Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Similar documents
CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Sign languages and the Common European Framework of References for Languages

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

The Eaquals Self-help Guide for Curriculum and Syllabus Design Maria Matheidesz and Frank Heyworth

EXAMPLES OF SPEAKING PERFORMANCES AT CEF LEVELS A2 TO C2. (Taken from Cambridge ESOL s Main Suite exams)

English. (Swiss Adult Learners) Brian North (Eurocentres) Gareth Hughes (Migros Club Schools)

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

One Stop Shop For Educators

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

CEF, oral assessment and autonomous learning in daily college practice

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Handbook for Teachers

To appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING. Kazuya Saito. Birkbeck, University of London

Formulaic Language and Fluency: ESL Teaching Applications

Cognitive Thinking Style Sample Report

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

November 2012 MUET (800)

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Teachers Guide Chair Study

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

ACTION LEARNING: AN INTRODUCTION AND SOME METHODS INTRODUCTION TO ACTION LEARNING

Conversation Task: The Environment Concerns Us All

Language Center. Course Catalog

The Task. A Guide for Tutors in the Rutgers Writing Centers Written and edited by Michael Goeller and Karen Kalteissen

Classify: by elimination Road signs

The History of Language Teaching

Merbouh Zouaoui. Melouk Mohamed. Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy. 1. Introduction

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Language Acquisition Chart

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Presentation Advice for your Professional Review

USING DRAMA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING CLASSROOMS TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF LEARNERS

Lower and Upper Secondary

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

A PRIMER FOR HOST FAMILIES

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK 17 AGUSTUS 1945 MUNCAR THROUGH DIRECT PRACTICE WITH THE NATIVE SPEAKER

RUSSIAN LANGUAGE, INTERMEDIATE LEVEL

10 Tips For Using Your Ipad as An AAC Device. A practical guide for parents and professionals

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Pre-vocational training. Unit 2. Being a fitness instructor

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 )

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

Lecturing Module

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

School Leadership Rubrics

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

The Use of Drama and Dramatic Activities in English Language Teaching

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

Creating Travel Advice

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

Training Staff with Varying Abilities and Special Needs

Spanish III Class Description

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

Vicente Amado Antonio Nariño HH. Corazonistas and Tabora School

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Applying Speaking Criteria. For use from November 2010 GERMAN BREAKTHROUGH PAGRB01

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

FACULTADE DE FILOLOXÍA DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOLOXÍA INGLESA. Lingua Inglesa 2. Susana M. Doval Suárez Elsa González Álvarez Susana M Jiménez Placer

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Assessing Oral Skills

Communication around Interactive Tables

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

How We Learn. Unlock the ability to study more efficiently. Mark Maclaine Stephanie Satariano

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

COURSE NUMBER: COURSE NUMBER: SECTION: 01 SECTION: 01. Office Location: WSQ 104. (preferred contact)

Radius STEM Readiness TM

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Transcription:

C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria Think A F R I C A - 1 -

1. The extracts in the left hand column are taken from the official descriptors of the CEFR levels. How would you grade them on a scale of low, medium, or high? Take 2-3 minutes to complete the form and then compare your answers with the others. He/she can, shows, expresses, uses, has, is., etc. initiate discourse on a wide range of topics limited to very familiar topics handle short exchanges reasonable accuracy keep going comprehensibly broad range of language repertoire of basic patterns without imposing strain on the interlocutor effective argument frequent breakdowns in communication strong mother tongue interference spontaneous communication simple interaction finer shades of meaning active part in an informal discussion smoothly-flowing, well-structured speech ask for basic information to cope with less routine situations sustain his/her opinion interlocutor hardly aware of difficulty good command of idiomatic expressions limited to specific rehearsed phrases unaware of mistakes he/she makes precisely frequently asks for repetition pausing is very evident almost effortlessly LOW MEDIUM HIGH - 2 -

2. Quickly read the short extracts in the column on the left to your colleagues. Put a tick in the box if you think the item corresponds to FLUENCY, RANGE, INTERACTION, COHESION or ACCURACY. Discuss your answers. ASSESSMENT CRITIERIA A F R I C A A natural colloquial flow Able to give clear descriptions without much searching for words and using some complex sentence forms Can follow the interlocutor but can rarely keep conversation going of his own accord Can initiate and maintain simple face-to-face conversation on familiar topics. Can repeat to check understanding Can initiate discourse, take turns, not always elegantly Can keep going, even though pausing for planning and repair is very evident Can link a series of shorter elements into a connected sequence. Can make himself understood in short utterances, pauses, false starts are very evident Can produce stretches of language with a fairly even tempo, few noticeable long pauses Can select suitable phrases to get or to keep the floor and relate his/her contribution to those of the other speakers Can use a limited number of devices to link utterances into clear discourse Consistent grammatical control, even when attention is otherwise engaged.. (e.g. in forward planning, in monitoring other s reactions) Errors are rare, difficult to spot and can be generally corrected by the student Express him/herself spontaneously, almost effortlessly. Only difficulties with conceptually difficult subject matters - 3 -

ASSESSMENT CRITIERIA A F R I C A Full and appropriate use of a wide variety of organisational patterns and devices Good command can select language in an appropriate style without having to restrict what he/she wants to say Great flexibility in reformulating ideas, convey finer shades of meaning precisely Groups of words with simple connectors and, but and because Has a very basic repertoire for personal details and concrete situations Has enough language to get by, topics such as family, hobbies, interests, etc In a simple way but communication is totally dependent on repetition, rephrasing, etc Limited control of a few simple grammatical structures Reasonably accurate repertoire of frequently used routines for more predictable situations Relatively high degree of grammatical control, errors do not cause misunderstandings Still systematically makes basic mistakes, Uses basic patterns with memorised phrases, to communicate in simple everyday situations Uses words with basic linear connectors like and or then Well-structured speech, use of organisational patterns, etc With ease and skill, interweave his/her contribution fully natural turn-taking, etc - 4 -

EAQUALS ORAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA GRID: CEF table 3; Manual Table 5.5-5 -

A1-C2 FLUENCY Can manage very short, isolated, mainly pre-packaged utterances, with much pausing to search for expressions, to articulate less familiar words, and to repair communication. Can express him/herself spontaneously at length with a natural colloquial flow, avoiding or backtracking around any difficulty so smoothly that the interlocutor is hardly aware of it. Can produce stretches of language with a fairly even tempo; although he/she can be hesitant as he or she searches for patterns and expressions, there are few noticeably long pauses. Can make him/herself understood in very short utterances, even though pauses, false starts and reformulation are very evident. Can express him/herself fluently and spontaneously, almost effortlessly. Only a conceptually difficult subject can hinder a natural, smooth flow of language. Can keep going comprehensibly, even though pausing for grammatical and lexical planning and repair is very evident, especially in longer stretches of free production. - 6 -

A1-C2 RANGE Has a sufficient range of language to be able to give clear descriptions and express viewpoints on most general topics, without much conspicuous searching for words, using some complex sentence forms to do so. Shows great flexibility reformulating ideas in differing linguistic forms to convey finer shades of meaning precisely, to give emphasis, to differentiate and to eliminate ambiguity. Also has a good command of idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms. Has a good command of a broad range of language allowing him/her to select a formulation to express him/herself clearly in an appropriate style on a wide range of general, academic professional or leisure topics without having to restrict what he/she wants to say Has a very basic repertoire of words and simple phrases related to personal details and particular concrete situations. Has enough language to get by, with sufficient vocabulary to express him/herself with some hesitation and circumlocutions on topics such as family, hobbies and interests, work, travel, and current events. Uses basic sentence patterns with memorised phrases, groups of a few words and formulae in order to communicate limited, information in simple everyday situations. - 7 -

A1-C2 INTERACTION Can interact with ease and skill, picking up and using non-verbal and intonational cues apparently effortlessly. Can Interweave his/her contribution into the joint discourse with fully natural turntaking, referencing, allusion making etc. Can initiate, maintain and close simple face-to-face conversation on topics that are familiar or of personal interest. Can repeat back part of what someone has said to confirm mutual understanding. Can select a suitable phrase from a readily available range of discourse functions to preface his remarks appropriately in order to get or to keep the floor and to relate his/her own contributions skilfully to those of other speakers. Can ask and answer questions and respond to simple statements. Can indicate when he/she is following but is rarely able to understand enough to keep conversation going of his/her own accord. Can initiate discourse, take his/her turn when appropriate and end conversation when he/she needs to, though he/she may not always do this elegantly. Can help the discussion along on familiar ground confirming comprehension, inviting others in, etc. Can ask and answer questions about personal details. Can interact in a simple way but communication is totally dependent on repetition, rephrasing and repair. - 8 -

A1-C2 COHERENCE Can create coherent and cohesive discourse making full and appropriate use of a variety of organisational patterns and a wide range of connectors and other cohesive devices. Can produce clear, smoothly flowing, well-structured speech, showing controlled use of organisational patterns, connectors and cohesive devices. Can link a series of shorter, discrete simple elements into a connected, linear sequence of points. Can link words or groups of words with very basic linear connectors like and or then. Can link groups of words with simple connectors like "and, "but" and "because". Can use a limited number of cohesive devices to link his/her utterances into clear, coherent discourse, though there may be some "jumpiness" in a long contribution. - 9 -

A1-C2 ACCURACY Consistently maintains a high degree of grammatical accuracy; errors are rare, difficult to spot, and generally corrected when they do occur. Uses reasonably accurately a repertoire of frequently used "routines" and patterns associated with more predictable situations. Maintains consistent grammatical control of complex language, even while attention is otherwise engaged (e.g. in forward planning, in monitoring others reactions). Uses some simple structures correctly, but still systematically makes basic mistakes. Shows a relatively high degree of grammatical control. Does not make errors which cause misunderstanding, and can correct most of his/her mistakes. Shows only limited control of a few simple grammatical structures and sentence patterns in a memorised repertoire. - 10 -