Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

Similar documents
FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Anatomy and Physiology. Astronomy. Boomilever. Bungee Drop

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

Trends in College Pricing

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

EPA Approved Laboratories for UCMR 3

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Wilma Rudolph Student Athlete Achievement Award

46 Children s Defense Fund

2007 NIRSA Salary Census Compiled by the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association NIRSA National Center, Corvallis, Oregon

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

93 percent of local providers will not be awarded competitive bidding contracts 2.

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

NC Community College System: Overview

Brian Isetts University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Anthony W. Olson PharmD University of Minnesota, Twin Cities,

Educational Attainment

Educational History. B. A., 1988, University Center at Tulsa, Sociology. Professional Experience. Principal Positions:

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Multi-Year Guaranteed Annuities

A Profile of Top Performers on the Uniform CPA Exam

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

136 Joint Commission Accredited Organizations (1273 sites*) with Primary Care Medical Home (PCMH) Certification (by state) as of 1/1/2015

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Sheryl L. Skaggs, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

cover Private Public Schools America s Michael J. Petrilli and Janie Scull

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

A Diverse Student Body

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

Financial Education and the Credit Behavior of Young Adults

Pathways to Health Professions of the Future

Network Technology/Cisco and Linux Networking Education Report. 5, % $27.63/hr

Price Sensitivity Analysis

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

2014 Comprehensive Survey of Lawyer Assistance Programs

Findings from the 2005 College Student Survey (CSS): National Aggregates. Victor B. Saenz Douglas S. Barrera

2017 National Clean Water Law Seminar and Water Enforcement Workshop Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credits. States

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

STRONG STANDARDS: A Review of Changes to State Standards Since the Common Core

Discussion Papers. Assessing the New Federalism. State General Assistance Programs An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Jeffrey H. Diritto, M.S., CSCS, SCCC, USAW

The Economic Impact of College Bowl Games

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Career Services JobFlash! as of July 26, 2017

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Election Cycle Updated June 27, PAC Candidate Contributions

Adver sing 2012 Graduate Survey

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISON GROUPS UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI I 2012

Stetson University College of Law Class of 2012 Summary Report

Jon N. Kerr, PhD, CPA August 2017

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

The Sarasota County Pre International Baccalaureate International Baccalaureate Programs at Riverview High School

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Memorandum RENEWAL OF ACCREDITATION. School School # City State # of Years Effective Date

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

JANIE HODGE, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Special Education 225 Holtzendorff Clemson University

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Russell M. Rhine. Education

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Charter School Performance Comparable to Other Public Schools; Stronger Accountability Needed

Bethune-Cookman University

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Communities in Schools of Virginia

2017 Women s Individual Tennis Regional Contacts and Playoff Berth Information

Housekeeping. Questions

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

Two Million K-12 Teachers Are Now Corralled Into Unions. And 1.3 Million Are Forced to Pay Union Dues, as Well as Accept Union Monopoly Bargaining


Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

A Math Adventure Game Pi and the The Lost Function Episode 1 - Pre-Algebra/Algebra

Susanna M Donaldson Curriculum Vitae

Algebra Nation and Computer Science for MS Initiatives. Marla Davis, Ph.D. NBCT Office of Secondary Education

Transcription:

Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE, SC 119 ARKANSAS NORTHEASTERN COLLEGE, AR 66 ASHLAND COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE, KY 737 BISHOP STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AL 68 BLACK HAWK COLLEGE, IL 48 BOSSIER PARISH COMMUNITY COLLEGE, LA 80 BURLINGTON COUNTY COLLEGE, NJ 60 COCHISE COLLEGE, AZ 352 COLLEGE OF COASTAL GEORGIA, GA 180 COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND, MD 141 COLUMBIA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 879 COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY, THE, MD 107 COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF THE AIR FORCE, AL 395 CUMBERLAND COUNTY COLLEGE, NJ 66 DARTON COLLEGE, GA 662 DAYTONA STATE COLLEGE, FL 113 DEL MAR COLLEGE, TX 68 DELAWARE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, PA 31 EASTERN GATEWAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, OH 43 EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE, WV 57 FLETCHER TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, LA 45 FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE AT JACKSONVILLE, FL 198 GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AZ 371 GREENVILLE TECHNICAL COLLEGE, SC 323 JEFFERSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AL 89 JUDSON COLLEGE, AL 63 KANAWHA VALLEY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE, WV 95 KASKASKIA COLLEGE, IL 31 KEISER UNIVERSITY, FL 89 LARAMIE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, WY 970 LDS BUSINESS COLLEGE, UT 226 MADISONVILLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, KY 211 MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NC 137 MCDOWELL TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NC 40 METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MO 164 MINERAL AREA COLLEGE, MO 1,158 MONTANA TECH OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA, MT 569 MONTCALM COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MI 51 MORGAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, CO 50 MOTLOW STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 876 MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MI 148 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students MOUNT WACHUSETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MA 48 NATIONAL COLLEGE, VA 404 NAVARRO COLLEGE, TX 33 NORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, IA 101 NORTHEAST STATE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,308 NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA A&M COLLEGE, OK 365 PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE, FL 79 PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, AZ 192 RARITAN VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NJ 34 ROANE STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 646 SAINT PHILIP'S COLLEGE, TX 116 SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE, FL 86 SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE, WV 303 SOUTHWEST TENNESSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,039 SOUTHWEST TEXAS JUNIOR COLLEGE, TX 114 ST. VINCENT'S COLLEGE, CT 181 SURRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NC 81 THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY COLLEGE, MO 397 UNION COUNTY COLLEGE, NJ 98 UNIVERSITY OF AKRON WAYNE COLLEGE, OH 59 VICTOR VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, CA 83 VICTORIA COLLEGE, TX 36 VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,396 WALTERS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 1,508 WARREN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE, NJ 31 WESTERN WYOMING COMMUNITY COLLEGE, WY 429 YOUNG HARRIS COLLEGE, GA 34 19,377 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

Distribution of Institutional Mean Total Scores Mean Number of Percent of Mean Number of Percent of Total Institutions Instns. Total Institutions Instns. Score Below Score Below 470 to 500.00 0 100 445 to 445.99 3 90 469 to 469.99 0 100 444 to 444.99 2 87 468 to 468.99 0 100 443 to 443.99 7 76 467 to 467.99 0 100 442 to 442.99 8 65 466 to 466.99 0 100 441 to 441.99 7 54 465 to 465.99 0 100 440 to 440.99 6 46 464 to 464.99 0 100 439 to 439.99 9 32 463 to 463.99 0 100 438 to 438.99 3 28 462 to 462.99 0 100 437 to 437.99 3 24 461 to 461.99 0 100 436 to 436.99 4 18 460 to 460.99 0 100 435 to 435.99 2 15 459 to 459.99 0 100 434 to 434.99 4 9 458 to 458.99 1 99 433 to 433.99 1 7 457 to 457.99 0 99 432 to 432.99 1 6 456 to 456.99 0 99 431 to 431.99 1 4 455 to 455.99 0 99 430 to 430.99 2 1 454 to 454.99 0 99 429 to 429.99 1 0 453 to 453.99 0 99 428 to 428.99 0 0 452 to 452.99 0 99 427 to 427.99 0 0 451 to 451.99 0 99 426 to 426.99 0 0 450 to 450.99 0 99 425 to 425.99 0 0 449 to 449.99 0 99 400 to 424.99 0 0 448 to 448.99 0 99 447 to 447.99 0 99 446 to 446.99 3 94 Total Number of Institutions 68 Mean 440.11 Std. Dev. 4.62

Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores Skills Subscores Critical Thinking Reading Writing Math No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to 130 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 125 to 125.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 124 to 124.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 123 to 123.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 122 to 122.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 121 to 121.99 0 100 1 99 0 100 0 100 120 to 120.99 0 100 1 97 0 100 0 100 119 to 119.99 0 100 5 90 0 100 1 99 118 to 118.99 0 100 14 69 0 100 0 99 117 to 117.99 0 100 22 37 0 100 0 99 116 to 116.99 1 99 10 22 1 99 0 99 115 to 115.99 0 99 8 10 2 96 0 99 114 to 114.99 0 99 5 3 8 84 3 94 113 to 113.99 1 97 2 0 32 37 10 79 112 to 112.99 11 81 0 0 16 13 22 47 111 to 111.99 24 46 0 0 8 1 18 21 110 to 110.99 18 19 0 0 1 0 8 9 109 to 109.99 10 4 0 0 0 0 4 3 108 to 108.99 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 107 to 107.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 to 106.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 to 105.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of 68 68 68 68 Institutions Mean 111.04 117.23 113.24 112.05 Standard Deviation 1.28 1.48 1.04 1.59

Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores (continued) Context-based Subscores Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to 130 0 100 0 100 0 100 125 to 125.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 124 to 124.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 123 to 123.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 122 to 122.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 121 to 121.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 120 to 120.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 119 to 119.99 0 100 0 100 1 99 118 to 118.99 0 100 0 100 0 99 117 to 117.99 1 99 1 99 0 99 116 to 116.99 2 96 0 99 4 93 115 to 115.99 15 74 1 97 21 62 114 to 114.99 23 40 8 85 23 28 113 to 113.99 16 16 20 56 10 13 112 to 112.99 9 3 20 26 9 0 111 to 111.99 1 1 13 7 0 0 110 to 110.99 1 0 4 1 0 0 109 to 109.99 0 0 1 0 0 0 108 to 108.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 to 107.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 to 106.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 to 105.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of 68 68 68 Institutions Mean 114.21 112.79 114.64 Standard Deviation 1.20 1.27 1.26

Distribution of Individual Students' Total Scores Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Score Below Score Below Score Below Score Below 500 >99 475 95 450 70 425 17 499 >99 474 94 449 69 424 15 498 >99 473 94 448 67 423 13 497 >99 472 93 447 65 422 13 496 >99 471 93 446 64 421 11 495 >99 470 92 445 61 420 10 494 >99 469 91 444 59 419 9 493 >99 468 90 443 57 418 7 492 >99 467 90 442 55 417 7 491 99 466 89 441 52 416 6 490 99 465 89 440 51 415 5 489 99 464 87 439 47 414 4 488 99 463 86 438 46 413 3 487 99 462 86 437 43 412 3 486 98 461 85 436 42 411 2 485 98 460 84 435 38 410 2 484 98 459 82 434 36 409 2 483 98 458 81 433 34 408 1 482 98 457 80 432 31 407 1 481 97 456 79 431 30 406 1 480 97 455 78 430 27 405 1 479 96 454 77 429 25 404 1 478 96 453 75 428 23 403 <1 477 95 452 74 427 21 402 <1 476 95 451 72 426 19 401 <1 400 0 No. of Students 17,398* 90th percentile 467 Mean 441.4 75th percentile 453 Standard Deviation 18.1 50th percentile 439 25th percentile 429 10th percentile 420 *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 900 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 900/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 1800 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 900/1800 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 900 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 1800 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 900 students.

Scaled Score Junior (61-90 semester hours or 91-145 quarter hours) Distribution of Individual Students' Subscores Skills Subscores: Percent of Students Below Each Scaled Score Critical Context-Based Subscores: Pct. of Students Below Each Scaled Score Social Natural Thinking Reading Writing Mathematics Humanities Sciences Sciences 130 >99 98 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 129 >99 97 >99 >99 99 >99 >99 128 >99 94 >99 99 98 >99 >99 127 99 90 >99 98 96 99 99 126 99 88 99 97 96 98 97 125 98 85 99 96 93 96 96 124 96 76 99 95 91 95 92 123 95 73 96 94 89 95 90 122 94 68 96 91 84 93 87 121 92 62 92 89 82 88 81 120 87 57 88 88 78 81 73 119 86 51 86 83 72 78 72 118 83 47 83 80 66 76 66 117 78 44 72 77 62 71 56 116 74 38 68 73 60 66 52 115 70 32 60 67 52 62 50 114 66 29 50 60 50 53 42 113 61 26 41 56 41 48 33 112 53 20 34 51 36 41 30 111 49 15 25 44 30 39 25 110 43 14 21 34 24 31 19 109 38 12 13 29 17 24 13 108 30 7 10 21 16 20 11 107 23 6 8 15 7 18 6 106 16 3 4 10 4 9 3 105 12 2 3 5 4 6 3 104 8 1 2 3 2 4 1 103 5 <1 1 2 <1 2 1 102 3 <1 <1 1 <1 1 <1 101 1 <1 <1 1 <1 <1 <1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Students 17,398* 17,398* 17,398* 17,398* 17,398* 17,398* 17,398* Mean Score 111.4 117.6 113.5 112.4 114.5 113.1 115.0 Standard Deviation 6.1 6.6 4.7 5.8 6.2 6.0 5.7 90th percentile 120 126 120 121 123 121 122 75th percentile 116 123 117 116 119 117 120 50th percentile 111 118 114 111 113 113 114 25th percentile 107 112 110 108 110 109 110 10th percentile 104 108 107 106 107 106 107 *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 900 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 900/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 1800 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 900/1800 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 900 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 1800 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 900 students.

Summary of Proficiency Classifications Percent of Students Classified as Skill Dimension and Level Not Proficient Marginal Proficient Critical Thinking 4% 17% 79% Reading, Level 2 33% 21% 46% Reading, Level 1 64% 21% 16% Writing, Level 3 5% 21% 74% Writing, Level 2 14% 35% 51% Writing, Level 1 57% 31% 12% Mathematics, Level 3 5% 12% 82% Mathematics, Level 2 22% 24% 54% Mathematics, Level 1 47% 29% 24% Total Number of Students: 19,377 Weighted Number of Students: 17,398* *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 900 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 900/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 1800 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 900/1800 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 900 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 1800 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 900 students.

Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category AGE Under 20 5% 5% 20 to 29 64% 64% 30 to 39 19% 19% 40 to 49 9% 9% 50 to 59 3% 3% 60 or more <1% <1% GENDER Male 36% 36% Female 64% 64% ETHNICITY American Indian/Alaskan Native 1% 1% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Is. 2% 2% African American 9% 9% Black Hispanic 1% 1% Hispanic 5% 6% Latin American 1% 1% White 78% 77% Other 3% 3% BEST LANGUAGE English 87% 87% Other Language 9% 9% Both Equal 3% 4% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 900 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 900/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 1800 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 900/1800 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 900 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 1800 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 900 students.

Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category ENROLLMENT STATUS Full Time 71% 71% Part Time 29% 29% CREDIT HRS TRANSFERRED Not a Transfer 70% 71% 0-15 Hours Transferred 10% 10% 16-30 Hours Transferred 8% 8% >30 Hours Transferred 11% 11% HOURS WORKED FOR WAGES None 23% 23% 1-15 Hours 17% 17% 16-30 Hours 27% 27% >30 Hours 33% 33% CUMULATIVE GPA 3.50-4.00 33% 33% 3.00-3.49 38% 38% 2.50-2.99 22% 22% 2.00-2.49 6% 6% 1.00-1.99 <1% <1% Less than 1.00 <1% <1% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 900 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 900/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 1800 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 900/1800 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 900 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 1800 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 900 students.