Academic Affairs Policy #1

Similar documents
Academic Affairs Policy #1

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

University of Toronto

Sacramento State Degree Revocation Policy and Procedure

Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech

Regulations for Saudi Universities Personnel Including Staff Members and the Like

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

GENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICY APM REGARDING ACADEMIC APPOINTEES Limitation on Total Period of Service with Certain Academic Titles

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

DATE ISSUED: 3/5/ of 6 LDU FM(LOCAL)-X

Northwest Georgia RESA

Article 15 TENURE. A. Definition

Program Change Proposal:

Residential Admissions Procedure Manual

ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Discipline

Florida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures

University of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON STAFF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

Application for Fellowship Leave

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

Discrimination Complaints/Sexual Harassment

Current Position Information (if applicable) Current Status: SPA (Salary Grade ) EPA New Position

PROGRAM HANDBOOK. for the ACCREDITATION OF INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION LABORATORIES. by the HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Pattern of Administration. For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012

College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science

SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS POLICY ON EXPANSION FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES

GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY CONTRACT TO CHARTER A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ISSUED TO: (A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY)

ARTICLE IV: STUDENT ACTIVITIES

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO. Audit Report June 11, 2014

LAKEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES CODE LAKEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR POLICY #4247

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETICS

EXPANSION PACKET Revision: 2015

2. Related Documents (refer to policies.rutgers.edu for additional information)

WASHINGTON STATE. held other states certificates) 4020B Character and Fitness Supplement (4 pages)

2. Sibling of a continuing student at the school requested. 3. Child of an employee of Anaheim Union High School District.

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

Undergraduate Degree Requirements Regulations

BSW Student Performance Review Process

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Graduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year Academic year Last Revised March 16, 2015

Department of Communication Criteria for Promotion and Tenure College of Business and Technology Eastern Kentucky University

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

University of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON FACULTY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT

NATIVE VILLAGE OF BARROW WORKFORCE DEVLEOPMENT DEPARTMENT HIGHER EDUCATION AND ADULT VOCATIONAL TRAINING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

Community Unit # 2 School District Library Policy Manual

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Friday, October 3, 2014 by 10: a.m. EST

EXPANSION PROCEDURES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

OPEN-ENROLLMENT CHARTER CONTRACT RENEWAL APPLICATION

MADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT

BY-LAWS of the Air Academy High School NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY

SPORT CLUB POLICY MANUAL. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINoIS at CHICAGO

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

Non-Academic Disciplinary Procedures

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Academic Freedom Intellectual Property Academic Integrity

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

Utica College Web Policies and Guidelines

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

University of Toronto

Master of Philosophy. 1 Rules. 2 Guidelines. 3 Definitions. 4 Academic standing

Subject: Regulation FPU Textbook Adoption and Affordability

Curriculum for the doctoral (PhD) programme in Natural Sciences/Social and Economic Sciences/Engineering Sciences at TU Wien

Greek Conduct Process Handbook

P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Approved Academic Titles

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

REGULATIONS RELATING TO ADMISSION, STUDIES AND EXAMINATION AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOUTHEAST NORWAY

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

Hamline University. College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Promotion and Tenure Policy

GRADUATE ASSISTANTSHIP

Conflicts of Interest and Commitment (Excluding Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research)

Transcription:

Academic Institutes and Centers Date of Current Revision: September 23, 2009 Responsible Office: Vice Provost, Research and Public Service Academic Affairs Policy #1 1. PURPOSE This policy provides guidelines for the establishment, renewal and termination of chartered academic institutes and centers ( AICs ) at James Madison University. 2. AUTHORITY The Board of Visitors is given the authority to establish policies for the university. This power is delegated to the President in areas in which the Board has not established policy. The establishment of policies and procedures concerning the Division of Academic Affairs has been delegated by the President to the Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs ( Provost ). 3. DEFINITIONS Academic Unit Head ( AUH ) An academic department head, school director, administrative program coordinator or functional equivalent. Academic Institute or Center ( AIC ) AICs are administrative, organizational, and/or budgetary units existing within the Academic Affairs Division of the university. Depending on their focus and breadth, an AIC may exist at the university, college or academic unit level. The AIC may be staffed by faculty members, staff members, and/or students, working together to achieve the research, instructional, and outreach goals of the AIC. Charter A charter is an official recognition given by the university to an AIC upon approval of its formation or of its continuation. 4. APPLICABILITY This policy applies to all AICs within the university, regardless of name or title, but it does not apply to institutes or centers established by divisions of the university other than the Division of Academic Affairs. 5. POLICY 5.1 AICs serve as a method of organizing complex academic activities of faculty, staff and students from backgrounds in different disciplines to work on common projects and opportunities. They may be called institutes, centers, laboratories, consortia, or have other titles, but their function is to provide for a unified coordinated approach to the work of the university through interdisciplinary efforts of the faculty, staff and students who serve and staff them. Academic Affairs Policy #1 1

5.2 AICs function to conduct research, facilitate outreach to the community, and coordinate learning opportunities for faculty, staff and students that are not otherwise available within the academic units and colleges of the university. AICs do not grant degrees or admit students. An AIC may propose courses to be housed in traditional academic units within the university, including but not limited to cross-listed courses, and if no appropriate academic unit exists for the courses, the AIC may be approved to offer courses of its own. Approval of such courses must follow normal university procedures. 5.3 No new AIC may be recognized, chartered, or otherwise established by any individual or group within the Academic Affairs Division at the university except through the procedures outlined in this policy. Any attempt by any group or individual within the university to establish an AIC at the university without following these procedures shall be null and void, and shall not subject the university to any responsibility for such purported unit of the university. Additionally, any unauthorized attempt to establish or claim university affiliation with an AIC may subject the individual to sanctions. 5.4 Only a chartered AIC may receive funding, assigned space, reassigned time for faculty or staff, or any other support for its activities through the university. Only a chartered AIC may use the university s name and resources to support its mission and objectives. 5.5 The university may deny or remove a charter without prior notice from any AIC for any reason, including but not limited denial or removal of a charter from an AIC that fails to follow the university s policies and procedures, state or federal law. 5.6 No individual or group within the university has any legitimate expectation that an AIC charter will be granted or will be continued. The decision to charter all AICs rests with the Provost, as well as the decision to remove or deny a charter for any reason. 5.6 An AIC must support academic unit, college and university priorities. The university allows for the formation of such AICs, depending on available support for such units. Any AIC that does not support academic unit, college and university priorities will have its charter removed without prior notice. 5.7 A chartered AIC must identify itself as a part of the university, and must ensure that all external and internal information concerning the AIC is current and correct. Charters may be revoked for the dissemination of inaccurate, non-current or inappropriate information. 5.8 A chartered AIC and all individuals associated with the AIC must conform to all university policies and procedures, including but not limited to fiscal management regulations. All funds received by an AIC must be deposited within university accounts, and are subject to the university s rules and regulations. Such funds must be disbursed according to the established policies of the university. Signatory authority for the operations of the AIC shall be developed in accordance with university policy. 6. PROCEDURES 6.0 Pre-proposal authorization The office of the Vice Provost for Research and Public Service is available for consultation concerning the requirements and procedures for a proposed new AIC. Individuals proposing a new AIC should contact the appropriate administrative offices to obtain approval before Academic Affairs Policy #1 2

filing a proposal for a new AIC. If all appropriate levels of administration are agreed that the proposed new AIC fits the mission of the academic unit, college and university, the proposal may go forward. Additionally, the necessary level of monetary and other support should be agreed upon by all levels before the proposal for charter is filed, along with the potential sources of that support. Approval to go forward with a proposal is not a guarantee of the issuance of a charter for a proposed AIC. Before any private funding for the proposed AIC may be raised, the individuals proposing the new AIC must have the approval of University Advancement under the terms of policy 5101. University Advancement staff will review the proposal and analyze the feasibility and needs for the proposal, and will report directly to the Vice Provost for Research and Public Affairs on its analysis. The Vice Provost will take the report of University Advancement into account in its consideration of the application for a charter. 6.1. Proposal for new AIC Because a new AIC creates demand for additional resources, oversight, reporting and review, and may require the commitment of duties for faculty and staff members and students, there must be a written justification for establishing a new AIC. Not all AICs that are proposed will be chartered. An AIC that is denied a charter may be proposed in subsequent academic years. Four criteria must be met for any new AIC to be chartered: There must be an articulated need for the AIC that does not duplicate the mission of an existing academic unit, college or other administrative structure at the university; The AIC must support university priorities; The AIC must have appropriate funding, either in hand or proposed, and a proposal for funding which does not materialize in a timely manner shall result in revocation of a provisional charter; and The AIC must have appropriate staffing, either through faculty members, staff members or students, to perform the work of the unit in the areas of research, instruction, and outreach opportunities requiring an interdisciplinary approach. Such staffing must be arranged and approved by the appropriate AUHs and other appropriate offices in advance. 6.2 Approval of new AIC A formal request to establish an AIC shall be generated by the faculty or staff member wishing to form the AIC. The request shall be sent to the appropriate administrative office (i.e., AUH, dean, or vice provost). The request shall include the following components: The name of the AIC; The mission and objectives of the AIC; The names or functional description of the faculty and staff members, students, and any others to be involved in the work of the AIC, and any reassignment of effort necessary to accomplish the work of the AIC, along with the appropriate approvals from AUHs and others necessary to agree to such reassigned time; Academic Affairs Policy #1 3

The administrative structure of the AIC, including the reporting relationships, any governance issues, and any proposed Advisory Boards (required for AICs housed at the university level); Sources of funding for the AIC, including in-hand funds, committed funds, and proposed funds, and their sources (NOTE: only a provisional charter will be granted unless sufficient funds are in hand); The university support needs of the proposed AIC, including General Education requirements, any proposed undergraduate or graduate courses to be offered by the AIC or an academic unit, any international experiences, library and other substantial support needed from the university, space needs, information technology support needs, etc.; A proposal for the appointment of a Director of the AIC, including the qualifications of such individual; The positive impact the AIC is anticipated to have on the department, the college, the university, higher education, and/or the community; The administrative office receiving the request shall review the request, and if appropriate, shall forward it to the next level of administration. If all appropriate administrative levels approve of the request, it shall be forwarded to the Office of the Vice Provost for Research and Public Service. That office shall review the request for the appropriateness of the proposal and the overall benefit to the university. The Vice Provost may appoint a committee of faculty members, staff members, students, and/or administrators to review proposals and advise him or her on whether a charter should be granted. For each application, the Vice Provost shall make a recommendation to the Provost on whether the AIC should receive a charter (or a provisional charter, in the situation where the funding is not in hand). Only the Provost has the authority to charter an AIC. All such charters shall be in writing and signed by the Provost. 6.3 Approval of an existing AIC. All AICs currently in existence at the university when this policy takes effect must apply for a charter in order to continue their operations under the auspices of the university. Failure to apply for and receive a charter will result in the discontinuance of funding, space, and all other support for the AIC from the university. Failure to discontinue operation of an AIC that is denied a charter may result in potential discipline of the employees involved. All existing AICs as of the date of this policy shall submit applications by June 30, 2010 to receive a charter under these policies and procedures. Any AIC whose application has not been submitted by this date will not receive direct or indirect funding or other university support for the 2010-2011 fiscal year. Any AIC which files an application by this date will be eligible to continue to operate on a provisional status pending the processing of the application. All applications should be processed by June 30, 2011, but the university may, at its discretion, postpone consideration of any application past this date, and continue provisional status for any AIC still under consideration. Currently existing AICs should in their applications describe not only their current level of support from the university (including funding, positions, space, and all other types of university provided support), but also any anticipated needs for additional support in the next five years. Any charter issued to an existing AIC may be limited to current levels of support, or a charter may be denied because of increased needs for support. Academic Affairs Policy #1 4

6.4 Length of charter. Charters are effective for a specified length of time, which shall be stated on the document. The maximum amount of time for a charter is five years, at the end of which the AIC must apply for renewal of the charter to continue to operate and receive support from the university. Criteria and the approval mechanism for continuation shall be those found in sections above, with the additional inclusion of information concerning any effect on the academic unit, the college, the university, the public, the faculty, staff, students, and members of the public should the AIC not receive a continuation of its charter. The application for renewal must also include a description of the activities since its last charter, fiscal viability and sources for continuation of resources in the future (business plan), goals for the future, and justification for continuation of the AIC. 6.5. Reassigned time. Reassigned time for instructional faculty members working for an AIC must be designated and approved by the academic unit holding the faculty member s primary assignment, with the approval of the dean and appropriate vice provost. Reassigned time for staff members requires the approval of the supervisor and appropriate administrative officers up to the level of the dean. Reassigned time from normal duties is authorized only for official university or state business and it must be reflected on the Faculty Anticipated Activity Plan for instructional faculty members, and on the Employee Work Profile for staff members. 6.6 Removal of charter. A charter for an AIC may be removed or revoked at any time and for any reason by action of the Provost. Notice of the removal or revocation of the charter will be sent by the Provost or his or her designee to the Director of the AIC, with copies to the appropriate administrative individuals within the university. 6.7 Naming of an AIC. The AIC is a part of the university, and the university maintains control over the ability to name the AIC. Approval for the name of the AIC is a part of the approval process. No AIC may adopt a name or change its name without prior approval of the Provost. A part of the review of existing AICs will be whether the existing name is appropriate. Identification of any office, group, or unit as a Center, or Institute, must be approved under these procedures, unless special permission is granted by the Provost to an existing or proposed administrative office. Generally, an Institute is housed at the university level, but a center may be at the university, college or academic unit level. 6.8 Change in mission, administrative structure or designation of AIC. An AIC that has been chartered may apply to change its name, its mission, its administrative structure, or any other significant component of its existence by submitting a new charter application to the appropriate administrative offices listed in 6.2 above. Until such charter is reissued, the AIC is not authorized to make the proposed changes. 6.9 Application for a charter. Proposers must complete the AIC Charter Request form. The form available from the Academic Affairs Policy Web site: http://www.jmu.edu/acadaffairs/policies.shtml. The form is available in PDF and Word formats. Forms should be saved from the Web site to a local server by the proposer to ensure no data is lost while completing the forms. Forms must be submitted electronically to the Office of Research and Public Service. Academic Affairs Policy #1 5

7. RESPONSIBILITIES Director The Director of an AIC is responsible for the operation of the AIC in compliance with all applicable polices, procedures, rules and regulations of the university, the outside funding source, the state and federal governments. The Director has the authority to supervise those instructional faculty, staff and students assigned to the AIC, including the authority to recruit, assign duties to, evaluate the performance of, and dismiss from AIC duties, in accordance with university policy and following regular university approval processes and procedures. The Director is also responsible for ensuring that all external and internal information disseminated concerning the AIC is current and correct. If the AIC has an outside advisory board, the Director is responsible for communications with and coordination of the efforts of the advisory board. The Director is also responsible for communications concerning the AIC with external constituents and the general public. At least annually, the Director shall report on the activities of the AIC to the administrative level to whom the AIC reports (i.e., the AUH, dean or vice provost), and these annual reports should be shared with the upper levels of administration within Academic Affairs. Academic Unit Head The academic unit head ( AUH ) is responsible for the oversight of the administration of a center housed within the academic unit, including reviewing financial and administrative functions of the academic unit centers within the academic unit. The AUH is also responsible for reviewing all proposals for the establishment of a new AIC within the academic unit, for appointment and supervision of the Director of an AIC within the academic unit, and for considering requests for reassigned time of the unit s instructional faculty for work in an AIC either within or outside of the academic unit. The AUH is responsible for evaluating faculty members in his or her academic unit even if a faculty member has a portion of his or her time reassigned to work in an AIC outside of the academic unit. For purposes of the evaluation of the faculty member s performance, the AUH should take into consideration the input of the Director of the AIC for this portion of the faculty member s evaluation. If the faculty member is the Director of the AIC, the AUH should take into consideration the input of the person to whom the Director reports in his or her AIC duties. Dean The dean is responsible for the oversight of the administration of an AIC housed within the college, including reviewing financial and administrative functions of the college centers within the college. The dean is also responsible for reviewing all proposals for the establishment of a new AIC within the academic units or the college, for appointment and supervision of the Director of an AIC housed within the college, and for approving requests for reassigned time within the college of the instructional faculty for work in an AIC, in conjunction with the appropriate AUHs to whom the faculty members receiving reassigned time report. Vice Provost The Vice Provost is responsible for the oversight of the administration of an AIC housed within the Vice Provost s area of authority, including reviewing financial and administrative functions of the AICs within the area. The Vice Provost is also responsible for reviewing all proposals for the establishment of a new AIC within the colleges in his or her area, for appointment and supervision of the Director of an AIC reporting directly to the Vice Provost, and for reviewing and approving requests for reassigned time for faculty members within the area of the Vice Provost, in conjunction with the appropriate AUHs and deans to whom the faculty members receiving reassigned time report. Academic Affairs Policy #1 6

The Vice Provost for Research and Public Service (VPRPS) is responsible for reviewing all proposals for the establishment of a new AIC, and for making recommendations to the Provost on such proposals. The VPRPS or his or her designee will work cooperatively with the appropriate vice provost, dean, and/or AUH in providing the oversight of the administration of an AIC, including reviewing financial and administrative functions of the AICs at the university level. The VPRPS or his or her designee is also responsible for appointment and supervision of the Director of an AIC housed at the university level, and for monitoring instructional faculty reassigned time to university level AICs. The VPRPS or his or her designee will work with the appropriate AUHs, deans and vice provosts in this process when working with faculty who are on split appointments and/or reassignments. The VPRPS or his or her designee will consult on the issue of reassigned time for faculty members in AICs with the deans and AUHs to whom the faculty members report. Provost The Provost is responsible for determining whether a charter will be issued for a new AIC, for granting renewals of charters, and for revoking the charter of an AIC when appropriate. 8. SANCTIONS Employees who fail to follow this policy are subject to appropriate disciplinary action. 9. EXCLUSIONS This policy does not apply to any center in any division other than the Academic Affairs Division of the university. This policy does not apply to any center in the Academic Affairs Division which grants degrees. 10. Interpretation The authority to interpret this policy rests with the Provost, and is generally delegated to the Vice Provost for Research and Public Service. Approved: Douglas T. Brown Date: Sept. 23, 2009 Provost and Senior Vice President, Academic Affairs Index Terms Centers Institutes Academic Affairs Policy #1 7