Academic Program Assessment Form B: Assessment Plan (Three Year) Completed by: Patrick Blaine and Gail Ament, with Marty Knepper

Similar documents
Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Teachers Guide Chair Study

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

Handbook for Graduate Students in TESL and Applied Linguistics Programs

D direct? or I indirect?

NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

What does Quality Look Like?

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Kinesiology. Master of Science in Kinesiology. Doctor of Philosophy in Kinesiology. Admission Criteria. Admission Criteria.

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

Linguistics. Undergraduate. Departmental Honors. Graduate. Faculty. Linguistics 1

American Studies Ph.D. Timeline and Requirements

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

Focus Groups and Student Learning Assessment

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

I AKS Research Grant

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Assessment Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología

eportfolio Assessment of General Education

University of New Orleans

B.A. in Arts and Sciences Major: Global Studies Sample 4-Year Plan

MANAGEMENT, BS. Administration. Policies Academic Policies. Admissions & Policies. Termination from the Major. . University Consortium

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Steps for Thesis / Thematic Paper Process (Master s Degree Program)

GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.

STUDENT HANDBOOK. Center for International Studies Welcome to the NEW Department of International Studies & Modern Languages

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Department of Education School of Education & Human Services Master of Education Policy Manual

PH.D. IN COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM (POST M.S.)

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

GERMAN STUDIES (GRMN)

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Program Report for the Preparation of Journalism Teachers

Secondary English-Language Arts

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

MASTER OF ARTS IN APPLIED SOCIOLOGY. Thesis Option

Annual Report Accredited Member

Developing a Comprehensive Assessment Plan: Lessons Learned

A Diagnostic Tool for Taking your Program s Pulse

GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

PhD in Computer Science. Introduction. Dr. Roberto Rosas Romero Program Coordinator Phone: +52 (222) Ext:

MASTER OF LIBERAL STUDIES

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico

Senior Project Information

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM Introduction to Communication Spring 2010

Graduate Program in Education

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER

ENG 111 Achievement Requirements Fall Semester 2007 MWF 10:30-11: OLSC

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

European 2,767 ACTIVITY SUMMARY DUKE GLOBAL FACTS. European undergraduate students currently enrolled at Duke

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

THE M.A. DEGREE Revised 1994 Includes All Further Revisions Through May 2012

University of Exeter College of Humanities. Assessment Procedures 2010/11

UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION POSTGRADUATE STUDIES INFORMATION GUIDE

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

The term globalization is very popular nowadays >>>CLICK HERE<<<

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION. Administrative Officers. About the College. Mission. Highlights. Academic Programs. Sam Houston State University 1

RULES AND GUIDELINES BOARD OF EXAMINERS (under Article 7.12b, section 3 of the Higher Education Act (WHW))

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

Standard IV: Students

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

KIS MYP Humanities Research Journal

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

eportfolio for Your Professional Teaching Practice

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Department of Rural Sociology Graduate Student Handbook University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Bachelor of International Hospitality Management, BA IHM. Course curriculum National and Institutional Part

August 30, Dear Dean Clover:

University of Richmond Teacher Preparation Handbook

Bachelor of Arts in Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies

National Survey of Student Engagement

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

General syllabus for third-cycle courses and study programmes in

MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL

Georgetown University School of Continuing Studies Master of Professional Studies in Human Resources Management Course Syllabus Summer 2014

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

Transcription:

1 Academic Program Assessment Form B: Assessment Plan (Three Year) Academic Department: Academic Program: Department of English and Modern Languages Modern Languages Completed by: Patrick Blaine and Gail Ament, with Marty Knepper Date: June 15, 2015 NOTE: Spanish faculty members will set up the Task Stream DRF, and new majors and minors will learn how to use the system in SPAN 155, 201, 202, or 303, depending on where students start the Spanish sequence of courses. NOTE: Other assessment methods will be used, as information is available to us: for example, alumni surveys and employment data. A. Morningside Student Learning Outcomes M01. Morningside graduates demonstrate analytic, synthetic, creative, evaluative, and quantitative thinking. NOTE: An individual artifact may not demonstrate every critical thinking process indicated above but should demonstrate more than one of the thinking processes. Assessment Method: Direct a) What: Task Stream DRF b) To Whom: All students in Capstone Seminar (SPAN 423/424) c) When: During the course, all students will submit a designated assignment to the departmental DRF for review and assessment by Spanish faculty. d) How: The DRF includes an assignment from the Capstone Seminar that demonstrates this objective. This artifact will be reviewed by Spanish faculty, and the following rubric will be applied: Exceeds expectations: The artifact demonstrates that the student has Meets expectations: The artifact demonstrates that the student has

2 Partially meets expectations: The artifact demonstrates that the outcome to his/her Fails to meet expectations: The artifact demonstrates that the student in e) Expected Results: We expect that at least 70% of our students will meet or exceed expectations for this objective. following semester or during the summer (in the case of spring courses) by Spanish faculty for inclusion in the departmental assessment report. Results will be discussed at Spanish faculty meetings. g) Responsibilities: Students will be directed by the faculty member teaching the course to place the appropriate document in the departmental DRF. The department chair is responsible for making sure that results are written up in the annual departmental assessment report and initiating any changes faculty decide to make in response to the assessment. M02. Morningside graduates communicate effectively. NOTE: For this Morningside outcome, students are being assessed on their general writing and rhetorical skills, rather than on language skills, which are assessed within departmental outcomes. Students can achieve the writing endorsement through work in a second major. Our writing endorsement policy has been rewritten to reflect these policy changes. Assessment Method: Direct a) What: Task Stream DRF b) To Whom: All students of SPAN 303 and Capstone Seminar (423/424) c) When: During each course, the student is directed by the faculty member to submit designated research writing assignments (one from each class) to the departmental DRF. d) How: The DRF includes assignments from coursework that demonstrate this objective. These artifacts will be reviewed by Spanish faculty, and the following rubric will be applied: Exceeds expectation: The artifacts demonstrate that the student has

3 Partially meets expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the outcome to his/her Fails to meet expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the student in e) Expected Results: We expect that at least 70% of our students will meet or exceed expectations for this objective. f.) Link to Improvement: Results will be compiled and analyzed early in the following semester or during the summer (in the case of spring courses) by Spanish faculty for inclusion in the departmental assessment report. Results will be discussed in a Spanish faculty meeting. g.) Responsibilities: Students will be directed by the faculty members teaching the courses to place the appropriate documents in the departmental DRF. The department chair is responsible for making sure that results are written up in the annual departmental assessment report and initiating any changes the faculty decide to make as a result of the assessment. Writing Rubric: Research Writing Grading Rubric for the Writing Assignment IDEAS 15% Thoughtful, clear ideas Focused, original idea (thesis) Meets assignment Mature, thoughtful analysis DEVELOPMENT 35% Concrete descriptions Purposeful sentences Sufficient examples Relevant support Effective introduction/conclusion Addresses the issue Understands assignment ORGANIZATION 25% Clear thesis All points connect to thesis Clear transitions Focused throughout Writing is cohesive Writing is articulate

4 MECHANICS/STYLE/VOICE 25% Spelling, mechanics Direct, complete sentences Varied sentences Best diction (word choice) Appropriate tone MLA formatting Works Cited page TOTAL: COMMENTS: M03. Morningside graduates behave ethically and responsibly. Assessment Methodology a) What: Task Stream DRF b) To Whom: All students of SPAN 202 (service learning) and Capstone Seminar (SPAN 423/424) c) When: During the courses, the student will be directed by the faculty members to submit designated assignments (one from each class) to the departmental DRF. d) How: The DRF includes assignments from coursework that demonstrate the objective. These artifacts will be reviewed by faculty, and the following rubric will be applied: Exceeds expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the student has Partially meets expectation: The artifacts demonstrate that the outcome to his/her Fails to meet expectation: The artifacts demonstrate that the student in e) Expected Results: We expect that at least 70% of our students will meet or exceed expectations for this objective.

5 following semester or during the summer (in the case of spring courses) by Spanish faculty for inclusion in the departmental assessment report. Results will be shared with faculty and department chair and discussed at a faculty meeting. g) Responsibilities: Students will be directed by the faculty member teaching the courses to place the appropriate documents in the departmental DRF. The department chair is responsible for making sure that results are written up in the annual departmental assessment report and initiating any changes faculty decide to make in response to the assessment. B. Discipline-Specific Student Learning Outcomes DO1. Communicate orally and in writing in Spanish at the appropriate level according to the guidelines of ACTFL. Assessment Method #1: Direct a) What: Task Stream DRF: TalkAbroad and Final Exams/Papers b) To Whom: All students of SPAN 155, 202 (service learning), and Capstone c) When: During the courses, the student is directed by the faculty members to submit designated assignments to the departmental DRF. d) How: The DRF includes assignments from coursework that demonstrate this objective. These artifacts will be reviewed by faculty, and the following rubric will be applied: Exceeds expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the student has speaking and speaking and Partially meets expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the outcome to his/her speaking and Fails to meet expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the student in speaking and

6 e) Expected Results: We expect that at least 70% of our students will meet or exceed expectations for this objective. following semester or during the summer (in the case of spring courses) by Spanish faculty for inclusion in the departmental assessment report. Results will be shared with faculty and department chair and discussed at a faculty meeting. g) Responsibilities: Students will be directed by the faculty member teaching the courses to place the appropriate documents in the departmental DRF. The department chair is responsible for making sure that results are written up in the annual departmental assessment report and initiating any changes faculty decide to make in response to the assessment. DO2. Gain functional knowledge and understanding of Hispanic cultures. Assessment Method #1: Direct a) What: Task Stream DRF b) To Whom: All students of SPAN 202, 303, and Capstone c) When: During the courses, the student is directed by faculty members to submit designated assignments to the departmental DRF. d) How: The DRF includes assignments from coursework that demonstrate these objectives. These artifacts will be reviewed by faculty and the following rubric will be applied: Exceeds expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the student has Partially meets expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the outcome to his/her Fails to meet expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the student in

7 e) Expected results: We expect that at least 70% of our students will meet or exceed expectations for this objective. following semester or during the summer (in the case of spring courses) by Spanish faculty for inclusion in the departmental assessment report. Results will be shared with faculty and department chair and discussed at a faculty meeting. g) Responsibilities: Students will be directed by the faculty member teaching the courses to place the appropriate document in the departmental DRF. The department chair is responsible for making sure that results are written up in the annual departmental assessment report and initiating any changes faculty decide to make in response to the assessment. Assessment Method #2: Indirect a) What: Senior Exit Interviews b) To Whom: All graduating students with majors in Spanish and selected students with Spanish minors. c) When: Usually in spring semester of the final year of studies. For those students graduating in the fall, interviews will be conducted then. d) How: Senior exit interviews will be conducted from a set group of questions, while also allowing the conversation to develop organically. e) Expected Results: We expect that we will reach approximately 80%-90% of graduating majors and selected minors in a given year. f) Link to Improvement: Transcripts of the interviews will be posted on the Modern Languages faculty Moodle site. Spanish faculty will diagnose trends based on the information gleaned from the transcripts and will compile information for inclusion in the department chair s report. Possible changes in the program based on this information will be proposed and implemented. g) Responsibilities: The departmental chair is responsible for making sure that results are discussed at Spanish faculty meetings, written up in an annual departmental assessment report, and any changes are initiated. D03. Connect the language, cultural production, and literatures of Hispanic peoples to academic and personal experiences. Assessment Method #1: Direct a) What: Task Stream DRF Reflective Artifact b) To Whom: All students of SPAN 201, 303, and 350 c) When: During the course, the student is directed by the faculty member to submit relevant assignments to the departmental DRF. d) How: The DRF includes assignments from coursework that demonstrate these objectives. These artifacts will be reviewed by faculty and the following rubric will be applied:

8 Exceeds expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the student has Partially meets expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the outcome to his/her Fails to meet expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the student in e) Expected results: We expect that at least 70% of our students will meet or exceed expectations for this objective. following semester or during the summer (in the case of spring courses) by Spanish faculty for inclusion in the departmental assessment report. Results will be shared with faculty and department chair and discussed at a faculty meeting. g) Responsibilities: Students will be directed by the faculty member teaching the courses to place the appropriate documents in the departmental DRF. The department chair is responsible for making sure that results are written up in the annual departmental assessment report and initiating any changes faculty decide to make in response to the assessment. Assessment Method #2: Indirect a) What: Senior Exit Interviews b) To Whom: All graduating students with majors in Spanish and selected students with Spanish minors. c) When: Usually in spring semester of the final year of studies. For those students graduating in the fall, interviews will be conducted then. d) How: Senior exit interviews will be conducted from a set group of questions, while also allowing the conversation to develop organically. e) Expected Results: We expect that we will reach approximately 80%-90% of graduating majors and selected minors in a given year. f) Link to Improvement: Transcripts of the interviews will be posted on the Modern Languages faculty Moodle site. Spanish faculty will diagnose trends based on the information gleaned from the transcripts and will compile information for inclusion

9 in the department chair s report. Possible changes in the program based on this information will be proposed and implemented. g) Responsibilities: The departmental chair is responsible for making sure that results are discussed at Spanish faculty meetings, written up in an annual departmental assessment report, and any changes are initiated. DO4. Participate in Spanish-speaking communities at home and around the world. Assessment Method #1: Direct a) What: Task Stream DRF Reflective Artifact b) To Whom: All students of SPAN 155, 202 c) When: During the course, the student is directed by the faculty member to submit reflective assignments to the departmental DRF. d) How: The DRF includes reflective assignments from coursework that demonstrate these objectives. These artifacts will be reviewed by faculty and the following rubric will be applied: Exceeds expectations: The artifacts demonstrate that the student has Partially meets expectation: The artifacts demonstrate that the outcome to his/her Fails to meet expectations: The artifacts demonstrates that the student has failed to grasp the objective, displaying little to no evidence of skill in applying the key points and principles of the outcome to his/her e) Expected results: We expect that at least 70% of our students will meet or exceed expectations for this objective. following semester or during the summer (in the case of spring courses) by Spanish faculty for inclusion in the departmental assessment report. Results will be shared with faculty and department chair and discussed at a faculty meeting.

10 g) Responsibilities: Students will be directed by the faculty member teaching the courses to place the appropriate documents in the departmental DRF. The department chair is responsible for making sure that results are written up in the annual departmental assessment report and initiating any changes faculty decide to make in response to the assessment. Assessment Method #2: Indirect a) What: Senior Exit Interviews b) To Whom: All graduating students with majors in Spanish and selected students with Spanish minors. c) When: Usually in spring semester of the final year of studies. For those students graduating in the fall, interviews will be conducted then. d) How: Senior exit interviews will be conducted from a set group of questions, while also allowing the conversation to develop organically. e) Expected Results: We expect that we will reach approximately 80%-90% of graduating majors and selected minors in a given year. f) Link to Improvement: Transcripts of the interviews will be posted on the Modern Languages faculty Moodle site. Spanish faculty will diagnose trends based on the information gleaned from the transcripts and will compile information for inclusion in the department chair s report. Possible changes in the program based on this information will be proposed and implemented. g) Responsibilities: The departmental chair is responsible for making sure that results are discussed at Spanish faculty meetings, written up in an annual departmental assessment report, and any changes are initiated. Appendix: Senior Exit Interview Questions Last Updated 4/13/15 Outcomes Related: 1. How do you think your time with the program has affected your understanding of Hispanic cultures? Do you feel that it has been deepened? If so, how? (DO2) 2. What connections do you see between your academic and personal experiences to your understanding of Hispanic language, culture, and literature? (DO3) 3. In what ways have you participated in Spanish-speaking communities at home and around the world? (DO4) General: 4. Did you study Spanish before coming to Morningside? How long? Where? 5. Did you grow up in or have close contact to a Spanish-speaking environment before Morningside? 6. Have you studied abroad? If so, where, and what was the experience like? 7. What groups have you been involved with on campus? How have you been involved? 8. Did you take part in Spanish Club activities? If so, what was your experience? 9. If we had a more basic course (101/102) would you have wanted to start there? 10. How can we get first-year students more involved in the program? 11. What things could we do to stay in touch with students over spring semesters when there are no upper-level classes offered?