PARIS COMMUNIQUÉ DRAFT 2.0

Similar documents
European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

The Bologna Process: actions taken and lessons learnt

The recognition, evaluation and accreditation of European Postgraduate Programmes.

Interview on Quality Education

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

General report Student Participation in Higher Education Governance

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Conventions. Declarations. Communicates

Emma Kushtina ODL organisation system analysis. Szczecin University of Technology

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

NATIONAL REPORTS

The European Higher Education Area in 2012:

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying document to the

Ten years after the Bologna: Not Bologna has failed, but Berlin and Munich!

BOLOGNA DECLARATION ACHIEVED LEVEL OF IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE ACTIVITY PLAN

Setting the Scene: ECVET and ECTS the two transfer (and accumulation) systems for education and training

EUA Quality Culture: Implementing Bologna Reforms

The Referencing of the Irish National Framework of Qualifications to EQF

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

National and Regional performance and accountability: State of the Nation/Region Program Costa Rica.

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY CONTACTS: ADDRESS. Full Professor Saša Boţić, Ph.D. HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT. Assistant Professor Karin Doolan, Ph.D.

Accreditation in Europe. Zürcher Fachhochschule

Master s Programme in European Studies

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

3 of Policy. Linking your Erasmus+ Schools project to national and European Policy

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

WHAT IS AEGEE? AEGEE-EUROPE PRESENTATION EUROPEAN STUDENTS FORUM

2 di 7 29/06/

EUA Annual Conference Bergen. University Autonomy in Europe NOVA University within the context of Portugal

HEPCLIL (Higher Education Perspectives on Content and Language Integrated Learning). Vic, 2014.

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

Bologna Process in Ukraine: The Decade Anniversary Sofiya Nikolaeva

Fostering learning mobility in Europe

The European Consensus on Development: the contribution of Development Education & Awareness Raising

QUALITY ASSURANCE AS THE DRIVER OF INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN UKRAINE Olena Yu. Krasovska 1,a*

SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS

LOOKING FOR (RE)DEFINING UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY

Baku Regional Seminar in a nutshell

The development of ECVET in Europe

What is the added value of a Qualifications Framework? The experience of Malta.

An Introduction to LEAP

Call for Volunteers. Short-term EVS. Volunteering for Acceptance and Diversity. About CID

Knowledge Sharing Workshop, Tiel The Netherlands, 20 September 2016

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION POSTGRADUATE STUDIES INFORMATION GUIDE

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Self-certification of the NQFs of the Netherlands and Flanders Mark Frederiks

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Harnessing the power and potential of adult learning and education for a viable future

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

IMPLEMENTATION OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING 2010 WORK PROGRAMME

Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosova - Republic of Kosovo Qeveria Vlada Government

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Name of the PhD Program: Urbanism. Academic degree granted/qualification: PhD in Urbanism. Program supervisors: Joseph Salukvadze - Professor

Curriculum for the Academy Profession Degree Programme in Energy Technology

Student Experience Strategy

and The Maria Grzegorzewska Academy of Special Education (Maria Grzegorzewska University in

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Team Work in International Programs: Why is it so difficult?

Programme Specification

Summary and policy recommendations

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Douglas Proctor, University College Dublin Markus Laitinen, University of Helsinki & EAIE Christopher Johnstone, University of Minnesota

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

Texas Woman s University Libraries

Semester: One. Study Hours: 44 contact/130 independent BSU Credits: 20 ECTS: 10

Academic profession in Europe

UPPER SECONDARY CURRICULUM OPTIONS AND LABOR MARKET PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM A GRADUATES SURVEY IN GREECE

The development and implementation of a coaching model for project-based learning

LEARNING AGREEMENT FOR STUDIES

NA/2006/17 Annexe-1 Lifelong Learning Programme for Community Action in the Field of Lifelong Learning (Lifelong Learning Programme LLP)

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

GENERAL INFORMATION STUDIES DEGREE PROGRAMME PERIOD OF EXECUTION SCOPE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE OF STUDY CODE DEGREE

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

EQF Pro 1 st Partner Meeting Lille, 28 March 2008, 9:30 16:30.

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Department of Sociology and Social Research

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

Implementing Pilot Early Grade Reading Program in Morocco

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Impact of Educational Reforms to International Cooperation CASE: Finland

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SLAM

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Dr Padraig Walsh. Presentation to CHEA International Seminar, Washington DC, 26 January 2012

Transcription:

1 Last modified 22/12/2017 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 PARIS COMMUNIQUÉ DRAFT 2.0 Please note that titles and sub-titles are tentative and will be changed Preamble/Introduction We, Ministers, meeting in Paris on 24 and 25 May 2018, 20 years after the Sorbonne declaration, are proud to recognize that the vision which inspired our predecessors has given rise to the European Higher education area (EHEA) where 48 countries with different political, cultural and academic backgrounds cooperate on the basis of open dialogue shared goals and common commitments. The Bologna Process has allowed to set the basis for dialogue and convergence among our higher education systems. Through our cooperation, which has become a point of reference for other regions of the world, we have paved the way for student mobility, comparability and transparency of different national higher education systems and increased quality and competitiveness for European higher education. Since the Sorbonne and the Bologna Declarations, the society has changed in many regards and the fundamental values of higher education are challenged in Europe and beyond. Welfare is unevenly distributed, and unemployment, especially among the young, is high in many countries; intolerance, populism, polarization and radicalization have increased It is thus essential that we renew our vision for the EHEA and agree on new goals to consolidate the EHEA structure and to strengthen further developments. I. Roles and Objectives of Higher Education Higher education provides opportunities for individual development throughout life and improves for the prospect of employment, and thereby active participation in society. It has a key role to play in furthering intercultural understanding, civic engagement, ethical awareness, tolerance and respect of others in an inclusive society. Higher education should therefore be equally accessible to all, irrespective of social, economic or cultural background. We want higher education to promote effective and active citizenship in a multicultural and inclusive society. Facing the challenges that society and democracy have to encounter today, the fundamental values linked to academic freedom, institutional autonomy and participation of staff and students in higher education governance are of outmost importance for EHEA development together with the implementation of the Bologna process principles in our 48 different national contexts. Academic integrity, social responsibility, transparency, commitment to democracy, human rights and the rule of law, are also essential to fostering high quality education and research.

46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 We stress the importance of inclusiveness of higher education and reaffirm our commitment to the fundamental values of the EHEA as well as to the responsibility of public authorities in ensuring that they are a living reality. Furthermore, we recognize the role and responsibility of higher education institutions and we encourage them to engage in critical self-analysis and strategic value development. At the same time, societal changes require that we explore new aspects of the fundamental values, which go well beyond the legal relationship between public authorities and the academic community. We will ensure that policy measures are compatible with and further the fundamental values of the EHEA, together with encouraging the contribution of higher education institutions to society and we encourage them to continuously improve their system of governance. II. Challenges of the EHEA Implementation The success of the Bologna Process depends on the full commitment to its implementation by all parties: it relies on national policy makers, institutions, staff, students and other stakeholders to make the EHEA a reality. The functioning credibility and development of the EHEA depends on successful implementation of our agreed goals. Progresses have been made but implementation and completion of the reforms varies among the 48 countries. We reaffirm our commitment to paying attention to the remaining issues identified in the Bologna Process Implementation Report. In accordance to the Yerevan Communiqué, the Bologna Follow-up Group identified three key commitments to reinforce and support the quality and exchanges inside the EHEA (i) a threecycle system compatible with the Qualification framework of the EHEA and scaled by ECTS; (ii) the compliance of recognition practices with the Lisbon Recognition Convention; and (iii) a quality assurance system in conformity with European Standards and Guidelines. We will strengthen our efforts in implementing in all our national systems all the commitments in order to make the EHEA effective and attractive. To improve the implementation of the three key commitments, we adopt [waiting for joint peer support approach from AG3-WG2-in collaboration with WG1] We recognize that the implementation of our common commitments is complex, and acknowledge that the task might be difficult for some topics and for some members. We underline the role and responsibility of higher education institutions to reach these goals. On the basis of the conclusions of the report and the recommendations of the BFUG on the Belarus roadmap since this country joined the EHEA in 2015, we undertake to [waiting for recommendations and debates from AG2] Implementation is only measured at national level so far and we now need to move beyond and take into account the reality of cross-border exchanges in education, teaching and research. Learning and teaching We, Ministers, are determined to support the development of new teaching methods and modern approaches to teaching and learning and teaching enhancement and to support 22_12_2017 2/5

99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 including integration of the digital transformation in order to enhance digital competences of students and staff. We will ensure the new digital technologies help tackle inequality in the access to higher education and build a more inclusive learning and teaching community by ensuring integration of social and diverse student population and integration of academic practitioners in the design and implementation of new pedagogical initiatives. We promote a more flexible access to higher education that takes into account the rapid changes in our societies and in employment landscape throughout lifelong learning development and support the idea of short cycles as part of higher education and as part of a flexible study path. We will promote recognition of prior learning as it can both help individuals in acquiring new qualifications and migrants in getting their skills recognized at international level and national level in their new country. We will promote further the principles set by the Lisbon Recognition Convention, in particular for refugees and persons in a refugee-like situation. We support that it is necessary to develop joint or transnational programs and stress interoperability between the EHEA higher education systems in order to foster mobility of students and staff, as these are key pillars of the Bologna process, increase collaboration in teaching and research, developing high quality research and maintaining high level of didactical competences and skills. International cooperation in the field of higher education, including promotion of mobility Increasing pace and complexity of internationalization has impacted specifically on higher education which as a whole has opened up to the world in recent years combined to the digital and media transformation and with the issues raised by migration in several regions. As a space of dialogue and co-construction the EHEA which encompasses a very wide geographical area is contributing to the geopolitical interactions between the concerned countries and should keep contributing positively at a time when one can observe backlash against globalization (or internationalization) in parts of the world, combined with changing geopolitical relations, and this spells uncertainty for the global knowledge economy of the future. Although there is still work to be done across the EHEA on reaching inter-operability in many areas to sustain student mobility, the model of dialogue and convergence between national systems fostered by EHEA based on voluntary mutual adjustment among members is still a appealing one. We support the idea of an EHEA forum in order to enter into dialogue with other international fora in order to develop international staff and students exchanges, foster joint programs and research programs and enhance multicultural understanding and inclusiveness. We want the EHEA to develop an innovative vision in order to foster a sustainable international dialogue in our changing and connected societies as other internationalization initiatives or strategies might be evolving around the globe. We recommend the EHEA to develop a more thorough approach of international cooperation based on closer and elaborate contacts - such as thematic workshops - with other regional, or 22_12_2017 3/5

152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 international higher education organizations and establish a dialogue with key international stakeholders. III. New goals (next period) and perspectives for the future EHEA beyond 2020 Higher education and active citizenship We encourage the higher education institutions to rethink their strategies and activities to respond to the complexities and diversities of society. Joint programs and mobility should be developed as a way to participate to a better understanding of each other and as participating to the construction of a shared European culture. We therefore renew and strengthen our commitment to the fundamental values and core principles of the EHEA by recognizing the importance of the civic and social role of higher education, and the importance of the free and informed pursuit of knowledge and freedom of thought and expression which are at the heart of democratic culture and societies. Good quality teaching rests on good research; the principle that all higher education should be research-based, should be reinforced and we reaffirm that the initiation of undergraduates into research is necessary. Teaching, learning and research are all three necessary key elements in the development of critical and creative thought. We encourage HEIs to ensure that synergies between teaching, learning and research should be considered in a more systematic way and therefore we encourage more and further interaction between the EHEA and the European Research Area Renewed vision of the EHEA We call for a concerted reflection and action on the perspective of European universities. We will promote cooperation between higher education institutions at international and regional levels in order to contribute to growth, creativity and societal development. We will work on creating truly European higher education institutions tackling ambitious goals concerning the mobility of students and will support multilingualism across the EHEA. We strongly call for reflection from the BFUG on the issues of the EHEA visibility and collaboration with other stakeholders and a wider audience at the international level. A renewed Bologna Process needs to affirm its values and visibility. We mandate the BFUG to engage in a reflection upon its governance, the process and its structure as well as to identify effective solutions to the period after 2020. The future of the Process after 2020 We call on the Bologna Follow-up Group to present to us at our next Ministerial Conference in 2020 in Italy, a proposal on how to take the EHEA further beyond 2020, in particular with a new governance and revised working modes with a view of improving effectiveness and ownership by including higher education institutions and stakeholders to a larger extent. Annexes: tbd 22_12_2017 4/5

205 206 207 208 Revised Diploma Supplement 22_12_2017 5/5