Speaking Classes. Objectives

Similar documents
Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

One Stop Shop For Educators

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Public Speaking Rubric

Language Acquisition Chart

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Lecturing Module

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Lower and Upper Secondary

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Pearson Longman Keystone Book F 2013

Creating Travel Advice

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Language Center. Course Catalog

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Teachers Guide Chair Study

RESPONSE TO LITERATURE

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Pennsylvania Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 11

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

Mini Lesson Ideas for Expository Writing

Pearson Longman Keystone Book D 2013

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

The Use of Drama and Dramatic Activities in English Language Teaching

Improving Advanced Learners' Communication Skills Through Paragraph Reading and Writing. Mika MIYASONE

Communication Skills for Architecture Students

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - WRITING THIRD GRADE FIFTH GRADE

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Formulaic Language and Fluency: ESL Teaching Applications

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Tap vs. Bottled Water

4 th Grade Reading Language Arts Pacing Guide

Predatory Reading, & Some Related Hints on Writing. I. Suggestions for Reading

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Assessment and Evaluation

Providing student writers with pre-text feedback

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Assessment. the international training and education center on hiv. Continued on page 4

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Statewide Framework Document for:

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Chemistry Senior Seminar - Spring 2016

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Spanish III Class Description

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

Pronunciation: Student self-assessment: Based on the Standards, Topics and Key Concepts and Structures listed here, students should ask themselves...

Secondary English-Language Arts

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

2006 Mississippi Language Arts Framework-Revised Grade 12

21st Century Community Learning Center

Loveland Schools Literacy Framework K-6

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Transcription:

CURRICULUM AND CLASS OVERVIEW Speaking Classes The English Language Support Program (ELSP) endeavors to provide high quality language instruction to ensure that students advance their speaking proficiency during the first year of academic study. Students are provided with an integrated framework for building effective communication skills (constructed around the assessment criteria in ACTFL s Oral Proficiency Interview (accuracy, content, context, text type and global tasks) with additional instruction in presentation skills and paralinguistic cues (non verbal communication). The curriculum encourages long term development of advanced oral proficiency as well as success in Emory teaching roles and the professional speaking demands in the professional world inside and/or outside the university community. Objectives establish language goals considering the teaching requirements set by the Laney Graduate School for all graduate students frame the context and content of courses around professional language usage (particularly in classroom and lab settings) recognize and allow for the time constraints for language study of degree seeking students focus on individual learning needs by targeting areas most critical to each student s speech performance provide instructional materials and objectives consistent with OPI Guidelines (advancing students through levels of proficiency) ensure language growth and the development of confident, public presentation performance within the frame of each student s professional field of study (including the development of language cues for clear organization of materials, voice quality, vocal variety, clear pronunciation, and correct grammar) coordinate the development track of students over the sequence of courses assure consistency among instructors and avoid material overlap between courses Graduate students are required to take either the intermediate (505_int, 515_int, 516_int) or advanced (515_adv, 516_adv) sequence of classes; students can elect to enroll in the high advanced (520, 530) sequence. Employees can enroll in the graduate class sequence if their test scores are comparable to graduate students. Two special classes (502 and 503) are offered only for research employees to prepare them for participation in the intermediate sequence for graduate students. A brief description of the classes follows.

Intermediate Sequence (505, 515, 516) To communicate clearly with paragraph discourse structure Objectives: The Intermediate Track is designed to improve the communication skills of intermediate (OPI level 2) students. Intermediate speakers can handle many of the speaking exchanges of routine life and work; however, they typically require a sympathetic listener accustomed to speakers whose first language is not English. Intermediate speakers may have difficulty sequencing and/or linking ideas into paragraph length discourse, maintaining appropriate past, present, and future time frames, sustaining fluency, and/or being readily comprehensible. In the Intermediate Track, students focus on: language functions: fluency: grammar: pronunciation vocabulary listening: self study strategies: developing the ability to narrate and describe in major time frames; moving towards supporting opinions improving flow of speech; developing ability to use cohesive devices to connect sentences & paragraphs improving command of word endings, word forms and syntax improving articulation of sounds; building awareness of/ improving grouping, rhythm, stress, intonation expanding vocabulary and lexical phrases used in academic speaking tasks building awareness of patterns of spoken English to improve comprehension implementing learning techniques outside the classroom, including self monitoring/self correcting Grading: S (satisfactory) 80 points out of 100 needed to receive an S U (unsatisfactory) Intermediate Track Sequence Fall (ELSP 505) Spring (ELSP 515) Summer (ELSP 516) Connecting sentences (time frame and tense control) Presenting (scripted) Discussing (unscripted) Building paragraphs Expressing opinions Presenting (semi scripted w/ppt) Leading discussions (controlled topic) Using extended paragraphs Expressing conditional & hypothetical Presenting (unscripted w/ppt) Leading discussions (self selected topic) Overview of Presentations Presentations are limited to 2 3 minutes to ensure maintained focus on targeted language features. Presentations move from scripted to unscripted; from simple organizational patterns to more complex patterns; from single paragraphs to multi paragraphs; from speaking from podiums to more relaxed stance with effective gesturing and body positioning.

Overview of Seminar Discussions Discussion topics in the fall semester derive from familiar textbook content and move to articles of public interest. Students respond to questions with expanded answers for connecting sentences and developing paragraph level discourse and move to more elaborated responses and remarks while managing and leading discussions. Questions move from those related to personal experience to those of a more abstract and hypothetical nature. Overview of Audio Activities Audio activities are 1 2 minute recordings completed outside of class, submitted online, and generally non scripted to help the student develop self monitoring skills. Each activity reinforces the particular language and/or pronunciation features addressed in the classroom. Students receive individual feedback on their targeted areas as well as the language features, e.g. past tense narration, restatements, stress and grouping, contrasting information with stress and intonation, expressing opinions, solving problems, discussing graphs, charts, and other visual data. Advanced Sequence (517, 518) To communicate effectively with your words and your voice Objectives: The Advanced Track is designed to improve the communication skills of advanced (OPI level 3) students. Advanced speakers can narrate and describe in the past, present, and future time frames in paragraphlength discourse. Although they may have varying degrees of fluency and accuracy, advanced speakers typically can convey their message without confusion and be understood by listeners not accustomed to speakers whose first language is not English. However, they may lack the language to discuss topics extensively, participate in formal and professional conversations, and consistently provide a structured argument in extended discourse. The Advanced Track focuses on: language functions: fluency: grammar: pronunciation: vocabulary: listening: self study strategies: solidifying the ability to easily narrate and describe in major time frames; and advancing the ability to structure, explain, and defend arguments and the ability to construct hypotheses improving the flow and flexibility of speech and the use of cohesive devices to connect extended discourse improving command of word endings, word form, syntax, and advancing control of complex structures improving word stress, grouping (pausing, linking, and focus), intonation (vocal variety), rhythm, and English sound articulation (individualized) expanding vocabulary from general to more precise and sophisticated word choice building awareness of patterns of spoken English to improve comprehension implementing learning techniques outside the classroom Grading: S (satisfactory) 80 points out of 100 needed to receive an S U (unsatisfactory)

Advanced Track Sequence Fall (ELSP 517 Advanced) Solidifying narration and description in major time frames(full cohesive paragraphs) Practicing complex structures Semi scripted formal academic presentations with field of study content with a controlled organizational pattern using visual support (PPT) Leading and participating in seminar style discussions topics derived from textbook Sharing and supporting opinions, structuring arguments Spring (ELSP 518 Advanced) Defending arguments, constructing hypotheses, (extended paragraphs with native like rhythm, stress, intonation) Solidifying the use of more complex structures Unscripted formal academic presentations related to field of study with visual support (PPT) choice of purpose and organizational pattern Leading and participating in seminar style discussions of self selected academic topics Identifying issues, posing potential solutions, evaluating proposed solutions, exploring abstract topics with in depth analysis of issue Overview of Presentations Presentations move from structured and directed organizational patterns to student selected organizational pattern and purpose, increasing in length (from 2 minutes to 5 minutes) and complexity (extended discourse). Academic presentations are supported by Power Point, as students practice effective integration of increasingly complex graphs/diagrams, formal, precise and concise language of increasing sophistication. Students practice basic body positioning and gestures and move to more complex, natural gesturing and positioning for greater fluency and audience rapport. In the second semester, students are expected to effectively respond to questions using extended discourse and engage in discussions about the presentation. Overview of Seminar Discussions Students practice effective and appropriate strategies to open, lead, manage and close a seminar style academic discussion. Topics are derived from the textbook in the first semester; in the second semester students choose field related, academic readings appropriate for a diverse scholarly group. Students develop questions to stimulate critical analysis of an abstract topic. Seminar discussions in the first semester focus on structuring and supporting opinions and arguments; discussions in the second semester analyze issues and employ hypothetical structures to explore possibilities. Overview of Audio Activities Audio activities consist of non scripted 2 3 minute recordings completed outside of class and submitted online. Each assignment reinforces the particular language feature being addressed in the classroom and allows practice and demonstration of formal academic language with extended discourse. Activities move from personal anecdotes solidifying the control of time frames to synthesizing opinions, structuring arguments, talking about abstract topics, and analyzing issues.

Advanced High Sequence (520, 530) To communicate effectively in a real professional speaking event Objectives: The Advanced High sequence is designed to improve the academic and professional speaking performance of the Advanced and Superior level students (OPI Levels 3.7 4.0). These speakers can provide a structured argument to support their opinions as well as construct hypotheses; they can explain in detail and narrate fully and accurately in all time frames with linguistic ease, confidence and competence. However, when they are called on to perform complex tasks over a variety of topics, their language may break down or prove inadequate: patterns of error appear, or they may avoid the task altogether. They may resort to simplification through the use of description or narration in place of argument or hypothesis. Although they can, in general, discuss topics abstractly, especially those relating to their particular interests and special fields of expertise, they may be more comfortable discussing a variety of topics concretely. The classes offer support in oral communication concurrent with student s initial teaching experience/professional speaking event ensure that students transfer speech patterns such as connected/paragraph discourse, pronunciation, voice quality, and vocal variety to the real teaching experience/professional speaking event guide student s in monitoring and reflecting upon their speaking performance facilitate the learning and adoption of effective body language, voice, expression and behavior appropriate for American university classrooms, conferences, professional work environment provide learning strategies for successful interaction in and out of the class room that can compensate for weak language areas provide an environment in which students practice speaking tasks with self confidence enable students to develop habits and language skills necessary for self directed growth Format: This Advanced High sequence combines group discussion sessions/classroom activities and individual consultations to analyze video recorded teaching/presenting performance. If applicable, participants will have the opportunity to be observed and/or video recorded while teaching or presenting. Each observation will be followed by an individual consultation with the ELSP instructor. Grading: S (satisfactory) 80 points out of 100 needed to receive an S U (unsatisfactory)

Fall (520): Seminar in Professional Communication Micro teaching / presentations (3 micro teaching /conference presentations from field of study with visual support Organization strategies for lectures or presentations Asking and responding to questions Counter arguing/evaluating arguments Strategies for speaking clearly Explaining visual information Analyses of discussion topics Spring (530): Laboratory in Professional Communication Presenting (at conferences) Lecturing Discussing Reporting Negotiating Interviewing/Patient Histories Hypothesizing and Analyzing Abstracting, Expanding, Defending Arguments Responding to Questions Organizing Poster Presentations Summarizing Discussing Non Verbal Visual support

Writing Classes The ELSP writing classes (ELSP 510 and ELSP 511) prepare graduate students to write effectively for a broad, general academic audience as well as for an audience connected to their individual disciplines. ELSP 510 (4 credits) builds the foundation for writing with the basic elements expected by an English speaking audience. ELSP 511 (2 credits) expands the students skills for writing effectively with professional writing conventions displayed in research articles. The curriculum: establishes a workshop/seminar setting for instruction frames the instruction around a procedure that models the process of writing used by effective, professional writers recognizes the importance for students to analyze writings noting the underlying cultural assumptions of American writers as well as the accepted conventions in their discipline specific writing communities includes practice for students to write a variety of academic assignments for a general, academic audience frames the writing assignments to build critical thinking skills and informed views provides assignments for students to practice the skills needed to become credible publishers of research encourages students to select writing topics related to their research themes and areas of interest provides an overview of the basic grammar and syntax needed to improve the readability of writings focuses on individual learning by targeting areas most critical for advancement of each student s writing skills recognizes that students must analyze, revise and edit their individual writings recognizes the need for students to synthesize and document information without plagiarizing recognizes the time constraints for language study of degree seeking students

Overview: ELSP 510 and ELSP 511 ELSP 510 ELSP 511 Objectives The purpose of ELSP 510 is to prepare students to write effectively for an academic audience. Students will learn effective writing techniques in a workshop setting. The students will: understand the basics of academic writing begin to develop a process of writing consistent with that of other academic writers practice writing a variety of assignments and common structures analyze their individual patterns of writing learn how to revise and self edit review basic grammar and syntax to improve the readability of writings ELSP 511 is designed to expand the written communication skills of graduate students who have a basic understanding of effective academic writing. The purpose of this course is to prepare students for academic research writing. The course will focus on: the synthesis and documentation of information expanded strategies for rewriting compositions for content, style, cohesion, grammar the use of critical thinking skills and development of informed views presentation of research findings in a group publication Tasks Students will be required to write 2 3 drafts of a: Brief Research Interest Statement Biographical Statement Summary Comparative Structure Problem/Solution Text Commentary Content Areas: Academic Writing Communities and Audience Paragraphs Flow of Information Reader Expectations Source Citation Process Writing Strategies Self Editing Skills Writing Portfolio Students will submit research articles to be published in the ELSP 511 Course Journal printed annually by the ELSP 511 classes. The publication will showcase articles focusing on current and relevant research incentives of interest to the students. Students will be expected to work cooperatively with peers (as is often the case in research projects) and to collaborate in open discussion and writing activities. The research theme and topics will relate to students areas of research interest. Each member will be responsible for at least two roles on the writing team: author of research essay editor of one or more sections of the publication

Grading S/U 50% Writing Assignments 50% Final Exam S/U 50% = Individual Assignments 50% = Final Group Project