Frazier International Magnet School Chicago Public Schools. Assessment Policy

Similar documents
EQuIP Review Feedback

What does Quality Look Like?

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

NC Global-Ready Schools

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Honors Mathematics. Introduction and Definition of Honors Mathematics

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Presentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland.

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

AIS KUWAIT. School Improvement Plan (SIP)

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Student Packets and Teacher Guide. Grades 6, 7, 8

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE AT IVANHOE GRAMMAR SCHOOL. An Introduction to the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme For Students and Families

A Survey of Authentic Assessment in the Teaching of Social Sciences

1st Grade Rubrics About Produce Quality Work

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Sample Performance Assessment

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

World s Best Workforce Plan

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

Standards-Based Bulletin Boards. Tuesday, January 17, 2012 Principals Meeting

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

Why OUT-OF-LEVEL Testing? 2017 CTY Johns Hopkins University

Assessment and Evaluation

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Humanitas A. San Fernando High School. Smaller Learning Community Plan. Azucena Hernandez, Redesign Team. Bob Stromoski, Redesign Team

Requirements for the Degree: Bachelor of Science in Education in Early Childhood Special Education (P-5)

School Leadership Rubrics

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

MYP personal project guide 2011 overview of objectives

Generic Project Rubrics 4th Grade

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Challenging Texts: Foundational Skills: Comprehension: Vocabulary: Writing: Disciplinary Literacy:

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document.

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Institutional Program Evaluation Plan Training

TEACH 3: Engage Students at All Levels in Rigorous Work

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

ESL Curriculum and Assessment

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Writing a Basic Assessment Report. CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Poll. How do you feel when someone says assessment? How do your students feel?

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Department of Education School of Education & Human Services Master of Education Policy Manual

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

Scoring Notes for Secondary Social Studies CBAs (Grades 6 12)

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

Lesson Plan. Preliminary Planning

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

Mastering Biology Test Answers

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Transcription:

Frazier International Magnet School Chicago Public Schools Assessment Policy

Table of Contents I. Assessment Overview II. Assessment Philosophy III. Purpose of Assessment IV. Assessment Practices I. Assessment Overview MYP assessment is internal, as opposed to external. All Chicago Public Schools (CPDS) are expected to structure both curriculum and assessment procedures according to the 2

needs of their students and their local context. At Frazier International Magnet School the purpose is to establish an accepted and routinely used school-wide protocol for assessment, and to ensure the school s curriculum provides a rigorous education for the students. Formative assessment must be the key feature of all teaching and learning in the MYP. Assessment must be planned in the first stage of creating MYP units of work and used throughout. Assessments must take place frequently in order to extend student learning. Each teacher will determine how often they will assess students using the MYP criterion in each subject area. Summative assessment aims to give teachers and students a clear insight into students understanding. Summative assessment is the culmination of the teaching and learning process, and gives the students opportunities to demonstrate what has been learned as a result of unit of inquiries across the eight subjects of the Middle Years Programme. The assessment criteria used is drawn from the assessment criterion from IB. Summative assessment can assess several elements simultaneously: it informs and improves student learning and the teaching process; it measures understanding of the central idea, and prompts students towards action. The aim of assessment in the MYP is to: Promote positive student attitudes towards learning in the MYP Promote a deep understanding of subject content/using the areas of interaction in the MYP Promote the development of higher-order cognitive skills by providing rigorous objectives that value these skills in the MYP Reflect the international-mindedness of the programme by allowing assessments to be set in a variety of cultural and linguistic contexts in MYP Support the holistic nature of the programme by including in its model principles that take account of the development of the whole student in the MYP Support and encourage student learning in the MYP Inform, enhance and improve the teaching process in the MYP To provide Frazier educators a commonly agreed upon protocol for: Gathering and interpreting data Improving instructional practices Evaluating instructional practices that reflect student inquiry Understanding our community of learners Reporting data to students, parents, and other community stakeholders Recording data in a way that is easily accessible to all stakeholders Assessing the process of inquiry as well as the products of inquiry II. Assessment Philosophy Frazier International Magnet School s IB World School Candidate Middle Years Programme is dedicated to providing each student with a balanced programme by which 3

students can acquire knowledge and skills necessary to prepare them for the future. Students are given the opportunity to develop higher-order thinking skills, through various disciplines, and to increase their depth of local and global issues. Our teachers support and believe foremost that the purpose of assessment is to support and encourage student learning. Our assessment practices endorse teacher and student reflection. Frazier is committed to communicating the student learning process to each IB parent. Our curriculum supports the MYP philosophy of curriculum and assessment alignment. Frazier International Magnet School values knowledge, experiences, action, and growth. Some students come to us with a large body of prior knowledge while others need additional supports to move forward in a unit of inquiry. Assessment is key to determining what our students already know (knowledge), what their prior knowledge is (prior experience), and how much they have grown. Action is measured via student selfassessment. While we must ensure that assessments measure the five essential elements of learning (the understanding of concepts, the acquisition of knowledge, the mastering of skills, the development of attitudes, the decision to take responsible action), it is equally important to ensure that, when possible, students should be given choice in the way they demonstrate their proficiency in a particular strand. Student assessments should also be authentic when practical. Worksheets should be minimized while authentic work that involves students engaging in real-life situations should be maximized. III. Purpose of Assessment Assessments should promote student growth through new experiences leading to new knowledge. The purpose of assessment is to both determine areas for potential growth and areas of strength, as well as, advise students, parents, teachers, schools, and districts how to better support students for continued knowledge building. Who is responsible for assessment and how? Administrators, Teachers, and Students are responsible for assessment. Administrator s Responsibility at Frazier: To provide an environment conducive to learning To provide a platform for the review and analysis of assessments To monitor the development of rigorous standards To monitor the support of diverse learners within the programme To provide opportunities that will deepen student understanding Teacher s Responsibility at Frazier To provide information about student learning To collect evidence of the student s understanding and thinking To document the inquiry and learning processes of the students To engage students in reflection Develop relevant standards based assessment Provide in and out of school learning opportunities to support achievement on summative assessments To develop clear rubrics that may consist of student input, especially in the case of the community service projects. 4

To keep records of test and/or task results using the CPS IMPACT grading system, NWEA, IB report cards, student portfolios, and the identification of exemplar student work. To provide rigorous opportunities for higher order thinking skills to be developed and to extend students knowledge and understanding To provide timely authentic feedback on assessments and the students process of learning to all stakeholders Student Responsibility at Frazier: To provide input, when necessary, in the development of clear rubrics for tasks To self- and peer-assess work developed by themselves and others using rubrics To utilize rubrics throughout the inquiry process To share their inquiries and understanding with others To participate in the reflection process To use the inquiry process throughout their learning To be able to analyze their own learning and understandings To immerse themselves in a rigorous education experience in order to extend their knowledge and understanding, and to develop their skills and attitudes. Why do we assess? To provide formative assessment as a tool aimed to identify the learning needs of the students To provide summative assessment as an accountability tool regarding student achievement in each subject mater To provide accountability in teaching To evaluate both student performance and efficacy of the program To guide pacing and mapping of content/skills To provide student performance data as mandated by local, state, and IBmandated criteria To inform the stakeholders To show mastery of content, skills, and standards To remediate the content, skills, and standards as necessary To monitor the learning trends of students To show growth and trends 5

What do we assess? Assessment Strategies and Tasks (May include, but are not limited to the following lists) Strategies and Tasks Examinations Questionnaires Investigations Research Performances Presentations verbal (oral or written), graphic through various media Observations Open-ended tasks Process Journals Portfolios Creation of models Essays FORMATIVE Exit Slips Observations Journaling Reflections Quizzes Written responses Observations Discussions Homework Classwork Graphic Organizers Progress Monitoring Math Talks SUMMATIVE Unit of Inquiry Summative Assessments Performance Assessments Projects Tests NWEA End of Unit Assessments Persuasive Essays Argumentative Essays Informative Posters/Bulleting Documentation Portfolios: Purpose: The portfolio is a way to track growth for both the teacher and the student. The portfolio should provide data to all stakeholders on student progress. What is included: o Student Work: At least 4 pieces per unit. 1 Unit/planner summative assessment with student reflections, rubrics, and in the case of MYP, criterion referenced levels of achievement will be collected per unit/planner. Format: The portfolio will first be created when the student arrives at Frazier. Portfolios will be kept in folders/binders, in the classroom. At the end of every unit 1 high, 2 mediums, and 1 low summative assessment, with reflections and rubrics will be collected, which can then be used for MYP monitoring once Frazier becomes an authorized IB World School. 6

Accessibility: The portfolios will be clearly labeled and kept in a location that is easily accessible to all stakeholders: teachers, students, and parents, administration, and staff members. How should assessment information be analyzed and reported? Reporting: Assessment tools will be determined by the grade level or classroom teacher, but may include: Rubrics with task specific clarifications Exemplars Checklists Anecdotal Records Process Journals (specific to MYP Arts, MYP Design, MYP Level 3 Community Project) Student input should be used whenever possible during the creation of expectations and assessment formats. MYP Specific Rubrics o Year 1 Objectives will be assessed during Year 1 and the Fall of Year 2 o Year 3 Objectives will be assessed during the Spring of Year 2 and Year 3 o Each objective and criteria will be assessed twice in a school year in each subject. o Teachers will create task specific Rubrics for each unit, that will also become the reports to students and parents using a standardized format. How will assessment information be reported to students and parents? Students will receive regular updates (at the teacher discretion) and all assessment information is posted on CPS IMPACT, and both students and parents have access to the grading system. Parents will also receive 5 week progress reports for each 9 or 10 week quarter, and in addition to the 5 week progress reports, two parent teacher conferences will be held during the first and third quarter of each school year. Report Cards IB Report Cards, as developed by Frazier, will distributed four times per year, at the end of each quarter (approximately November, February, April, and June) How often will we review our assessment practices? Review of the assessment practices will be continuous and ongoing. We will officially review the Assessment Policy every year during the School Improvement Cycle (CIWP). 7

IV. Assessment Practices Types of Assessment The following assessments are mandatory: All formative and summative assessments, as well as student reflections from all MYP Unit Summative Tasks. Criterion-Referenced assessments in the MYP. NWEA Assessments (3 times per year) as required by CPS. PARCC Standardized Test as determined by the State of Illinois. REACH Assessments as determined by Chicago Public Schools 8