NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Similar documents
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

National Survey of Student Engagement

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2010

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

National Survey of Student Engagement at UND Highlights for Students. Sue Erickson Carmen Williams Office of Institutional Research April 19, 2012

Student Engagement and Cultures of Self-Discovery

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

GRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK Master of Science Programs in Biostatistics

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

An Introduction to LEAP

Certificate of Higher Education in History. Relevant QAA subject benchmarking group: History

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

YOU RE SERIOUS ABOUT YOUR CAREER. SO ARE WE. ONLINE MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK

Bachelor of Arts in Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies

MGMT 3280: Strategic Management

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Executive Summary. DoDEA Virtual High School

MANAGEMENT, BS. Administration. Policies Academic Policies. Admissions & Policies. Termination from the Major. . University Consortium

Shyness and Technology Use in High School Students. Lynne Henderson, Ph. D., Visiting Scholar, Stanford

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

TREATMENT OF SMC COURSEWORK FOR STUDENTS WITHOUT AN ASSOCIATE OF ARTS

The recognition, evaluation and accreditation of European Postgraduate Programmes.

Principal vacancies and appointments

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Master s Degree Online in Educational Leadership

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Developing Effective Teachers of Mathematics: Factors Contributing to Development in Mathematics Education for Primary School Teachers

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND KINESIOLOGY

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Complete the pre-survey before we get started!

ST. ANDREW S COLLEGE

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Community Unit # 2 School District Library Policy Manual

VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS, MFA

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

MSc Education and Training for Development

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

WHY GRADUATE SCHOOL? Turning Today s Technical Talent Into Tomorrow s Technology Leaders

Department of Social Work Master of Social Work Program

STEM SMART Workshop Las Vegas - Sept 19, 2012

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS AT UNC

Executive Summary. Abraxas Naperville Bridge. Eileen Roberts, Program Manager th St Woodridge, IL

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

BME 198A: SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT I Biomedical, Chemical, and Materials Engineering Department College of Engineering, San José State University

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Communication Disorders Program. Strategic Plan January 2012 December 2016

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY HANDBOOK

James W. Lloyd, DVM, PhD Associate Dean for Budget, Planning, and Institutional Research College of Veterinary Medicine Michigan State University

Senior Project Information

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

Critical Thinking in the Workplace. for City of Tallahassee Gabrielle K. Gabrielli, Ph.D.

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

World s Best Workforce Plan

Center for International Studies

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Baker College Waiver Form Office Copy Secondary Teacher Preparation Mathematics / Social Studies Double Major Bachelor of Science

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

Spiritual and Religious Related

AMERICA READS*COUNTS PROGRAM EVALUATION. School Year

Residency Principal and Program Administrator Internship and Certification Handbook

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

Department of Education School of Education & Human Services Master of Education Policy Manual

Co-op Placement Packet

c o l l e g e o f Educ ation

Parents as Partners. Bethany Naser, Director of New Student Orientation

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

Transcription:

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT 2010 Benchmark Comparisons Report OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH & PLANNING To focus discussions about the importance of student engagement and to guide institutional improvement efforts, created five Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice: Level of Academic Challenge, Active and Collaborative Learning, Student-Faculty Interaction, Enriching Educational Experiences, and Supportive Campus Environment. This Benchmark Comparisons Report compares the performance of Illinois Wesleyan University with the national consortium. The construction of the Benchmarks: 1) All items that contribute to a benchmark are converted to a 0-100 point scale. 2) Student-level benchmark scores are created for each group of items by taking the mean of each student's scores. A mean was calculated for each student so long as they had answered three-fifths of the items in any particular benchmark. 3) Institutional benchmarks are created by calculating weighted averages of the student-level scores for each class (first-year students and seniors).

2010 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT - 1 Level of Academic Challenge Benchmark 54.1 58.7 57.5 62.1 Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Colleges and universities promote high levels of student achievement by emphasizing the importance of academic effort and setting high expectations for student performance. * had significantly higher scores than its peers for both first-year students and seniors in the Level of Academic Challenge Benchmark (p <.001). Level of Academic Challenge Benchmark Items - Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, rehearsing, etc. related to academic program) 1 = 0 hrs/wk, 2 = 1-5 hrs/wk, 3 = 6-10 hrs/wk, 4 = 11-15 hrs/wk, 5 = 16-20 hrs/wk, 6 = 21-25 hrs/wk, 7 = 26-30 hrs/wk, 8 = more than 30 hrs/wk Both first-year students and seniors spent an average of approximately16-20 hours per week preparing for class. First-year 4.92 4.85 Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings 1 = none, 2 = 1-4, 3 = 5-10, 4 = 11-20, 5 = more than 20 First-year students averaged close to 11-20 assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings per school year, while seniors averaged between 5-10 and 11-20. First-year 3.71 3.53

2010 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT - 2 Level of Academic Challenge Benchmark Items - (continued) Number of written papers or reports of 1 = none, 2 = 1-4, 3 = 5-10, 4 = 11-20, 5 = more than 20...20 pages or more 1) First-year students averaged almost no written papers of 20+ pages per school year. 2) averaged closer to 1-4 written papers of 20+ pages per school year....between 5 and 19 pages 1) First-year students averaged approximately 1-4 written papers per school year. 2) averaged closer to 5-10 written papers per school year....fewer than 5 pages 1) First-year students averaged approximately 1-4 written papers per school year. 2) averaged closer to 5-10 written papers per school year. First-year 1.15 1.68 First-year 2.27 2.66 First-year 2.27 2.66 Both first-year students and seniors reported substantial* emphasis on the following coursework activities: Coursework Activities Analyzing basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory Synthesizing and organizing ideas Making judgments about the value of information Applying theories or concepts to practical problems First-year 91% 93% 81% 83% 70% 79% 83% 87% Percentage of students who frequently* worked harder than they thought they could to meet faculty standards or expectations Percentage of students who felt that placed substantial* emphasis on studying and academic work First-year 62% 56% First-year 91% 94%

2010 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT - 3 Active and Collaborative Learning Benchmark 43.7 42.6 51.4 50.9 Students learn more when they are intensely involved in their education and asked to think about what they are learning in different settings. Collaborating with others in solving problems or mastering difficult material prepares students for the messy, unscripted problems they will encounter daily during and after college. * There were no significant differences between and its peers in the Active and Collaborative Learning Benchmark. Active and Collaborative Learning Benchmark Items Percentage of students who frequently* asked questions in First-year class or contributed to class discussions 71% 82% Percentage of students who frequently* made a class First-year presentation 18% 59% Percentage of students who frequently* worked with other First-year students on projects during class 36% 35% Percentage of students who frequently* worked with class- First-year mates outside of class to prepare class assignments 48% 64% Percentage of students who frequently* tutored or First-year taught other students 19% 29% Percentage of students who frequently* participated in First-year a community-based project as part of a regular course 10% 10% Percentage of students who frequently* discussed ideas First-year from their readings or classes with others outside of class 61% 69% (students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

2010 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT - 4 Student-Faculty Interaction Benchmark 35.2 33.8 42.4 47.5 Students learn firsthand how experts think about and solve practical problems by interacting with faculty members inside and outside the classroom. As a result, their teachers become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, life-long learning. * seniors had significantly higher scores than its senior peers in the Student-Faculty Interaction Benchmark (p <.001). Student-Faculty Interaction Benchmark Items Percentage of students who frequently* discussed First-year grades or assignments with an instructor 48% 57% Percentage of students who frequently* talked about First-year career plans with a faculty member or advisor 30% 60% Percentage of students who frequently* discussed First-year ideas from their readings or classes with faculty 19% 33% members outside of class Percentage of students who frequently* worked First-year with faculty members on activities other than 17% 29% coursework (committees, orientation, student-life activities, etc.) Percentage of students who frequently* received First-year prompt written or oral feedback from faculty on 66% 68% your academic performance By their senior year, 24% of students reported working with a faculty member on a research project outside of course or program requirements, while 46% of the first-year students plan to work with faculty before they graduate.

2010 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT - 5 Enriching Educational Experiences Benchmark 27.9 31.1 40.5 53.1 Complementary learning opportunities enhance academic programs. Diversity experiences teach students valuable things about themselves and others. Technology facilitates collaboration between peers and instructors. Internships, community service, and senior capstone courses provide opportunities to integrate and apply knowledge. * had significantly higher scores than its peers for both first-year students and seniors in the Enriching Educational Experiences Benchmark (p <.001). Enriching Educational Experiences Benchmark Items Participating in co-curricular activities (organizations, publications, student government, sports, etc.) 1 = 0 hrs/wk, 2 = 1-5 hrs/wk, 3 = 6-10 hrs/wk, 4 = 11-15 hrs/wk, 5 = 16-20 hrs/wk, 6 = 21-25 hrs/wk, 7 = 26-30 hrs/wk, 8 = more than 30 hrs/wk Both first-year students and seniors spent an average of approximately 6-10 hours per week participating in co-curricular activities. First-year 3.08 3.18 By their senior year, 75% of students reported participating in a practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment, while 77% of first-year students plan to participate in these activities before they graduate. Seventy-nine percent of seniors reported participating in community service or volunteer work, while 39% of first-year students have already participated, and another 44% plan to do so before graduation. By their senior year, 76% of students reported participating in foreign language coursework, while 54% of first-year students have already participated, and another 27% plan to do so before they graduate. Almost 50% of the seniors reported participating in a study abroad program. Sixty-seven percent of the first-year students plan to study abroad before graduation. Approximately 30% of the seniors reported participating in an independent study or self-designed major, while almost 20% of first-year students plan to do the same. Over 50% of the seniors reported participating in a culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.). Fifty-seven percent of first-year students plan a similar activity before graduating.

2010 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT - 6 Enriching Educational Experiences Benchmark Items (continued) Percentage of students who frequently* had serious conversations with students First-year of different religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values 68% 68% Percentage of students who frequently* had serious conversations with students First-year of a different race or ethnicity 62% 57% Percentage of students who frequently* used an electronic medium to discuss First-year or complete an assignment 47% 53% Percentage of students who felt that strongly* encouraged contact among First-year students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds 67% 48% Almost 25% of the seniors reported participating in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together. Twenty percent of first-year students plan to do the same before they graduate.

2010 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT - 7 Supportive Campus Environment Benchmark 62.5 67.8 59.6 59.5 Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relations among different groups on campus. * had significantly higher scores than its peers for first-year students on the Supportive Campus Environment Benchmark (p <.001). Supportive Campus Environment Benchmark Items Percentage of students who felt that placed a First-year substantial* commitment to their academic success 91% 94% Percentage of students who felt that strongly First-year supported their needs in coping with non-academic 48% 21% responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Percentage of students who felt that strongly First-year supported their social needs 54% 26% Seventy-two percent of first-year students reported that their peers were friendly, supportive, and helped them feel as if they belonged, while 70% of the seniors reported similar feelings. Fifty-eight percent of first-year students reported faculty members as available, helpful, and sympathetic to their needs. Sixty-eight percent of the seniors reported feeling the same of faculty. Thirty-six percent of first-year students found the administrative personnel and offices helpful, considerate, and flexible, while 26% of the seniors reported the same. Response Rates: FY (45%); SR (40%); Response Rates: FY (30%); SR (33%). - Approximately 231 FY and 182 SR respondents; - Approximately 167,715 FY and 195,339 SR respondents. Produced By: Office of Institutional Research & Planning -.