UNDERSTANDING THE ACCREDITATION PROCESS

Similar documents
GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Course INTRODUCTION TO DEGREE PROGRAM EXPECTATIONS: WHAT FACULTY NEED TO KNOW NOW

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment

University of Toronto

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

The College of Law Mission Statement

An Introduction to LEAP

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Pattern of Administration. For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

Teaching Excellence Framework

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE

Introduction 3. Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3. Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

ITEM: 6. MEETING: Trust Board 20 February 2008

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Program Change Proposal:

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Master s Programme in European Studies

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire


Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Services for Children and Young People

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy

5 Early years providers

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Joint Board Certification Project Team

Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

Module Title: Managing and Leading Change. Lesson 4 THE SIX SIGMA

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Educational Leadership and Administration

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

Program Assessment and Alignment

VIRGINIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION (VISA)

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications

Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Pattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING. Version: 14 November 2017

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Global Convention on Coaching: Together Envisaging a Future for coaching

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Intellectual Property

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

MASTER OF ARTS IN BUSINESS MA INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP*

Programme Specification

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

Transcription:

UNDERSTANDING THE ACCREDITATION PROCESS Jason Aase, Dean of Career and Technical Education, NWCCU Liaison Umpqua Community College February 13, 2019 Board of Education

Who is the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)? Independent Non-profit Membership-driven NWCCU is recognized by the U.S. Department of Education as the authority on the educational quality and institutional effectiveness of higher education institutions in the Northwest region of the United States, including the states of Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, as well as Canada. NWCCU recognizes higher education institutions for performance, integrity, and quality to merit the confidence of the educational community and the public. Our accreditation of postsecondary institutions is a voluntary, nongovernmental, self-regulatory process of quality assurance and institutional improvement. Accreditation or preaccreditation by NWCCU also qualifies institutions and enrolled students for access to Title IV federal funds to support teaching, research, and student financial aid.

Who is the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)? The Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities is one of seven regional organizations recognized by the U.S. Department of Education to accredit postsecondary institutions within the United States. NWCCU is us! UCC is an accredited member of NWCCU, and one of 162 institutions sharing our voices to drive the peer review process. NWCCU s decision-making body consists of up to twenty-six Commissioners who represent the public and the diversity of higher education institutions within the Northwest region.

Who are the evaluators and why do they visit? Commission evaluators, reviewers, and observers consist of NWCCU staff, teams of peer evaluators, and the Board of Commissioners. They regular check in to ensure that the institution is: continuing to address recommendations given to UCC during previous visits, remaining compliant with NWCCU standards for being recognized as an effective institution of higher learning, offering high-quality education (academic programs, certificates, transfer programs), and engaging in ongoing fulfillment of its mission and core themes.

What are our obligations to the NWCCU? Accreditation under the NWCCU is ongoing, inclusive of campus wide constituents, and operates in a seven year reporting cycle, consisting of: a yearly institutional update report; scheduled self-study reports in the first, third, and seventh year of the institution s cycle; any additional reports requested by the Board of Commissioners, and reporting any changes that fall under the Commission s Substantive Change Policy.

STANDARDS Colleges are required to adhere to a set of standards that guide and underpin operations, academics, student services, assessment, and effectiveness. Each standard has several indicators that we must achieve in order to remain compliant as an institution of higher learning.

STANDARD ONE MISSION AND CORE THEMES The institution articulates its purpose in a mission statement, and identifies core themes that comprise essential elements of that mission. In an examination of its purpose, characteristics, and expectations, the institution defines the parameters for mission fulfillment. Guided by that definition, it identifies an acceptable threshold or extent of mission fulfillment.

STANDARD TWO RESOURCES AND CAPACITY By documenting the adequacy of its resources and capacity, the institution demonstrates the potential to fulfill its mission, accomplish its core theme objectives, and achieve the intended outcomes of its programs and services, wherever offered and however delivered. Through its governance and decision-making structures, the institution establishes, reviews regularly, and revises, as necessary, policies and procedures that promote effective management and operation of the institution.

STANDARD THREE PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION The institution engages in ongoing, participatory planning that provides direction for the institution and leads to the achievement of the intended outcomes of its programs and services, accomplishment of its core themes, and fulfillment of its mission. The resulting plans reflect the interdependent nature of the institution s operations, functions, and resources. The institution demonstrates that the plans are implemented and are evident in the relevant activities of its programs and services, the adequacy of its resource allocation, and the effective application of institutional capacity. In addition, the institution demonstrates that its planning and implementation processes are sufficiently flexible so that the institution is able to address unexpected circumstances that have the potential to impact the institution s ability to accomplish its core theme objectives and to fulfill its mission.

STANDARD FOUR EFFECTIVENESS AND IMPROVEMENT The institution regularly and systematically collects data related to clearly defined indicators of achievement, analyzes those data, and formulates evidence-based evaluations of the achievement of core theme objectives. It demonstrates clearly defined procedures for evaluating the integration and significance of institutional planning, the allocation of resources, and the application of capacity in its activities for achieving the intended outcomes of its programs and services and for achieving its core theme objectives. The institution disseminates assessment results to its constituencies and uses those results to effect improvement.

STANDARD FIVE MISSION FULFILLMENT, ADAPTATION, AND SUSTAINABILITY Based on its definition of mission fulfillment and informed by the results of its analysis of accomplishment of its core theme objectives, the institution develops and publishes evidencebased evaluations regarding the extent to which it is fulfilling its mission. The institution regularly monitors its internal and external environments to determine how and to what degree changing circumstances may impact its mission and its ability to fulfill that mission. It demonstrates that it is capable of adapting, when necessary, its mission, core themes, programs, and services to accommodate changing and emerging needs, trends, and influences to ensure enduring institutional relevancy, productivity, viability, and sustainability.

What is Accreditation cycle?

How does what I do on a daily basis relate to accreditation? It s all about ensuring our daily operations are aligned with the strategic plan, mission, and core themes. We must document how we meet each indicator of achievement to show processes and continual improvement.

What is our current status? Our Mid-cycle Evaluation (MCE) is due March 1 st, 2019 along with an ad-hoc report addressing recommendations 1, 3, 4, 6, and 7 from the 2017 NWCCU report.

Recommendation 1 (Mission Fulfillment) Ensure that core themes reflect and encompass the mission; provide indicators that measure mission fulfillment.

Recommendation 3 (Governance) The institution will identify internal and external factors that contribute to administrator turnover and formulate a plan to increase institutional stability through effective leadership. The institution demonstrates an effective and widely understood system of governance with clearly defined authority, roles, and responsibilities.

Recommendation 4 (Leadership and Management, Administration) The institution s major support and operational areas, including instruction, student services, and administrative services, work collaboratively with faculty, students, and staff to foster fulfillment of the institution s mission. In addition to a chief executive officer, the institution employs a sufficient number of qualified administrators who provide effective leadership and management for the institution's major support and operational functions and work collaboratively across institutional functions and units to foster fulfillment of the institution's mission and achievement of its core themes. The institution employs a sufficient number of qualified administrators who provide effective leadership and management for the institution s major support and operational functions and work collaboratively across institutional functions and units to foster fulfillment of the institution s mission and accomplishment of its core theme objectives.

The institution will Recommendation 6 (Human Resources) clearly identify duties, responsibilities, and authority of each administrative and staff position, adopt a system that provides for regular evaluation of administrative and staff positions, develop formal procedures and resources to provide professional development for exempt staff, employ a sufficient number of qualified personnel to maintain its support and operations functions, evaluate administrators and staff regularly with regard to performance of work duties and responsibilities, and provide professional growth and development.

Recommendation 7 (Education Resources, Educational Program, Institutional Effectiveness) The institution will: encourage will work collaboratively to develop a systematic approach to assessing student learning, including institutional student learning outcomes, at the College, program, and course level; provide one or more educational programs which include appropriate content and rigor consistent with its mission and core themes; ensure educational program(s) culminate in achievement of clearly identified student learning outcomes, and lead to collegiate-level degree(s) with degree designation consistent with program content in recognized fields of study; systematically apply clearly defined evaluation and planning procedures, assesses the extent to which it achieves its mission and core themes, uses the results of assessment to effect institutional improvement, and periodically publishes the results to its constituencies;

Recommendation 7 continued (Education Resources, Educational Program, Institutional Effectiveness) provide programs, wherever offered and however delivered, with appropriate content and rigor that are consistent with its mission; publish expected course, program, and degree learning outcomes. Expected student learning outcomes for courses, wherever offered and however delivered, are provided in written form to enrolled students; ensure credits and degrees are offered in consistency with institutional policies that reflect generally accepted learning outcomes, norms, or equivalencies in higher education; ensure degree programs demonstrate a coherent design with appropriate breadth, depth, sequencing of courses, and synthesis of learning. Admission and graduation requirements are clearly defined and widely published, and

Recommendation 7 continued (Education Resources, Educational Program, Institutional Effectiveness) demonstrate that faculty exercise a major role in the design, approval, implementation, and revision of the curriculum, and have an active role in the selection of new faculty. Faculty with teaching responsibilities take collective responsibility for fostering and assessing student achievement of clearly identified learning outcomes.

How is the Board of Education involved in the Accreditation process? 1. Understand the key standards put forth by NWCCU. 2. Periodically, make sure all BOE members know, understand, and can articulate the mission and core themes of the college. 3. Review strategic plan updates on a quarterly basis and ask questions where applicable to ensure the strategic priorities are met. 4. Review institutional effectiveness updates on a quarterly basis and ask questions where applicable to ensure a broad understanding of the college s engagement, ongoing planning, assessment, effectiveness, and sustainability. 5. Determine specific ways that the BOE would like to demonstrate fulfillment of the mission and core themes. 6. Provide evidence and documentation of efforts related to items 1-5.

Q & A