School Climate Transformation: The Awesome, The Surprising and The Challenging February 26, 2015

Similar documents
Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Denver Public Schools

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

State Parental Involvement Plan

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

El Toro Elementary School

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Exceptional Student Education Monitoring and Assistance On-Site Visit Report. Sarasota County School District April 25-27, 2016

The School Discipline Process. A Handbook for Maryland Families and Professionals

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

GRADUATE CURRICULUM REVIEW REPORT

Connecting to the Big Picture: An Orientation to GEAR UP

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

CDS Code

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Evaluation of pupil premium grant expenditure 2015/16 Review Date: 16th July 2016

School-Wide Restorative Practices: Step by Step

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Long Beach Unified School District

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Every student absence jeopardizes the ability of students to succeed at school and schools to

Cuero Independent School District

1110 Main Street, East Hartford, CT Tel: (860) Fax: (860)

Division of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs

A Compendium of Practice & Findings

Massachusetts Juvenile Justice Education Case Study Results

HEATHER EDL ORMISTON, PH.D., NCSP

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Positive Learning Environment

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

SY School Performance Plan

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Glenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Horizon Community College SEND Policy. Amended: June 2017 Ratified: July 2017

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Val Verde Unified School District

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Summer School 2017 Report

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

School Action Plan: Template Overview

About PACER PACER FACTS. What is PACER Center? Highlights from PACER programs:

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

Trends & Issues Report

Pentyrch Primary School Ysgol Gynradd Pentyrch

Restorative Practices In Iowa Schools: A local panel presentation

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Pyramid. of Interventions

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

1GOOD LEADERSHIP IS IMPORTANT. Principal Effectiveness and Leadership in an Era of Accountability: What Research Says

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

RtI Meeting 9/24/2012. # (Gabel)

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

School Leadership Rubrics

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

3 of Policy. Linking your Erasmus+ Schools project to national and European Policy

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Transcription:

School Climate Transformation: The Awesome, The Surprising and The Challenging February 26, 2015 Debbi D Angelo : Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment debbidangelo@berkeley.net Judy Appel, BUSD Board President judyappel@berkeley.net Josh Daniels, BUSD Board Member joshdaniels@berkeley.net Berkeley Unified s First Year LCAP Story

School Climate Transformation Through the LCAP: The Awesome, The Surprising and The Challenging 1. Engaging the Community with School Climate: Disproportionality in Discipline Lessons Learned 2. LCAP Provisions and School Climate Reform: Vision, Goals, Baseline Data, Actions and Expenditures 3. Progress Monitoring and Implementation: Dashboard Design, Implementation, Spotlights 4. What else would you like to know? Q and A??

Community Engagement: What We Did Formal Input 14 meetings: Parent Advisory Council (PAC), English Learner PAC/District ELAC and Education Advisory Council Measure A Planning and Oversight Committee, Superintendent s Budget Advisory Council discussed LCAP at least twice Focus groups including Building Opportunities for Self Sufficiency, Latinos Unidos, Bay Area Hispano Institute for Advancement, A Better Way (foster youth programs) Proposals from Berkeley High and Parents of Children of African-American Descent

Community Engagement: What We Did Two district wide public forums October: Standing-room only meeting. December: Community forum in English and Spanish Table groups of more than 100 people generated ideas, goals and outcomes 140 suggestions posted on website and presented to the Board

Community Engagement: What We Did Additional Input Principals discussed LCAP at 7 meetings Multiple discussions by School Governance and Site Councils Email address to provide comment feedback On Board agenda: 6 times District staff responded to every public comment, not just to PAC/DELAC comments

Community Engagement: What We Learned Simplify process Lots of staff work to make accessible County office and state uncertainty made it more difficult Not all metrics needed same level of scrutiny More direct student input is needed Berkeley Unified LCAP policy being drafted to implement lessons learned

Community Needs Assessment: Baseline Climate Data - What did it tell us? Disproportionality in Chronic Absenteeism African-American and Socio-Economically Disadvantaged students were 33% more likely to miss school than non-african-american peers Disproportionality in Suspensions African-American students made up over 50% of suspensions At Malcolm X and John Muir elementary schools, suspensions were lower than other school sites There were no quantifiable data on alternatives to suspension provided at schools The California Healthy Kids Survey and District s Acceleration of the Achievement of African-American Students Workgroup indicated a need for: African-American students to connect to an adult who can respect them and recognize their academic and social potential Cultural Competency Training Tools for students to use to feel welcomed and connected to school

Emerging Themes School Climate Finding Solutions to Eliminate the Disproportionality in Suspensions Alternatives to Suspension Overall Mental Health/Trauma Informed support a priority Early Intervention system for struggling students Student Engagement Classroom Equity Strategies to engage all learners

Berkeley Unified Overarching Goals Eight priorities into three overarching LCAP goals: Goal 1: Provide high quality classroom instruction and curriculum that promote college and career readiness with academic interventions in place to eliminate barriers to student success. Goal 2: End the racial predictability of academic achievement by ensuring that all systems are culturally and linguistically responsive to the needs of our students. Goal 3: Ensure all school sites have safe, welcoming and inclusive climates for all students and their families, so that all students are in their classes ready to learn. Description of annual goals, for all pupils and for each subgroup of pupils that include English Learners, Foster Youth, Socio-Economically Disadvantaged, and African-American and Latino students.

LCAP Goal 1: Provide high quality classroom instruction and curriculum that promote college and career readiness with academic interventions in place to eliminate barriers to student success. Intervention Support for High Risk Students Action: Oversee college and career planning and provide academic support with full-time BHS Intervention Coordinator and mentors Expenditures: $95,000 (LCFF Supplemental); $46,100 (BSEP), $46,100 (LCFF Base) AVID Expansion in Grades 7-11- Action: Expand AVID (Advancement via Individual Determination), using individual Transcript Evaluation Service Tracking tool to communicate on-track progress. Expenditures: $115,000 (LCFF Supplemental) Middle and High School Bridge Action: Support high risk students in a college-going culture: a) summer program, b) access to technology, c) after school class, skill development, and mentoring. Expenditures: $129,000 (LCFF Supplemental); $60,000 (One-time LCFF Base); $55,000 (City of Berkeley); $73,800 (BSEP)

LCAP Goal 2: End the racial predictability of academic achievement by ensuring that all systems are culturally and linguistically responsive to the needs of our students. Cultural Competency Training Action: Develop teacher and staff cultural competence and use of culturally and linguistically relevant instructional practices with PD workshops that focus on African-American students and English Learners. Expenditures: $45,000 (BSEP) Consultant/Specialist for Teachers of Color - Action: Increase capacity to leverage partnerships with local teacher credentialing programs to attract student teachers and teachers who are African-American and Latino, and support and retain these teachers with a part-time specialist. Expenditures: $36,900 (LCFF Supplemental) ELD Teacher Coaches at sites Action: Provide daily direct instruction in English Language Development (ELD) to all English Learners by ensuring all sites have ELD teachers to provide coaching and instruction / support. Expenditures: $894,300 (LCFF Supplemental)

LCAP Goal 3: Ensure all school sites have safe, welcoming and inclusive climates for all students and their families, so that all students are in their classes ready to learn. Contracts with Mental Health/Trauma Support Agencies - Action: Increased mental health services to support students dealing with trauma and other emotional issues. Expenditures:$55,000 (City of Berkeley); $93,000 (LCFF Supplemental) (proposed increase to 200K in Year 2015-16) Culturally Relevant Positive Behavioral Intervention Supports (PBIS) including Toolbox - Action: Develop culturally relevant positive behavioral intervention supports (PBIS) and Toolbox social-emotional domains to help students in danger of suspension with guidance of a Behavioral Specialist. Expenditures: Training/ Curriculum:$45,000 (BSEP);$38,500 (LCFF Supplemental); $18,400 (Title II); $38,700 (Special Education) Site Coordinators for Family Engagement - Action: Services to support families and students dealing with trauma and other emotional issues. Expenditures:$215,000 (LCFF Supplemental); $411,000 (BSEP) (proposed increase to $900,000 by 2016-17)

Mental Health Model

Family Liaisons Targeted Third Graders with low performance, low attendance, and socio-economically disadvantaged Focused contacts by Family Liaisons Incentives for improved attendance and achievement School Attendance Review Team (SART) Meeting with Principal, Teacher, Family, Student and Family Liaison School Attendance Review Board (SARB) Inclusive of SART Team and City of Berkeley Partners

Cycle of Continuous Progress Analyze Adjust Berkeley LCAP Plan Evaluate Implement

Research and Evaluation Questions: Be Effective and Efficient How can we tell if our programs are actually making a difference? How can we figure out which students might struggle in advance to target for socio-emotional support? How can we target our limited resources to the students and families most in need? How can we talk about the achievement gap (educational debt) without contributing to stereotype threat?

On-going Implementation and Evaluation Goals with evaluation tools - link Transparency Evaluation Crosswalk Bit.ly/LCAPData Evaluation Qualitative and Quantitative Superintendent goals tied to LCAP Survey tools, Focus groups and Observations Partnership with UC Berkeley (Toolbox and Mental Health) On-going review at Trimester and Semester Report Card Attendance Officer Referrals Suspensions Alternatives to Suspensions Family Engagement Logs

Protective and Risk Factors for Student Performance

Spotlight: Secondary Suspension Disproportionality and Alternatives Alternatives to Suspension added this year to Data System with staff trained and alternatives being provided, they include the legal language from Ed. Code as well LCAP Language: ATOD Intervention / ASPIRE Program Behavior Intervention Plan Community Service Conflict Resolution / Mediation Counseling Lifelines Academy / Alive and Free Parent Shadowing Restorative Justice Sexual Harassment Program AHAs with the new Alternatives Tool in Incident Management: Middle and High Schools using new language more than Elementary Need a way to tag if alternative would have been a suspension Still need further consistency in entering of office referrals

Spotlight: Secondary Suspension Disproportionality and Alternatives Semester 1 Suspensions Student Counts 2013-2014 % 2014-2015 % Up/Down African American 70 57% 78 68% 12% Students without IEPs 46 37% 37 32% -5% Counseling Enriched * 5% * 8% 3% Students with IEPs (No CEC) 18 15% 32 28% 13% All Others (Not African-American) 53 43% 36 32% -12% Students without IEPs 49 40% 33 29% -11% Counseling Enriched 0 0% 0 0% 0% Students with IEPs (No CEC) * 3% * 3% -1% *Less than 10 students

Spotlight: Secondary Suspension Disproportionality and Alternatives Semester 1 Suspensions Student Counts 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 AA 56.6% 52.8% 50.0% 50.0% 51.9% All Others (Not African-American) 43.4% 47.2% 50.0% 50.0% 48.1% Semester 1 Suspensions Student Counts 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 African American 107 104 88 70 78 Counseling Enriched (CEC) * 12 * * * Students without IEPs 73 54 60 46 37 Students with IEPs (No CEC) 31 38 20 18 32 All Others (Not African-American) 64 90 58 53 36 Counseling Enriched (CEC) 0 * * 0 0 Students without IEPs 56 71 53 49 33 Students with IEPs (No CEC) * 11 * * *

Spotlight: TOOLBOX New Elementary Common Core Report Card with the Social-Emotional Domains from Toolbox - Baseline Results (Average Score out of 4) Grade 3 Cohort Average Score Social-Emotional Domains Habits of Work All Students (N=649) 2.81 2.92 African-American (N=124) 2.36 2.54 Latino (N=102) 2.64 2.71 English Learners (N=48) 2.65 2.67 Socio-Economically Disadvantaged (N=243) 4: Exceeding; 3: Meeting; 2: Approaching, 1: Below 2.48 2.64

Spotlight: K-3 Truancy K-3 Overtime Average Number of Truancy Events for K-3 Students with One or More Events All Students African- American Latino English Learners / RFEP Socio- Economically Disadvantaged 2011-12 5.8 (N=1866) 9.9 (N=343) 5.8 (N=420) 5.3 (N=311) 7.8 (N=787) 2012-13 4.8 (N=2255) 6.5 (N=465) 3.9 (N=603) 3.7 (N=345) 5.2 (N=1091) 2013-14 4.6 (N=2615) 6.0 (N=633) 3.6 (N=782) 2.9 (N=449) 4.5 (N=1429) K-3 Cohort Analysis (Same Students Over Time) Average Change Upon Intervention for Students with 3 or more truancy Events 3 or More All Students African- American Latino EL/RFEP SED Ave Change -1 (N=489) -1 (N=84) -.4 (N=114) -1 (N=67) -1 (N=208) Reduced 266 43 57 36 119 No Change 61 * 14 10 26 Increased 162 32 43 21 63

Monitoring & Accountability Ongoing discussions regarding oversight How frequently does Board need updates regarding implementation? How does oversight and monitoring fit with developing annual update? How does timing of receiving outcome data impact monitoring and oversight? What is role, if any, of PAC, DELAC, EAC, others in monitoring action/service implementation? Developing LCAP Policy to provide guidance

QUESTIONS?

THANK YOU Please follow our LCAP progress by viewing updates at: http://www.berkeleyschools.net/local-control/ Data Crosswalk is available at: bit.ly/lcapdata Feel free to email: Debbi D Angelo : LCAP Evaluation debbidangelo@berkeley.net Judy Appel, BUSD Board President judyappel@berkeley.net Josh Daniels, BUSD Board Member joshdaniels@berkeley.net