Accreditation Follow-Up/ Midterm Reports

Similar documents
El Camino College Planning Model

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

MIDTERM REPORT. Solano Community College 4000 Suisun Valley Road Fairfield, California

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Ministry Audit Form 2016

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Upward Bound Program

State Budget Update February 2016

Public Comments (2 minute limit per person) AS Executive Board Reports (15 minutes)

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Program Change Proposal:

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Progress or action taken

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Creating an Information Literacy Plan

Physics/Astronomy/Physical Science. Program Review

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

CONTRACT TENURED FACULTY

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

School Leadership Rubrics

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

Application Guidelines for Interventional Radiology Review Committee for Radiology

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Career Checkpoint. What is Career Checkpoint? Make the most of your Marketable Skills

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

ARTICLE XVII WORKLOAD

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Volunteer State Community College Budget and Planning Priorities

WMO Global Campus: Frequently Asked Questions and Answers, July 2015 V1. WMO Global Campus: Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Introduction: SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY

Department of Education School of Education & Human Services Master of Education Policy Manual

Xenia High School Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Application

SERVICE-LEARNING Annual Report July 30, 2004 Kara Hartmann, Service-Learning Coordinator Page 1 of 5

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

District Consultation Council Meeting. April 24, :00 p.m. Anaheim Campus Room 105 AGENDA

Chaffey College Program Review Report

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

The Curriculum in Primary Schools

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data


BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Brockton Public Schools. Professional Development Plan Teacher s Guide

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

supplemental materials

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

The 21st Century Principal

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Centre for Excellence Elite Sports Program

Strategic Plan Revised November 2012 Reviewed and Updated July 2014

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT

Section 1: Program Design and Curriculum Planning

LaGrange College. Faculty Handbook

Computer Science Self-Study Report for APC Review Fall 2007

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Subject Inspection of Mathematics REPORT. Marian College Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 Roll number: 60500J

University Assessment Council Minutes Erickson Board Room September 12, 2016 Louis Slimak

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

George Mason University Graduate School of Education

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

University of Toronto

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Librarian/Library Faculty Meeting

Current Position Information (if applicable) Current Status: SPA (Salary Grade ) EPA New Position

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles

Ohio Valley University New Major Program Proposal Template

Section on Pediatrics, APTA

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Transcription:

Welcome to the Merritt College Flex Day Accreditation Presentation! The for the presentation are to, Provide an overview and update on the status of Merritt s Accreditation Follow-Up and Midterm Reports. Extend an invitation to the entire College community to participate. Accreditation Follow-Up/ Midterm Reports Introduction Accessing the AFR/ Midterm in MOODLE College Recommendation 6 --Progress to Date College Vetting Process Timeline Components of the Midterm Report Review of College Recommendations 1-9 Actionable Improvement Plans Timeline Invitation Survey

CR. 1--In order to meet the Standards, the Team recommends that the College develop and implement policy and procedures for systematically reviewing the college mission statement. CR. 2 --In order to increase institutional effectiveness, the Team recommends that the College implement an evidence-based process that links institutional planning and decision-making to the College mission. CR.3 --In order to meet the Standards, the Team recommends that the College implement systematic and evidence-based integrated planning processes that show clear linkages between planning, program review, Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) assessment, and resource allocations CR.4 --In order to meet the Standards, the Team recommends that the College accelerate the completion of comprehensive program reviews and Annual Program Updates (APUs) for all instruction, student services, learning resources, and administrative services; to ensure that the process is systematic, integrated into college planning and resource allocation, and utilized for continuous program improvement. CR.5 --In order to meet the Standards, the Team recommends that the College establish institution set standards for student achievement and systematically assesses the institution s progress in meeting or exceeding these standards. CR.6 --Student Learning Outcomes-- In order to meet the Standards, the Team recommends that the College accelerate the identification and documentation of student learning outcomes for all courses, programs, certificates, and degrees; assess student attainment of those outcomes to ensure that all of its instructional courses and programs are of high quality and to make improvements. CR.7--In order to meet the Standard, the Team recommends that the College work with the District Human Resources Department and follow its policy to systematically complete all personnel evaluations CR.8 --In order to meet the Standard, the Team recommends that the College assess and determine the adequate number of qualified faculty and staff to support the College s mission. CR.9 --In order to meet the Standard, the Team recommends the College establish and implement a written policy providing for faculty, staff, administrator, and student participation in decision-making processes which specifies the manner in which individuals bring forward ideas from their constituencies and work together on appropriate policy, planning, and implementation.

1. Standard I.A: The College will research the feasibility of implementing Distance Education (DE) A.A. degree program(s), expand and improve the DE evaluation methods, and increase DE Student Support Services by 2015-16. 2. Standard I.B.7: The College will review and update the Educational Master Plan and the participatory governance handbooks to strengthen institutional effectiveness and to streamline the College s decision-making processes. In addition, an organized summary of evaluations will be linked to the College s annual accomplishments. The results will serve as a guide to the strategic planning process. The update and a calendar of regular evaluations for continuous improvement will be completed by spring 2015. 3. Standard II.A.1.c: The College will continue to assess its course student learning outcomes on a three-year cycle. Programs with capstone courses and/or license exams will continue with their established assessment cycles. General education degrees will be assessed starting spring 2015 using course outcome data. Assessment of institutional learning outcomes will be revised in spring 2015 with a college-wide professional workshop that focuses on increased dialogue between disciplines. The Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Committee (SLOAC) will develop and run all workshops and reports. 4. Standard II.A.7.c: The College will review, update, and publish the Student Behavioral Manual and Student Code of Conduct and make them accessible in appropriate locations during the 2015-16 academic years. 5. Standard II.B.1: The College will determine counseling needs during 2014-15 for implementation of the Student Service Success Plan and increase the number of counseling faculty for the 2015-16 academic years. 6. Standard II.B.3: To supplement District research, an on-campus Research Data Specialist will analyze reports to increase data collection with regards to program effectiveness, grant projects, and evaluation of institutional effectiveness. The College will then be able to apply the analysis and data to improvement plans. During the 2015-16 academic year, the College will seek to hire a full-time Research Data Specialist to aid with these processes.

7. Standard II.B.3.a: The College will assess and expand online student services to include ease of enrollment, accessibility and ascertain levels of satisfaction. This is scheduled for 2015-16. 8. Standard II.C.1: The College will update and expand existing Merritt College Library collections, staff, and funding sources and seek to identify additional instructional space for MCL functions and activities. This is scheduled for spring 2015 and will be ongoing. 9. Standard III.B.1.a: The College will work with the District on developing a funded maintenance program that utilizes the principle that total cost of ownership is key in the development process for all physical resources including updates to Merritt College s 60- year-old facilities. 10. Standard III.C.1.b: The District/College will develop, coordinate, and implement the District s enterprise system training workshops in order to optimize human resource competence by providing formal training for new employees along with professional development opportunities for existing employees. This is scheduled for fall 2016. 11. Standard III.D.1.b: Merritt College and the Enrollment Management Task Force will develop and enhance target programs for high risk students; and early outreach to local high schools, academic and career pathways, and adult education that will align with the District Budget Allocation Model and State FTES apportionment funding. 12. Standard IV.A.2.b: The College will continue to enhance its relationship with faculty by delineating how the 10+1 (academic matters) applies to the Merritt College governance structures and College functions. Reliance on the Academic Senate and appropriate faculty leadership for academic matters will be specified for implementation of college-wide initiatives. In fall 2015, a graphic outline will be included in the College governance manual. 13. Standard IV.B.2.b: To increase administrative position stability and enhance the College s participatory governance process, the College President will complete the permanent searches for administrative positions by spring 2015 and support long term planning and administrative stability by assisting with and advocating for reconvening the District Administrative Leadership Training Program as a means of fostering future administrative leaders from within existing faculty and administration personnel.

1. The status of Merritt College s Accreditation Follow-Up and Midterm Reports are clear to me. (Please choose one response) Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Comments 2. I would like to participate in the preparation of the Midterm Report. (Please circle one response) Yes No Maybe 3. My area of expertise is 4. I would like additional information in the area/s of

Merritt College FLEX DAY August 18, 2017 Accreditation Follow-Up Report Midterm Updates

Introduction Accreditation Follow-Up Report/ Response Team in Collaboration with SLOAC Dr. Jeffrey Lamb Dr. Mia Kelly Nghiem Thai Dinh Truong

College Recommendation 6 Progress to Date: AFR Introduction Collaboration with SLOAC Intro---Commendations Restating what the Visiting Team said We did well More time needed to demonstrate sustainability Statement of Report Preparation Process Timeline Writing the Report Evidence Collection/ Documentation

College Recommendation 6 Progress to Date Components of the Report, 7 Sections Corrective Actions Remaining from 2016 report 1. Accelerating Learning Outcomes, Identification and Assessment of, 2. Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) Assessment 3. Service Area Outcomes (SAO) Assessment 4. Program Learning Outcomes (PLO) Assessment 5. Institutional Learning Outcomes (ILO) Assessment Still some work to be completed. 6) Plans for Sustainability and, 7) Conclusion

College Recommendation 6 Progress to Date--Finalization College Vetting Process, College Council to review and approve AFR on August 23 rd Can access the AFR in MOODLE until August 22 nd AFR to Board on 28 th, for approval on September 12 Team visit tentatively scheduled for November 2017!

AFR Timeline

Accreditation Midterm Report Components of the Midterm Report

Review of College Recommendations 1-9 Refer to Handouts

CR1 In order to meet the Standard, the Team recommends that the College develop and implement policy and procedures for systematically reviewing the college mission statement. CR2 In order to increase institutional effectiveness, the Team recommends that the College implement an evidence-based process that links institutional planning and decision-making to the College mission. (I.A.4) CR3 In order to meet the Standards, the Team recommends that the College implement systematic and evidence-based integrated planning processes that show clear linkages between planning, program review, Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) assessment, and resource allocations CR4 In order to meet the Standards, the Team recommends that the College accelerate the completion of comprehensive program reviews and Annual Program Updates (APUs) for all instruction, student services, learning resources, and administrative services; to ensure that the process is systematic, integrated into college planning and resource allocation, and utilized for continuous program improvement. CR 5 In order to meet the Standards, the Team recommends that the College establish institution set standards for student achievement and systematically assesses the institution s progress in meeting or exceeding these standards.

CR6 Student Learning Outcomes In order to meet the Standards, the Team recommends that the College accelerate the identification and documentation of student learning outcomes for all courses, programs, certificates, and degrees; assess student attainment of those outcomes to ensure that all of its instructional courses and programs are of high quality and to make improvements. CR7 In order to meet the Standard, the Team recommends that the College work with the District Human Resources Department and follow its policy to systematically complete all personnel evaluations CR8 In order to meet the Standard, the Team recommends that the College assess and determine the adequate number of qualified faculty and staff to support the College s mission. CR9 In order to meet the Standard, the Team recommends the College establish and implement a written policy providing for faculty, staff, administrator, and student participation in decision-making processes which specifies the manner in which individuals bring forward ideas from their constituencies and work together on appropriate policy, planning, and implementation.

Actionable Improvement Plans (Handout)

Weekly Accreditation Response Team meetings Timeline Bi Weekly meeting with President Accreditation Response Team Met Email to Coleads and Managers enlisting their participation Steering Committee Luncheon Shared Governance Vetting Final Draft into Moodle To Board for Approval 2 0 1 7 July August September October November December 2 0 1 8 January February March Steering Committee ID Flex Day Announcement Midterm Second Draft/Actiona ble Improvement Plans Completed Midterm Report discussion at Fall Flex Day Printing Midterm first Draft

Invitation to Participate