Inleiding Taalkunde. Docent: Paola Monachesi. Blok 4, 2001/ Syntax 2. 2 Phrases and constituent structure 2. 3 A minigrammar of Italian 3

Similar documents
Argument structure and theta roles

Derivational: Inflectional: In a fit of rage the soldiers attacked them both that week, but lost the fight.

CS 598 Natural Language Processing

Syntax Parsing 1. Grammars and parsing 2. Top-down and bottom-up parsing 3. Chart parsers 4. Bottom-up chart parsing 5. The Earley Algorithm

Constraining X-Bar: Theta Theory

Today we examine the distribution of infinitival clauses, which can be

1/20 idea. We ll spend an extra hour on 1/21. based on assigned readings. so you ll be ready to discuss them in class

Introduction to HPSG. Introduction. Historical Overview. The HPSG architecture. Signature. Linguistic Objects. Descriptions.

The presence of interpretable but ungrammatical sentences corresponds to mismatches between interpretive and productive parsing.

Context Free Grammars. Many slides from Michael Collins

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

Case government vs Case agreement: modelling Modern Greek case attraction phenomena in LFG

Approaches to control phenomena handout Obligatory control and morphological case: Icelandic and Basque

Theoretical Syntax Winter Answers to practice problems

Basic Syntax. Doug Arnold We review some basic grammatical ideas and terminology, and look at some common constructions in English.

Som and Optimality Theory

Universal Grammar 2. Universal Grammar 1. Forms and functions 1. Universal Grammar 3. Conceptual and surface structure of complex clauses

Hindi-Urdu Phrase Structure Annotation

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

The Structure of Relative Clauses in Maay Maay By Elly Zimmer

Natural Language Processing. George Konidaris

CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Long-distance wh-movement. Long distance wh-movement. Islands. Islands. Locality. NP Sea. NP Sea

Grammars & Parsing, Part 1:

Chapter 4: Valence & Agreement CSLI Publications

ENGBG1 ENGBL1 Campus Linguistics. Meeting 2. Chapter 7 (Morphology) and chapter 9 (Syntax) Pia Sundqvist

Proof Theory for Syntacticians

Some Principles of Automated Natural Language Information Extraction

LNGT0101 Introduction to Linguistics

Minimalism is the name of the predominant approach in generative linguistics today. It was first

Parsing of part-of-speech tagged Assamese Texts

Construction Grammar. University of Jena.

SPRING GROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Advanced Grammar in Use

11/29/2010. Statistical Parsing. Statistical Parsing. Simple PCFG for ATIS English. Syntactic Disambiguation

Ch VI- SENTENCE PATTERNS.

Dear Teacher: Welcome to Reading Rods! Reading Rods offer many outstanding features! Read on to discover how to put Reading Rods to work today!

Control and Boundedness

Language acquisition: acquiring some aspects of syntax.

Part I. Figuring out how English works

A Computational Evaluation of Case-Assignment Algorithms

Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes in Pak-Pak Language

The subject of adjectives: Syntactic position and semantic interpretation

THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & SOCIAL STUDIES

An Introduction to the Minimalist Program

Unit 8 Pronoun References

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 ( 2014 )

Words come in categories

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

Tibor Kiss Reconstituting Grammar: Hagit Borer's Exoskeletal Syntax 1

Objectives. Chapter 2: The Representation of Knowledge. Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Fourth Edition

Pseudo-Passives as Adjectival Passives

Citation for published version (APA): Veenstra, M. J. A. (1998). Formalizing the minimalist program Groningen: s.n.

On Labeling: Principle C and Head Movement

Aspectual Classes of Verb Phrases

PROBLEMS IN ADJUNCT CARTOGRAPHY: A CASE STUDY NG PEI FANG FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR

Derivations (MP) and Evaluations (OT) *

Prediction of Maximal Projection for Semantic Role Labeling

Compositional Semantics

Developing Grammar in Context

Developing a TT-MCTAG for German with an RCG-based Parser

Language Acquisition Fall 2010/Winter Lexical Categories. Afra Alishahi, Heiner Drenhaus

Korean ECM Constructions and Cyclic Linearization

SOME MINIMAL NOTES ON MINIMALISM *

Interpretive (seeing) Interpersonal (speaking and short phrases)

Multiple case assignment and the English pseudo-passive *

Course Outline for Honors Spanish II Mrs. Sharon Koller

Basic Parsing with Context-Free Grammars. Some slides adapted from Julia Hirschberg and Dan Jurafsky 1

lgarfield Public Schools Italian One 5 Credits Course Description

ITALIAN I GRADES THE EWING PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2099 Pennington Road Ewing, NJ 08618

The optimal placement of up and ab A comparison 1

Chapter 3: Semi-lexical categories. nor truly functional. As Corver and van Riemsdijk rightly point out, There is more

IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH

Achim Stein: Diachronic Corpora Aston Corpus Summer School 2011

Update on Soar-based language processing

Phenomena of gender attraction in Polish *

The Syntax of Coordinate Structure Complexes

Using a Native Language Reference Grammar as a Language Learning Tool

TEAM-BUILDING GAMES, ACTIVITIES AND IDEAS

Underlying and Surface Grammatical Relations in Greek consider

Campus Academic Resource Program An Object of a Preposition: A Prepositional Phrase: noun adjective

Lesson Plan Art: Painting Techniques

Participate in expanded conversations and respond appropriately to a variety of conversational prompts

On the Notion Determiner

ON THE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS

Adjectives tell you more about a noun (for example: the red dress ).

15 The syntax of overmarking and kes in child Korean

Accounting 380K.6 Accounting and Control in Nonprofit Organizations (#02705) Spring 2013 Professors Michael H. Granof and Gretchen Charrier

Second Language Acquisition of Complex Structures: The Case of English Restrictive Relative Clauses

Which verb classes and why? Research questions: Semantic Basis Hypothesis (SBH) What verb classes? Why the truth of the SBH matters

ELD CELDT 5 EDGE Level C Curriculum Guide LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT VOCABULARY COMMON WRITING PROJECT. ToolKit

Intervention in Tough Constructions * Jeremy Hartman. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

CHALLENGES FACING DEVELOPMENT OF STRATEGIC PLANS IN PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN MWINGI CENTRAL DISTRICT, KENYA

An Interface between Prosodic Phonology and Syntax in Kurdish

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

L1 and L2 acquisition. Holger Diessel

Dependency, licensing and the nature of grammatical relations *

Rotary Club of Portsmouth

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMTICAL ERRORS MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 5 PADANG IN WRITING PAST EXPERIENCES

The Interface between Phrasal and Functional Constraints

Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author

Transcription:

Inleiding Taalkunde Docent: Paola Monachesi Blok 4, 2001/2002 Contents 1 Syntax 2 2 Phrases and constituent structure 2 3 A minigrammar of Italian 3 4 Trees 3 5 Developing an Italian lexicon 4 6 S(emantic)-selection 5 6.1 Other predicates......................... 6 6.2 More on s-selection........................ 6 7 C(ategorial)-selection 7 8 A constraint-based grammar 7 1

9 Remote Dependencies: movement 8 1 Syntax 2 Phrases and constituent structure Define which phrases are formed from the following sequences of words and draw a tree: (i) libro book, telefono telephone ; (ii) il ragazzo the boy, una ragazza a girl ; (iii) Maria Mary, io I, Giovanni John ; (iv) bella beautiful, brutta ugly ; (v) grande casa big house, brutto sogno ugly dream ; (vi) a Maria to Mary, nel bosco in the forest ; (vii) contenta di Maria happy about Mary, arrabbiata con Giovanni angry at John ; (viii) moglie di Giovanni wife of John, sorella di Maria sister of Mary ; (ix) bevo drink, uccido kill, amo love ; (x) uccise Giovanni killed John, mangio pizza ate pizza ; (xi) va a Milano goes to Milan, vive a Roma lives in Rome ; (xii) da il libro a Giovanni gives the book to John, spedisce la lettera a Maria sents the letter to Mary ; (xiii) dovrebbe mangiare mele should eat apples ; (xiv) Maria ama Giovanni Mary loves John, Giovanni mangia mele John eats apples ; 2

(xv) che Giovanni ama Maria that John loves Mary ; (xvi) penso che Maria beve vino think that Mary drinks wine ; (xvii) vede Maria che mangia mele sees Mary that eats apples; 3 A minigrammar of Italian Phrase structure rules define the structure of each type of phrase: context-free rewrite rules. (1) a. PP P DP b. AP A (PP) c. NP N (PP) d. DP D NP ; Name ; Pronoun e. NP A NP f. VP V (DP) (PP; CP; VP) g. Sentence DP VP h. CP C Sentence 4 Trees Trees consist of labeled nodes connected to one another by vertical or diagonal lines. Each node represents a constituent. Terminal nodes vs. non terminal nodes. 3

Every constituent dominates all its subconstituents. The nodes of the tree are arranged in a linear order: precedence. Precedence and dominance as crucial properties of sentence structure which are represented by trees. They are transitive relations. Immediate precedence and immediate dominance are not transitive relations. If two nodes are immediately dominated by the same node, they are sister of each other. Binary branching vs. ternary branching vs. non branching tree. Trees vs. labeled brackets as alternative way of representation. Draw trees for the following sentences: s1 Maria spedira il nuovo libro all editore Mary will send the new book to the editor. s2 L uomo credeva che Maria era una segretaria della scuola The man belived that Mary was a secretary of the school. s3 L uomo disse a Maria che sarebbe dovuta rimanere in questa casa The man told Mary that she should stay in this house. Determine: (i) How many nonterminal nodes are in s1; (ii) How many binary-branching nodes are in s2; (iii) How many sisters does the determiner l have in s2; (iv) How many nodes does the CP in s3 dominate; 5 Developing an Italian lexicon In order for the grammar to account for actual sentences a lexicon must be developed. 4

Each lexical entry must include a representation of its selectional properties as well as a representation of its argument structure (for predicative categories). 6 S(emantic)-selection Verbs specify the arguments that they have as well as the roles that are associated with these arguments: argument structure. (i) ride laughs is a one place predicate or a predicate taking one argument. (ii) mangia eats is a two place predicate or a predicate taking two arguments. The two arguments do not enter in the same relation with the verb: one is the agent and the other is the theme. The DP interpreted as the agent is the subject of the verb while the DP interpreted as theme is the complement of the verb. (iii) uccide kill?? agent, patient (iv) odia hates?? experiencer, theme (v) cammina walks?? agent (vi) ha has?? possessor, theme (vii) spedisce sents?? (vs. double-object construction in English) agent, patient, goal Verbs are often classified according to how many arguments they have in their argument structure: intransitive, transitive, ditransitive verbs. The kind of dependency between the various arguments of the verb and the syntactic position/function in which they occur is known as the Linking Property of the verb. Are the following verbs transitive, intransitive or ditransitive? Romeo sang to Juliet. Henry s invasion of France terrified the Dauphin. Petruccio resided in Italy. 5

The men gave Caesar a warning. Determine how many arguments the verb has, identify them and indicate their roles. 6.1 Other predicates Verbs are not the only categories that can have argument structure: the same is true of adjectives, prepositions and nouns. Adjectives have normally one argument (theme): la bella ragazza the beautiful girl, Maria e bella Mary is beautful. Some have two arguments (experiencer and theme): Maria e arrabbiata con Bill Mary was angry at Bill. Prepositions can function as case markers: Maria e arrabbiata con Bill Mary was angry at Bill. The PP functions as complement of the adjective. Prepositions can also function as predicates specifying a spatial or temporal relation between two arguments (Theme and Location or Figure and Ground): Roma e in Italia Rome is in Italy. Nouns can refer to events or situations, in this case they have two arguments: odio hate. Nouns such as libro book also function as predicates, they refer to properties attributed to the DPs that contain them. 6.2 More on s-selection Why are the following sentences ungrammatical? (i) *Mary sent to John (ii) *Sent to John (iii) *Mary admires (iv) *loves (v) *Mary loves John to Bill 6

(vi) * Mary laughed Bill Are the following sentences grammatical? (i) The king attacked. (ii) Soldiers kill. (iii) Mary laughed. In certain languages (Italian, Spanish), the subject can be omitted. Null pronouns in subject position as a parameter of cross-linguistic variation. Selectional restrictions: verbs select certain intrinsic semantic properties of the arguments (animate, human). 7 C(ategorial)-selection Predicates may impose restrictions on the lexical category of their arguments: PPs, DPs... Verbs with similar meaning might select arguments of different categories: arrivare arrive and raggiungere reach. The lexical category of the selected verb is sometimes unpredictable and must be specified in the lexical entry of the verb. Give examples of lexical entries. 8 A constraint-based grammar Phrase structure rules are not the only possible way to explain constituent structure. Many linguists believe that the grammars of the human languages do not contain rules but constraints (general conditions). 7

It is possible to formulate two general conditions that applies to the rules given for Italian: (i) Every phrase XP must contain a position reserved for a lexical category of type X. This positio is called the head of the phrase. (ii) Within XP, the X position is the leftmost subconstituent of XP, preceding the complements selected by the head. Selectional restrictions of lexical items allow for the elimination of several phrase structure rules. Problems: (i) DP Name; Pronoun S DP VP It is possible to assume the presence of an empty D, while there are languages where pronouns and determiners coincide. Sentences could be considered TP, that is projections of Tense. Every phrase XP contains a specifier position preceding the head. 9 Remote Dependencies: movement Which book do you think is going to win the prize? * Which book do you think are going to win the prize? What car did Mary drive? which book behaves as the subject of the clause, while what car behaves as the object of the clause: s-selction and c-selction seem to work normally. The elements are displaced since they do not occur in the position of the subject and complements of these verbs would occur. Wh-movement is the process by which wh-questioned constituents are realized as remote subjects and complements 8

First step: the complement occurs in the normal position. Second step: the rule of wh-movement applies and the complement is displaced. The wh-moved constituent gets attached to CP. The movement can be rather long: Which book do you think that Mary belives that John said is going to win the prize? Wh-movement is blocked in certain cases: *Who did Mary make the claim that he saw last week? 9