CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING. is presented in relation to the research questions.

Similar documents
BULATS A2 WORDLIST 2

DOES RETELLING TECHNIQUE IMPROVE SPEAKING FLUENCY?

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 ( 2014 )

Linguistic Variation across Sports Category of Press Reportage from British Newspapers: a Diachronic Multidimensional Analysis

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141 ( 2014 ) WCLTA Using Corpus Linguistics in the Development of Writing

LEXICAL COHESION ANALYSIS OF THE ARTICLE WHAT IS A GOOD RESEARCH PROJECT? BY BRIAN PALTRIDGE A JOURNAL ARTICLE

IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK 17 AGUSTUS 1945 MUNCAR THROUGH DIRECT PRACTICE WITH THE NATIVE SPEAKER

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Written by: YULI AMRIA (RRA1B210085) ABSTRACT. Key words: ability, possessive pronouns, and possessive adjectives INTRODUCTION

Vocabulary Usage and Intelligibility in Learner Language

EdIt: A Broad-Coverage Grammar Checker Using Pattern Grammar

Collocations of Nouns: How to Present Verb-noun Collocations in a Monolingual Dictionary

Advanced Grammar in Use

Testing Collocational Knowledge of Taif University English Seniors

EUROPEAN DAY OF LANGUAGES

Formulaic Language and Fluency: ESL Teaching Applications

Project in the framework of the AIM-WEST project Annotation of MWEs for translation

The Internet as a Normative Corpus: Grammar Checking with a Search Engine

Developing Grammar in Context

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

I. INTRODUCTION. for conducting the research, the problems in teaching vocabulary, and the suitable

The development of a new learner s dictionary for Modern Standard Arabic: the linguistic corpus approach

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY 2012)

Campus Academic Resource Program An Object of a Preposition: A Prepositional Phrase: noun adjective

Mentouri University-Constantine. Faculty of Letters and Languages. Department of Languages

SINGLE DOCUMENT AUTOMATIC TEXT SUMMARIZATION USING TERM FREQUENCY-INVERSE DOCUMENT FREQUENCY (TF-IDF)

The English Monolingual Dictionary: Its Use among Second Year Students of University Technology of Malaysia, International Campus, Kuala Lumpur

Copyright 2017 DataWORKS Educational Research. All rights reserved.

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

LANGUAGE IN INDIA Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow Volume 11 : 12 December 2011 ISSN

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Basic Syntax. Doug Arnold We review some basic grammatical ideas and terminology, and look at some common constructions in English.

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMTICAL ERRORS MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 5 PADANG IN WRITING PAST EXPERIENCES

Age Effects on Syntactic Control in. Second Language Learning

CORPUS ANALYSIS CORPUS ANALYSIS QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS

Mercer County Schools

VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION

DESIGNING NARRATIVE LEARNING MATERIAL AS A GUIDANCE FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN LEARNING NARRATIVE TEXT

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

Corpus Linguistics (L615)

HOW TO RAISE AWARENESS OF TEXTUAL PATTERNS USING AN AUTHENTIC TEXT

GRAMMATICAL MORPHEME ACQUISITION: AN ANALYSIS OF AN EFL LEARNER S LANGUAGE SAMPLES *

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

SAMPLE PAPER SYLLABUS

CORRECT YOUR ENGLISH ERRORS BY TIM COLLINS DOWNLOAD EBOOK : CORRECT YOUR ENGLISH ERRORS BY TIM COLLINS PDF

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Enhancing Unlexicalized Parsing Performance using a Wide Coverage Lexicon, Fuzzy Tag-set Mapping, and EM-HMM-based Lexical Probabilities

English Collocations in the Tunisian EFL Context

Possessive have and (have) got in New Zealand English Heidi Quinn, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Senior Stenographer / Senior Typist Series (including equivalent Secretary titles)

LEXICAL CATEGORIES: CONCEPT MAPPING INSTRUCTION ON THE EFFECT OF NOUN IDENTIFICATION IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEXTS

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

Lexical Collocations (Verb + Noun) Across Written Academic Genres In English

INSTANT VOCABULARY 6-10

Learning and Retaining New Vocabularies: The Case of Monolingual and Bilingual Dictionaries

CS 598 Natural Language Processing

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Author: Fatima Lemtouni, Wayzata High School, Wayzata, MN

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

PROBLEMS IN ADJUNCT CARTOGRAPHY: A CASE STUDY NG PEI FANG FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR

Chapter 9 Banked gap-filling

Emmaus Lutheran School English Language Arts Curriculum

Intensive English Program Southwest College

L1 and L2 acquisition. Holger Diessel

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

ELD CELDT 5 EDGE Level C Curriculum Guide LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT VOCABULARY COMMON WRITING PROJECT. ToolKit

A corpus-based approach to the acquisition of collocational prepositional phrases

National University of Singapore Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Centre for Language Studies Academic Year 2014/2015 Semester 2

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

English Language and Applied Linguistics. Module Descriptions 2017/18

1. Introduction. 2. The OMBI database editor

Lower and Upper Secondary

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Description: Pricing Information: $0.99

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Review in ICAME Journal, Volume 38, 2014, DOI: /icame

Pseudo-Passives as Adjectival Passives

The Effect of Personality Factors on Learners' View about Translation

Student-led IEPs 1. Student-led IEPs. Student-led IEPs. Greg Schaitel. Instructor Troy Ellis. April 16, 2009

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

Effects of connecting reading and writing and a checklist to guide the reading process on EFL learners learning about English writing

The Impact of Formative Assessment and Remedial Teaching on EFL Learners Listening Comprehension N A H I D Z A R E I N A S TA R A N YA S A M I

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Lemmatization of Multi-word Lexical Units: In which Entry?

THE VERB ARGUMENT BROWSER

Special Edition. Starter Teacher s Pack. Adrian Doff, Sabina Ostrowska & Johanna Stirling With Rachel Thake, Cathy Brabben & Mark Lloyd

Teaching Global English with NNS-NNS Online Communication

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

MORE THAN A LINGUISTIC REFERENCE: THE INFLUENCE OF CORPUS TECHNOLOGY ON L2 ACADEMIC WRITING

A Comparison of Two Text Representations for Sentiment Analysis

Institute for Social and Legal Sciences

CONTENUTI DEL CORSO (presentazione di disciplina, argomenti, programma):

Transcription:

34 CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING This chapter presents the analysis and the interpretation of the data obtained based on the result of students writing assignment. The chapter involves findings and discussions. Each finding has discussions of the data that is presented in relation to the research questions. A. FINDINGS As previously stated in chapter I, this study aims to analyze the kinds of collocations and the kinds of collocation errors used by students of English Education Department at UIN Surabaya. As stated on the research methodology, the researcher took the sample from students of the forth semester of English Education Department who took writing 3 and their English level was intermediate to advanced. After collecting and analyzing the data, the study found that there are a lot of writing problems in students writing. In order to decide the acceptability of the use of collocations made by students, Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Students of English gives access to 250,000 word combinations and 75,000 examples of how these collocations are used, and also the British National Corpus (available at http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk) were used to provide information on the words that headwords could combine with. The British National Corpus comprises

35 100 million words of written and spoken language; the written part includes 90 million words from eight genres. 1. The Common Collocations Used by Students The collocations produced by the students were divided into seven types of collocations: 1) verb-preposition, 2) noun-preposition, 3) adjectivepreposition, 4) verb-noun, 5) adjective-noun, and 6) adverb-adjective. Based on this categorization, the first three types are included in grammatical collocations while the others are included in lexical collocations. Table 3 Syntactic pattern of collocations Types Of Collocation N Example of collocation used by students Verb+ Preposition 132 Deduced from, Focus on, Decided to Verb+ Noun 114 Do task, Gain motivation, Pay attention Noun+ Preposition 71 Accordance with, Correlation between, Connection with Adjective+ Noun 92 Great impact, Wide variety, High expectation Adjective+ Preposition 53 Interested in, Afraid of, Aware of Adverb+ Adjective 39 Completely different, very naughty, really ready

36 As the table showed above, there are many collocations used by students in their writing. The total of collocations used by students is 501 which can be described for the first type of collocation that occur frequently in their writing is Verb + Preposition. The total of Verb + Preposition collocations is accounted 132. Verb + Preposition is typically involved in Grammatical Collocation. So that way, the first type of collocation which commonly produced by students in their writing is Verb + Preposition. The second type of collocation which commonly occurs in students writing is Verb + Noun collocation. The total of Verb + Noun collocation is accounted 114. Verb + Noun is typically involved in Lexical Collocation. The third type of collocation which commonly produced by students in their writing is Adjective + Noun. Adjective + Noun collocation is typically involved in Lexical Collocation. The total of Adjective + Noun collocation which commonly occur in students writing is accounted 92. The next type of collocations which commonly occur in students writing is Noun + Preposition collocation. Noun + Preposition collocation is involved in Grammatical Collocation. The total of Noun + Preposition collocation which commonly occur in students writing is accounted 71. After Noun + Preposition, Adjective + Preposition becomes type of collocations which commonly occur in students writing. Adjective + Preposition is

37 involved in Grammatical Collocation. The total of Adjective + Preposition collocation which commonly occur in students writing is accounted 53. The last type of collocation is Adverb + Adjective collocation. Adverb + Adjective collocation is typically involved in Lexical Collocation. The total of Adverb + Adjective collocation which commonly occur in students writing is accounted 39. Therefore, based on the categorization, the total of Grammatical Collocations which commonly occur in students writing is accounted 256. While the total of lexical collocations which commonly occur in students writing is accounted 245. So, we can claim that the common type of collocations used by students is Grammatical Collocation. 2. Types of Collocation Errors are Commonly Made by Students A. Verb + Preposition Collocations In this research, it found that there are some collocations errors found on students wirings product. For more detail description about Verb + Preposition collocations, the data are described in table below: Table 4: Data Tabulation of Verb + Preposition Collocation Students TC CC IC 1. 6 5 1 2. 4 2 2 3. 4 3 1

38 4. 5 2 3 5. 8 5 3 6. 4 4-7. 9 8 2 8. 5 4 1 9. 3 3-10. 4 4-11. 3 1 2 12. 6 4 2 13. 5 3 2 14. 3 3-15. 4 4-16. 4 3 1 17. 2 2-18. 1 1-19. 5 1 4 20. 7 4 3 21. 3 1 2 22. 4 2 2 23. 4 1 3 24. 6 2 4

39 25. 3 3-26. 3 2 1 27. 5 2 3 28. 5 4 1 29. 2 2-30. 5 4 1 132 88 44 Note: St: Students TC: Total Number of Collocation CC: Correct Collocation IC: Incorrect Collocation From the table above, it can be seen that there are 132 collocations found in students writing products. The total of students collocation errors in using verb + preposition collocation are 44. Discussing about the result of students writing, it found that some students were difficult to combine two words especially in grammatical collocation. For example in the use of Verb + Preposition collocation shown in (1) below, English Teacher Education Department students combine the word related and to, and certainly it will produce collocation errors. It may be predicted that they use their mother language in transferring the

40 pattern of the Indonesia collocation sehubungan dengan / related with, rather than the target collocation related to in English. It is the same with the verb + noun collocation in (2) below, the students produce the collocation error work in rather than work at a particular field. Those errors seem to happen because they use their mother language to transfer the word combination without knowing whether collocations they used are natural or not. As Davici stated as cited in Hamdi s research that most of students directly translate collocations based on their mother tongue into their target language. In fact, they have learnt collocation material in the structure 4 class. They seemed unaware with the collocations they produced. (1) It is related with Widdiwson, he stated that the success interaction between teacher and students depend on teachers knowing to the part of learners role Indonesia Collocation: /sehubungan dengan/ which is literary translated /related with/ Target English collocation: related to (2) Draws up the students to work in a particular field Target English collocation: work at The other examples of collocation errors made by students related to verb + preposition collocation can be seen on the table below:

41 Table 5. Verb + Preposition Grammatical Collocation (Verb + Preposition) Erroneous collocation Help improve Conducted of Focus into Correct collocation Help to improve Conducted to Focus on B. Verb + Noun Collocations In this research, it found that there are some collocations errors found on students wirings product. For more detail description about Verb + Noun collocations, the data are described in the table below: Table 6: Data Tabulation of Verb + Noun Collocation Students TC CC IC 1. 3 3 0 2. 6 4 3 3. 4 2 2 4. 3 3 0 5. 4 3 1 6. 4 3 1 7. 5 2 3 8. 3 2 1

42 9. 5 4 1 10. 3 1 2 11. 3 2 1 12. 2 1 1 13. 4 2 2 14. 3 2 1 15. 2 2-16. 4 4-17. 5 1 4 18. 3 2 1 19. 2 2-20. 5 2 3 21. 4 3 1 22. 6 3 4 23. 3 2 1 24. 3 3-25. 5 4 1 26. 4 1 3 27. 3 3-28. 3 2 1 29. 4 3 1

43 30. 3 1 2 114 71 43 Note: St: Students TC: Total Number of Collocation CC: Correct Collocation IC: Incorrect Collocation From the table above, it can be seen that there are 114 collocations found in students writing products. The total of students collocation errors in using verb + Noun collocation is 43. While the total of students correct collocation is 71. Verb + Noun collocation become the biggest percentage of collocation errors made by students than other collocation. Discussing about the result of students writing, it found that some students seemed to be difficult to combine two words especially lexical collocation. We can take a look at the use of Verb + Noun collocation shown in the example (1) below, English Teacher Education Department students combine the word finish with the task, which caused a collocational error. It may be predicted that they were confused in the use of synonym of two words which have almost the same meaning. So that way, they use the pattern of the Indonesia collocation

44 menyelesaikan tugas / finish the task, rather than the target collocation complete the task in English. Another example related to the verb + noun collocation in (2), the students made the error improve bravery rather than demonstrate bravery. Those errors seemed to happen because they chose another synonym of words which have almost the same meaning with the target language. However it comes unnatural for the native speaker. Howarth as cited in book of Justyna, he stated that students have the big problem with the use of collocations or word combinations whether it is free combination or restricted combination. It means that the students have lack of knowledge about collocations which have options whether it is free combinations or not. The sentences are: (1) The other just talk with their friends rather than finished the task Indonesia Collocation: /menyelesaikan tugas/ which is literally translated/finished the task/ Target English collocation: completed the task (2) Improve their bravery in reading class Indonesia collocation: improve bravery Target English collocation: demonstrate bravery The other examples of collocation errors made by students related to verb + Noun collocation can be seen on the table below,-

45 Table 7. Verb + Noun Lexical Collocation (Verb + Noun) Erroneous collocation Increase motivation Develop vocabulary Conduct observation Correct collocation Gain motivation Increase vocabulary Make observation C. Adjective + Noun Collocations In this research, it found that there are some collocations errors found on students writings product. For more detail description about Adjective + Noun collocations, the data are described in table below: Table 8: Data Tabulation of Adjective + Noun Collocation Students TC CC IC 1. 4 2 2 2. 3 1 2 3. 3 3-4. 2 1 1 5. 4 3 1 6. 4 2 2 7. 5 4 1 8. 3 1 2 9. 5 3 2

46 10. 3 3-11. 4 1 3 12. 2 1 1 13. 3 2 1 14. 2 2-15. 2 1 1 16. 4 2 2 17. 3 3-18. 5 2 3 19. 3 2 1 20. 2 2-21. 3 3-22. 2 1 1 23. 1 1-24. 4 2 2 25. 2 2-26. 3 3-27. 4 3 1 28. 2 2-29. 1 1-30. 4 3 1

47 92 62 30 Note: St: Students TC: Total Number of Collocation CC: Correct Collocation IC: Incorrect Collocation From the table above, it can be seen that there are 92 collocations found in students writing products. The total of students collocation errors in using verb + Noun collocation is 30. Adjective + Noun collocation become the third type of collocation errors made by students in their writing products. As previously stated on the chapter 2, adjective-noun is involved in Lexical Collocation. In this finding research, students seemed not to be aware in combining this type of collocations. We can take a look at the example shown at table 9, students chose the word rememberable to combine with the word learning. It caused they produce a collocation error. They transfer separately the word rememberable and learning rather than memorable learning so that it produces unnatural combination. In fact, we will not find the word rememberable in the dictionary. As James and Gass & Selinker cited in Yumanee research, they claimed that the process of transferring collocations

48 into target language caused an error because of the influence of L1 (mother language) transfer. Table 9. Adjective + Noun Erroneous collocation Efficient outcome Correct collocation Expected/successful Lexical Collocation (Adjective + Noun) Rememberable learning Favorable outcome outcome Memorable learning Expected/successful outcome D. Noun + Preposition Collocations In this research, it found that there are some collocations errors found on students writings product. For more detail description about Noun + Preposition collocations, the data are described in table below: Table 10: Data Tabulation of Noun + Preposition Collocation Students TC CC IC 1. 3 2 1 2. 2 2-3. 4 2 2 4. - - - 5. 2 1 1

49 6. 4 3 1 7. 2 1 1 8. 2 2-9. 3 1 2 10. 4 4-11. 2 1 1 12. 3 2 1 13. 1 1-14. 2-2 15. - - - 16. 1 1-17. 3 1 2 18. 2 1 1 19. 1 1-20. 4 3 1 21. 2 2-22. 4 3 1 23. 3 2 1 24. 1 1-25. 3 2 1 26. 2 2 -

50 27. 3 2 1 28. 3 3-29. 2 1 1 30. 3 2 1 71 49 22 Note: St: Students TC: Total Number of Collocation CC: Correct Collocation IC: Incorrect Collocation From the table above, it can be seen that there are 71 collocations found in students writing products. The total of students collocation errors in using Noun + Preposition collocation is 22. Noun + Preposition collocation become the forth type of collocation errors made by students in their writing products. As Phoocharoensil cited in Yumanee research, collocation errors which mostly occurred in students writing are related to prepositions. They seemed to leave a preposition where there must be a collocation. We can take a look at the example below, some of English Teacher Education Department students use word lack. However, they do not add the word of after they use word lack, they directly combine the word lack with vocabulary.

51 (1) Students cannot understand the text because lack vocabulary Students collocation: lack vocabulary Target English collocation: lack of vocabulary Table 11. Noun + Preposition Lexical Collocation (Noun + Preposition) Erroneous collocation Lack vocabulary Impact in Relation with Correct collocation Lack of vocabulary Impact on Relation to E. Adjective + Preposition Collocations In this research, it found that there are some collocations errors found on students writings product. For more detail description about Adjective + Preposition collocations, the data are described in table below: Table 12: Data Tabulation of Adjective + Preposition Collocation Students TC CC IC 1. 3 2 1 2. 2 2-3. 1 1-4. 3 1 2 5. 4 2 2 6. - - -

52 7. 1 1-8. 3 2 1 9. 2 1 1 10. 2 2-11. 1-1 12. 1 1-13. 3 2 1 14. 2 2-15. - - - 16. - - - 17. 2 1 1 18. 1 1-19. 3 1 2 20. - - - 21. 1 1-22. 2 1 1 23. 2 2-24. - - - 25. 3 2 1 26. 2 2-27. 1 1 -

53 28. 3 1 2 29. 2 1 1 30. 3 3-53 36 17 Note: St: Students TC: Total Number of Collocation CC: Correct Collocation IC: Incorrect Collocation From the table above, it can be seen that there are 53 collocations found in students writing products. The total of students collocation errors in using Adjective + Preposition collocation is 17. Adjective + Preposition collocation become the fifth type of collocation errors made by students in their writing products. We can take a look at the example below, students of English Teacher Education Department combine bore with the word in, and they seemed unaware to combine those two words into target language. In fact, it produces a collocation error. The word in and at seemed almost the same meaning. However, if it combined with the word bored, we will not find bored in on the Oxford Collocation Dictionary or British National Corpus. As like the second example shown below, they combine the word interested with to

54 rather than interested with in. In fact, it will produce more natural collocation interested to when they combine those two words. (1) They are bore in learning vocabulary Indonesia collocation: Bore in Target English collocation: Bored at (2) Arrangement of topic being interested to discuss teaching English Indonesia collocation: interested to Target English collocation: interested in Other examples from students writing product can be seen in table below,- Table 13. Adjective+ Preposition Lexical Collocation (Adjective+ Preposition) Erroneous collocation Afraid with Different with Good in Correct collocation Afraid of Different from Good at

55 F. Adverb + Adjective Collocations In this research, it found that there are some collocations errors found on students writings product. For more detail description about Noun + preposition collocations, the data are described in the table below: Table 14: Data Tabulation of Adverb + Adjective Collocation Students TC CC IC 1. 2 2-2. 1 1-3. - - - 4. 2 2-5. 3 2 1 6. - - - 7. - - - 8. 2 1 1 9. 3 3-10. 1 1-11. 2 1 1 12. 3 2 1 13. 1 1-14. 2 1 1 15. - - -

56 16. 1 1-17. - - - 18. 2 2-19. 1 1-20. 3 2 1 21. - - - 22. - - - 23. 2 2-24. 1 1-25. 3 1 2 26. 1 1-27. - - - 28. - - - 29. 2 1 1 30. 1 1-39 30 9 Note: St: Students TC: Total Number of Collocation CC: Correct Collocation IC: Incorrect Collocation

57 From the table above, it can be said that there are 39 collocations found in students writing products. The total of students collocation errors in using Adverb + adjective collocation is 9. Adverb + adjective collocation becomes the last type of collocation errors made by students in their writing products. The students often used the adverb very, when they want to combine with some adjective words. Table 15. Adverb + adjective Lexical Collocation (Adverb + adjective) Erroneous collocation Highly different Closely absorbed Exactly sure Correct collocation Completely different Deeply absorbed Quite sure Based on the analysis of the researcher using Oxford Collocation Dictionary and British National Corpus, there are six types of collocation, Verb+ Preposition categories with 44 collocational errors which if accounted, it becomes the most common collocation errors. After Verb + Preposition, the lists of common collocation errors are made by students based on each type of collocations as follow: (1) Verb-Preposition, (2) Verb-Noun, (3) Adjective-Noun, (4) Adjective-Preposition, (5) Noun-Preposition, (6) Adverb-Adjective.

58 Table 16. Frequency and percentage of collocational errors Type of collocation N Frequency of Errors Percentage Verb+ Preposition 132 44 33,3% Verb+ Noun 114 43 37,7% Noun+ Preposition 71 22 30,9% Adjective+ Preposition 53 17 32% Adjective+ Noun 92 32 32,6% Adverb+ Adjective 39 9 23% Total 501 167 33,3% Figure 1: Percentage of errors in different types of collocation 40 Collocation Error 35 30 25 20 Collocation Error 15 10 5 0 VP VN NP AP AN AV

59 Based on finding above, it can be seen that there are many collocation errors found on students writing product. The most collocation errors made by students in their writing are (1) Verb-Preposition, there are 132 collocations. (2) Verb-Noun, there are 114 collocation used in this type of collocation. (3) Adjective-Noun, there are 92 collocations used in this type of collocation. (4) Noun-Preposition, there are 71 collocation used in this type of collocation. (5) Adjective-Preposition, there are 53 collocations used in this type of collocation (6) Adverb-Adjective, there are 39 collocation used. B. DISCUSSION Based on the analysis, it was found that the most collocation errors made by students in their writing product were Verb + Preposition collocations. This is not in line with Al Zahrani 1, she claimed that Verb-Noun is kind of collocation that is most common collocation errors made by students in learners productions. In this result, students made more mistakes in using Verb-Preposition collocations. From the analysis of the researcher, it was found that there are two main problems faced by students in using collocation in their writing product. First, students change a particular word with its synonym. We can take a look at one of the example of Verb + Noun 1 Al-Zahrani, M. S., 1998. Knowledge of English lexical collocations among male Saudi college students majoring in English at a Saudi university.

60 collocation produced by students in their writing, it was found that some of them used finish the task rather than complete the task. Although finish and complete are almost different meaning when it comes in a single word. They prefer using finish because when they translate into Indonesia language menyelesaikan tugas, however complete in a single word means melengkapi. They seemed not to choose the word complete because they have already thought in their mother language not directly in target language. So that way, the word finish cannot replace the use of complete in complete the task. If someone changes it, the use of collocation will be incorrect or unnatural. This is in line with Boonyasaquan that stated that collocations have the components which can not be changed or substituted by a synonym or word of similar meaning. 2 It means that collocations is the word combination which have its own meaning and it comes naturally as native speaker used in their daily conversation. The next problem faced by students is that students mother tongue influences the use of correct collocations. Back to the previous example, finish the task is incorrect because in English, the word task usually collocates with complete, not finish. On the other hand, in Indonesia, the word finish (menyelesaikan) can collocate with the task (tugas). It becomes finish the task (menyelesaikan tugas). So in that way, mother tongue 2 Boonyasaquan, S. (2006).An analysis of collocational violations in translation. Journal of Humanities, 27(2), 79-91. Bangkok: Faculty of Humanities, Srinakarinwirot University.

61 influences their English, especially in using collocations. This is also a line with Deveci research, he stated that some students just directly transfer their mother tongue into English. It means that, we can not deny when students produce collocations to the target language, their first language influence on the process of transferring of collocations. Dealing with the first question which to identify the type of collocations used by students of English Teacher Education Department at UIN Surabaya. Then the second question dealt with identifying collocation errors made by students. Based on Oxford Collocation dictionary and British National Corpus found that different types of collocations produced, different degrees of challenge to produce collocation for students. Based on the results, grammatical collocations in general and verb-preposition collocations in particular became the most errors of types of collocation for English Teacher Education Department at UIN Surabaya. As the table 15 showed, after verbpreposition collocations, the major collocational error categories are related to verb-noun (37, 7%), adjective-noun (32, 6%), adjective-preposition (32%), noun-preposition (30, 9%), and adverb-adjective (23%). Therefore, this research finding has correlation with the previous finding by Sahrab. He found that most EFL, learners have difficulty in the use of English preposition collocations. Similar conclusions can be taken from a study by Panahifar, in which he analyzed the types of collocation errors made

62 by advanced learners of English in oral production. Even tough, he analyzed oral production of students, it had same result with this research. He found that errors in the use of collocations mostly are Verbs-Preposition. In his result or research, he found that the type of collocation errors mostly used by students in oral production is Verb-Preposition. However, the type of collocation which is rarely used by students in oral production is adverb-verb. It indicates that the result is almost the same with my research in that it found that in written production, students rarely made collocation errors in Adverb- Verb. Different from Hamdi s finding research, he only analyzed the use of two types of collocation (Verb-noun and Adjective-noun), and he also used the test as an instrument of the data. The result of finding research showed that the highest percentage of kind of collocations errors was Verb-Noun. Most of them used their mother tongue in their writing, rather than used collocation naturally. So that way, when they express their ideas in their writing product, their first language influence to the target language.