Youth in Action makes a difference!

Similar documents
SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS

CALL FOR PARTICIPANTS

The recognition, evaluation and accreditation of European Postgraduate Programmes.

The European Higher Education Area in 2012:

National Pre Analysis Report. Republic of MACEDONIA. Goce Delcev University Stip

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

3 of Policy. Linking your Erasmus+ Schools project to national and European Policy

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

National Academies STEM Workforce Summit

Impact of Educational Reforms to International Cooperation CASE: Finland

A TRAINING COURSE FUNDED UNDER THE TCP BUDGET OF THE YOUTH IN ACTION PROGRAMME FROM 2009 TO 2013 THE POWER OF 6 TESTIMONIES OF STRONG OUTCOMES

Introduction Research Teaching Cooperation Faculties. University of Oulu

Call for Volunteers. Short-term EVS. Volunteering for Acceptance and Diversity. About CID

The Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) provides a picture of adults proficiency in three key information-processing skills:

The development of ECVET in Europe

UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY IN EUROPE II

NA/2006/17 Annexe-1 Lifelong Learning Programme for Community Action in the Field of Lifelong Learning (Lifelong Learning Programme LLP)

Introduction. Background. Social Work in Europe. Volume 5 Number 3

Summary and policy recommendations

Twenty years of TIMSS in England. NFER Education Briefings. What is TIMSS?

Universities as Laboratories for Societal Multilingualism: Insights from Implementation

The development of national qualifications frameworks in Europe

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

international PROJECTS MOSCOW

PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON OBJECTIVES IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING

BLASKI, POLAND Introduction. Italian partner presentation

EUROPEAN STUDY & CAREER FAIR

Interview on Quality Education

The development of ECVET in Europe

Department of Education and Skills. Memorandum

Overall student visa trends June 2017

ehealth Governance Initiative: Joint Action JA-EHGov & Thematic Network SEHGovIA DELIVERABLE Version: 2.4 Date:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SLAM

Deliverable n. 6 Report on Financing and Co- Finacing of Internships

Participant Report Form Call 2015 KA1 Mobility of Staff in higher education - Staff mobility for teaching and training activities

Lifelong Learning Programme. Implementation of the European Agenda for Adult Learning

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying document to the

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Teaching Practices and Social Capital

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Department of Sociology and Social Research

Science and Technology Indicators. R&D statistics

May To print or download your own copies of this document visit Name Date Eurovision Numeracy Assignment

PIRLS. International Achievement in the Processes of Reading Comprehension Results from PIRLS 2001 in 35 Countries

SEDRIN School Education for Roma Integration LLP GR-COMENIUS-CMP

Students with Disabilities, Learning Difficulties and Disadvantages STATISTICS AND INDICATORS

WHAT IS AEGEE? AEGEE-EUROPE PRESENTATION EUROPEAN STUDENTS FORUM

EQE Candidate Support Project (CSP) Frequently Asked Questions - National Offices

SECTION 2 APPENDICES 2A, 2B & 2C. Bachelor of Dental Surgery

DISCUSSION PAPER. In 2006 the population of Iceland was 308 thousand people and 62% live in the capital area.

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

General report Student Participation in Higher Education Governance

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

National and Regional performance and accountability: State of the Nation/Region Program Costa Rica.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

Summary results (year 1-3)

International House VANCOUVER / WHISTLER WORK EXPERIENCE

Grundtvig partnership project Empowering Marginalized Elders

DEVELOPMENT AID AT A GLANCE

Challenges for Higher Education in Europe: Socio-economic and Political Transformations

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

INFORMATION What is 2GetThere? Learning by doing

the contribution of the European Centre for Modern Languages Frank Heyworth

The European Consensus on Development: the contribution of Development Education & Awareness Raising

TC The Power of Non Formal Education 2014

IMPLEMENTATION OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING 2010 WORK PROGRAMME

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

The Bologna Process: actions taken and lessons learnt

Summary Report. ECVET Agent Exploration Study. Prepared by Meath Partnership February 2015

Master s Programme in European Studies

Europe in gear for more mobility

and The Maria Grzegorzewska Academy of Special Education (Maria Grzegorzewska University in

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

Meek School of Journalism and New Media Will Norton, Jr., Professor and Dean Mission. Core Values

PLEASE NOTE! THIS IS SELF ARCHIVED VERSION OF THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

University of Plymouth. Community Engagement Strategy

Learning Europe at School. Final Report - DG EAC

Ten years after the Bologna: Not Bologna has failed, but Berlin and Munich!

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

D.10.7 Dissemination Conference - Conference Minutes

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

LAW ON HIGH SCHOOL. C o n t e n t s

An Introduction to LEAP

WP 2: Project Quality Assurance. Quality Manual

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

Programme Specification

Study on the implementation and development of an ECVET system for apprenticeship

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Note: Principal version Modification Amendment Modification Amendment Modification Complete version from 1 October 2014

Alternative education: Filling the gap in emergency and post-conflict situations

CEN/ISSS ecat Workshop

Fostering learning mobility in Europe

A comparative study on cost-sharing in higher education Using the case study approach to contribute to evidence-based policy

Guidelines on how to use the Learning Agreement for Studies

2 Research Developments

HIGHER EDUCATION IN POLAND

Transcription:

Youth in Action makes a difference! 1

youth in action Youth in Action (2007 to 2013) is a programme of the European Union that supports European youth projects. Youth in Action (YiA) fosters participation, active citizenship and competence development of young people, youth workers and youth leaders through non-formal education and learning, thus empowering them to meet the challenges of their respective societies. YiA also contributes to the inclusion of young people with fewer opportunities as well as to the development of youth organisations, centres and groups, and thus to civil society. Overall, YiA contributes to the development of a democratic society with active citizens in Europe and beyond. YiA will find its continuation in the youth chapter of the EU Programme Erasmus+ (2014 to 2020). key messages Recent research results show that the YiA Programme provides a space for new learning experiences for young people, youth leaders and youth workers through on-going innovation of educational design, methodologies and methods applied in funded projects. A wide range of contexts and settings which participants and project leaders become involved in is complemented by a broad variety of methods applied in YiA projects: this is inherent to YiA projects, covering the full spectrum of informal, non-formal and somewhat formal learning situations, with on average approximately half of the project time being dedicated to non-formal education and learning. The learning environments created by YiA projects contribute to a great extent to the development of competences which are essential for active citizenship and participation in public and political life as well as in civil society, in particular in a European context. Projects are reported to contribute to the development of a European identity, interest in European issues, awareness of European values, appreciation of cultural diversity and the inclusion of young people with fewer opportunities. Furthermore, young people as well as youth workers and youth leaders involved in YiA projects indicate that they develop knowledge, skills, attitudes and values which are related to all key competences for lifelong learning 1 which can be useful for their professional development and employability. This competence development is fostered by the combination of informal, non-formal and rather formal learning methods and settings occurring in YiA projects. Research findings also indicate that the involvement in YiA projects stimulates both participants and project leaders to consider or actually plan further educational activities and their professional development, including studying, working or doing an internship abroad as well as further developing foreign language skills. Youth workers and youth leaders also report that their youth work competences were developed, in particular with respect to non-formal education and international youth work. As the programme period of YiA will be coming to an end in 2013, it is of utmost importance that the research evidence available is used for the implementation of the youth chapter of the new EU programme Erasmus+, which will continue to foster participation, active citizenship, competence development and the inclusion of young people with fewer opportunities. 1 See http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/key_en.htm 2

Effects of projects on participants from the perspective of participants and project leaders Opinion of participants and leaders on effects of the project feel more European 66% 84% became more respective for Europe s multi-culturality 80% 94% are more prepared to study, work or live in another country 75% 85% got a clearer idea about further educational pathway 64% 77% got a clearer idea about professional career aspirations and goals belive that job chances increased 66% 73% 69% 68% are readier to pursue further education or training 82% 89% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Sum of affirmative answers / Percent project leaders (n=1,183) project participants (n=3,341) 3

setting the scene During the past decades, youth work has increasingly been recognised as being relevant for policy development at national and European levels. Youth work is at the core of the European Commission White Paper A New Impetus for European Youth (2000) 2 and of the EU Strategy for Youth Investing and Empowering (2010-2018) 3 ; youth work is also emphasised in the Agenda 2020 4. The main role of youth work is to provide to young people opportunities for participation, personal development and nonformal learning. In such contexts, young people can also develop a range of competences as described in the framework of key competences for lifelong learning 5. The latter is considered to be a positive factor in supporting young people s employability or encouraging them to enrol in continuing or higher education. In Europe, youth work has a history dating back more than a century. The internationalisation of youth work in Europe, involving also youth mobility and youth exchanges, started to become an increasingly important element of youth work after World War II (often as confidence building measures between former enemy countries) and evolved into out-of-school learning opportunities (now referred to as nonformal learning ) over the following decades. In this context, the Youth for Europe Programme was established by the European Union in 1988. For the period 2007 to 2013 it was named Youth in Action in fact, the 25th anniversary of EU Youth Programmes was celebrated in 2013. The programme will find its continuation in the youth chapter of the Erasmus+ Programme (2014 to 2020). The shift towards more evidence-based policy-making also presents a challenge to YiA, the only EU programme in the field of youth work and non-formal learning. Therefore, the project Research-based analysis and monitoring of Youth in Action (RAY) was established. In order to develop and improve the programme, it is necessary to have a research-based analysis of the effects of the programme. RAY is dedicated to providing such an insight by exploring processes, outcomes and effects of YiA funded projects using a multi-method and a transnational approach. 2 http://ec.europa.eu/youth/documents/publications/whitepaper_en.pdf 3 http://www.salto-youth.net/downloads/4-17-2444/investing%20and%20empowering.pdf 4 http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/youth/source/resources/forum21/issue_no12/n12_agenda_2020_en.pdf 5 http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/publ/pdf/ll-learning/keycomp_en.pdf 4

research-based analysis and monitoring of the youth in action programme aims and objectives Research-based analysis and monitoring of the YiA Programme (RAY) is conducted by the RAY Network, which was founded in 2008 and currently includes the YiA National Agencies and their research partners in 16 countries 6. RAY aims to explore the effects of the YiA Programme of the European Union, in particular the effects on young people, youth workers and youth leaders involved in YiA-funded projects as well as on their organisations and the communities where projects take place. Not only are the effects explored with respect to the intentions, objectives and priorities of the YiA Programme, but so are the unintended impacts of YiA projects in general. Furthermore, RAY aims to study how the actors involved in YiA projects are learning and, in particular, which contexts, settings, educational approaches, methodologies and methods used in the projects contribute to their learning and competence development. In this respect, RAY aims to contribute to quality assurance and development in the implementation of the YiA Programme (and, subsequently, the youth chapter of Erasmus+) as well as to evidence-based and research-informed youth policy development. At the same time, RAY seeks to generate new knowledge about the processes and outcomes of non-formal education and learning mobility in general and more specifically about non-formal youth education activities with an international dimension. research approach In principle, research-based analysis and monitoring of YiA uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative social research methods. Based on concepts and research instruments developed by the Institute of Educational Science at the University of Innsbruck in Austria (the research partner of the Austrian National Agency of YiA), two multilingual online questionnaires aimed at exploring the effects of YiA projects were created one for participants and another for project leaders/team members. So-called Standard Surveys using these questionnaires (now available in 16 languages) have been conducted on a regular basis since 2009 and will be continued until 2014 in order to collect data for most of the duration of the YiA Programme. In a second step, multilingual questionnaires for a Special Survey on learning in YiA were developed in 2012 for the purpose of exploring the educational approaches, design, methodology and methods applied in YiA projects. Between October 2009 and May 2013, more than 100,000 participants and project leaders/team members of YiA projects were invited to take part in the RAY online surveys and more than 30,000 completed the respective questionnaires. Complementary to the surveys, a study using qualitative methods interviews and group discussions was conducted in 10 countries 7 in order to explore deeper the learning processes and outcomes of YiA projects as well as to further develop the research approach and instruments applied in RAY. Further qualitative studies on a variety of aspects related to YiA were conducted by individual RAY Network members at the national level. 6 Austria, Belgium (Flemish-speaking community), Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia and Turkey; the Netherlands and Sweden were involved in the RAY Network until 2011/2012. 7 Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, France, Hungary, Luxembourg, Poland and Turkey 5

Furthermore, a study on competence development in Youth in Action projects was conducted in six countries 8 in 2012. The Special Survey explored if participation in short-term mobility projects supported by YiA results in a significant increase in participants competences and skills, independently of other factors. A quasi-experimental research design involving a comparison of levels of participants and nonparticipants competences was used. It was also taken into consideration that the competence levels were influenced by education, length and intensity of participation in other youth work activities, age and other background factors. The investigation included bivariate comparisons and regression analyses. main findings participation and active citizenship The outcomes of the surveys suggest that the involvement in YiA projects contributes to the development of the four permanent priorities of the YiA programme 9, especially to the development of citizenship competences in a broad sense and in particular to the development of interpersonal, social, intercultural and foreign language competences of both participants and project leaders. This includes the development of respective skills and knowledge, but also of attitudes and values, for example: respect for other cultures and appreciation of cultural diversity; solidarity, tolerance and individual freedom; feeling as a European and being interested in European issues; new knowledge about Europe, inclusion, youth and youth policies; awareness of European values and of inequality in society. The responses also indicate that involvement in the projects results in increased participation in public and political life. Participants self-perceptions of effects the project had on them with respect to YiA objectives and priorities Opinion of participants on effects of the project... I participate in societal and/or political life 9% 56% 35% I am interested in European issues 5% 43% 52% I am committed to work against discrimination, intolerance, xenophobia or racism 9% 58% 34% Disadvantaged people have my support 6% 56% 39% Total 7% 53% 40% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% to a smaller extent to the same extent to a greater extent 8 Belgium/Flemish-speaking community), Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland and Sweden 9 The four permanent priorities of the YiA programme 2007-2013 are European citizenship, participation of young people, cultural diversity and inclusion of young people with fewer opportunities. 6

competence development The findings indicate that participation in YiA projects contributes to the development of all key competences for lifelong learning. While the most distinct development is reported for interpersonal, social and intercultural competences as well as for communication in a foreign language, a significant development is also reported for sense of entrepreneurship, civic competence, cultural awareness and expression, and learning competence ( learning to learn ). In addition developments can be found for communication in the first language (mother tongue), mathematical competence and sense of initiative. The self-assessment of participants is confirmed by the project leaders assessment of the participants competence development, showing a highly significant correlation between self-perception and external perception. These findings are partly confirmed by the Special Survey on competence development in Youth in Action projects in six countries in 2012 (see research approach above): participants in YiA projects tended to report higher levels of competences than non-participants with a difference of up to 10 percentage points. Participants generally tended to consider each of the competences more important, assessed their competence levels higher and expressed more willingness to improve the respective competences in the future. There is one exception to the general pattern being active at work was rated higher by non-participants than participants, but the difference was small. Two of the differences were statistically significant: the importance given to skills for collaborating with other people and the competence level for communicating in a foreign language. An in-depth analysis of the survey data confirmed that the two differences occurred indeed independently of other possible explanations such as educational attainment, size of municipality of residence, age, experience in other youth work environments, country of residence, etc. Further differences that were less pronounced but still relevant could be observed for the following: the skill of artistic expression, for which responses showed the most systematic positive differences for YiA participants; and the greater importance given by YiA participants to foreign language skills and collaboration skills indicating that YiA participants developed the respective competences within their YiA project. Self-assessment of level of skill or personal characteristic (averages) compared to other people in general (1 = significantly below others 4 = significantly above others ) Being tolerant Behaving well in different situations Foreign language that the respondent considered to be his/her best Ability to acquire new knowledge Skills for collaborating with people Knowing my skills Artistic expression Being active at work Frequent participation in youth organisation(s) 1 2 3 4 non-participants participants 7

educational and professional development The results of the surveys indicate that the involvement in YiA projects stimulates both participants and project leaders to consider or actually plan further educational activities and their professional development. Furthermore, a large majority of both participants and project leaders believe that their job opportunities have increased at least to some extent. This, together with the competence development outlined above, reflects an effect on the professional development of the actors involved in the YiA programme beyond the youth field and civil society, especially in view of their involvement in the work domain. Therein lies a significant effect that complements the social, cultural and political dimensions of the YiA programme. Youth workers and youth leaders also report that their youth work competences were developed, in particular with respect to non-formal education and international youth projects. Effects of the project with respect to educational and professional development from the perspective of participants I believe that my job chances have increased 9% 22% 35% 34% I now really intend to go abroad to study, work, do a work placement [an internship] or live there 9% 17% 39% 35% I now really intend to develop my foreign language skills 5% 10% 46% 39% I am planning to engage in further education and training 6% 12% 43% 39% I have a clearer idea about my professional career aspirations and goals 9% 25% 33% 34% I have a clearer idea about my further educational pathway 10% 26% 31% 33% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Not at all Not so much To some extent Definitely youth in action a space for new learning experiences A majority of participants report that their project used exercises, games and methods that were new to them. Similarly, a majority of project leaders report that during their project they applied exercises, games and methods for the first time. This indicates that YiA projects are a space for trying out and experiencing new educational and learning methods a laboratory for training, teaching and learning for both participants and project leaders. And these projects also provide for successful learning spaces: a considerable majority of participants indicate that these methods addressed important topics and triggered their interest for such topics, that they helped them to learn something more easily, and that they consider them to be suited also for school or university. Only a very small proportion of participants thought that the methods used were useless for learning something valuable or that they were somewhat childish. 8

Methods used in the project from the perspective of participants The projects used exercises, games and methods that... N=5,398 (Somewhat true + Very true). ts used exercises, games and methods that..." N=5,398 were new to me. 78% triggered my interest for the project topics. addressed important topics. 88% 87% helped me learn something more easily. would also be suited for school or university. 74% 76% were somewhat childish. 27% were useless for learning something valuable. 17% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% youth in action projects providing the full spectrum between informal, non-formal and formal learning Participants and project leaders report that between 40% and 50% of the project time was dedicated to non-formal education and learning methods. Between 20% and 25% of the project time was dedicated to activities which would rather correspond to formal education learning methods (i.e., presentations/ inputs given by experts or project leaders). Around 20% of the project time was not part of the project programme, providing opportunities primarily for informal learning. This indicates that YiA projects offer a broad spectrum of learning opportunities between more formal education activities at one end and more informal learning situations on the other, thus covering the full learning continuum 10, with around half of the activities in the non-formal education/learning bracket. Percentage of project time allocated to types of activities Listening to and engaging with presentations/inputs given by experts or group/project leaders 20% 25% Planned activities and exercises which were part of the programme of the project, including its preparation; consultations with a project leader / member of the project team 39% 50% Activities which were not part of the project programme including breaks and meals 19% 24% Other activities or situations 11% 13% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% project leaders (n=1,594) project participants (n=4,416) 10 The full spectrum of formal, non-formal and informal learning. 9

learning in youth in action projects Research results indicate that in YiA projects the participants develop key competences through a combination of non-formal, informal and rather formal education/learning methods and settings. Nonformal education methods and activities which were part of the programme play the most dominant role, followed by informal experiences with people in and around the project. In particular, the responses indicate that the development of citizenship/civic skills is strongly supported through informal learning. Furthermore, taking part in the organisation of the project and applying what one has learned in the project are reported to contribute considerably to the development of selected skills for lifelong learning, thus confirming the relevance of a participatory approach and of practical experience for learning. Similar to the participants, project leaders report having developed key competences for lifelong learning through a combination of different types of activities they implemented in their role as project leaders. Overall, project leaders report having developed the skills in question best through activities which are directly linked to designing, developing and implementing the project and also during organisational and administrative tasks. Designing the project, cooperating with youth workers from other countries and implementing project activities with and for participants are reported to be very effective for work-related learning in YiA projects. reaching out to all young people A considerable proportion of participants in YiA projects are young people with fewer opportunities, which means that a major objective of the YiA programme, namely inclusion, has been met. Approximately 40% of the participants in youth projects indicate that they are confronted with obstacles in their access to education, work, mobility or participation in society. Furthermore, there is a high interest of beneficiaries, youth workers and youth leaders to include young people with fewer opportunities in YiA projects: a large majority of the participants in training and networking projects reported to be youth workers/leaders who work with young people with fewer opportunities. Obstacles to education, work, employment, mobility and participation in society and politics reported by participants Are you confronted with obstacles participants. in your access "Are.... you N=3,470 confronted with obstacles in your access...". N=3,470... to education? 19% 76% 5% to work and employment? 29% 56% 16% to active participation in society and politics? 18% 68% 14% to mobility? 19% 73% 8% Total RAY 20% 69% 11% Total 21% 68% 11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Yes No don't know 10

conclusions Research evidence indicates that the YiA programme is very effective in meeting its objectives and priorities, in particular in fostering European citizenship, in encouraging young people to participate in society, in promoting cultural diversity and in including young people with fewer opportunities. Research findings also indicate that the effects of YiA projects go far beyond the YiA objectives, e.g. by contributing to the development of all eight key competences for lifelong learning and by supporting young people, youth leaders and youth workers in further developing their educational and professional career perspectives, which in turn can contribute to an increased level of employability. These effects reported by participants and youth workers involved in YiA projects are achieved primarily through non-formal and informal learning as an inherent element of YiA projects. In this respect, research findings indicate that YiA contributes to reaching the goals of the EU Strategy 2010-2018 Youth Investing and Empowering 11, especially regarding the aims concerning non-formal education, participation as well as entrepreneurship. Therefore, the elements contributing to the success of the YiA Programme in particular the non-formal learning approach should be maintained in the youth chapter of the new EU Programme Erasmus+, which will follow the present EU Programmes in the fields of education, youth, culture and sports. policy implications and recommendations For the future it would be necessary to take the following steps: Enhance the recognition of non-formal education and learning, especially its contribution to the competence development and increased employability of young people, which is one of the fields of action defined in the EU-Strategy Youth Investing and Empowering. Continue to support youth projects which foster democratic citizenship and the readiness of young people to be active in the interest of their community. Improve existing European mechanisms such as the structured dialogue to foster youth participation on local, regional and European levels and establish new initiatives for enhancing participation of all young people in public and political life as well as in civil society. Recognise the potential of European youth programmes in reaching young people with fewer opportunities and improve and expand the inclusive approach of YiA in order to find new possibilities to reach even more young people with fewer opportunities through the development of specific strategies. Further develop opportunities for education and training of youth workers and youth leaders as key actors of (international) youth work through respective instruments in the youth chapter of Erasmus+. This will secure a high level of quality in youth work and the possibility for professional exchange and development. Ensure the supportive approach towards the target groups of the youth chapter of Erasmus+ through a network of National Agencies that has special expertise and competence in the youth field. Ensure research-based analysis and monitoring for the youth chapter of Erasmus+ in order to contribute to quality assurance and development in the implementation of the programme as well as to evidence-based and research-informed youth policy development. This includes the further development of research approaches and instruments in order to provide for a more comprehensive analysis of processes and outcomes of funded projects as well as of learning mobility at large. 11 See http://eur-lex.europa.eu/lexuriserv/lexuriserv.do?uri=com:2009:0200:fin:en:pdf 11

project identity Coordinator Research project direction Project partners Contact Duration Institute of Educational Science of the University of Innsbruck, Austria Interkulturelles Zentrum/Intercultural Centre, Vienna, Austria Professor Lynne Chisholm National Agencies and their research partners from Austria, Belgium (Flemish-speaking community), Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, the Netherlands (until 2011), Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Sweden (until 2012) and Turkey Helmut Fennes Institute of Educational Science University of Innsbruck Liebeneggstraße 8 6020 Innsbruck, Austria helmut.fennes@uibk.ac.at 2008 on-going Date November 2013 Website wwww.researchyouth.net http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/key_en.htm http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/framework_en.htm http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/targets_en.pdf http://www.researchyouth.net/2013/publications Fennes, Helmut; Gadinger, Susanne; Hagleitner, Wolfgang: Exploring Youth in Action. Effects and outcomes of the Youth in Action Programme from the perspective of project participants and project leaders. Transnational analysis 2011. Innsbruck, 2012. http://www.researchyouth.net/documents/ray_20102011_transnational_analysis_fullreport.pdf Fennes, Helmut, Gadinger, Susanne, Hagleitner, Wolfgang, Lunardon, Katharina: Learning in Youth in Action. Results from the surveys with project participants and project leaders in May 2012. Interim Transnational Analysis. Innsbruck, 2013. http://www.researchyouth.net/documents/ray_specialsurvey_learning.pdf Taru, Marti: A study on the effects of participation in a Youth in Action project on the level of competences. Youth Research Ltd.,Tallinn, 2013 http://www.researchyouth.net/documents/ray_specialsurvey_competences.pdf Imprint: Publisher & Editor: Interkulturelles Zentrum, Lindengasse 41/10, 1070 Vienna, Austria, www.iz.or.at Proofreader: Alexander Biewald 12