENT SCAFFOLDING STRATEGIES IN THE BILINGUAL CLASSROOM CONTEXT Refi Ranto Rozak IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro refi.ranto@ikippgribojonegoro.ac.id Abract: Teaching intensive reading to young learners of English has a long hiory. It aims to train the learners to read for predetermined reading queions and for language exercises. The use of udents fir language alongside English in school and to use it in intensive reading will support both academic achievement and development of English as an additional language. However, teaching intensive reading in bilingual classrooms is lack of teacher s reading rategies that facilitate udents comprehension and words recognition in English. To fill this practical gap, the presenter will introduce different scaffolding rategies to develop udents reading skills. These involve encouraging reciprocal teaching (teacher modeling of rategies), teacher s self-regulated comprehension rategies (prior knowledge activation and queion generation); delivering reading texts; making frequent repetitions of key words and ideas; and clarifying the meaning of words through graphic organizers, pictures, and charts as scaffolding tools to convey concepts. This paper presentation reports how each of these rategies work in Indonesia the bilingual classroom. Keywords: Intensive reading, scaffolding, rategies, bilingual Introduction Teaching reading for young learners is very urgent and essential. The urgency of reading especially in primary schools cannot be neglected as a school effort in improving udents early literacy. This is needed to develop udents further language development and is very crucial to place language foundations. Meanwhile, the mo important goal of reading inruction in primary school is to assi udents in obtaining skill and knowledge they need to read grade-level text fluently and with good comprehension (Torgesen, Houon, Rissman, and Kosanovich, 2007). Thus, the reading program should be able to improve udents academic achievement and development of English as an additional language. As a part of school efforts in developing international language especially English, some schools in Indonesia have attempted to immerse the exiing literacy program. This aims at supporting udents literacy and language learning in the current of globalization (Cumming-Potvin, Renshaw, and Van Kraayenoord, 2003). In addition, the issue is also supported by sociocultural approaches to literacy that emphasizes the importance of integrating udents everyday life experiences and cultural practices into classroom pedagogies (Bloch, 1999; Breen et al., 1994). This can be well-implemented if teacher is able to underand the process of becoming literate using appropriate different learning rategies and employ fir language as the foundation of successful early childhood program acknowledge. As mentioned by A Global Education Association (2010) notified that research on second language development has shown that literacy in a second language is supported by literacy in the native language. Language and literacy knowledge in one language can serve as the foundation for a new language (Cummins, 1991; Paez & Rinaldi, 2006; Proctor, Augu, Carlo, & Snow, 2006). Dealing with teacher s effort in developing primary udents literacy in intensive reading and further language development in English as an additional language, providing appropriate rategies are particularly important. Grasser as cited in Kolic-Vehovec, Bajsanski, and Zubkovic (2011) declared that reading rategies are cognitive or behavioral actions that are enacted under particular contextual condition, with the goal of improving some aspects of comprehension. Alexander, Graham, and Harris (1998) ated that rategies are procedural, purposeful, effortful, willful, and facilitative in nature. However, teaching intensive reading in bilingual classroom is lack of English school teacher s reading rategies that facilitate udents comprehension and words recognition in English. Whereas comprehension in reading is very essential in building accessible conceptual knowledge about a particular domain in form of words, phrases, clauses, and complex texts. Furthermore, little is known about how udents learn additional language via bilingual learning and how they can use in reading activities. In this regard, the teacher s rategies used in intensive reading should be based on sociocultural perspective which involves Vygotsky s work on zone of proximal development (ZPD). Here, Vygotsky (1978) poulated that the ZPD as the difference between the child s actual level of development assessed through independent problem solving and the level of potential development determined from various forms of assied performance. The nature of scaffolding rategies is considered developing udents social interaction. It is in line with Vacca and Levitt (2011) that learning is social process and not individual one, and it occurs when 730

udents interact with their teacher and with one another in the classroom. Again, in the classroom, scaffolding is a process by which a teacher provides udents with a temporary framework for learning. As Dorn, French, and Jones (1998) ated that a temporary support that teachers create to help extend current skills and knowledge to a higher level of competence. The skillful use of observation and the teacher s knowledge of the child enable the teacher to design and employ the appropriate dialogue, experiences, rategies, and/or models that will scaffold children as they conruct their underanding of the concepts that will extend their knowledge to more advanced levels (Burch, 2007). This article attempts to give broader comprehension dealing with teaching intensive reading for primary school udents using different scaffolding rategies in bilingual classroom context. The rategies are based on the theoretical basis on reading comprehension. The outcome of the recent research is expected to encourage primary udents early literacy and additional language awareness. Meanwhile, it can be a teacher s professional development in developing and increasing teacher s technical reading inruction using different scaffolding rategy in bilingual classroom context as he/she is able to develop both literacy and language learning. The research context The inveigation took place at Muhammadiyah Primary School 3 International Class Program (ICP) Sumberrejo in Bojonegoro dirict, Ea Java Indonesia. Principal research queion underpinning this ethnography udy was In what extent do teacher and udents implement different scaffolding rategies in bilingual classroom context?. According to Cumming-Potvin, Renshaw, and van Kraayenoord (2003), characterized by active intervention of the researcher into the psychological and cultural processes being udied, this type of experiment differs significantly from the verification method that attempts to isolate and control independent variables. The characteriics of the lesson The lesson was designed as intensive reading program as an additional English program in school s literacy enrichment. It was conducted in six meetings between June and July, 2014. Each meeting laed 90 minutes in grade 5 th classroom of Muhammadiyah Primary School 3 International Class Program from 08.00 09.30 A.M. The initial second language reading program of the school is conducted twice a week every Monday and Thursday. As the researcher, I attempted to implement different scaffolding reading rategies to enrich udents reading experience and develop their comprehension. The program was developed in five reading components such as phonemic awareness, phonics inruction, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension (National Initute of Child Health and Human Development/NICHD, 2000: 4). Participants A teacher of English and some selected grade 5 th udents are chosen as research participants. The udents following the program were those who filled research content forms. These aimed to give udents agreement on the purposes, description, guidelines, and schedule of the research. Based on the diributed consent forms, there were 21 udents (5 male and 16 female udents) participating in the program. All of the participants ages range from 9 to 10. In addition, 3 udents were interviewed to express their experiences during following the program. It documented their responses and it was analyzed to know the connections between different scaffolding rategies and second language learning using bilingual approach emerged as important for underanding learning and development. Meanwhile, an English teacher was selected as the research respondent who gave information on intensive reading program of the school. She observed the implementation of my reading intervention using different scaffolding rategies and helped me set technically the program as well. She could not participate during the research implementation all the times because she had her own business. However, the English teacher data obtained from several inruments helped me complete in exploring intensive reading program of the school. Teaching materials In designing the material, I used some short reading texts from K5 Learning Website in which there were previously two kinds of reading selection namely fiction and non-fiction trialed in the fir intensive reading activity. I could easily determine which texts needed to adapt based on udent s comprehension level, length of the words and time allocation. In fact, moly udents found that reading non-fiction texts seemed to be difficult because the text was too long and the vocabulary used were too complex. It became my consideration in the following meetings that the texts selection mu be according to the udents knowledge and comprehension and it was found in fiction texts. The features of fiction texts are moly imaginative, simple, entertaining, easy to underand, and full of illuration that primary udents can imulate their imagination. Meanwhile, the selected topics of fiction texts were various including adventure, fantasy, hiorical fiction, and 731

science fiction. They characterize fiction texts including character, setting, problem or conflict, plot, point of view, and moral value of the author. Meanwhile, the reading activities included in three main reading ages (pre-, while-, and po- reading) were ructured in learning log. It enabled udents to keep track of learning as it happens and provide a springboard for follow-up activities. Logs furnish an additional way for all udents to participate actively in their group (Klingner & Vaughn, 1998: 35). Logs can be used for recording ideas while applying every rategy, or only used for some of the rategies (e.g.: for writing down clunks and key ideas). Research Methodology The research had been conducted in 3 phases. Phase 1 of research involved obtaining information from research setting social situation dealing with literacy and bilingual program including classroom selection based on teacher and school aff consideration. Phase 2, various inruments were trialed such as reading comprehension exercises, interviews, and self-participant observation. Reading comprehension exercises were given in the end of intensive reading program each meeting to check udents comprehension. Individual interview was conducted with an English teacher and three udents. Meanwhile, self-participant observation was useful for recording events in the classroom. During the participant observation, the I engaged in an active role, such as marking udents work and conducting different scaffolding rategies in bilingual classroom context or animating English reading groups along with English teacher. The participant observation was retrospectively recorded in research journal, which provided a means to reflect and generate hypotheses and sometimes guide future interventions. Totally, there were six meetings in intensive reading program using different scaffolding rategies in bilingual classroom context in this research. Each meeting had the similar teaching and learning characteriics including program identification and reading ages. Program identification included date of the course (25, 28, and 29 June and 02, 05, and 06 July 2014), Time (@ 90 minutes each), Class (5 grade), level of reading proficiency (basic), subject (English language/intensive reading), genre (Fiction), Topics (Joe and Dick Do Not Like Rats, The Bomb, The Bee, Dolphins, The Blue Whales, and The Coat), the goal (udents will be able to apply such basic reading skills as literal comprehension, reorganization, referential comprehension, evaluation, and appreciation when reading the assigned text), source (K5 Learning Website and teacher-made materials), and materials (udent worksheets). Data Analysis In analyzing the data, I used selective verbatim transcripts for teacher and udents oral interview and self-observation using field notes description. Selective verbatim transcript helped me obtain the data from teacher of English and udents responses. Such selective verbatim transcript assied me in doing conversational analysis on teacher-udents interactions. Self-observation using field notes helped me identify and follow processes in witnessed events and how udents characterize and describe particular activities and events based on video recording. Specifically, the above data analysis using two inruments can be combined such as: 1) gather all the interview transcripts and field notes together for coding; 2) empirical codes are created from the emerging data so are essential in identifying new phenomena that we had not necessarily predicted; 3) making additional notes and highlighting any quotes we may wish to use; 4) Once this has been completed and we have surveyed the coded data, examine it again for similarities and differences (conant comparative method); and 5) re-examining the data to identify broader conceptual framework that links to the research queions. Results The implementation of different scaffolding rategies in bilingual classroom context The results of the research based on the research queion. Based on the data I coded, I highlight four issues as follows. Different scaffolding rategies in intensive reading In the classroom, scaffolding is a process by which a teacher provides udents with a temporary framework for learning. At the completion of the lesson, the scaffolding is removed altogether; udents no longer need it (Lawson as cited in Vacca & Levitt, 2011). In the scaffolding implementation, the udents needed to be introduced its learning procedures. This age called teacher s modeling. The teacher models the desired learning rategy or task and then gradually shifts responsibility to the udents. This type of interaction is consient with Vygotsky s belief that learning and cognitive development are culturally and socially based (Vacca and Levit, 2011). This means, moreover, that learning is a social process and not an individual one, and it occurs when udents interact with their teacher and with one another in the classroom. When the udents were able to underand the scaffolding rategies, they independently used the rategies in pre-, while-, and po-reading ages. In pre-reading, the activities consied of teacher modeling of 732

different scaffolding rategies, self-regulated comprehension rategies (prior knowledge activation and queion generation, telling some qualities in the text, and making prediction), and delivering reading texts. According to Fitzgerald and Graves (2004) this level involves motivating - ask udents queions or make atements to intere udents in a reading selection. In while-reading, the activities consied of skimming and scanning the comprehension queions, reading passages with the groups, writing difficult words or concept in clunk column, using fix-up rategies to find out the difficult words, making frequent repetitions of keywords and ideas in gi column, and clarifying the meaning of words through graphic organizers, pictures, and charts as scaffolding tools to convey concepts. Fitzgerald and Graves (2004) suggeed that teachers multi-task and monitor udents reading as well as use desired scaffolding rategy in this age. In po-reading, the activities consied of making queions about main ideas using queions words and reviewing something the udents had learnt. According to Fitzgerald and Graves (2004) teachers need to ask queions verbally or write queions down for udents to answer. Discussions can provide teachers with an insight on where udents are with reading achievement level. Reading exposures To support udents literacy, the school provides all classrooms with reading exposures. This aims at enriching udents access on print comprehension and second language learning because moly reading exposures are in English. Literacy udies have found that exposure to print through wide and voluminous reading contributes to several aspects of both fir and second language literacy acquisition (Elley, 1991; Nagy, Herman, & Anderson, 1983). Access to print, although it has received less attention, has also been shown to be an important factor influencing udents reading behavior by inducing udents to read more (McQuillan, 1998a; Krashen, 2004). The setting of the research in grade 5 showed some exposures such as classroom regulations, reward boards, numbers, names of animals and its organs, human s body parts, English alphabets, collection of Islamic prayers, names of fruits, archipelago and its province description, and learning schedule. Those exposures are attached on the wall and written in English. This issue was supported by teacher FAA interview result that as the realization of school support in developing reading program, many reading exposures and udents works are attached on the classroom wall. She said, We try to attach some reading exposures such as udents works, udents drawings, and some colorful pictures to add udents learning value. Meanwhile, udent HIS, AHP, and VBP also ated that they can find many exposures in their classroom and they could read them anytime. Therefore, teacher of English language learners might use language development rategy like realia (concrete objects to represent words), to help them internalize new vocabulary. They might simplify their language and teach specific vocabulary likely to be unfamiliar to English language learners (Calderon, 2001; Carlo et al. 2004). Teaching and learning reading using bilingual approach During the process of intensive reading activity, both udents and I used our fir and second language. Brown (2000) claims that fir language can be a facilitating factor and not ju an interfering factor, and Schweers (1999) encourages teachers to incorporate the native language into lessons to influence the classroom dynamic, and sugges that arting with fir language provides a sense of security and validates the learners lived experiences, allowing them to express themselves. The reading texts used were totally written in English but to get easy underanding I used fir language especially in conversation activities, discussion of intensive reading, and preparation for writing. This atement is also supported by HIS s response that it will be easier to know and underand the materials of reading texts using bilingual. This finding is in line with Nation (2008) that the reasons for using fir language could be: 1) it is more communicatively effective to use the fir language, and 2) it is easier and more communicatively effective to use the fir language. The use of udents fir language would overcome udents embarrassment particularly for shy learners and those who feel they are not very proficient in the second language (Nation, 2008). As teacher FAA replied, the use of bilingual is helpful to support udents underanding. She added: Because in the classroom there are two kinds of udents. Those are active and those are passive. When we meet passive udents, they usually do not really underand about the meaning of the text. So, by using Bahasa Indonesia combining with English, it can help them comprehend the difficult words and then they can know the meaning. In contrary, the finding also showed that intensive reading inruction using bilingual was not effective because of much time consuming. It was shown in FAA teacher s interview that It takes too long teaching using bilingual in reading because we have to translate difficult words into Bahasa Indonesia and actually it is not 733

effective because udents can open up the dictionary when they need to know the meaning of difficult words. Native language inruction interferes with or delays English language development, and relegates children who receive such inruction to a second-class, separate atus within the school and, ultimately, within society. The reason that more time on English reading should translate into more learning (Rossel and & Bake, as cited in Sohn, 2005). Students comprehension in intensive reading using different scaffolding rategies The results of the udy showed that scaffolding has a positive effect on learners' reading comprehension. These findings are in line with the previous udies (e.g., Walqui, 2006; Mehdian, 2009; Pishghadam and Ghardiri, 2011), confirming the claim that scaffolding can promote internal individual learner variables like motivation and in this it can lead to learners' full engagement. When I asked the teacher about the effectiveness of different scaffolding rategies in intensive reading she said The rategy is good. Because some of the udents especially passive udents sometimes they didn t know well about the meaning each word in the text. By scaffolding rategy, the materials need to be prepared before by using pictures, graphics, etc. it can help the udents to comprehend about the text. Meanwhile, the udents also had positive responses toward the implementation of intervention rategy in intensive reading because it could help their comprehension. Conclusion and Recommendation Teaching intensive reading in primary school using bilingual approach has two essential roles namely as a school literacy development program and additional language enrichment. As the mo important goal of reading inruction in primary school is to help udents acquire the skills and knowledge they need to read grade-level text fluently and with good comprehension. In other words, reading proficiency at the end of primary school requires that udents be able to identify the words on the page accurately and fluently; that they have enough knowledge and thinking ability to underand the words, sentences, and paragraphs; and that they are motivated and engaged enough to use their knowledge and thinking ability to underand and learn from the text. Therefore, teacher needs to implement various reading rategies, udents second language acquisition, and some of the theories on which inructional practices in bilingual classroom reading are based. Bibliography Alexander, P.A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1998). A perspective on rategy research : Progress and prospects. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 129-154. A Global Education Association. (2010). Position paper on language and literacy development for young English language learners (ages 3-8). TESOL, 1. Bloch, C. (1999). Literacy in the early Years: Teaching and learning in multilingual early childhood classroom. International Journal of Early Years Education, 7(1), 39-59. Breen, M., Louden, W., Barret-Pugh, C., Rivalland, J., Rohl, M., Rhydwen, M., Llyold, S. & Carr, T. (1994). Literacy in its place: Literacy practices in urban and rural communities. Overview and interpretations. Canberra, Department of Education and Training. Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. Fourth edition. White plains, NY: Pearson Education Burch, J. R. (2007). A udy examining the impact of scaffolding young children s acquisition of literacy in primary grades. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. Calderon, M. (2001). Curricula and methodologies used to teach Spanish-speaking limited English proficient udents to read English. In R. E. Slavin & M. Calderon (Eds.), Effective Programs for Latino Students. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Cummin-Potvin, W., Renshaw, P., Van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2003). Scaffolding and bilingual shared reading experiences: Promoting Primary School Students Learning and Development. Auralian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(2), 54-68. Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of fir- and second-language proficiency in bilingual children. In E. Bialyok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 70 89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carlo, M.S., Augu, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C.E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D., Lively, T., & White, C. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English language learners in bilingual and mainream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188-215. Dorn, L. J., French, C., & Jones, T. (1998). Apprenticeship in literacy: Transitions across reading and writing. York, ME: Stenhouse. Elley, W. (1991). Acquiring literacy in a second language: The effect of book-based programs. Language Learning, 41, 375-411. 734

Fitzgerald, J., & Graves, M. F. (2004). Scaffolding reading experiences for English-language learners. Norwood, MA: Chriopher-Gordon. Klingner & Vaughn. (1998). Using Collaborative Strategic Reading. Teaching Exceptional Children: The University of Texat at Auin [Publication]. Retrived from: https://www.utexas.edu /cola/centers/tlc /_files/conferences/newmedianewmaterials/using _collaborative.pdf. Kolic-vehovec, S., Bajsanski, I., & Zubkovic, B., R. (2011). The role of reading rategies in scientific text comprehension and academic achievement of university udents. Review of Psychology, 18(2), 81-90. Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading. 2 nd edition. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited. McQuillan, J. (1998a). The literacy crisis: False claims, real solutions. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Mehdian, N. (2009). Teacher s role in the reading apprenticeship framework: Aid by the side or sage by the age. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 3 12. Nagy, W., Herman, P., & Anderson, R. (1983). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233-253. Nation, Paul. (2008). Young bilingual children learning to read with dual language books. English Teaching: Practice and Critique. 7(2), 71-84. NICHD. (2000). A Closer Look at the Five Essential Components of Effective Reading Inruction [Report]. Retrieved from: https://education.ucf.edu/mirc/research/closer%20 Look.pdf. Páez, M., & Rinaldi, C. (2006). Predicting English word reading skills for Spanish-speaking udents in fir grade. Topics in Language Disorders, 26, 338 350. Pishghadam, R., & Ghardiri, S. (2011). Symmetrical or asymmetrical scaffolding: Piagetian vs. Vygotskyan views to reading comprehension. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 7(1), 4 64. P. L. Carrell, and J. C. Eierhold. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573. Proctor, Augu, Carlo, & Snow (2006). The intriguing role of Spanish language vocabulary knowledge in predicting English reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 150 169. Schweers, W. Jr. (1999). Using L1 in the L2 classroom. English Teaching Forum, 37(2), 6 9. Sohn, Janina. (2005). A synthesis of research on language of reading inruction for English language learners. In The effectiveness of bilingual school programs for immigrant children. Programme on Intercultural Conflicts and Societal Integration (AKI). Torgesen, J., Houon, D., Rissman, L., & Kosanovich, M. (2007). Teaching All Students to Read in Elementary School. Florida Center for Reading Research: Florida State University. Vacca, J.S., & Levitt, R. (2011). Using scaffolding techniques to teach a lesson about the civil war. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(18), 150-161. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MS, Harvard University Press. Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding inruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159 180. Biodata Refi Ranto Rozak obtained his BA in ELT from Teacher College of PGRI Bojonegoro, Indonesia and Maer of English Education from University Sebelas Maret (UNS), Surakarta Indonesia. He specializes in teaching Reading Comprehension, Liening Comprehension, Bilingual Learning, and Computer Assied Language Learning (CALL). He recently sits on a Chair, English Department Language Laboratory Teacher College of PGRI Bojonegoro. 735