Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

Similar documents
Evaluation of Teach For America:

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WOULD THE ELIMINATION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFFECT HIGHLY QUALIFIED MINORITY APPLICANTS? EVIDENCE FROM CALIFORNIA AND TEXAS

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Best Colleges Main Survey

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Transportation Equity Analysis

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Idaho Public Schools

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

A Diverse Student Body

Peer Influence on Academic Achievement: Mean, Variance, and Network Effects under School Choice

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

Access Center Assessment Report

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

The Effects of Statewide Private School Choice on College Enrollment and Graduation

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

ABILITY SORTING AND THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLEGE QUALITY TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM COMMUNITY COLLEGES

Cooper Upper Elementary School

National Academies STEM Workforce Summit

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Educational Attainment

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Rural Education in Oregon

Creating a Culture of Transfer

FACTORS INFLUENCING POSITIVE INTERACTIONS ACROSS RACE FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN, ASIAN AMERICAN, LATINO, AND WHITE COLLEGE STUDENTS

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

NEGATIVE ACTION VERSUS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICANS ARE STILL CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

University of Arizona

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

The Declining Equity of American Higher Education

The Impacts of Regular Upward Bound on Postsecondary Outcomes 7-9 Years After Scheduled High School Graduation

BARUCH RANKINGS: *Named Standout Institution by the

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

PEIMS Submission 1 list

PEER EFFECTS IN THE CLASSROOM: LEARNING FROM GENDER AND RACE VARIATION *

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

We re Not Even Allowed to Ask for Help

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Effectiveness of McGraw-Hill s Treasures Reading Program in Grades 3 5. October 21, Research Conducted by Empirical Education Inc.

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Raw Data Files Instructions

What We Are Learning about Successful Programs In College Calculus

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Understanding and Interpreting the NRC s Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (2010)

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

Denver Public Schools

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

ACCESS TO SUCCESS IN AMERICA: Where are we? What Can We Learn from Colleges on the Performance Frontier?

Robert S. Unnasch, Ph.D.

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning


The Unequal Distribution of Economic Education: A Report on the Race, Ethnicity, and Gender of Economics Majors at US Colleges and Universities

FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE COLLEGE CHOICE PROCESS FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENTS. Melanie L. Hayden. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

LIM College New York, NY

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

The Racial Wealth Gap

Legacy of NAACP Salary equalization suits.

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Swarthmore College Common Data Set

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

Predicting the Performance and Success of Construction Management Graduate Students using GRE Scores

Multicultural Education: Perspectives and Theory. Multicultural Education by Dr. Chiu, Mei-Wen

46 Children s Defense Fund

African American Male Achievement Update

Math Placement at Paci c Lutheran University

Shelters Elementary School

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Networks and the Diffusion of Cutting-Edge Teaching and Learning Knowledge in Sociology

Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering

Transcription:

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience Thomas J. Espenshade Alexandria Walton Radford Chang Young Chung Office of Population Research Princeton University December 15, 2009 1

Overview of NSCE Project Purpose of the study Data used institutional data student survey other extant data 2

Three Questions for Today Do we still need affirmative action? Mixing and mingling on campus: Is the promise of diversity being realized? Does elite higher education perpetuate inequality? 3

I. Do We Still Need Affirmative Action? 4

TABLE 2.1 Descriptive Statistics for the Combined Applicant Pool at Seven NSCE Colleges and Universities NSCE Applicant Sample: Fall 1997 Cohort (N=3,670) Characteristic Percent Race White 68.1 Black 6.8 Hispanic 5.2 Asian 20.0 Socioeconomic Status Upper 4.9 Upper Middle 46.8 Middle 37.7 Working 9.3 Lower 1.3 First Generation College Student First Generation 18.1 Not First Generation 81.6 Unknown 0.3 Source: NSCE 5

TABLE 3.2 Differences Between Applicants to Public and Private NSCE Institutions in Acceptance Rates and Standardized Test Scores, Fall 1997 Category Public Institutions Applicants to Private Institutions Overall Acceptance Rate (percent) 55.1 23.8 SAT Score Average for all applicants 1205 1341 ACT Score Average for all applicants 25.9 29.0 Percent in 30 36 range 17.7 52.1 SAT II (Achievement) Tests Percent taking none 50.2 7.4 Average number of tests taken 2.8 3.8 Average test scores(s) 598 649 Percent scoring 650 or above 32.2 56.0 Percent scoring 750 or above 0.7 6.2 Advanced Placement Examinations Percent taking none 37.8 14.3 Average number of tests taken 2.6 4.1 Source: NSCE; Educational Testing Service 6

TABLE 3.3 Acceptance Rates to Public and Private NSCE Institutions, by Race and Social Class, Fall 1997 Percent Admitted Item Public Institutions Private Institutions Total 55.1 23.8 Race White 56.2 25.7 Black 58.5 31.0 Hispanic 40.8 26.7 Asian 39.9 18.4 Social Class Lower 57.8 23.2 Working 51.5 18.3 Middle 57.4 21.2 Upper Middle 53.7 27.4 Upper 65.0 25.1 Source: NSCE 7

TABLE 3.5 Race and Social Class Admission Preferences at Public and Private Institutions Measured in ACT and SAT Points, Fall 1997 Item Public Institutions ACT Point Equivalents (out of 36) Private Institutions SAT Point Equivalents (out of 1600) Race (White) Black 3.8 310 Hispanic 0.3 130 Asian 3.4 140 Social Class Lower 0.1 130 Working 0.0 70 (Middle) Upper Middle 0.3 50 Upper 0.4 30 Source: NSCE 8

TABLE 3.7 Odds Ratios from Logistic Regression Estimates of the Effect of Race, Immigrant Generation, and Social Class on Admission Probabilities to Private NSCE Institutions, Fall 1997 Predictor Variables Private Disaggregated Race (White) Black descendants 9.81*** Black non descendants 3.89*** Hispanic 1 st generation 1.11 Hispanic 2 nd generation 2.79*** Hispanic 3 rd and higher generation 1.68 Asian 1 st generation 0.39** Asian 2 nd generation 0.27*** Asian 3 rd and higher generation 0.61 Social Class Low 1.44 (Middle) High 1.26 Number of observations 2765 p < 0.10; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 Source: NSCE 9

Six Year Graduation Rates at NSCE Institutions, by Race and Social Class; 1993 and 1997 Entering Cohorts Combined (N=4,390) White Black Hispanic Asian 78% 89% 88% 92% Total 89% Upper Upper Middle Middle Working Lower 90% 90% 89% 79% 81% Source: National Study of College Experience 10

TABLE 6.1 Odds Ratio Results from Logistic Regressions Examining Six Year Graduation Rates NSCE Matriculant Data: 1993 and 1997 Cohorts (N=4,390) Bowen and Bok Model a (1) NSCE Model b (2) Predictor Variables Race (White) Black 0.47*** 0.57** Hispanic 0.83 0.53** Asian 1.26 0.68 Social Class Upper Middle and Upper Class 1.08 0.69 (Middle Class) Lower and Working Class 0.55* 0.78 College Selectivity Most Selective Tier 1.99** 1.68 Second Most Selective Tier 1.18 1.29 (All Other Colleges) 11

Percentile Class Rank at Graduation for Those Graduating from NSCE Institutions Within Six Years, by Race; 1993 and 1997 Entering Cohorts Combined (N=3,788) 26% 5% 8% 14% 9% 13% 20% Top Quintile 21% 23% 17% 21% 21% 28% 22% 17% 51% 20% 33% 16% 17% Bottom White Black Hispanic Asian Source: National Study of College Experience 12

TABLE 6.2 OLS Regression Results for Percentile Class Rank at Graduation NSCE Matriculant Data: 1993 and 1997 Cohorts (N=3,788) Predictor Variables Race (White) Black 17.3*** Hispanic 14.9*** Asian 9.9*** Social Class Upper Middle and Upper Class 3.4 (Middle Class) Lower and Working Class 3.1 College Selectivity Most Selective Tier 18.4*** Second Most Selective Tier 15.4*** (All Other Colleges) 13

TABLE 9.1 Effect of Eliminating Affirmative Action at Private Institutions: Simulation Results, Fall 1997 Difference From Observed Baseline Admitted If Observed Baseline Observed Baseline No Affirmative Race Neutral Item Applications Admitted Action Admission Total 51,836 12,233 0 0 Race (%) White 55.7 59.9 4.6 6.5 Black 6.3 8.3 4.7 5.5 Hispanic 7.0 7.9 2.1 3.2 Asian 31.0 23.9 2.2 15.1 Social Class (%) Lower 1.6 1.6 0.8 1.2 Working 10.7 8.3 2.0 4.3 Middle 38.0 33.4 0.4 5.8 Upper Middle 43.0 49.6 2.5 0.5 Upper 6.8 7.2 0.7 0.1 Mean SAT Score 1,340 1,405 5 10 14

TABLE 9.3 Effect of Substituting Other Policies for Affirmative Action at Private Institutions: Simulation Results, Fall 1997 Difference From Observed Baseline Admitted If Item Observed Baseline Admitted No Affirmative Action More Low Income Weight No Affirmative Action, More Low Income Weight, Less Emphasis on Academic Performance No Affirmative Action, More Low Income Weight, No Weight to Academic Performance Total 12,233 0 0 0 Race (%) White 59.9 3.0 2.4 2.2 Black 8.3 4.3 2.5 0.7 Hispanic 7.9 1.7 1.0 0.6 Asian 23.9 2.9 1.1 0.9 Social Class (%) Lower 1.6 2.5 3.0 3.4 Working 8.3 4.5 6.7 8.4 Middle 33.4 4.0 5.2 5.1 Upper Middle 49.6 2.9 4.7 7.4 Upper 7.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 Mean SAT Score 1,405 5 34 76 15

Conclusions? 16

I. Do We Still Need Affirmative Action? II. Mixing and Mingling on Campus? III. Does Elite Higher Education Perpetuate Inequality? 17

TABLE 5.3 Students Social Relations with Students of a Different Race or the Same Race NSCE Matriculant Sample: 1980s, 1993, and 1997 Cohorts Combined (N=6,350) Social Relation Percent Socialize Often/Very Often with Students of a Different Race 62.8 Students of the Same Race 92.4 Live with at Least One Student of a Different Race 51.2 Student of the Same Race 87.8 Have a Close Friendship with a Student of a Different Race 50.9 Student of the Same Race 92.5 Date at Least One Student of a Different Race 35.8 Student of the Same Race 83.9 Source: National Study of College Experience 18

Patterns of Social Interaction, by Race: 1980s, 1993, 1997 Cohorts Combined Race of Respondent Percent Socializing Often/Very Often with Percent Living with at Least One Percent Having a Close Friendship with a Percent Dating at Least One Mean Row Percent White Student(s) of the Same Race 96.3 95.0 97.0 90.0 (95) Student(s) of a Different Race 56.5 42.1 43.7 29.5 (43) Black Student(s) of the Same Race 86.5 70.9 87.1 75.9 (80) Student(s) of a Different Race 76.6 75.2 62.3 41.8 (64) Asian Student(s) of the Same Race 80.6 65.7 79.3 59.1 (71) Student(s) of a Different Race 86.6 84.9 79.0 59.0 (77) Hispanic Student(s) of the Same Race 60.9 37.4 50.9 47.2 (49) Student(s) of a Different Race 94.3 92.4 93.3 83.7 (91) Source: NSCE 19

Pairwise Racial Patterns of Social Interaction on NSCE College Campuses; NSCE Matriculant Data: 1980s, 1993, and 1997 Cohorts Combined (N=6,350) White Hispanic.60 White Asian.42 Hispanic Asian.39 Black Hispanic.35 Black Asian.20 Black White.14 Relative Likelihood of Between Group Versus Within Group Social Interaction 20

How Much Students Learned From Other Students of Different Racial and Ethnic Backgrounds Source: National Study of College Experience 21

Patterns of Social Interaction on Campus and Whether Students Learned a Lot From Diversity Source: National Study of College Experience 22

The Challenge? 23

I. Do We Still Need Affirmative Action? II. Mixing and Mingling on Campus? III. Does Elite Higher Education Perpetuate Inequality? 24

Percent of Enrolled Students from Upper Middle or Upper Class Backgrounds, by Cohort 53.1% 48.7% 52.2% 58.0% Source: National Study of College Experience 25

Social Class Acceptance Rates by Social Class, Fall 1997 All Applicants Public Institutions Private Institutions Higher 37 54 27 Middle 33 57 21 Lower 26 52 19 Total 34.6 55.1 23.8 Source: NSCE 26

Effect of Race and Social Class on the Probability of Being Admitted to Private NSCE Institutions, All Other Things Held Constant, 1997 Source: National Study of College Experience 27

Social Class Profile of NSCE Students from Application to College Graduation, 1997 Cohort Source: National Study of College Experience 28

Category TABLE 8.1 Combined Percentage of Upper Middle and Upper Class Students in Successive Stages of the Application to Graduation Process, 1997 Cohort All Applicants All Accepted Students All Matriculants Graduated Within Six Years All Students 51.7 56.5 60.1 60.0 Public 56.9 56.6 60.9 60.4 Private 49.1 56.3 59.4 59.6 White 57.8 61.1 65.4 64.9 Black 26.0 25.0 27.6 27.7 Hispanic 37.1 38.2 38.3 39.4 Asian 43.2 55.2 56.1 56.2 Source: National Study of College Experience 29

The Challenge? 30

31

32