The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

Similar documents
REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

Utica College Web Policies and Guidelines

1) AS /AA (Rev): Recognizing the Integration of Sustainability into California State University (CSU) Academic Endeavors

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

State Budget Update February 2016

P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Examples of Individual Development Plans (IDPs)

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

Graduate Student Grievance Procedures

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

New Graduate Program Proposal Review Process. Development of the Preliminary Proposal

Faculty governance especially the

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

CCC Online Education Initiative and Canvas. November 3, 2015

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

OP-P 602 A-E Page 1 of 8. Operating Protocol-Procedure #: 602 (A-E) Category: Instruction Office of Primary Responsibility: Office of Academic Affairs

ASCD Recommendations for the Reauthorization of No Child Left Behind

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Career Checkpoint. What is Career Checkpoint? Make the most of your Marketable Skills

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

CURRICULUM PROCEDURES REFERENCE MANUAL. Section 3. Curriculum Program Application for Existing Program Titles (Procedures and Accountability Report)

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Program Change Proposal:

University Senate CHARGE

College of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

BEYOND FINANCIAL AID ACTION PLANNING GUIDE

New Start Procedures for Starting a Kairos Ministry in a New Institution

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

ARTICLE XVII WORKLOAD

New Program Process, Guidelines and Template

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

Helping Graduate Students Join an Online Learning Community

Assistant Director of African American/Black Student Support & Success Posting Details

A Diagnostic Tool for Taking your Program s Pulse

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

Dr Padraig Walsh. Presentation to CHEA International Seminar, Washington DC, 26 January 2012

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Creating an Information Literacy Plan

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS CALENDAR

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Supervision & Training

University Assessment Council Minutes Erickson Board Room September 12, 2016 Louis Slimak

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

ITEM: 6. MEETING: Trust Board 20 February 2008

EAP. updates KHENG WAICHE. early proficiency programs coordinator

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

Santiago Canyon College 8045 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA AGENDA CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION COUNCIL Monday, October 30, :30pm B-104

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Strategic Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Measures

El Camino College Planning Model

Palmetto College University of South Carolina Columbia, SC (803) BACHELOR OF ARTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF STUDY

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

CHARTER SCHOOL APPLICATION TIMELINE

California State University College of Education. Policy Manual. Revised 10/1/04. Updated 08/13/07. Dr. Vanessa Sheared. Dean. Dr.

Application. All original documents must be received at UC San Diego by February 23, 2018.

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

Proposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels. Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO. Audit Report June 11, 2014

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

A Framework for Safe and Successful Schools

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

Approved Academic Titles

University of Toronto

California State University EAP Updates 2016

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Transcription:

Academic Department Proposal Template The purpose of this template is to assist faculty and others in preparing the proposals required by AP 4023 (Academic Departments) for Initiation, Merging, Splitting or Renaming of Academic Departments. This template is not meant to limit the information that can be provided in the proposal but to provide a format that helps to make sure the required information is included. The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate. Proposals to rename an existing department without splitting or merging should use the Renaming Proposal Form for Academic Departments. Section 1 - Basic Information 1. Type of Change Requested (please select all that apply): Create a New Department from Previously Unaffiliated Existing Courses/Programs Create a New Department by Merging Existing Departments Split an Existing Department into One or More Departments 2. Please provide a brief (no more than a paragraph) description of the change requested and how this change will help the students of the college.

Section 2 Background Information 1. Is the proposal part of a program review recommendation or objective? If not, what has changed since the last program review that would support the proposal? 2. Why is this proposal necessary to achieve programmatic success? For example, for initiating a new department, could the proposed department be absorbed into an existing department instead? 3. Is the proposed department s academic discipline common to the California Community College system and mission? 4. Is the proposal similar to the departmental structures at other institutions? How and why is it the same or different in nature? a) If this departmental structure currently exists at other community colleges, please provide a few examples. b) If this departmental structure similar to those found at UC or CSU, please provide a few examples.

Section 3 Stakeholders 5. Are the affected faculty members in support of this proposal? Please explain why or why not. 6. Does the Office of Academic Affairs support this proposal? Please explain why or why not. 7. Are there any additional issues raised by the Academic Senate or the Office of Academic Affairs that should be considered? Section 4 Potential Impacts 1. What will be the size of the proposed department(s)? Is this a relevant factor to consider? If so, why? 2. Will the proposal provide for a more effective use of time, resources, and faculty? If so, please explain how and why.

3. What is the proposal s impact on existing students? 4. Would there be any resulting changes to curriculum, and, if so, what is the intended timeline for implementation and approval by the curriculum committee? [Note: Close consultation with the Curriculum Chair, Counseling Office, and Articulation Officer is recommended]. 5. Will the creation of the department result in new certificates, licenses, degrees or transfer degrees? If so, what will they be? 6. Would the proposal have any impact on negotiated agreements with either of the two faculty unions? If so, how? 7. Will exiting full-time faculty be assigned or transferred to the new department? And if so, has funding been secured to provide replacement for any vacancies created by this transfer? [Note: transfer only can occur if there is a BOT- approved open position (new or replacement). 8. Would this proposal require any additional funding or other resources? How will these be provided?

Section 5 Implementation Plan Please provide a detailed implementation plan (including dates) and documentation of any needed funding or other resources (at least one year of documented funding needed). Academic Senate First Review Date: Academic Senate Second Review Date: Academic Senate Action (Vote to Approve or Not Approve) Date: Approval of COCFA President (Signature & Date): [Note: If the proposal is approved by the Academic Senate and there is mutual agreement between the Academic Senate and the Chief Instruction Officer, the proposal will be advanced for implementation. All newly initiated departments are deemed pilot departments for a period of three years with required yearly reporting.]