Individual Component Checklist S P E A K I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

Similar documents
Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Language Acquisition Chart

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

One Stop Shop For Educators

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Section B: Educational Impact Statement 2017

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Author: Fatima Lemtouni, Wayzata High School, Wayzata, MN

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Fountas-Pinnell Level P Informational Text

Communication Skills for Architecture Students

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Daily Assessment (All periods)

Science in the Environment: Living Things (National 1)

EXAMPLES OF SPEAKING PERFORMANCES AT CEF LEVELS A2 TO C2. (Taken from Cambridge ESOL s Main Suite exams)

Reviewed by Florina Erbeli

Lesson 12. Lesson 12. Suggested Lesson Structure. Round to Different Place Values (6 minutes) Fluency Practice (12 minutes)

AGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

FCE Speaking Part 4 Discussion teacher s notes

ELP in whole-school use. Case study Norway. Anita Nyberg

Mercer County Schools

To appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING. Kazuya Saito. Birkbeck, University of London

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

EXAMINER PROMPTS. 10 Places (Can be used with three candidates) 18

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Cal s Dinner Card Deals

Biome I Can Statements

ELA Grade 4 Literary Heroes Technology Integration Unit

First Grade Standards

Lower and Upper Secondary

Ohio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets

IN THIS UNIT YOU LEARN HOW TO: SPEAKING 1 Work in pairs. Discuss the questions. 2 Work with a new partner. Discuss the questions.

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

Multiple Intelligence Teaching Strategy Response Groups

Non-Secure Information Only

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Unit 13 Assessment in Language Teaching. Welcome

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Conversation Task: The Environment Concerns Us All

Vicente Amado Antonio Nariño HH. Corazonistas and Tabora School

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

A Survey of Authentic Assessment in the Teaching of Social Sciences

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

Cambridgeshire Community Services NHS Trust: delivering excellence in children and young people s health services

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

Unpacking a Standard: Making Dinner with Student Differences in Mind

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

21st Century Community Learning Center

Strategies for Differentiating

Unit 14 Dangerous animals

H EALTHCARE S CIENCE

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

CEF, oral assessment and autonomous learning in daily college practice

Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

LITERACY-6 ESSENTIAL UNIT 1 (E01)

Summary / Response. Karl Smith, Accelerations Educational Software. Page 1 of 8

EQuIP Review Feedback

Creating Travel Advice

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

Case study Norway case 1

Handbook for Teachers

Grade 6: Module 2A: Unit 2: Lesson 8 Mid-Unit 3 Assessment: Analyzing Structure and Theme in Stanza 4 of If

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Films for ESOL training. Section 2 - Language Experience

Assessing Children s Writing Connect with the Classroom Observation and Assessment

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Intermediate Academic Writing

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

Writing a Basic Assessment Report. CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

EVERY PICTURE TELLS A STORY

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Making Sales Calls. Watertown High School, Watertown, Massachusetts. 1 hour, 4 5 days per week

Transcription:

S P E A K I N G Individual Component Checklist for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

INTRODUCTION This checklist has been designed for use as a practical tool for describing ONE TASK in a test of speaking. Some pages may need to be photocopied to accommodate further items. General Notes In this checklist the following terminology is used: Component One subtest in an examination. Usually an examination is made up of subtests in the different skills, and components are commonly called by the names of skills. This checklist concerns the speaking component of an examination. Components are also often referred to as papers. Input The material provided by the candidate for use in order to produce an appropriate response. In a test of speaking it may take the form of written, pictorial or oral prompts. Item Each testing point which is given a separate mark or marks. It may consist of, for example, one gap in a written text, or one multiple choice question with three or four options. Response The candidate s written or spoken response to a task. The term answer is often used in this context. However, for reasons of precision, it is not used here. material: An example of a rubric for a speaking test is: In this part of the test I m going to give each of you the chance to talk for about a minute. First, I m going to give each of you some pictures to look at. Please do not show your pictures to each other. Task A task is defined precisely as a combination of rubric, input and response. For example, a reading text with several multiple choice items, all of which can be answered by referring to a single rubric, can be classified as a task. If another set of items relates to the same text, but requires a different rubric in order for a response to be produced, then that combination of text, rubric and items constitutes a different task. Thus the same text can for part of the same input for one or more tasks. The term question which is often used when referring to tasks, whether or not they are presented as grammatical questions, is avoided here because of its ambiguity. Text In the context of a reading component of an examination, a text is any piece of written language which is used as part of the input to a task. Please note Some of the questions in this checklist are to be answered with a couple of words or numbers, and some have boxes to tick yes or no. Others, which involve making some qualitative judgement, ask for an assessment on a scale of 1 4, where 1 represents the most negative judgement and 4 the most positive. Instructions for Individual Questions Rubric The instructions given to a candidate on how to respond to a particular input. The rubric for a speaking test might be spoken by an examiner, or take the form of a written rubric accompanying written or graphic prompt 1. INPUT 3 Topic used in task The likely extent of topic areas used in tests of spoken language is covered by the notions in Threshold Level 1990.

4 Which type of prompt is used? A prompt is any material which is used as stimulus to oral production. 2. LANGUAGE ABILITY TESTED 1 Main focus of testing By this it is meant the main focus of what is being tested in language terms, although it may also touch on other areas. It is taken as understood that there is a great deal of ambiguity in this area. 4. EXPECTED RESPONSE 2 Are role relationships (between candidates or between candidate and assessor (s)) simulated In some tests of speaking candidates are asked to imagine that they are in certain situations and respond appropriately, or are given the role of a character with particular views, in support of which they have to argue. Other tests do not use this role play approach, instead asking candidates to respond to prompts by giving their own reactions and opinions. 3 Is register important? This refers to the degree of formality expressed in response, which is determined by the purpose of speaking and the relationship between the participants in the exchange, or the roles they are playing. 6 To what extent is there an overlap with testing another area of linguistic skill? This question attempts to gauge the extent to which skills other than language ability are required in order to provide a response. An example of this would be an item which demands some type of mathematical calculation in order to get the correct answer, or an item which involves the candidate reading a map or interpreting an plan or diagram. 7 To what extent is there an overlap with testing another area of linguistic skill? This question attempts to gauge the extent to which testing one area of language skill also involved the candidate s ability in another area of skill. It is difficult to separate skills completely from one another. For example, it is likely that any test of speaking will involve candidates in reading or listening to instructions and other forms of input. 4. EXPECTED RESPONSE 1 What are the criteria for marking? The emphasis in marking tests of speaking may be placed in various features related to accuracy, or more importance may be given to the achievement of the task set. 5 How many assessors are involved in each oral assessment? This will probably depend on how many candidates are assessed at once. It is difficult for one assessor working alone to assess more than two candidates at a time. In some examinations the number of candidates an assessors will be fixed, while other candidates have a choice of being examined alone, in pairs or in larger groups. 6 How are their roles defined? If there is only one oral examiner, he or she has to act as both interlocutor and assessor, whereas if two people carry out each assessment, one may act solely as interlocutor, talking to the candidates and setting the tasks, while the other is responsible only for assessing the candidate s responses.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION NAME OF EXAMINATION NAME OF COMPONENT NAME / NUMBER OF TASK

1 INPUT 1 Is the interview carried out 3 Topic used in task a) face to face? a a) personal identification a b) taped? b c) other (please specify c b) house, home and environment b c) daily life c 2 Are candidates interviewed d) free time, entertainment d a) individually? a e) travel e b) in pairs? b c) in groups of more than two? c f) relations with other people f d) other (please specify) d g) health and bodycare g h) education h i) science and scholarships i j) current affairs j k) shopping k l) food and drink l m) services m n) places n o) language o p) weather p q) other (please specify) q

1 INPUT 2 LANGUAGE ABILITY TESTED 4 Which type of prompt is used? 1 Main focus of testing: a) photographs a a) describing a b) reporting events b b) drawings b c) requesting information c d) responding to requests for information / explaining d c) diagrams c e) giving examples e f) agreeing or disagreeing f d) cue cards d g) expressing opinions/preferences g h) giving instructions h e) texts e i) making suggestions i j) persuading j f) audio f k) complaining k l) apologising l g) video g m) expressing possibility m n) expressing purpose n h) other (please specify) h o) comparing and contrasting o p) classifying p q) summing up q r) appropriate social exchange r 5 How long is the prompt? 2 Task type used a) in words a) reading text aloud a b) in minutes b) answering questions from an assessor b c) problem solving c 6 If input includes printed text of any kind, how 1 d) discussion with assessor d appropriate is this? 2 e) discussion with another candidate e 3 f) other (please specify) f 4

3 VIDEO 5 MARKING 1 Number of speakers 1 What are the criteria for marking? a) grammatical accuracy a 4 EXPECTED RESPONSE b) range of structure and vocabulary b c) stress and intonation c 1 Which of the following occur? d) pronunciation d e) fluency e a) short turns a f) register f b) longer turns b g) task achievement g c) questions from candidate c h) other (please specify) h d) responses from candidate d 2 Are role relationships (between candidates or Yes between candidate and assessor(s)) simulated? No 2 Are marking criteria indicated to the candidate? Yes No 3 Is register important? Yes No 3 How many marks does each task carry? 4 To what extent is specialist knowledge assumed? 1 3 4 Is the number of marks available indicated Yes 2 4 to the candidate? No 5 To what extent is cultural knowledge assumed? 1 3 5 How many assessors are involved in each 2 4 oral assessment? 6 To what extent are non-linguistic skills 1 3 a) one a being tested? 2 4 b) two b c) two or more c 7 To what extent is there an overlap with testing 1 3 another are of linguistic skill? 2 4 6 How are their roles defined? (in terms of interlocutor and assessor) a) one interlocutor / assessor a b) two interlocutors / assessors b c) one interlocutor + one assessor c