Workload Policy Goals and Aspirations of the School of Nursing (SON) Contribution Diversity Engagement Integrity Opportunity Leadership:

Similar documents
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Educational Leadership and Administration

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

The development of our plan began with our current mission and vision statements, which follow. "Enhancing Louisiana's Health and Environment"

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY M. J. NEELEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION & TENURE AND FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES 9/16/85*

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

University of Toronto

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

PROMOTION and TENURE GUIDELINES. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Gordon Ford College of Business Western Kentucky University

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Strategic Plan Revised November 2012 Reviewed and Updated July 2014

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology

AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Data Collection Webinar

IMSH 2018 Simulation: Making the Impossible Possible

Art Department Bylaws and Policies Approved 4/24/02

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

August 22, Materials are due on the first workday after the deadline.

Pattern of Administration. For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Critical Care Current Fellows

Department of Communication Promotion and Tenure Criteria Guidelines. Teaching

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

ENGINEERING FACULTY HANDBOOK. College of Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, MI

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

PHL Grad Handbook Department of Philosophy Michigan State University Graduate Student Handbook

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Pharmaceutical Medicine

Improving recruitment, hiring, and retention practices for VA psychologists: An analysis of the benefits of Title 38

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

School of Optometry Indiana University

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT EXTERNAL REVIEWER

The Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Departmental Bylaws

IMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM

Program Change Proposal:

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Pattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Full-time MBA Program Distinguish Yourself.

An Introduction to LEAP

1. Amend Article Departmental co-ordination and program committee as set out in Appendix A.

RESIDENCE DON APPLICATION

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Hamline University. College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

State Parental Involvement Plan

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

Work plan guidelines for the academic year

Submission of a Doctoral Thesis as a Series of Publications

with Specific Procedures for UT Extension Searches

Department of Anatomy Bylaws

University of Toronto

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

University of Delaware Library STRATEGIC PLAN

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

National Survey of Student Engagement

A Strategic Plan for the Law Library. Washington and Lee University School of Law Introduction

Mission Statement To achieve excellence in our Pharm.D. and graduate programs through innovative education and leading edge research.

RC-FM Staff. Objectives 4/22/2013. Geriatric Medicine: Update from the RC-FM. Eileen Anthony, Executive Director; ;

College of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions

Graduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year Academic year Last Revised March 16, 2015

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

Doctoral Programs Faculty and Student Handbook Edition

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

Engagement of Teaching Intensive Faculty. What does Engagement mean?

Executive Summary. DoDEA Virtual High School

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Teaching Excellence Framework

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Transcription:

Workload Policy Goals and Aspirations of the School of Nursing (SON) The School of Nursing of the Bouvé College of Health Sciences is a vibrant inter-professional academic environment of undergraduate and graduate students who are recognized by clinical partners for highly competent nursing graduates. The faculty work to achieve recognition for the generation of innovative research. The School of Nursing and Bouvé College of Health Sciences embrace and uphold the university s core values of: Contribution: seeking to contribute to the individual fulfillment of each member of the campus, to the welfare of the surrounding communities, and to solutions that will address global and societal needs. Diversity: celebrating diversity in all its forms and fostering a culture of respect that affirms inter-group relations and builds community. Engagement: promoting active engagement in teaching and learning, in scholarship and research, in the life of urban communities and with our alumni and friends. Integrity: pursuing each of its activities and interactions with integrity, always maintaining the highest ethical standards. Opportunity: providing opportunities to those who strive to overcome adversity and show great promise for future success. The School of Nursing faculty prepare students to become leaders as nurse clinicians, educators, and researchers. The organizing concepts of the curriculum are: Leadership: Leadership encompasses the ability to listen, translate, decide, take action and inspire others. Leaders have the vision to set direction, engage the stakeholders towards a common goal, and have the competency to create and cultivate open, trusting and caring relationships with others. Critical Thinking/Clinical Reasoning: Critical thinking is a reflective process based on creative, intuitive, logical, and inferential thought patterns. Clinical reasoning is the ability to think critically about health care decisions related to patients, families, and communities. Evidence-Based Practice: EBP consists of an integration of the best evidence available, nursing expertise, and the values and preferences of the individuals, families and communities who are served. Evidence based nursing care bridges the gap between the best evidence available and the most appropriate nursing care of individuals, groups and populations with varied needs. Research: To advance the field of inquiry by envisioning new questions and engaging in rigorous scientific methods and theoretical thinking to promote the health and welfare of people and the environment. As a creative endeavor, research advances the science of nursing toward greater understanding, generation of new knowledge, and translation of knowledge to diverse populations. Cultural and Linguistic Competence: Cultural and linguistic competence is a set of congruent behaviors, attitudes, and policies that come together in a system, agency, or 1

among professionals that enable effective work in cross-cultural situations that value and incorporate the cultural differences of diverse populations. It promotes evaluation of one s own health-related values and beliefs, health care organizations, and health care providers, and responds appropriately to, and directly serves the unique needs of populations whose cultures may be different from the prevailing culture. Interprofessional Collaboration: Interprofessional collaboration is a process wherein multiple healthcare workers from different professional backgrounds work together with patient s families, care givers and communities to deliver the highest quality of care. Informatics/Technology: Nurses incorporate the use of informatics/information technology into their clinical care to augment communication, manage knowledge, mitigate error, and support decision making. To that end, all faculty members make substantial and meaningful contributions to the school, college, and university in various ways. Faculty workloads, which are at best an approximation, reflect that nursing faculty are clinically competent educators, practitioners, and researchers. Those faculty who show significant effort in excess of their negotiated workload should be recognized for that effort during merit review. I. Types of full-time faculty appointments with distribution of duties A. Tenured Faculty 40% Teaching 1 40% Research 20% Service B. Tenure-Track Faculty 40% Teaching 2 50% Research 10% Service C. Non Tenure-Track Faculty 60-70% Teaching 10-20% Scholarly activity 20% Service D. Joint appointments Some faculty are hired jointly by two different units or colleges at Northeastern University. The procedure for ensuring agreement about workload balance between the two units/college and the faculty member is as follows: 1. The academic unit heads (e.g., school dean, department chair, etc.) will compose a memo of agreement (MOA) using the workload policy parameters of Bouvé College. The faculty member will review the MOA and negotiate changes accommodating the two unit parties. 1 Tenured faculty without an active program of research (see 2.B.1) will have a 60% teaching load with a scholarship expectation of 10-20% and a service expectation of 20-30%. 2 Newly hired tenure-track faculty will have a teaching load reduced by 50% in each of their first two years and a 25% reduction in their third year at the University. 2

2. The respective unit heads will assign 100% percent effort of faculty (in teaching, research/scholarship, and service) by working the best fit for the faculty and the unit. 3. Salary compensation by the unit/college will depend on this distribution of teaching, research/scholarship, and service. 4. Each unit will compose specific goals and measurable metrics with the faculty member and include it in the MOA. The MOA will be reviewed every year at the time of merit review by each unit head and the faculty member, resulting in a joint merit document for the faculty. II. Types of work A. Teaching 1. Percent/Load equivalent 3 : a. 40% load - 4 courses per academic year 3-4 credit hours each or maximum of 16 credit hours (CH). b. 60% load - 6 courses per academic year 3-4 credit hours each or maximum of 24 CH. c. Faculty with external research funding may negotiate teaching load reduction depending on research progression. To obtain a course reduction, faculty must use external funding to buy out of teaching in a manner described in the College Externally-funded Research Support Policy. d. All faculty must teach a minimum of one course per academic year. 2. Activities: a. Academic courses A typical on-ground course should have no more than 40 students/section. A typical online course should have no more than 24 students/section. Additional workload percentage may be assigned by the school dean for teaching and/or coordinating a larger than typical class size not team-taught (1-3 CH negotiated, aligned to actual size). b. Supervision, advising, and/or mentoring of students. Includes activities such as honor s thesis, directed studies, lab/clinical coordination, DNP scholarly project advising, and PhD dissertation committee chair. Additional workload percentage may be assigned as appropriate, for example 1 CH per year for: One UG honor s student thesis, Two directed study students, B. Research/Scholarly activity 1. Research activity for Tenure-track and Tenured faculty is defined as a program of research that demonstrates evidence of progressive development and contribution of new knowledge to a chosen field or translation of knowledge to new populations. Scholarly productivity should be at a level that is consistent with expectations of peers and aspirational schools at Research-1 universities. Examples of research activity 3 Faculty on a 12-month contract will have an additional load of 2-3 courses or maximum of 12 contact hours. 3

include (but are not limited to): Development and submission of research proposals and grants, Carrying out the aims of funded research, Data collection and analysis, Dissemination of results in publication and presentations, Manuscript, abstract and grant submissions, Mentoring junior faculty to promote a culture of success, Leadership demonstrated by participating in editorial boards and organizations. 2. Scholarly activity for Non tenure-track faculty is distinguished from that of tenured/tenure-track faculty. There is no expectation for a major focused program of original research (i.e., the scholarship of discovery) but scholarship activity is understood to be intellectual work that is visible, disseminated to professional audiences, and validated by peers. Emphasis is placed on work that brings professional peer recognition as practitioner-educators. Examples of scholarly activity include (but are not limited to): Published evaluations of novel approaches to teaching or teaching methodology, innovative approaches to teaching in clinical settings, patientcare services, program development and innovation, outcomes of innovative programs and/or services; Planning, conducting, and disseminating clinical Quality Improvement Project; Evidence of external transfer of innovative teaching and/or clinical service models; Authorship of professional practice guidelines and publications of textbooks, book chapters, monographs, videotapes, extended learning materials, or other educational materials; Invited presentations, poster and podium presentations, and published abstracts; Consultation to government agencies, industry, or professional groups; Competitive grants or contracts for teaching, practice, or service programs; Authorship in peer reviewed publications. 3. Professional Development activities may include participation in and/or attendance at: Conferences, trainings, seminars and colloquia related to the professional practice and/or research area. Conferences, trainings, seminars and colloquia to enhance current skills as they relate to the professional practice or research area, or to the education process. C. Service 1. To the Institution (school, college, university) is expected of all faculty members and includes activities such as: Membership on committees, Attendance at faculty meetings, Advising and/or precepting at the undergraduate and/or graduate level, Supervision and oversight of part-time faculty, Faculty and student recruitment, Student group mentorship. 4

2. To the Discipline/Profession may include activities such as: Clinical practice in a health care setting, National board certifications or awards, Expert panel or committee membership, Participation in local, state, regional, national or international professional organizations and publications (e.g., journal reviewer, service on editorial boards). 3. To the Community/Public may include activities such as: Health-related community service projects, invited presentations to the public, Consultation with community healthcare agencies. While service to the discipline/profession and community/public are valued by the School and College, they may not take the place of service that is needed to the School, College and University. 4. All full-time faculty are expected to serve on at least two committees or workgroups (e.g., task force, subcommittee, etc.) at the school or college level. Additional service workload percentage may be assigned by the school dean for activities including, but not limited to: Chair of an internal (within university) committee or workgroup, Additional internal and/or external committee or workgroup service, Professional leadership position outside the university. 5. Additional workload percentage may be negotiated between the school dean and faculty who serve as a Program Director with administrative duties including, but not limited to: Marketing and recruiting activities; Engagement with potential and actual applicants (phone, face-to-face, at conferences, etc.); Clinical site affiliations (e.g., securing student placements, site visits); Student advisement and professional development activities; Maintenance of student files and database records for the SON/Bouvé, various credentialing agencies, and for program evaluation; Preparation of student statistical reports for the SON/Bouvé and credentialing agencies; Curriculum responsibility and overall program oversight. III. Policies A. Review of policy: The SON Steering Committee will appoint an ad hoc committee of the school to review and update the Workload Policy at least every 3 years 4, or as needed with university policy changes. Revised policies must be voted on and approved by the full-time SON faculty, college dean and the provost. 4 Policy review to be done annually for the first 3 years after initial approval. 5

B. Location of policy: The workload policy and the list of faculty members annual workload percentage distributions will be posted on the SON SharePoint site by May 30 each year. C. Modifications: Workload distributions may be modified for specific criteria including but not limited to maternity/adoption leaves, medical leaves, military service, newly hired tenure-track considerations, and when faculty are grant-funded for a percent of release time; and follow the guidelines of the appropriate departments (e.g., Human Resource Management, Provost Office). D. Timeline: Workload distribution for all three areas (teaching, research/scholarship, and service) will be assigned by the school dean during the annual spring goals meeting. The total workload percentages will be communicated to each faculty member with both printed and electronic copies distributed by the last day of the spring semester. E. Process for faculty to address workload concerns: Faculty who wish to express concerns regarding their workload assignment must do so in writing to the School Dean within 5 working days of receiving their workload letter. If the individual faculty member disagrees with the School Dean s formal workload adjustment decision, then that faculty member forward their concerns in writing level may forward their concerns in writing to the College Dean. The decision of the College Dean is final. 6

School of Nursing Checklist for Unit Workload Policy Documents Each unit s chairperson and/or dean should initial each point on the checklist. By doing so, he or she attests that the full time faculty workload policy document satisfies each of these requirements. bg Document is consistent with published College and University policies. bg Document clearly reflects the goals/aspirations of the unit as these relate to workload. bg Document clearly defines the types of activities that constitute each of teaching, research/ scholarship/creative activities/professional development, and service for the unit. bg Document describes the different types of full-time positions in the unit. _bg Document clearly defines the teaching, research/scholarship/creative activities/professional development, and service expectations for the different types of appointments. _bg Document describes all unit policies related to workload for full time faculty. _bg Document describes criteria in which workloads may be modified, including pre-tenured minimum course reductions, family leaves, maternity/adoption leaves, and medical leaves. _bg Document states how frequently the workload policy document will be reviewed. bg Document indicates where and how the unit s current workload policy document can be found. bg Document indicates where and how the workload assignments for each full time faculty member can be found. _bg Document describes the process for faculty to address any concerns with their workload in the unit. _bg Document indicates date of approval, any subsequent modifications by the unit, and anticipated date of next review. bg Document indicates date of approval of the unit s dean. _bg Document indicates when it was sent to the Provost s Office to be included in the master list of policies for all units, and date of approval of the provost. If the unit has one or more faculty with joint appointments in other units: _bg Document defines how the workload policy changes for faculty members with an appointment of less than 100% in the unit, include impact of tenure home. bg Document describes how the unit will coordinate workload policy decisions with other units for faculty members with joint appointments, and how differences in workload expectations across units will be handled.