Owens Community College 2017 Campus Climate Survey Results Summary

Similar documents
Title IX, Gender Discriminations What? I Didn t Know NUNM had Athletic Teams. Cheryl Miller Dean of Students Title IX Coordinator

Partnerships and sponsorships: beverage pouring rights, on-campus ATMs and banking center, athletics sponsorships.

Price Sensitivity Analysis

Division of Student Affairs Annual Report. Office of Multicultural Affairs

TITLE IX COMPLIANCE SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY. Audit Report June 14, Henry Mendoza, Chair Steven M. Glazer William Hauck Glen O.

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Non-Academic Disciplinary Procedures

Restorative Measures In Schools Survey, 2011

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

The Impact of Honors Programs on Undergraduate Academic Performance, Retention, and Graduation

2013 donorcentrics Annual Report on Higher Education Alumni Giving

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

Making Health Happen on Campus: A Review of a Required General Education Health Course

ECON492 Senior Capstone Seminar: Cost-Benefit and Local Economic Policy Analysis Fall 2017 Instructor: Dr. Anita Alves Pena

Director, Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute

CMST 2060 Public Speaking

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

Curriculum Assessment Employing the Continuous Quality Improvement Model in Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs

Student Code of Conduct Policies and Procedures

Discrimination Complaints/Sexual Harassment

Harrassment: offensive, hostile, or intimidating conduct that interfered unreasonably with their ability to work or learn on campus.

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Discipline

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

Lisa K. Regula Meyer

SAFETY REPORT STATEMENT OF CAMPUS SECURITY POLICY CLERY ACT REPORTING

Greek Conduct Process Handbook

Miami Valley Tech Prep

Ohio Journal of School MATHEMATICS Building an Energetic Community of Ohio Mathematics Educators

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

The objectives of the disciplinary process at Barton County Community College are:

2017 Women s Individual Tennis Regional Contacts and Playoff Berth Information

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

OREGON TECH ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

STUDENT WELFARE FREEDOM FROM BULLYING

Educational Attainment

USF Course Change Proposal Global Citizens Project

Background Checks and Pennsylvania Act 153 of 2014 Compliance. Frequently Asked Questions

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

TABLE OF CONTENTS CSWE INITIAL ACCREDITATION SELF STUDY GREATER MIAMI VALLEY JOINT MASW: MIAMI UNIVERSITY OF OHIO AND WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Reporting On-Campus Crime Online: User Intention to Use

CORNERSTONE. I am an engaged learner in constant search of knowledge. I foster human dignity through acts of civility and respect.

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

The Louis Stokes Scholar Internship A Paid Summer Legal Experience

EMPLOYEE DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT COMPLAINT PROCEDURE

AGENDA Symposium on the Recruitment and Retention of Diverse Populations

Curriculum Vitae of. JOHN W. LIEDEL, M.D. Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrician

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Tamwood Language Centre Policies Revision 9/27/2017

Participation Rates: Fall 2012

London School of Economics and Political Science. Disciplinary Procedure for Students

ACBSP Related Standards: #3 Student and Stakeholder Focus #4 Measurement and Analysis of Student Learning and Performance

Use of Results 4. Assessment 5. Use of improve Student Learning? (or did it?) 1. Goals/Objective 2. Phase 3. Assessment Procedures

Bowling Green State University Ohio Staff Council of Higher Education 22nd Annual Summer Conference (June 7-8, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio)

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology

A Guide to Supporting Safe and Inclusive Campus Climates

Greek Life Code of Conduct For NPHC Organizations (This document is an addendum to the Student Code of Conduct)

School Competition and Efficiency with Publicly Funded Catholic Schools David Card, Martin D. Dooley, and A. Abigail Payne

State Parental Involvement Plan

WELCOME! College of Music Graduate Students

Shelters Elementary School

b) Allegation means information in any form forwarded to a Dean relating to possible Misconduct in Scholarly Activity.

The College of Law Mission Statement

TA Decision Chart WHAT IS THIS RESOURCE? DESCRIPTION AND CONTACT INFORMATION POLICIES

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Law Professor's Proposal for Reporting Sexual Violence Funded in Virginia, The Hatchet

Legal Technicians: A Limited License to Practice Law Ellen Reed, King County Bar Association, Seattle, WA

The University of Michigan-Flint. The Committee on the Economic Status of the Faculty. Annual Report to the Regents. June 2007

Required Texts: Intermediate Accounting by Spiceland, Sepe and Nelson, 8E Course notes are available on UNM Learn.

I. STATEMENTS OF POLICY

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

STUDENT CODE OF CONDUCT & STUDENT CONDUCT PROCEDURES

School Health Survey, Texas Education Agency

STUDENT SUSPENSION 8704

AMERICA READS*COUNTS PROGRAM EVALUATION. School Year

Evaluation of Teach For America:

OVERVIEW Getty Center Richard Meier Robert Irwin J. Paul Getty Museum Getty Research Institute Getty Conservation Institute Getty Foundation

ABOUT THE STUDENT CODE OF CONDUCT

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Draft Preliminary Master Plan April 18, 2012

MGMT 3362 Human Resource Management Course Syllabus Spring 2016 (Interactive Video) Business Administration 222D (Edinburg Campus)

A Study of the Effectiveness of Using PER-Based Reforms in a Summer Setting

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

2014 State Residency Conference Frequently Asked Questions FAQ Categories

Individual Instruction Voice (MPVA 300, 301, 501) COURSE INFORMATION Course Description Learning Objectives: Course Information

SOAS Student Disciplinary Procedure 2016/17

Applied Trumpet V VIII

2013 TRIAL URBAN DISTRICT ASSESSMENT (TUDA) RESULTS

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

The Impact of Inter-district Open Enrollment in Mahoning County Public Schools

The College of West Anglia

SYLLABUS: RURAL SOCIOLOGY 1500 INTRODUCTION TO RURAL SOCIOLOGY SPRING 2017

Transcription:

Owens Community College 1 Owens Community College 2017 Campus Climate Survey Results Summary The State of Ohio s Changing Campus Culture Initiative seeks to strengthen its ability to better respond to, and ultimately prevent, sexual violence on the state s college campuses. All Ohio campuses were encouraged to participate in 13 common benchmark questions associated with recommendation #1 in the Changing Campus Culture report: use data to guide action. The purpose of the benchmark questions was to provide the Ohio Department of Higher Education with a common set of data to measure statewide progress in addressing prevention and response to sexual violence, and to track trends over time. In October 2016, a revised set of benchmark questions were released to Ohio campuses who were asked to disseminate these questions to their campus community. The revised questions do not allow for accurate comparison between 2016 and 2017, but moving forward campuses will be able to compare their progress from year to year. Methodology and Sample Data collection began in the 2016 fall semester and ended by June 2017. Institutions collected data in various ways, including through paper surveys and electronically. All responses were anonymous. Response scales for benchmark questions varied slightly for some institutions, therefore any questions with substantively different response scales were excluded from the aggregate analyses. Fourteen public university main campuses, 18 community/state/technical colleges, and 30 private colleges/universities participated in the survey. The overall sample included 44,704 students across the sampled 62 campuses. Nine Hundred Twenty One students participated from Owens Community College. The state wide sample description provided above can be used as a comparison point for Owens Community College s student population. In this report, comparisons are made for the data from the 13 benchmark questions between Owens Community College students and all Community/State/Technical Colleges. The aggregated data across all Community/State/Technical Colleges that participated in the survey comprise the comparison group. Appendix A provides the average responses for each of the 13 benchmark questions for Owens Community College and for all sampled Community/State/Technical Colleges. See Appendix B for a complete list of participating institutions.

Owens Community College 2 Summary of Results Perceptions of Campus Leadership, Policies, and Reporting Six questions assessed how students believe Owens Community College leadership would respond to a report of sexual assault based on their opinions. Averages for each question for the campus sample are provided below along with the sample wide averages across all surveyed Community/State/Technical Colleges. 1 = Not at all likely, 2 = A little bit likely, 3 = Somewhat likely, 4 = Very likely, 5 = Extremely likely Campus officials would take the report seriously. the safety of the person making the report. Campus officials would support the person making the report. Campus officials would take action against the alleged offender(s). the person making the report from retaliation. Campus officials would take action to address factors that may have led to the sexual misconduct. Owens Community College All Community/State/Technical Colleges 4.40 4.29 4.38 4.26 4.35 4.22 4.25 4.11 4.26 4.13 4.27 4.12 Additionally, Owens Community College students were asked how confident they are that the campus will follow formal procedures to address complaints of sexual misconduct (with responses ranging from 1=Strongly disagree to 4 =Strongly agree). Owens Community College average = 3.53 All Community/State/Technical Colleges average = 3.42 Student Education, Efforts, and Knowledge Students indicated whether or not they have participated in training on the prevention of sexual misconduct. Owens Community College = 32.57% of respondents participated All Community/State/Technical Colleges = 33.86% of respondents participated Owens Community College students also reported if they were actively involved in activities to address sexual misconduct (with responses ranging from 1=Strongly disagree to 4=Strongly agree). Owens Community College average = 1.90 All Community/State/Technical Colleges average = 2.03

Owens Community College 3 Furthermore, if an incident of sexual misconduct occurred, students indicated how knowledgeable they were with resources to get help (with responses ranging from 1=Not at all knowledgeable to 4 =Very knowledgeable). Where to go to get help if a friend or the student was the victim of sexual misconduct: Owens Community College average = 2.76 All Community/State/Technical Colleges average = 2.86 Where to make a report of sexual misconduct on campus: Owens Community College = 2.67 All Community/State/Technical Colleges = 2.78 Campus policies on sexual misconduct: Owens Community College = 2.83 All Community/State/Technical Colleges = 2.82 Campus formal procedures to address complaints of sexual misconduct: Owens Community College = 2.48 All Community/State/Technical Colleges = 2.52 Prevalence Students at Owens Community College evaluated how much they agreed with the statement Sexual misconduct is a problem on campus (with responses ranging from 1=Strongly disagree to 4=Strongly agree). Owens Community College average = 2.01 All Community/State/Technical Colleges average = 2.15 Moreover, Owens Community College students indicated how likely they think it is that they will experience sexual misconduct on campus (with responses ranging from 1=Not likely at all to 5=Extremely likely). Owens Community College = 1.52 All Community/State/Technical Colleges = 1.66 The sample of students also reported if they have experienced any sexual misconduct since attending Owens Community College. Percentages for each question for the campus sample are provided below along with the sample wide percentage across all surveyed Community/State/Technical Colleges. Owens Community College All Community/State/Technical Colleges Percent that have experienced sexual 4.23% 5.86% harassment Percent that have experienced stalking 3.47% 4.45% Percent that have experienced non consensual 1.74% 2.37% sexual contact Percent that have experienced non consensual sexual intercourse 0.43% 0.86%

Owens Community College 4 Percent that have experienced intimate partner violence 3.80% 3.13% Appendix A Average Responses to all Benchmark Questions See notes below table for response scales. Question Owens Community College Community/State/Techni cal Colleges Campus officials would take the report 4.40 4.29 seriously. 1 4.38 4.26 the safety of the person making the report. 1 Campus officials would support the person 4.35 4.22 making the report. 1 Campus officials would take action against 4.25 4.11 the alleged offender(s). 1 4.26 4.13 the person making the report from retaliation. 1 Campus officials would take action to address 4.27 4.12 factors that may have led to the sexual misconduct. 1 Percent of students who reported taking a 32.57% 33.86% training on the prevention of sexual misconduct (Examples would include an online training, a workshop, a session, or a course). If yes, how useful did you think the training n/a 3.10 was? (on prevention of sexual misconduct) 2 Knowledge regarding where to make a report 2.67 2.78 of sexual misconduct on campus. 3 Knowledge regarding where to get help if you 2.76 2.86 or a friend were the victim of sexual misconduct. 3 Knowledge regarding your campus policies 2.83 2.82 on sexual misconduct. 3 Knowledge of your campus formal 2.48 2.52 procedures to address complaints of sexual misconduct. 3 I have confidence that my college/university 3.53 3.42 will follow the formal procedures to address complaints of sexual misconduct. 4 I can do something about sexual misconduct 3.28 3.24 on campus. 4 Doing something about sexual misconduct is solely the job of the college/university. 4 2.19 2.22

Owens Community College 5 I am actively involved in activities to address 1.90 2.03 sexual misconduct on campus. 4 Sexual misconduct is a problem on campus. 4 2.01 2.15 How likely do you think it is that you will 1.52 1.66 experience sexual misconduct on campus? 5 Percent of students who experienced sexual 4.23% 5.86% harassment since attending Owens Community College Percent of students experienced stalking 3.47% 4.45% since attending Owens Community College Percent of students who experienced nonconsensual 1.74% 2.37% contact since attending Owens Community College Percent of students who experienced nonconsensual 0.43% 0.86% intercourse since attending Owens Community College Percent of students who experienced intimate partner violence since attending Owens Community College 3.80% 3.13% Notes: 1 Response scale: 1 = Not at all likely, 2 = A little bit likely, 3 = Somewhat likely, 4 = Very likely, 5 = Extremely likely 2 Response scale: 1 = Not useful, 2 = A little useful, 3 = Somewhat useful, 4 = Very useful, 5 = Extremely useful 3 Response scale: 1 = Not at all knowledgeable, 2 = A little knowledgeable, 3 = Somewhat knowledgeable, 4 = Very knowledgeable 4 Response scale: 1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Agree, 4 = Strongly agree 5 Response scale: 1 = Not at all likely, 2 = A little likely, 3 = Somewhat likely, 4 = Very likely, 5 = Extremely likely

Owens Community College 6 University main campuses: Bowling Green State University Central State University Cleveland State University Kent State University Miami University Northeast Ohio Medical University Ohio University Shawnee State University The Ohio State University University of Akron University of Cincinnati University of Toledo Wright State University Youngstown State University Appendix B Institutions Participating in the 2017 Survey Community/state/technical colleges: Belmont College Central Ohio Technical College Cincinnati State Technical & Community College Clark State Community College Columbus State Community College Cuyahoga Community College Eastern Gateway Community College Hocking College Lorain County Community College Marion Technical College North Central State College Northwest State Community College Owens State Community College Rio Grande Community College 1 Sinclair Community College Southern State Community College Stark State College Terra State Community College Washington State Community College Private colleges: Antioch University Ashland University Aultman College Baldwin Wallace University Capital University Case Western Reserve University Christ College of Nursing and Health Sciences

Owens Community College 7 College of Wooster Defiance College Franciscan University of Steubenville Franklin University Good Samaritan College of Nursing & Health Science Heidelberg University Hiram College Lourdes University Marietta College of Ohio Mercy College of Ohio Mount Carmel College of Nursing Mount St. Joseph University Muskingum University Ohio Northern University University of Findlay University of Mount Union University of Northwestern Ohio University of Rio Grande 1 Urbana University Ursuline College Wilmington College Wittenberg University Xavier University Notes: 1 The University of Rio Grande and Rio Grande Community College represent a unique partnership between a private and public institution of higher education. Students attending these institutions share staff, faculty, and facilities across a single campus. Due to this unique campus arrangement, surveys were collected from students attending each respective institution, combined, and aggregated with the both private and community colleges surveyed.