Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs in Radiation Oncology

Similar documents
REGULATION RESPECTING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT AND SPECIALIST'S CERTIFICATES BY THE COLLÈGE DES MÉDECINS DU QUÉBEC

GUIDELINES FOR COMBINED TRAINING IN PEDIATRICS AND MEDICAL GENETICS LEADING TO DUAL CERTIFICATION

Status of the MP Profession in Europe

RESIDENCY IN EQUINE SURGERY

UIC HEALTH SCIENCE COLLEGES

Basic Standards for Residency Training in Internal Medicine. American Osteopathic Association and American College of Osteopathic Internists

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENCY EDUCATION IN DEVELOPMENTAL-BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS

Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship Program Frequently Asked Questions

FACTS. & Figures. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Health System

Surgical Residency Program & Director KEN N KUO MD, FACS

Equine Surgery Residency Program

JUNE 15, :30 PM 9:15 PM

Perioperative Care of Congenital Heart Diseases

THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE ECVCP

Application Guidelines for Interventional Radiology Review Committee for Radiology

Coaching Others for Top Performance 16 Hour Workshop

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

New developments in medical specialty training

THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGISTS

Our visiting specialists bring their expertise to you!

AnMed Health Family Medicine Residency Program Curriculum and Benefits

FEEDBACK. British International Doctors Association (BIDA) Annual Conference

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR CLINICAL FELLOWSHIP TRAINING IN GENERAL COSMETIC SURGERY

RADIATION THERAPY PROGRAM

PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE TRAINING PROGRAMS

Primary Award Title: BSc (Hons) Applied Paramedic Science PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

UVM Rural Health Longitudinal Integrated Curriculum Hudson Headwaters Health Network, Queensbury, New York

Kannapolis City Schools 100 DENVER STREET KANNAPOLIS, NC

AD (Leave blank) PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Mayo School of Health Sciences. Clinical Pastoral Education Residency. Rochester, Minnesota.

Paramedic Science Program

Joint Board Certification Project Team

Pharmaceutical Medicine

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR CLINICAL FELLOWSHIP TRAINING IN FACIAL COSMETIC SURGERY

CLINICAL TRAINING AGREEMENT

Physician Assistant Studies

GUIDANCE TO CANDIDATES AND TRAINERS. for ADVANCED SPECIALIST DIPLOMA. in NON-GYNAECOLOGICAL CYTOLOGY

SESSION III: Training on Conducting the Informed Consent Process

Clinical Review Criteria Related to Speech Therapy 1

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

PROGRAM HANDBOOK. for the ACCREDITATION OF INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION LABORATORIES. by the HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY

PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE

MANPOWER PLANNING IN UPPER GI SURGERY: RIGHT OR WRONG?

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

Adapting for the future: a plan for improving the flexibility of UK postgraduate medical training

BIOH : Principles of Medical Physiology

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

value equivalent 6. Attendance Full-time Part-time Distance learning Mode of attendance 5 days pw n/a n/a

PAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism. Job Description. Supervised by: Band 7 Speech and Language Therapist

Qualification handbook

Constructing Blank Cloth Dolls to Assess Sewing Skills: A Service Learning Project

Master s Programme Comparative Biomedicine

Common Program Requirements Frequently Asked Questions ACGME

Case of the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Lebanese. International University

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON MCGOVERN MEDICAL SCHOOL CATALOG ADDENDUM

Manchester Academy for Healthcare Scientist Education STP OPEN DAY. MAHSE ( Professor Phil Padfield.

REPORT OF THE PROVOST S REVIEW PANEL. Clinical Practices and Research in the Department of Neurological Surgery June 27, 2013

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Simulation in Radiology Education

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Game-designed interprofessional education:

Medium-Term Strategy (MTS) Designed by Mahmoud Hamed

Global Health Kitwe, Zambia Elective Curriculum

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Session 102 Specialty Update Nuclear Medicine 03/02/2013, 1:30PM 3:00PM

Contemporary Opportunities and Challenges for teaching Pharmacogenomics to Student Pharmacists

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

2015 / Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Program. heal. serve. educate. To serve, to heal and to educate

Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Dana Carolyn Paquin Curriculum Vitae

Personal Tutoring at Staffordshire University

83 Fellows certified in 2016! Currently 161 Fellows registered Global Online Fellowship In Head & Neck Surgery and Oncology

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Section on Pediatrics, APTA

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Here with us. INTERNAL MEDICINE RESIDENCY PROGRAM

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Institutional Policies and Procedures For Graduate Medical Education Programs

BIENNIUM 1 ELECTIVES CATALOG. Revised 1/17/2017

CLINICAL EDUCATION EXPERIENCE MODEL; CLINICAL EDUCATION TRAVEL POLICY

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

DIRECTORY OF POSTGRADUATE COURSES

ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in the Subspecialties of Pediatrics

MASTER OF EDUCATION (M.ED), MAJOR IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION

MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN (MCW) WHO WE ARE AND OUR UNIQUE VALUE

Research Output and Publications Impact of Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh ( )

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Program Assessment and Alignment

RRC Ne w s Ot o l a r y n g o l o g y

Postgraduate Double Degree Master s Program Clinical Medical Physics

IMSH 2018 Simulation: Making the Impossible Possible

Transcription:

Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs in Radiation Oncology 2019 VERSION 3.0 This document may be reproduced for educational purposes only provided that the following phrase is included in all related materials: Copyright 2018 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission. Please forward a copy of the final product to the Office of Specialty Education, attn: Associate Director, Specialties. Written permission from the Royal College is required for all other uses. For further information regarding intellectual property, please contact: documents@royalcollege.ca. For questions regarding the use of this document, please contact: accred@royalcollege.ca.

INTRODUCTION The Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs in Radiation Oncology are a national set of standards maintained by the Royal College, for the evaluation and accreditation of Radiation Oncology residency programs. The standards aim to provide an interpretation of the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs as they relate to the accreditation of residency programs in Radiation Oncology, and to ensure these programs adequately prepare residents to meet the health care needs of their patient population(s), upon completion of training. The standards include requirements applicable to residency programs and learning sites 1 and have been written in alignment with a standards organization framework, which aims to provide clarity of expectations, while maintaining flexibility for innovation. These standards are intended to be read in conjunction with the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs, as well as the discipline-specific documents for Radiation Oncology. In instances where the indicators reflected in the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs have been modified within this document to reflect a discipline-specific expectation, the indicator as reflected in this document takes precedence. 1 Note: The General Standards of Accreditation for Institutions with Residency Programs also include standards applicable to learning sites. Page 1 of 11

STANDARDS DOMAIN: PROGRAM ORGANIZATION The Program Organization domain includes standards focused on the structural and functional aspects of the residency program, which support and provide structure to meet the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs. The Program Organization domain standards aim to: Ensure the organizational structure and personnel are appropriate to support the residency program, teachers, and residents; Define the high-level expectations of the program director and residency program committee(s); and Ensure the residency program and its structure are organized to meet and integrate the requirements for the Education Program; Resources; Learners, Teachers and Administrative Personnel; and Continuous Improvement domains. STANDARD 1: There is an appropriate organizational structure, with leadership, and administrative personnel to effectively support the residency program, teachers, and residents. Refer to Standard 1 and its various components within the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs, in addition to elements, requirements, and indicators detailed below. Element 1.2: There is an effective and functional residency program committee structure to support the program director in planning, organizing, evaluating, and advancing the residency program. 1.2.2: The residency program committee has a clear mandate to manage and evaluate key functions of the residency program. 1.2.2.4 [Modified] 2 : The residency program committee structure includes a competence committee responsible for reviewing and making recommendations regarding residents readiness for increasing professional responsibility, progress in achieving the national standards of Radiation Oncology, promotion, and transition to independent practice. 2 [Modified] is used to identify where an indicator from the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs has been included, with minor discipline-specific modification(s). Page 2 of 11

1.2.2.5: The frequency of competence committee meetings is sufficient for the committee to fulfil its mandate. STANDARD 2: All aspects of the residency program are collaboratively overseen by the program director and the residency program committee. Refer to Standard 2 and its various components within the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs. DOMAIN: EDUCATION PROGRAM The Education Program domain includes standards focused on the planning, design, and delivery of the residency program, with the overarching outcome to ensure that the residency program prepares residents to be competent to begin independent practice. NOTE: Time-based residency programs are planned and organized around educational objectives linked to required experiences, whereas Competency Based Medical Education (CBME) residency programs are planned and organized around competencies required for practice. The Education Program domain standards in the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs have been written to accommodate both. STANDARD 3: Residents are prepared for independent practice. Refer to Standard 3 and its various components within the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs, in addition to elements, requirements, and indicators detailed below. Element 3.1: The residency program s educational design is based on outcomes-based competencies and/or objectives that prepare residents to meet the needs of the population(s) they will serve in independent practice. 3.1.1: Educational competencies and/or objectives are in place to ensure residents progressively meet all required standards for the discipline and address 3.1.1.1 [Modified]: The competencies and/or objectives meet the specialty-specific requirements for Radiation Oncology, as outlined in the Radiation Oncology Competencies and the Radiation Oncology Training Experiences. Page 3 of 11

societal needs. Element 3.2: The residency program provides educational experiences designed to facilitate residents attainment of the outcomes-based competencies and/or objectives. 3.2.1: The residency program s competencies and/or objectives are used to guide the educational experiences while providing residents with opportunities for increasing professional responsibility at each stage or level of training. 3.2.1.2 [Modified]: The educational experiences meet the specialty-specific requirements for Radiation Oncology, as outlined in the Radiation Oncology Competencies and the Radiation Oncology Training Experiences. 3.2.1.3 [Modified]: The educational experiences and supervision are appropriate for residents stage or level of training, and support residents achievement of increasing professional responsibility. 3.2.1.5: The educational experiences include the opportunity for each resident to undertake senior administrative tasks. 3.2.1.6: The educational experiences include instruction in appropriate safety techniques specific to Radiation Oncology, including the safe use of radioactive material and relevant regulations for the use of ionizing radiation. 3.2.1.7: The educational experiences include opportunities to attain competence in the investigation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with neoplastic disease in both inpatient and ambulatory settings, with a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach to patient care. 3.2.1.8: The educational experiences include adequate exposure to other therapeutic modalities and supportive care services used in the care of patients with cancer, including surgery, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and immunotherapy and targeted therapy. 3.2.1.9: The educational experiences include appropriate interprofessional interaction, ensured through a variety of activities, such as combined new patient evaluation or multidisciplinary patient management conferences. 3.2.1.10: The educational experiences include opportunities for: participation in all phases of patient management, including consultations, radiotherapy treatment, and follow-up; learning about the evolution of tissue changes after radiotherapy to different anatomical sites; exposure to all major modalities of radiotherapy, planning, and delivery, including external beam radiation of appropriate energy ranges, intracavitary Page 4 of 11

and interstitial sources of radioactive material, and therapeutic use of systemic radioisotopes; acquisition of skills in contemporary radiotherapy treatment planning over the whole range of clinical situations in which radiotherapy is useful, including inverse planned intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), intracranial and lung stereotactic radiation treatment, and gynecologic and prostatic brachytherapy; performing diagnostic procedures for ear, nose, and throat endoscopy and gynecologic examination; learning the principles of stereotactic body radiotherapy for other sites, including spine and liver, and of brachytherapy to other sites, including breast, head, and neck; and management of emergencies and complications of treatment. 3.2.1.11: The educational experiences include opportunities to experience radiation oncology practice in a communitybased setting. 3.2.1.12 [Exemplary]: A component of the educational experiences providing residents with opportunities to learn the evolution of tissue changes after radical radiotherapy to different anatomical sites is through participation in longterm follow-up of patients having undergone representative radical treatments. 3.2.2: The residency program uses a comprehensive curriculum plan, which is specific to the discipline and addresses all of the CanMEDS/CanMEDS-FM Roles. 3.2.2.7 The curriculum plan includes a coordinated educational program in oncology and related fields of medical imaging, medicine, and surgery. 3.2.2.8: The curriculum plan includes organized teaching in medical physics, radiation biology, tumour and molecular biology, and pathology relevant to the practice of Radiation Oncology. 3.2.2.9: The curriculum plan includes organized quality assurance education and activities, including radiation safety practices, and quality assurance peer review of radiation treatment plans. 3.2.2.10: The curriculum plan includes opportunities for residents to offer patients participation in clinical trials. 3.2.2.11: The curriculum plan includes opportunities for residents to learn the process required for a facility s accreditation to use ionizing radiation, including the role of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission in ensuring patient and public safety during the therapeutic use of ionizing radiation. Page 5 of 11

3.2.5: The educational environment supports and promotes resident learning in an atmosphere of scholarly enquiry. 3.2.2.12: The curriculum plan includes opportunities for residents to learn advocacy for issues such as radiation safety, quality assurance, and access to radiotherapy services. 3.2.2.13: The curriculum plan requires residents to complete at least one research or scholarly project. 3.2.2.14 [Exemplary]: The residency program incorporates the Radiation Oncology Pathway to Competence in its curriculum plan. 3.2.2.15 [Exemplary]: The radiation treatment quality assurance activities include activities such as incident reporting. 3.2.5.4: The residency program s radiation oncology service is engaged in research and scholarly activities, and participates in clinical trials on a local, national, and/or international basis. Element 3.4: There is an effective, organized system of resident assessment. 3.4.1: The residency program has a planned, defined and implemented system of assessment. 3.4.3: There is a wellarticulated process for decision-making regarding resident progression, including the decision on satisfactory completion of training. 3.4.4: The system of assessment allows for timely identification of and support for residents who are not attaining the required competencies as expected. 3.4.1.4 [Modified]: The system of assessment includes identification and use of appropriate assessment tools tailored to the residency program s educational experiences, including the use of direct observation with a STAPLER-like assessment tool (Structured Assessment of Treatment Planning Evaluation Report) or equivalent Portfolio assessment tool. 3.4.3.1 [Modified]: The competence committee regularly reviews (at least twice a year, or once per stage, whichever is more frequent) residents readiness for increasing professional responsibility, promotion, and transition to independent practice, based on demonstrated achievement of expected competencies and/or objectives for each level or stage of training. 3.4.3.5 [Exemplary]: The competence committee s recommendations regarding learner status are consistent with the Royal College s guidelines for Competence by Design. 3.4.4.2 [Modified]: Residents who are not progressing as expected are provided with the required support and opportunity to improve their performance, as appropriate. Page 6 of 11

DOMAIN: RESOURCES The Resources domain includes standards focused on ensuring resources are sufficient for the delivery of the education program and to ultimately ensure that residents are prepared for independent practice. The Resources domain standards aim to ensure the adequacy of the residency program s clinical, physical, technical, human, and financial resources. STANDARD 4: The delivery and administration of the residency program is supported by appropriate resources. Refer to Standard 4 and its various components within the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs, in addition to elements, requirements, and indicators detailed below. Element 4.1: The residency program has the clinical, physical, technical, and financial resources to provide all residents with educational experiences needed to acquire all competencies. 4.1.1: The patient population is adequate to ensure that residents experience the breadth of the discipline. 4.1.2: Clinical and consultative facilities and services are organized and adequate to ensure that residents experience the breadth of the discipline. 4.1.1.3: The volume, diversity, and consistent availability of patients to the residency program are sufficient to: support residents acquisition of knowledge, skills, and attitudes relating to population aspects of age, gender, culture, and ethnicity, appropriate to Radiation Oncology; and ensure opportunities for training and acquisition of clinical competence and technical proficiency over the full range of cancer in adults and in children. 4.1.2.4: Clinical services are organized to ensure sufficient opportunity to attain competence in the investigation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with cancer, in both inpatient and ambulatory settings. 4.1.2.5: The residency program has access to community health care resources such as palliative care units, hospices, home care, and community physicians to provide residents with experience working with other health professionals and to ensure a familiarity with and understanding of the role of appropriate community resources in the continuing care of patients with cancer. 4.1.2.6: The residency program has access to pediatric Page 7 of 11

Radiation Oncology. 4.1.2.7: [Exemplary] Clinical services are organized into tumour-site specific teams. 4.1.3: Diagnostic and laboratory services and facilities are organized and adequate to ensure that residents experience the breadth of the discipline. 4.1.4: The residency program has the necessary financial, physical, and technical resources. 4.1.3.2: The residency program has access to, and closely coordinates with, the following facilities and services: medical imaging services, with particular emphasis on diagnostic imaging and nuclear medicine investigations pertinent to the evaluation of, and treatment planning for, patients with cancer; laboratory services adequate for the evaluation of patients with cancer; pathology services adequate for the evaluation of patients with cancer, and adequate instruction in clinico-pathological correlation; and access to operating room facilities to enable the Radiation Oncologists to perform staging procedures, including examination under anesthesia for gynecological cancers, as well as intracavitary and interstitial radiation treatments. 4.1.4.6: The residency program has access to equipment for radiotherapy treatment planning, including an integrated CT-treatment planning simulator, and treatment planning computers, as well as facilities for fabrication of immobilization devices. 4.1.4.7: The residency program has access, at the primary training site, to equipment, facilities, and staff to provide intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and at least one of the two following essential elements: brachytherapy (gynecologic and prostate), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and intracranial and lung stereotactic radiation treatment. 4.1.5: There is appropriate liaison with other programs and teaching services to ensure that residents experience the breadth of the discipline. 4.1.5.2: The residency program has appropriate liaison with teaching services, including diagnostic radiology, general surgery and relevant surgical subspecialties, gynecologic oncology, internal medicine, medical oncology, nuclear medicine, palliative care, anatomical pathology, and pediatric hematology/oncology. 4.1.5.3: The residency program has access to other health services including social, spiritual, and psychological resources. Page 8 of 11

Element 4.2: The residency program has the appropriate human resources to provide all residents with the required educational experiences. 4.2.1: The number, credentials, competencies, and duties of the teachers are appropriate to teach the residency curriculum, supervise and assess trainees, contribute to the program, and role model effective practice. 4.2.1.1 [Modified]: The number, credentials, and competencies of the teachers are adequate to provide the required clinical teaching, academic teaching, assessment, and feedback to residents, including teaching in the basic and clinical sciences. 4.2.1.5: There is at least one full-time equivalent clinical Radiation Oncologist for each resident enrolled in the program, so as to ensure adequate individualized instruction. 4.2.1.6: The program director has Royal College certification in Radiation Oncology. 4.2.1.7: The majority of the clinical teachers hold Royal College certification in Radiation Oncology. 4.2.1.8: There is adequate staff support to provide instruction for residents in the areas of medical physics and dosimetry, and for all aspects of planning of radiotherapy treatments. 4.2.1.9: The residency program has adequate support to provide instruction to residents on the design and implementation of research studies, interpretation of data, and the critical assessment of medical literature and of new technologies. DOMAIN: LEARNERS, TEACHERS, AND ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL The Learners, Teachers, and Administrative Personnel domain includes standards focused on supporting teachers, learners, and administrative personnel people services and supports. The Learners, Teachers, and Administrative Personnel domain program standards aim to ensure: A safe and positive learning environment for all (i.e., residents, teachers, patients, and administrative personnel); and Value of and support for administrative personnel. Page 9 of 11

STANDARD 5: Safety and wellness is promoted throughout the learning environment. Refer to Standard 5 and its various components within the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs, in addition to elements, requirements, and indicators detailed below. Element 5.1: The safety and wellness of patients and residents are actively promoted. 5.1.1: Residents are appropriately supervised. 5.1.1.1 [Modified]: Residents and teachers follow the centralized and any program-specific policies regarding supervision of residents, including ensuring the physical presence of the appropriate supervisor, when mandated, during acts or procedures performed by the resident, as appropriate to their stage or level of training. STANDARD 6: Residents are treated fairly and adequately supported throughout their progression through the residency program. Refer to Standard 6 and its various components within the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs, in addition to elements, requirements, and indicators detailed below. Element 6.1: The progression of residents through the residency program is supported, fair, and transparent. 6.1.1: There are effective, clearly defined, transparent, formal processes for the selection and progression of residents. 6.1.1.3: The residency program has effective policies and procedures, or complies with and effectively implements centralized policies and procedures to address residents who are not progressing as expected through the stages of training. STANDARD 7: Teachers effectively deliver and support all aspects of the residency program. Refer to Standard 7 and its various components within the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs. Page 10 of 11

STANDARD 8: Administrative personnel are valued and supported in the delivery of the residency program. Refer to Standard 8 and its various components within the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs. DOMAIN: CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT The Continuous Improvement domain includes standards focused on ensuring a culture of continuous improvement is present throughout the residency program, with the aim of ensuring continuous improvement of residency programs. NOTE: To reinforce and create clarity with respect to the expectations related to continuous improvement, the Requirements under the Element mimic the continuous improvement cycle (Plan, Do, Study, Act). STANDARD 9: There is continuous improvement of the educational experiences to improve the residency program and ensure residents are prepared for independent practice. Refer to Standard 9 and its various components within the General Standards of Accreditation for Residency Programs. This document is to be reviewed by the Specialty Committee in Radiation Oncology by December 2019. APPROVED Specialty Standards Review Committee April 2018 Page 11 of 11