Mark Scheme (Results) Summer Pearson Edexcel International GCSE In Hindi (4HN0) Paper 1

Similar documents
Mark Scheme (Results) Summer International GCSE Bengali (4BE0/01)

DCA प रय जन क य म ग नद शक द र श नद श लय मह म ग ध अ तरर य ह द व व व लय प ट ह द व व व लय, ग ध ह स, वध (मह र ) DCA-09 Project Work Handbook

S. RAZA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL

क त क ई-व द य लय पत र क 2016 KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA ADILABAD

Question (1) Question (2) RAT : SEW : : NOW :? (A) OPY (B) SOW (C) OSZ (D) SUY. Correct Option : C Explanation : Question (3)

HinMA: Distributed Morphology based Hindi Morphological Analyzer


ENGLISH Month August

The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics NUMBER 95 APRIL

Examiners Report January GCSE Citizenship 5CS01 01

ह द स ख! Hindi Sikho!

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

CROSS LANGUAGE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL: IN INDIAN LANGUAGE PERSPECTIVE

Detection of Multiword Expressions for Hindi Language using Word Embeddings and WordNet-based Features

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

LANGUAGE IN INDIA Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow Volume 11 : 3 March 2011 ISSN

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

F.No.29-3/2016-NVS(Acad.) Dated: Sub:- Organisation of Cluster/Regional/National Sports & Games Meet and Exhibition reg.

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

November 2012 MUET (800)

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

GCSE. Mathematics A. Mark Scheme for January General Certificate of Secondary Education Unit A503/01: Mathematics C (Foundation Tier)

Language Acquisition Chart

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

One Stop Shop For Educators

Lower and Upper Secondary

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Example answers and examiner commentaries: Paper 2

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

This publication is also available for download at

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

Information Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge

How to analyze visual narratives: A tutorial in Visual Narrative Grammar

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Pearson BTEC Level 3 Award in Education and Training

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

How does an Apprenticeship work?

Syllabus. Cambridge International AS Level Japanese Language Syllabus code 8281 For examination in November 2013

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

READTHEORY TEACHING STUDENTS TO READ AND THINK CRITICALLY

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

Specification. BTEC Specialist qualifications. Edexcel BTEC Level 1 Award/Certificate/Extended Certificate in Construction Skills (QCF)

South Carolina English Language Arts

A Level English Language and Literature

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

A process by any other name

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Summer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz

Practical Research Planning and Design Paul D. Leedy Jeanne Ellis Ormrod Tenth Edition

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

CX 101/201/301 Latin Language and Literature 2015/16

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

Developing a concrete-pictorial-abstract model for negative number arithmetic

Handbook for Teachers

Information for Private Candidates

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

2006 Mississippi Language Arts Framework-Revised Grade 12

Edexcel Gcse Maths 2013 Nov Resit

Developing Grammar in Context

Tavastia Way of Finnish Language Support during Vocational Studies. Tiina Alhainen Coordinator of Multicultural Issues Tavastia Education Consortium

INTRODUCTION TO TEACHING GUIDE

Evidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness

foundations in accountancy (FIA) Preparatory Course for ACCA - Diploma in Accounting and Business

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

GCSE Mathematics B (Linear) Mark Scheme for November Component J567/04: Mathematics Paper 4 (Higher) General Certificate of Secondary Education

Newlands Girls School

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

GCE. Mathematics (MEI) Mark Scheme for June Advanced Subsidiary GCE Unit 4766: Statistics 1. Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Head of Maths Application Pack

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

Pronunciation: Student self-assessment: Based on the Standards, Topics and Key Concepts and Structures listed here, students should ask themselves...

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Kindergarten Lessons for Unit 7: On The Move Me on the Map By Joan Sweeney

Transcription:

Scheme (Results) Summer 2017 Pearson Edexcel International GCSE In Hindi (4HN0) Paper 1

Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK s largest awarding body. We provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and specific programmes for employers. For further information visit our qualifications websites at www.edexcel.com or www.btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on our contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus. Pearson: helping people progress, everywhere Pearson aspires to be the world s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone progress in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds of people, wherever they are in the world. We ve been involved in education for over 150 years, and by working across 70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international reputation for our commitment to high standards and raising achievement through innovation in education. Find out more about how we can help you and your students at: www.pearson.com/uk Summer 2017 Publications Code 4HN0_01_1706_MS* All the material in this publication is copyright Pearson Education Ltd 2017

General ing Guidance All candidates must receive the same treatment. Examiners must mark the first candidate in exactly the same way as they mark the last. schemes should be applied positively. Candidates must be rewarded for what they have shown they can do rather than penalised for omissions. Examiners should mark according to the mark scheme not according to their perception of where the grade boundaries may lie. There is no ceiling on achievement. All marks on the mark scheme should be used appropriately. All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be awarded. Examiners should always award full marks if deserved, i.e. if the answer matches the mark scheme. Examiners should also be prepared to award zero marks if the candidate s response is not worthy of credit according to the mark scheme. Where some judgement is required, mark schemes will provide the principles by which marks will be awarded and exemplification may be limited. When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the mark scheme to a candidate s response, the team leader must be consulted. Crossed out work should be marked UNLESS the candidate has replaced it with an alternative response.

Question Answer 1 Sentences testing grammatical knowledge This part of the paper is marked out of fifteen. 3 marks per sentence 2 X 5 = 10 marks Deduct ½ mark for each minor error. (15) Question Answer 1(a) वह हह द स खन क ह ए भ रत आई ह (2) Question Answer 1(b) आप न न श त क ह ए म क य ह य? (2) Question Answer 1(c) ज स ह म र व स ट शन पह च, ग ड च गई (2) Question Answer 1(d) हदल द हनय म सबस प रद ह त शहर म स एक ह (2) Question Answer 1(e) जब वह घर छ ड गई त म झ एहस स ह आ हक ग त म र थ (2)

Question 2 Translation into Hindi s are awarded for transmission and quality of language, using the following assessment criteria grids. Transmission Only the very basic points are transmitted successfully with some very straightforward sections totally misunderstood. The style is often incomprehensible. 1-3 Communication is frequently impaired. Only the more straightforward and concrete points are transmitted successfully. Very little or no awareness of nuance and/or idiom. Several sections totally 4-6 misunderstood. The style is incoherent with communication impaired at times. The main points, usually narrative and concrete, are conveyed successfully for the most part, although problems are encountered with more complex language. Inference, nuance and idiom transmitted successfully on occasions. Some passages 7-9 misunderstood and attempts at rephrasing only partially successful. The style is not always coherent. A generally very competent rendering of the original text with grasp of most detail, nuance and idiom. Some passages, usually more complex, misinterpreted. Some 10-12 successful attempts at rephrasing. The style is generally pleasing. Excellent transmission skills with clear grasp of detail. Excellent transfer of 13-15 inference, nuance and idiom. Pleasant to read.

Quality of language A very high incidence of basic error in all aspects of grammar, syntax and morphology. Basic lexis and structures appropriate to the task are unknown. No awareness of tense concept/time sequence. Large sections totally misunderstood. 1-2 Communication impaired. Very little worthy of credit. Some inaccuracies in basic grammar, although narrative sections, usually short and straightforward, are in general correct. Lexis and structures appropriate to the task restricted with some often quite basic items unknown. At times some fairly basic 3-4 problems with tense concept/time sequence. Use of given adjectives and/or adverbial phrases occasionally evident, though these are likely to be only partially successful. Often quite difficult to follow. Largely accurate when using simple, short phrases: incidence of error increases in more complex language. Lexis and structures appropriate to the task tend to be adequate, with several items unknown. Some use of given adjectives and/or 5-6 adverbial phrases with some degree of success. About half of what is written should be free of major errors. Not always easy to read. A high level of accuracy overall, however with occasional basic errors, usually in more complex language. Uses a wide range of lexis and structures appropriate to 7-8 the task with occasional lapses. Grasp of tense concept/time sequence generally secure, although occasional lapses are evident. Pleasant to read for the most part. A very high level of accuracy with only minor errors. Confident use of a wide range of lexis and structures appropriate to the task. Excellent grasp of tense 9-10 concept/time sequence. Very pleasant to read overall, although not necessarily faultless. Question Answer 2 क स भ नय र श त श र आत त य य स क त क क स र श त श उम र ल ब न क ह ए ल क न ई ब छ य य ल स ब त य प य यस र र त क जब प क स र श त य रय त क त र आत त य त ए र स श हयय य औ हबय अह कर त क प वक त ब तन स जब प ए र स ज नन लगत क तब हयय औ हबय स फ लगत क य व स अवस जब प स प न वत य र न पड त क ई भ स ल ल स प र ण न त ज स भ - प उस प य भ भ पन प र णन स यन अपन असल क छ प न प श स क प व यहक तव य त वपवप र ण ह स उस अपन स अलग ग त ज य ग बच क स स ब ह त हवसय स ल र श त य प श जग त, ब त प अपन हवक ए रय स फ ह क य न कल य प ग ल य भ न अपन ब त औ र स श भ स न ए औ बह त ज आत ब त हजस य र न क ह ए क प रत य र श त प य प ह त त स पपनपन हलए सयय र हजए औ ए र स सयह ए कफ ह त ह त अगल य हज ल प रय ह ए भगव न न प श जल र य प स प छ छ र ज ए औ त बरल ल र रय य कल र रय त य कल अन स स त लन र श त रर न र क स स र श त बन ए न हलए र न स ह य ब ब श जय न प ड न बह त जआत (25)

Question 3 Translation into English s are awarded for transmission and quality of language, using the following assessment criteria grids. Transmission Only the very basic points are transmitted successfully with some very straightforward sections totally misunderstood. The style is often incomprehensible. 1-3 Communication is frequently impaired. Only the more straightforward and concrete points are transmitted successfully. Very little or no awareness of nuance and/or idiom. Several sections totally 4-6 misunderstood. The style is incoherent with communication impaired at times. The main points, usually narrative and concrete, are conveyed successfully for the most part, although problems are encountered with more complex language. Inference, nuance and idiom transmitted successfully on occasions. Some passages 7-9 misunderstood and attempts at rephrasing only partially successful. The style is not always coherent. A generally very competent rendering of the original text with grasp of most detail, nuance and idiom. Some passages, usually more complex, misinterpreted. Some 10-12 successful attempts at rephrasing. The style is generally pleasing. Excellent transmission skills with clear grasp of detail. Excellent transfer of 13-15 inference, nuance and idiom. Pleasant to read. Quality of language A very high incidence of basic error in all aspects of grammar, syntax and morphology. Basic lexis and structures appropriate to the task are unknown. No awareness of tense concept/time sequence. Large sections totally misunderstood. 1-2 Communication impaired. Very little worthy of credit. Some inaccuracies in basic grammar, although narrative sections, usually short and straightforward, are in general correct. Lexis and structures appropriate to the task restricted with some often quite basic items unknown. At times some fairly basic 3-4 problems with tense concept/time sequence. Use of given adjectives and/or adverbial phrases occasionally evident, though these are likely to be only partially successful. Often quite difficult to follow. Largely accurate when using simple, short phrases: incidence of error increases in more complex language. Lexis and structures appropriate to the task tend to be adequate, with several items unknown. Some use of given adjectives and/or 5-6 adverbial phrases with some degree of success. About half of what is written should be free of major errors. Not always easy to read. A high level of accuracy overall, however with occasional basic errors, usually in more complex language. Uses a wide range of lexis and structures appropriate to 7-8 the task with occasional lapses. Grasp of tense concept/time sequence generally secure, although occasional lapses are evident. Pleasant to read for the most part. A very high level of accuracy with only minor errors. Confident use of a wide range of lexis and structures appropriate to the task. Excellent grasp of tense 9-10 concept/time sequence. Very pleasant to read overall, although not necessarily faultless.

Question Answer 3 There is a season of festivals in the month of October and November in India. All people want to celebrate the festivals with their families. This increases congestion on the roads and trains. People who work in remote locations depend on trains to go towards their local bases. When they go to buy tickets at the ticket window of the train station they find that there are no seats available on the train. But all people want to go home to celebrate the festivals. The passengers face significant problems due to congestion on trains. (25) Some people reserve their seats in advance on trains for their convenience. But there is still congestion. What contribution is the railway department making to celebrate the festivals with enthusiasm? Northern railway is putting on twenty six new trains for the convenience of its passengers. This initiative is introduced to provide better facilities to the passengers and to celebrate festivals happily. Under this initiative special preparation will take place for the festivals. An official of Northern Railway, Nirj Sharma said, This year the railway is working with enthusiasm to run more trains on the routes where more passengers travel so that they can be transported to their destinations to meet their family members. '

Question 4 Writing (35 marks) s are awarded for communication and content and quality of language, using the following assessment grid. Communication and content Task generally misunderstood with little relevant information conveyed. Much ambiguity, confusion and omission. Level of response minimal with only a few relevant phrases. Communication largely impaired. Time sequences rarely correct. 1-4 Largely incomprehensible with the exception of isolated items. Very difficult to read. Main points of the task understood but some points totally misunderstood. Some major omissions with a degree of irrelevance and/or repetition. Level of response fairly limited with little opinion and justification appropriate to the task. Functions predominantly in simple, concrete sentences for the most part. Some evidence of 5-8 correct time sequences but mostly inconsistent and insecure. Just about comprehensible overall with, however, a marked degree of ambiguity. Not easy to read. Majority of task completed, however, with some significant omissions. There may be some irrelevance. Goes beyond a minimal response with some expansion of ideas and straightforward opinion relevant to the task. Time sequences show a degree of ambiguity at times. Comprehensible overall with some attempt to link 9-12 the piece into a coherent whole. Ambiguous in places especially in more ambitious language. Tends to be somewhat predictable. Responds to nearly all of the task although there may be some omissions. Some relevant expansion at times. Provides evidence of description, narration and opinion as appropriate to the task. Time sequences generally sound with 13-16 occasional lapses. A generally well structured piece of writing. A sound attempt overall to link the piece into a coherent whole with, however, some lapses. May be a little pedestrian and predictable or somewhat over-ambitious at times. Responds fully and appropriately to the stimulus with excellent and relevant expansion. Gives detailed descriptions, expresses and justifies opinions as 17-20 appropriate to the task. The time sequence is clear and unambiguous. A coherent piece of writing which is pleasant to read.

Quality of language A high level of inaccuracy with very frequent and basic errors in grammar, syntax and morphology. There may be the occasional correct phrase. No awareness of tense concept/time reference. Vocabulary very basic with little of no evidence of 1-3 correct use of basic structures. Communication is severely impaired overall. Extremely difficult to read. Accuracy is inconsistent with frequent basic errors in grammar, syntax and morphology. Simple, short sentences are sometimes correct, but very little beyond. Range of vocabulary and structure very limited. Use of tense 4-6 concept/time reference limited and often inappropriate. Limited success in attempts at enhancement of fact with adjectives and/or adverbial phrases. Not easy to read. Fairly accurate in simple language, however tends to be inconsistent in application of grammar, syntax and morphology when attempting more complex language. Range of vocabulary, idiom and structure standard and somewhat predictable. Some inconsistency in use of tense concept/time reference. Some attempts at subordination and sentence linking which are only partially successful. Attempts 7-9 enhancement of fact with adjectives and/or adverbial phrases with moderate success. About half of what is written should be free of major errors. Despite inaccuracies, the basic message is conveyed. Generally accurate and secure in grammar, syntax and morphology with some lapses. Accuracy less secure when more complex language is attempted. Uses a good range of vocabulary, idiom and structure, which are for the most part appropriate to the task. Attempts at more ambitious structures not always 10-12 successful. Generally a secure grasp of tense concept/time reference. Manipulates language to suit the task at hand, however with some errors. A wide range of vocabulary, idiom and structure may compensate for a lower level of accuracy. Generally easy to read despite the errors. Predominantly accurate: free of all but minor errors in grammar, syntax and morphology. Uses a wide range of vocabulary, idiom and structure appropriate to the task with very little or no repetition. Excellent use of tense concept/time reference. Excellent examples of subordination and appropriate use of more 13-15 complex structures. Clear ability to manipulate language with a high degree of accuracy to suit the purpose. Very pleasant to read, though not necessarily faultless.

Pearson Education Limited. Registered company number 872828 with its registered office at 80 Strand, London, WC2R 0RL, United Kingdom