THE EFFECT OF NOTE TAKING ON LISTENING COMPREHENSION OF THE THIRD SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT AT IAIN PALANGKA RAYA THESIS BY NORMISLONA AMALIA NIM 1201120797 STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF PALANGKA RAYA FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION 2017 M / 1439 H i
THE EFFECT OF NOTE TAKING ON LISTENING COMPREHENSION OF THE THIRD SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT AT IAIN PALANGKA RAYA THESIS Presented to State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Sarjana in English Language Education BY NORMISLONA AMALIA NIM 1201120797 STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF PALANGKA RAYA FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION 2017 M / 1439 H ii
iii
iv
v
MOTTO AND DEDICATION Allah doesn t change the state of a clan, so they change the circumstances that exist on their own. (Qs. Ar Ra d: 11) This thesis is dedicated to: My beloved Father Mr. Syamsudin, SE and Mother Mrs. Suteraningsih for their valuable endless prayer sacrifice and support. My beloved brother Maulana Al Akmal. My senior Andrean and my beloved friends for their support. vi
ABSTRACT Amalia, Normislona. 2017. The Effect of Note Taking on Listening Comprehension of The Third Semester Students of English Department at IAIN Palangka Raya. Thesis, Department of Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya. Advisor (I) M. Zaini Miftah, M. Pd., (II) Aris Sugianto, M.Pd. Keywords: Effect, Teaching, Listening Comprehension, Note Taking. The main purpose of the study was to find out whether the students whom taught using Note Taking gain better scores than the students whom taught without Note Taking at third semester students in Interpretive Listening class at IAIN Palangka Raya. The type of this study was quasi-experimental, and the writer used quantitative approach in finding out to answer of the problem, the data collecting techniques used test and documentation. There were two classes of study namely B class as experimental group and C class as control group with the total number students which B class 25 students and C class 25 students. The sample of study was determined using cluster sampling technique. Both groups were given pretest before treatment. Then, the students of experiment group were taught by using Note Taking and control group was taught without using Note Taking. Finally, the writer gave posttest to both groups. The normality of the test was pretest and posttest of the experiment group in Kolmogorov-Smirnov was higher than level of significance Alpha used or r = 0.830> 0.05 (pretest) and r = 0.356 > 0.05 (posttest) and the normality of the test was pretest and posttest of control group in Kolmogorov-Smirnov was higher than level of significance Alpha used or r = 0.393> 0.05 (pretest) and r = 0.349 > 0.05 (posttest) so the distribution are normal. The homogeneity from pretest of experiment group and pretest of control group on homogeneity of variances in sig column is known that p-value was 0.351. The data in this study fulfilled homogeneity since the p value is higher 0.351> 0.05. The homogeneity from posttest of experiment group and posttest of control group on homogeneity of variances in sig column is known that p-value was 0.372. The data in this study fulfilled homogeneity since the p value is higher 0.372 > 0.05. In the result of hypothesis was using calculation of T-test with SPSS 18.0 The result of t-test which calculated by using SPSS 18.0 found the value of (t observed ) was greater than (t table ) at 1% and 5% significance level or 2.01>3.37>2.68. it was interpreted that alternative hypothesis (Ha) stated that students who were taught listening comprehension using Note Taking gain better scores than the students who were taught without using Note Taking was accepted and null hypothesis (Ho), students who were taught listening comprehension using Note Taking did not gain better scores than the students who were taught listening comprehension without using Note Taking was rejected. It meant that using Note Taking in teaching listening comprehension gives effect on the students listening comprehension at the third semester students of IAIN Palangka Raya. vii
ABSTRAK Amalia, Normislona. 2017. Pengaruh dari Note Taking Terhadap Pemahaman Mendengarkan Siswa Semester III Jurusan Bahasa Inggris di IAIN Palangka Raya. Skripsi, Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya. Pembimbing: (I) M. Zaini Miftah, M.Pd., (II) Aris Sugianto, M.Pd. Kata kunci: Pengaruh, Pengajaran, Kemampuan Mendengarkan, Note Taking. Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah siswa yang diajar menggunakan Note Taking mendapatkan nilai yang lebih baik daripada siswa yang diajar tanpa Note Taking pada siswa semester tiga kelas Interpreting Listening di IAIN Palangka Raya. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kuasi eksperimental, dan penulis menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif untuk mengetahui jawaban masalah, teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes dan dokumentasi. Ada dua kelas studi yaitu kelas B sebagai kelompok eksperimen dan kelas C sebagai kelompok kontrol dengan jumlah siswa kelas B kelas 25 dan kelas C 25 siswa. Sampel penelitian ditentukan dengan teknik cluster sampling. Kedua kelompok diberi pretest sebelum treatment. Kemudian, siswa kelompok eksperimen diajar dengan menggunakan Note Taking dan kelompok kontrol diajarkan tanpa menggunakan Note Taking. Akhirnya, penulis memberikan posttest kepada kedua kelompok. Normalitas tes dari pretest dan posttest kelompok eksperimen di Kolmogorov-Smirnov lebih tinggi dari pada tingkat signifikansi Alpha yang digunakan atau r = 0,830> 0,05 (pretest) dan r = 0,356> 0,05 (posttest) dan normalitas tes dari pretest dan posttest kelompok kontrol di Kolmogorov-Smirnov lebih tinggi dari pada tingkat signifikansi Alpha yang digunakan atau r = 0,393> 0,05 (pretest) dan r = 0,349> 0,05 (posttest) sehingga distribusinya normal. Homogenitas dari pretest kelompok eksperimen dan pretest kelompok kontrol pada homogenitas varians pada kolom sig diketahui bahwa nilai p adalah 0,351. Data dalam penelitian ini memenuhi homogenitas karena nilai p lebih tinggi 0,351> 0,05. Homogenitas dari posttest kelompok eksperimen dan posttest kelompok kontrol pada homogenitas varians pada kolom sig diketahui bahwa nilai p adalah 0,372. Data dalam penelitian ini memenuhi homogenitas karena nilai p lebih tinggi 0,372> 0,05. Hasil hipotesis menggunakan perhitungan T-test dengan SPSS 18.0 Hasil uji t yang dihitung dengan menggunakan SPSS 18.0 menemukan nilai (tobserved) lebih besar dari (ttabel) pada tingkat signifikansi 1% dan 5% atau 2,01. > 3,37> 2,68. Diinterpretasikan bahwa hipotesis alternatif (Ha) menyatakan bahwa siswa mengajarkan pemahaman mendengar dengan menggunakan Note Taking mendapatkan nilai yang lebih baik daripada siswa yang diajar tanpa menggunakan Note Taking diterima dan hipotesis nol (Ho), siswa yang mengajarkan pemahaman mendengar menggunakan Note Taking tidak mendapatkan nilai yang lebih baik daripada siswa yang mengajarkan pemahaman mendengar tanpa menggunakan Note Taking ditolak. Artinya, menggunakan Note Taking dalam viii
mengajarkan pemahaman mendengar memberi efek pada pemahaman mendengarkan siswa pada siswa semester III IAIN Palangka Raya. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer would like to express his sincere gratitude to Allah SWT., for the blessing bestowed in his whole life particularly during the thesis writing without which this thesis would not have come to its final form. Sholawat and salam always be bestowed to the last prophet Muhammad SAW., having shown us the role of life to make our life true. Her appreciation is addressed to: 1. Dr. Ibnu Elmi A.S. Pelu, S.H., M.H., as the Director of IAIN Palangka Raya for his direction and permission of conducting this thesis; 2. Dean of Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of the State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya, Drs. Fahmi, M.Pd., for his invaluable assistance both in academic and administrative matters. 3. Vice Dean in Academic Affairs, Dra. Hj. Raudhatul Jennah, M.Pd., for her invaluable assistance both in academic and administrative matters. 4. Chair of Department of Language Education, Santi Erliana, M.Pd., for her invaluable assistance both in academic and administrative matters. 5. Secretary of Department of Language Education, M. Zaini Miftah, M.Pd., for his invaluable assistance both in academic and administrative matters. 6. Thesis advisors, M. Zaini Miftah,M. Pd. and Aris Sugianto, M.Pd., for their generous advice, valuable guidance and elaborated correction during their busy time to the completion of her thesis. ix
7. Hesty Widiastuty, M. Pd and Novanie Sulastri, M. Pd the lecturer of Interpretive Listening Class at IAIN Palangka Raya, for the time and opportunity that has been given during the accomplishment of this thesis. 8. Both the members of the board of examiners, for their corrections, comments and suggestions which are profitable to the accomplishing of this thesis. 9. All lecturers of Study Program of English Education from whom she got indepth knowledge of English and English teaching. 10. Her beloved parents, Mr. Syamsudin, SE and Mrs. Suteraningsih, for their moral support and endless prayer so that she is able to finish her study. May Allah SWT bless them all. Amin. Palangka Raya, November, 2017 The writer, Normislona Amalia NIM. 1201120797 x
TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER... COVER (second page)... ADVISOR APPROAL... THESIS APPROAL... MOTTO AND DEDICATION... DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP... ABSTRACT... ABSTRACT (Indonesian)... viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... TABLE OF CONTENTS... LIST OF TABLES... xiv LIST OF FIGURES... xvii LIST OF APPENDICES... xviii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS... xix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study... 1 B. Problem of the Study... 7 C. Objective of the Study... 7 D. Hypotheses of the Study... 8 E. Variable of the Study... 8 F. Scope and Limitation... 8 G. Significance of the Study... 9 H. Definition of Key Terms... 10 i ii iii iv v vi vii ix xi CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE A. Related studies... 12 B. Listening... 16 1. Nature of Listening... 16 2. Kinds of Listening... 19 3. Teaching Listening Model... 20 4. Listening Problem... 22 xi
5. Teacher s Solutions to Solve the Problem... 25 a. The Massage... 25 b. The Speakers... 26 c. Physical Setting... 26 d. The Listener... 27 C. Note Taking Strategy... 28 1. Definition of Note Taking... 28 2. The Effects of Note Taking... 29 3. Teaching using Note taking... 29 4. Procedure of Guide Note Taking Method... 31 5. Procedure of Teaching Listening Through Note Taking Strategy... 31 6. The Functions and Benefit of Note Taking... 32 a. The Functions of Note Taking... 32 b. Benefit of Note Taking... 34 c. Solution to Common Problem in Taking... 36 7. Symbols of Note Taking... 37 CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD A. Research Method... 40 1. Research Type... 40 2. Research Design... 40 3. Approach... 43 B. B. Population and Sample... 43 1. Population of the Study... 43 2. Sample of the Study... 44 C. Instrument of the Study... 45 1. Research Instrument... 45 a. Test Type... 45 b. Documentation... 46 2. Instrument Try Out... 46 D. Research Instrument Validity... 47 D. E. Research Instrument Reliability... 50 F. Data Collection Procedure... 52 G. Data Analysis Procedure... 52 CHAPTER IV DATA FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION A. The presentation of data... 57 1. Distribution of pretest score of experiment group... 57 2. Distribution of pretest score of control group... 66 xii
CHAPTER V CLOSING REFERENCES APPENDICES 3. Distribution of posttest score of experiment group.. 74 4. Distribution of posttest score of control group... 82 B. Testing Normality and Homogeneity... 90 1. Testing Normality... 91 2. Testing Homogeneity... 93 C. Testing Hypothesis using t-test... 95 D. Testing hypothesis using SPSS Program... 99 E. Interpretation... 101 F. Discussion... 102 A. Conclusion... 105 B. Suggestion... 106 xiii