THE CONSENSUS PROCESS

Similar documents
RESOLVING CONFLICT. The Leadership Excellence Series WHERE LEADERS ARE MADE

Harvesting the Wisdom of Coalitions

RESOLVING CONFLICTS IN THE OFFICE

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Behaviors: team learns more about its assigned task and each other; individual roles are not known; guidelines and ground rules are established

Red Flags of Conflict

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

ACTION LEARNING: AN INTRODUCTION AND SOME METHODS INTRODUCTION TO ACTION LEARNING

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Team Report

Explorer Promoter. Controller Inspector. The Margerison-McCann Team Management Wheel. Andre Anonymous

INTRODUCTION TO TEAM & TEAM DYNAMIC

The Rise and Fall of the

A non-profit educational institution dedicated to making the world a better place to live

Experience Corps. Mentor Toolkit

The Stress Pages contain written summaries of areas of stress and appropriate actions to prevent stress.

Different Requirements Gathering Techniques and Issues. Javaria Mushtaq

Practice Examination IREB

To the Student: ABOUT THE EXAM

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

IMGD Technical Game Development I: Iterative Development Techniques. by Robert W. Lindeman

Harness the power of public media and partnerships for the digital age. WQED Multimedia Strategic Plan

Using Group Support Systems (FacilitatePro) in a learningcentered negotiation case exercise

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

AIFT Practicum Staff have adjusted well to the new structure overall although change has been harder for some

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

Brainstorming Tools Literature Review and Introduction to Code Development

IMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM

One Way Draw a quick picture.

Why Pay Attention to Race?

C O U R S E. Tools for Group Thinking

What Teachers Are Saying

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

Cognitive Thinking Style Sample Report

high writing writing high contests. school students student

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

URBANIZATION & COMMUNITY Sociology 420 M/W 10:00 a.m. 11:50 a.m. SRTC 162

Some Basic Active Learning Strategies

Fearless Change -- Patterns for Introducing New Ideas

Department of Geography, University of Delaware Graduate Program Policy Handbook

Youth Mental Health First Aid Instructor Application

UNIT 9 GROUP DECISION-MAKING MODULE - 3

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

OHIO HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

Presidential Leadership: Understanding the influence of academic disciplines

WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

How to organise Quality Events

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

Wisconsin Youth Apprenticeship. Historical Overview

ECE-492 SENIOR ADVANCED DESIGN PROJECT

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies

United states panel on climate change. memorandum

and. plan effects, about lesson, plan effect and lesson, plan. and effect

The Success Principles How to Get from Where You Are to Where You Want to Be

Inquiry Learning Methodologies and the Disposition to Energy Systems Problem Solving

New Start Procedures for Starting a Kairos Ministry in a New Institution

USING SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY TO ANALYZE QUALITY OF LIFE AND CONTINUOUS URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1

University of Toronto

Faculty Schedule Preference Survey Results

Trends & Issues Report

Garfield High School

Planning Theory-Based and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Interventions. An Intervention Mapping Approach

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

Program Alignment CARF Child and Youth Services Standards. Nonviolent Crisis Intervention Training Program

VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 143 ( 2014 ) CY-ICER Teacher intervention in the process of L2 writing acquisition

Train The Trainer(SAMPLE PAGES)

Data Modeling and Databases II Entity-Relationship (ER) Model. Gustavo Alonso, Ce Zhang Systems Group Department of Computer Science ETH Zürich

MGMT 479 (Hybrid) Strategic Management

What Is a Chief Diversity Officer? By. Dr. Damon A. Williams & Dr. Katrina C. Wade-Golden

Market Economy Lesson Plan

Community Power Simulation

Introduction to CRC Cards

What Am I Getting Into?

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology

Compilation of Data: Ecole Christine Morrison Ecole Mission Central French Immersion & English Programs

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Faculty Meetings. From Dissemination. To Engagement. Jessica Lyons MaryBeth Scullion Rachel Wagner City of Tonawanda School District, NY

Effectively Resolving Conflict in the Workplace

American Studies Ph.D. Timeline and Requirements

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

HARRISBURG AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE ONLINE COURSE SYLLABUS

Educational Leadership and Administration

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

Question bank for course evaluation

Retaining Postdoc Women Through Effective Postdoctoral Policies. Helen Mederer Department of Sociology University of Rhode Island

ICT + PBL = Holistic Learning solution:utem s Experience

Master of Motivation & Influence. Barbara Jordan, MS, LPC, CSAC

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

Social Gerontology: 920:303:01 Department of Sociology Rutgers University Fall 2017 Tuesday & Thursday, 6:40 8:00 pm Beck Hall 251

MSW Field Placement Manual Foundation and Advanced

CAMP 4:4:3. Supplemental Tools

Transcription:

THE CONSENSUS PROCESS OR CREATIVE JOINT PROBLEM SOLVING Consensus: Collective opinion or agreement, harmony, cooperation, sympathy and group solidarity. Advantages of Using a Consensus Process 1. Education and Awareness A consensus process provides learning opportunities for all involved. Shared perceptions and experiences provide a deeper, richer understanding of the issue being discussed. This increased understanding provides the basis for selecting appropriate solutions. 2. Better Decisions Decisions using a consensus process reflect the concerns of all involved parties and draw upon the creativity and breadth of ideas in the group. 3. Embracing the Result Those who have been engaged in creating a solution or making a decision will be more likely to embrace the result and less likely to challenge it. In other words, buy-in of parties is enhanced. 4. Faster Implementation Consensus results in less challenge to the implementation of a solution. When potential adversaries are involved at the beginning of a consensus process, those concerns are considered and integrated into the solution. The more that concerned parties are involved in a decision-making process, the less resistance will be experienced upon implementation. 5. Creation of New Partnerships New relationships are potentially formed as a result of sharing of common values, interests, and strategies. Drawbacks: Consensus takes time, patience, and willingness to compromise. Decisions can be halted by one person s objections.

DESIGNING A CONSENSUS PROCESS When to Use a Consensus Process: Issues are complex Many parties are involved No one agency or organization has decision making power Issues are negotiable Parties are willing to participate Goals for a Consensus Process: Develop collaborative vision and goals Make an inclusive collaborative decision Resolve a controversy Elements of a Consensus Process: Participation is inclusive Participants are jointly responsible for the success of a process, program, or effort People are informed Participants educate each other about the issue(s) People agree on a common definition of the problem Multiple solutions or options are identified Participants are responsible for overseeing implementation of solutions

STEPS IN CREATING A CONSENSUS PROCESS Step 1: Clarify and frame the issue What is the tangible issue? Where does each party stand on the issue? Participants in a consensus process must know what they are discussing and deciding. A common understanding of the problem its location, the extent, and the impacts is necessary before proceeding. It is helpful to frame the issue in terms of a question to initiate discussion: What strategies can we employ to prepare children for kindergarten in our community? Step 2: Establish agreements How will we decide? Who will make the decision? Group agreements are essential to any productive group process. Agreements, or ground rules, will be both process-oriented and task-oriented. Examples of process agreements include how group members will behave toward one another. Task-oriented or procedural agreements will include how information will be shared, when a decision will be made, and who will participate in decision-making. Step 3: Gather information What are the likely outcomes? What are the benefits and drawbacks? Participants will identify key issues, interests, and relevant data as related to the issue, as well as public input. Task groups can be formed to investigate different aspects of an issue and then report back to the entire group. The goal of the information gathering stage is to gain a collective understanding of an issue and to begin identifying common ground. Try to discover all the possible consequences of a particular decision. Step 4: Generate options Brainstorm all possible solutions Involve all parties affected by the decision

Participants generate options, or alternate solutions, to a problem or issue. Again, the community (e.g. youth, parents, etc.) may be invited to participate at this stage and task groups may be formed to generate alternate solutions to a particular aspect of an issue. For additional ideas, investigate what has worked in other communities or collaboratives. Step 5: Reach agreements Evaluate each proposed solution Choose the solution(s) most acceptable to all parties Decide together without voting As possible solutions are presented, it may be helpful to use criteria to evaluate those solutions. Some criteria may be: feasibility, resources available or resource requirements, community support, and/or impact on a community. Your collaborative will determine the criteria by which to evaluate options. Participants reach agreement by combining, synthesizing, and compromising. The final solution(s) is one that everyone can live with. The outcome should feel like a win-win situation. This is the time to focus a sense of shared values within the group and on common ground - interests, not positions. Step 6: Implementing and monitoring solutions How will the solution be carried out? When? How will we know if it s successful? If the first solution has flaws, revisit the decision This last step is essential. The group is responsible for an implementation plan including agreements with all involved parties and a plan for monitoring progress and outcomes. Sometimes, the first solution chosen is not always the best.

GUIDELINES FOR CONSENSUS* Not every decision calls for consensus. Modify the problem-solving/decisionmaking model to fit your own group, its needs, and the type or importance of the decision to be made. Think about using committees to gather and present relevant information or for a particular decision. It saves time. Attempt to satisfy objections. Since there is a great deal of power invested in every member, the power to block consensus must be used sparingly and in a responsible manner when there is a serious, principled objection. Plan ahead for enough time to develop consensus on vital decisions. Be aware of members who have difficulty expressing their ideas and have facilitators help out. Always look for the common ground where members can begin to agree on something and work from there. Remember, a meeting is not a competitive event where someone has to win and someone has to lose. Avoid arguing for your point of view. Present your views clearly and logically and then listen to what others have to say. Don't resort to conflict reducers, such as bargaining, majority votes, or flipping a coin. Work it out. Overcome fear of conflict. It's natural for people to disagree and have differing points of view. The more information and input, the better the decision. Beware of Group Think and the pressure to conform. Don't change your mind simply to avoid conflict. Be aware of the implications of a decision and watch out for important decisions that come too easily. Seemingly irreconcilable differences can be worked out if people talk freely and honestly and try to listen and understand all sides, including your own. * Adapted from Working Together: A Manual for Helping Groups Work More Effectively. Biagi, Bob. Citizen Involvement Training Project. University of Massachusetts. Amherst, MA. 1978.