Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Similar documents
Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

An Introduction to LEAP

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

National Survey of Student Engagement

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

LEARN. LEAD. DISCOVER.

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico

Student Engagement and Cultures of Self-Discovery

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Assessment Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología

Program Assessment and Alignment

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Strategic Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Measures

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

What does Quality Look Like?

CREDENTIAL PROGRAM: MULTIPLE SUBJECT Student Handbook

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

James Madison University Civic Action Plan

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

COVER PAGE. UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM Growth Agenda for Wisconsin Grants Program

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Biological Sciences, BS and BA

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

Bold resourcefulness: redefining employability and entrepreneurial learning

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Executive Summary. Colegio Catolico Notre Dame, Corp. Mr. Jose Grillo, Principal PO Box 937 Caguas, PR 00725

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

Refer to the MAP website ( for specific textbook and lab kit requirements.

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Distinguished Teacher Review

The Proposal for Textile Design Minor

Annual Report Accredited Member

PROGRAM PRESENTATION

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

MASTER OF LIBERAL STUDIES

Programme Specification (Postgraduate) Date amended: 25 Feb 2016

Requirements for the Degree: Bachelor of Science in Education in Early Childhood Special Education (P-5)

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

B. Outcome Reporting Include the following information for each outcome assessed this year:

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Governors State University Student Affairs and Enrollment Management: Reaching Vision 2020

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Assuring Graduate Capabilities

Strategic Planning Guide

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH A NEW GRADUATE DEGREE

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

The Role of Trustee. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education Seeking student trustee candidates at Slippery Rock University

Student Experience Strategy

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM and the INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROGRAM

Xenia High School Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Application

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Mayo School of Health Sciences. Clinical Pastoral Education Internship. Rochester, Minnesota.

PRINCIPAL LOYOLA SCHOOL

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Creating an Information Literacy Plan

LaGrange College. Faculty Handbook

Transcription:

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience Revision of Core Program In 2009 a Core Curriculum Task Force with representatives from every academic division was appointed by the Vice President for Academic Affairs to review the Core curriculum and recommend revisions. From 2009 to 2012, the Core Curriculum Task Force engaged in dialogue with faculty, staff, students, administrators, and Board of Trustees. The Task Force examined relevant research, including the requirements of accrediting and licensing agencies; reviewed the Core programs of institutions similar to Neumann in size, demographics, and mission; consulted with Core administrators in other institutions; and explored best practices related to Core. The Task Force considered the unique needs of Neumann students, examining relevant data from the 2005 Core Program review, the 2006 Middle States Self-Study and Evaluation Team Report, assessment information available from faculty workgroups, results of testing of incoming First Year students, results of ETS Proficiency Profile exams, and results of institutional surveys conducted through the Neumann Office of Institutional Research. In addition to the feedback received from stakeholders at Neumann and peer institutions, the Task Force considered and adopted recommendations from three national organizations: the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities, and the Association of American Colleges and Universities. Approved by Faculty Senate in December 2011 and by the Neumann University Executive Council in February 2012, the revised Core philosophy emphasizes that Core is an experience, rather than a set of courses. As its name implies, Core is at the heart of the Neumann University undergraduate experience and applies to students in the traditional undergraduate program and the adult accelerated degree completion programs. Although the revised Core includes specific required courses, there is an expectation that the knowledge, skills, competencies, and values will be deepened by every experience, every course, and every encounter that a student has both inside and outside the classroom. Therefore, the Core learning outcomes are supported and promoted through specified Core courses, courses in the major programs of study, and co-curricular activities. The revised Neumann University Core Experience applies to all students who entered the University beginning in fall 2012. Some parts of the revised Core experience, e.g. servicelearning integration and capstones in every major were implemented incrementally. Development of the Core Assessment Plan Consistent with the integrated nature of the revised Core experience, the first step in the development of the Core Assessment Plan engaged all members of the Neumann University community in developing a Core Map. Faculty members teaching Core courses and major courses, and staff members whose responsibilities support the achievement of the Core learning outcomes collaborated with the Core Curriculum Task Force from March to May 2012 to identify the courses and activities which support each Core learning outcome.

Based upon the Core Map developed in 2012 and revised in 2015, the Core Curriculum Task Force (now the Core Experience Committee) planned a three-year cycle of assessment. The Core Experience Committee will invite faculty members and representatives of co-curricular areas to review the Core Map on an on-going basis. Core Curriculum Task Force members adapted the VALUE rubrics developed by the Association of American Colleges and Universities for use in the Core assessment process. The Assessment Plan identifies the specific VALUE rubric associated with each Core Learning Outcome. In most cases, one basic rubric has been associated with each learning outcome; additionally, aspects of other rubrics will be incorporated as Committee members and other members of Neumann University continue to adapt the rubrics for use at Neumann University. Where there is not a VALUE rubric appropriate for a learning outcome specific to the mission of Neumann University, Committee members have developed such rubrics. In addition, members of the Neumann University faculty are developing rubrics for assessing scientific literacy and technological competency. The ETS Proficiency Profile was also identified as a direct measure of assessment of Core Learning Outcomes related to math, writing and reading/critical thinking. In fall 2012, the ETS was administered to senior students to complete the first cycle of testing; thereafter, the ETS Proficiency Profile was administered each year until spring 2015. The Task Force also identified several surveys regularly administered at Neumann as indirect and direct measures of assessment. Surveys include the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), administered to First Year and Senior students; the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory, administered to all students; the Neumann University Undergraduate Alumni Survey, formerly administered one year after graduation, and now replaced by the First Destination Survey; the Undergraduate Mission Survey, administered to graduating seniors each spring until 2013; the NSSE Catholic Colleges and Universities Mission Survey; the Employer Survey completed by supervisors of Business and Arts and Science students engaged in internships; and the Preceptor Surveys that assess Athletic Training students. The Office of Institutional Research oversees administration of most surveys; the Career and Personal Development Office oversees the administration of the Neumann University Student Internship Employer Evaluation and the First Destination Survey. Assessment Process The Assessment Plan was originally reviewed and approved by the Assistant Vice President of Academic Affairs (AVPAA) and the Learning Outcomes Assessment (LOAC) Task Force in June 2012. The Director of Core shared the original Assessment Plan with Division Deans in August 2012 and with faculty and staff members at information sessions early in the fall 2012 semester. The Core Assessment Plan was updated in 2016 and reviewed and approved by the LOAC. The Assessment Plan and relevant rubrics, surveys, and other assessment measures are shared with faculty and staff members on a regular basis. Faculty and staff members identify the

most appropriate course and/or activity and the best assignment to use as an artifact for assessment. It is expected that the assignment, project or activity chosen is a regular part of the course or activity. Core Committee members collaborate with faculty to select artifacts from an appropriate sample of students enrolled in the targeted courses. In the case of co-curricular activities, when the population of students is relatively small (e.g., students in the Institute for Student Leadership Formation or senior athletes), all students may be included in the sample assessed. The Director of Core invites members of the Core Committee, other faculty, and staff members to participate in an annual Assessment Week during which the collected artifacts are assessed. In some cases, the Core Committee may collaborate with an existing assessment group (e.g. Writing or Math) to avoid duplication of assessment efforts. The Committee shares assessment results with members of the Neumann community at the beginning of each academic year and monitors efforts to increase student learning, creating a cycle of continuous improvement. Benchmarks The Core Assessment Plan identifies benchmarks to indicate satisfactory levels of achievement for both direct and indirect measures. In order to establish the original benchmarks, the Core Curriculum Task Force considered many factors. For example, the Task Force analyzed how other institutions have used the AAC&U VALUE rubrics and consulted with the Senior Director of Assessment for AAC&U in order to identify realistic benchmarks. This analysis and consultation led to the decision to use data collected the first time each rubric was used to establish a baseline and set targets for growth over time. When the Core Assessment Plan was updated in 2016, the Core Experience Committee established an aspirational goal that 80% of the students included in the sample would reach the target benchmark on each feature of the rubric. The Task Force consulted the Office of Institutional Research to establish benchmarks for use with surveys. If necessary, the benchmarks specified in the Assessment Plan will be revised. Assessment of All Students Prior to Graduation The Assessment Plan reflects the best efforts of the Core Committee to ensure the collection of data related to every Core learning outcome at specific points in the academic and co-curricular program that will best reflect the achievement of all students. Where there is only one required course (e.g. history or science) which relates to a particular outcome, all such required courses have been included in the Assessment Plan. In instances where an outcome is introduced in a required Core course and then developed in subsequent courses (e.g. writing, ethics, quantitative reasoning), samples of student work may be drawn from the required Core courses and related upper level courses in each major. Assessment includes traditional undergraduate programs, as well as the adult accelerated degree completion programs. In this way, the sample of artifacts assessed over each three-year cycle should reflect the achievement of all students, although every student will not be assessed every year in relation to every learning outcome.

Assessment and Professional Development The Core Experience Committee supports faculty and staff to facilitate the implementation and assessment of the Neumann University Core Experience. Professional development opportunities to support the revised Core program have included: Liberal Education in the Catholic Franciscan Tradition with Timothy Johnson, PhD on January 10, 2012 Oral Communication with Erik Palmer on May 8, 2012 Service Learning workshop on May 10, 2012 Information Literacy workshop on August 23, 2012 Service-Learning workshop on November 15, 2012 Meaningful Reflection and Ethical Reasoning workshops on January 15, 2013 Understanding the ETS profile on January 15, 2013 Information literacy presentation on January 28, 2013 Results of Core Communication Assessment presented September 9-12, 2013 Results of Information Literacy Assessment presented October 7 10, 2013 Results of Oral Communication Assessment presented November 10-14, 2013 Presentation on Plans for Improvement in response to Communication Assessment results January 14, 2014 Preview of Comprehension and Compassion Assessment January 14, 2014 Service-Learning workshops presented February 3-6, 2014 Capstone development workshops presented March 17-20, 2014 Service-Learning workshop on May 15, 2014 Results of Core Contemplation Assessment presented September 8-11, 2014 Results of Core Conscience Assessment presented October 6-9, 2014 Capstone development workshops presented: o November 10-13, 2014 and February 2-5, 2015 Presentation on best practices related to Contemplation and opportunities for collaboration with Institutes for Student Leadership Formation and Sport, Spirituality, and Character Development on January 13, 2015 Preview of second cycle of Communication Assessment March 23-26, 2015 Service-Learning workshops on May 13 and 14, 2015 Presentations on oral communication by Erik Palmer at Faculty Development Day on May 11, 2015 Results of Core Comprehension assessment presented on September 15 and 16, 2015 Results of Core Compassion Assessment presented October 27-30, 2015 Overview of three years of Core assessment presented at Convivium in October 2015 Strategies to promote Critical Thinking and Reading Comprehension presented on January 12, 2016 Lunch and Learn sessions to explore various approached to developing Capstone courses offered in February 2016

A summary of the findings from the Core Communication assessment presented to writing (English 101 and 102) faculty members on August 23 and to full-time faculty members on August 25, 2016 Lunch and Learn sessions offered from September 13 to September 16, 2016 to discuss the results of the Core Communication assessments in greater depth. The Core Director and Committee will continue to offer professional development workshops, on-line resources, and consultations with specific disciplinary and co-curricular groups to ensure an understanding of the Core, the meaning of each Core learning outcome, the assessment process, and how to best facilitate student achievement of the outcomes. Special Note related to Technology The Core Experience Committee continues to investigate standards for technological competency. Once such standards have been developed the appropriate information will be added to the Assessment Plan. Schedule for Assessment of the Neumann University Core Experience The dates for the first and second cycles of assessment are listed below. Assessment continues on a repeated cycle with every Core learning outcome being assessed at least once every four years. Communication outcomes AY 2012-13/2015-2016 Contemplation and Conscience outcomes AY 2013-14/2016-2017 Comprehension and Compassion outcomes AY 2014-15/2017-2018 Revised August 2017