DEFINITION OF THE EVALUATION DOMAIN FOR CERTIFICATION AND RECOGNITION. Course Satisfying Basic Needs ENG-B123-4

Similar documents
National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

English for Life. B e g i n n e r. Lessons 1 4 Checklist Getting Started. Student s Book 3 Date. Workbook. MultiROM. Test 1 4

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

Primary English Curriculum Framework

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

Pronunciation: Student self-assessment: Based on the Standards, Topics and Key Concepts and Structures listed here, students should ask themselves...

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

National University of Singapore Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Centre for Language Studies Academic Year 2014/2015 Semester 2

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Greeley-Evans School District 6 French 1, French 1A Curriculum Guide

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

MISSISSIPPI OCCUPATIONAL DIPLOMA EMPLOYMENT ENGLISH I: NINTH, TENTH, ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH GRADES

BULATS A2 WORDLIST 2

Epping Elementary School Plan for Writing Instruction Fourth Grade

UNIT PLANNING TEMPLATE

Grade 2 Unit 2 Working Together

EQuIP Review Feedback

Large Kindergarten Centers Icons

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Missouri GLE FIRST GRADE. Communication Arts Grade Level Expectations and Glossary

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

Lower and Upper Secondary

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

California Treasures Combination Classrooms. A How-to Guide with Weekly Lesson Planners

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

Beginners French FREN 101 University Studies Program. Course Outline

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS SECOND GRADE

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

English IV Version: Beta

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Graduate Program in Education

Literacy THE KEYS TO SUCCESS. Tips for Elementary School Parents (grades K-2)

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

The Ontario Curriculum

Preschool - Pre-Kindergarten (Page 1 of 1)

Mercer County Schools

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

Alignment of Iowa Assessments, Form E to the Common Core State Standards Levels 5 6/Kindergarten. Standard

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Richardson, J., The Next Step in Guided Writing, Ohio Literacy Conference, 2010

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Name of Course: French 1 Middle School. Grade Level(s): 7 and 8 (half each) Unit 1

Linguistics. Undergraduate. Departmental Honors. Graduate. Faculty. Linguistics 1

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

Considerations for Aligning Early Grades Curriculum with the Common Core

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

This publication is also available for download at

Tears. Measurement - Capacity Make A Rhyme. Draw and Write. Life Science *Sign in. Notebooks OBJ: To introduce capacity, *Pledge of

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

LITERACY-6 ESSENTIAL UNIT 1 (E01)

Books Effective Literacy Y5-8 Learning Through Talk Y4-8 Switch onto Spelling Spelling Under Scrutiny

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

Arts, Literature and Communication (500.A1)

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Language Arts Levels 15 17/18

Handbook for Teachers

English Language and Applied Linguistics. Module Descriptions 2017/18

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

W O R L D L A N G U A G E S

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Sample Goals and Benchmarks

Jefferson County School District Testing Plan

Programma di Inglese

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Teaching Vocabulary Summary. Erin Cathey. Middle Tennessee State University

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Senior Stenographer / Senior Typist Series (including equivalent Secretary titles)

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Transcription:

DEFINITION OF THE EVALUATION DOMAIN FOR CERTIFICATION AND RECOGNITION Course Satisfying Basic Needs ENG-B123-4 Common Core Basic Education Program English, Language of Instruction Revised September 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... p. 1 Evaluation Content... p. 2 Explanation of the Evaluation Content... p. 3 Evaluation Criteria... p. 3 Proficiency in Subject-Specific Knowledge... p. 3 Weighting... p. 4 Knowledge... p. 4 Specifications for the Evaluation Instruments... p. 6 Examination: Number of Parts, Sections, Procedure and Duration... p. 6 Examination Content... p. 6 Information-Gathering Tools... p. 7 Authorized Materials... p. 7 Assessment Tools... p. 7 Pass Mark... p. 7 Retakes... p. 7

Introduction The (DED) ensures consistency between a course and the related evaluation instruments. The DED is used to select, organize and describe the essential and representative elements of the course. The DED is based on the program of study and the course, but should by no means replace them in the planning of instructional activities. The DED is the reference document that ensures the validity of the examinations across the province. 1 This document serves as a framework for developing multiple equivalent versions of an evaluation instrument. The DED for each ministerial examination is developed by the Ministère de l Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport (MELS). The DEDs for other types of examinations are developed by MELS or, at the request of school boards, by Société GRICS (BIM). For ethical reasons, only those responsible for developing Definitions of the Evaluation Domain can modify their content. Examinations developed by MELS are consistent with the content of their respective DEDs. It is recommended that all other versions of examinations be in agreement with the DED. 1 Québec, Ministère de l'éducation du Québec, Policy on the Evaluation of Learning (Québec: Gouvernement du Québec, 2003), 47. 1

Evaluation Content General Information Broad Areas of Learning Health and Well-Being Citizenship Environmental and Consumer Awareness The World of Work Subject Area Languages Class of Situations Using language to satisfy basic needs Program Course English, Language of Instruction Satisfying Basic Needs ENG-B123-4 Essential Elements Targeted by the Evaluation Competency To deal with a real-life situation pertaining to the class of situations targeted by the course. Categories of Knowledge Types of discourse (informative, expressive, aesthetic) Discourse cues and features The sound system The writing system Language functions Sociolinguistic features Grammar and syntax Vocabulary pertaining to satisfying basic needs Evaluation Criteria and Weighting Evaluation Criteria for the Competency Interacts using basic, common oral texts in routine situations at a functional level (20 %) Understands basic, common oral texts in routine situations at a functional level (20 %) Reads predictable, basic, common texts at a functional level (30 %) Proficiency in Subject-Specific Knowledge Proficiency in subject-specific knowledge presupposes its acquisition, understanding, application and mobilization, and is therefore linked with the evaluation criteria for the competency. Writes short, basic, common texts at a functional level (30 %) 2

Explanation of the Evaluation Content Evaluation Criteria The evaluation criteria are stated exactly as in the course. Information Clarifying the Evaluation Criteria Interacts using basic, common oral texts in routine situations at a functional level The above criterion assesses the adult s ability to: - use language functions to communicate; - sustain conversation by responding appropriately to the other speaker(s); - use basic elements of the sound system; - adapt language to the situation; - use basic vocabulary appropriate to the situation; - use basic discourse features appropriate to the communication situation; - apply rules of grammar and syntax. Understands basic, common oral texts in routine situations at a functional level The above criterion assesses the adult s ability to: - understand key words and phrases in an oral text; - understand basic information in an oral text. Reads predictable, basic, common texts at a functional level The above criterion assesses the adult s ability to: - understand basic information in a written text; - understand basic instructions in a written text; - understand key words and phrases; - identify thoughts and feelings; - respond to an aesthetic text. Writes short, basic, common texts at a functional level The above criterion assesses the adult s ability to: - provide basic information appropriate to the situation; - use basic elements of the writing system; - use basic discourse features appropriate to purpose and text type; - apply rules of grammar and syntax; - adapt language to the situation; - use basic vocabulary appropriate to the situation. Proficiency in Subject-Specific Knowledge Proficiency in subject-specific knowledge is evaluated through the evaluation of the competency, using tasks related to the evaluation criteria. 3

Weighting The weighting for the evaluation of the competency is 100 %. The weighting of the evaluation criteria appears in the table found on page 2 of this document. Knowledge The knowledge targeted for the evaluation of the competency is selected from the following categories of essential knowledge from this course and from previous courses. The knowledge is chosen according to the real-life situation used for evaluation: Types of discourse Informative, for example: o simple exchanges o conversations o instructions o short weather reports o bills/invoices o notes o messages o maps o graphically organized texts Expressive, for example: o card Aesthetic, for example: o illustrated children s story Discourse cues and features, for example: Visual o graphic cues and features layout font and colour o textual cues and features headings Beginning, middle, end Simple key words and phrases The sound system Phonemic awareness Pronunciation Word stress Sentence intonation patterns Volume Tone Pace The writing system Handwriting Print Cursive Upper and lower case letters The alphabet Upper and lower case letters Names of letters Vowels and consonants 4

Word recognition Common high-frequency sight words Phonics o sound-symbol correspondence o vowel patterns o consonant patterns Word patterns o word families o word beginnings and endings Syllabication Spelling Letter patterns Punctuation Initial capitalization End punctuation o period Signs and Symbols Logos Numerals Computer icons Language functions, for example: Asking for and giving information, instructions Requesting assistance Greeting and taking leave Expressing needs Expressing satisfaction, dissatisfaction Sociolinguistic features Appropriateness to situation o formal Appropriateness to audience or interlocutor o formal Grammar and syntax Word level Basic word classes o nouns o pronouns o verbs o adjectives Vocabulary pertaining to satisfying basic needs, for example: House and home News 5

Specifications for the Evaluation Instruments Examination: Number of Parts, Sections, Procedure and Duration The examination consists of one part divided into four sections, with a total duration of 180 minutes. The sections may be administered in the same exam session or during different exam sessions, in the order most relevant to the real-life situation. Section Interacting orally: 30 minutes (27 minutes for the preparation and 2 to 3 minutes for the interaction) Section Listening to informative texts: 30 minutes Section Reading informative, expressive or aesthetic texts: 60 minutes Section Writing informative or expressive texts: 60 minutes Examination Content The examination focuses on a real-life situation related to satisfying basic needs (e.g. preparing meals, using public transportation, finding best buys, using banking services). The adult learner will be required to interact orally, and listen to, read and write informative, expressive and/or aesthetic texts. When possible, the task or tasks related to the real-life situation may measure more than one evaluation criterion. Section Interacting orally The adult learner interacts with another speaker and may ask for and give basic information and instructions, state needs, request assistance, and/or express preferences, satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Section Listening to informative texts The adult learner listens to an informative text (e.g. announcement, commercial, weather report). The adult may complete a questionnaire and/or other documents relevant to the task to show his/her ability to listen for key words, phrases and basic information in an oral text. Section Reading informative, expressive or aesthetic texts The adult learner reads a text that may be informative (e.g. food package, phone bill, metro map), expressive (e.g. card), or aesthetic (e.g. illustrated simple story). The adult may complete a questionnaire and/or other documents relevant to the task to show his/her ability to understand basic information, instructions, key words and phrases in an informative text, or to identify thoughts and feelings in an expressive text, or to respond to an aesthetic text. Section Writing informative or expressive texts The adult learner produces an informative text (e.g. basic note, list, message) or an expressive text (e.g. card). This section of the examination evaluates the learner s ability to clearly and legibly provide basic information using simple grammatical structure and vocabulary. 6

Information-Gathering Tools Section Interacting orally - Observation Checklist (Teacher s Copy) Section Listening to informative texts - Questionnaires, forms or other documents relevant to the task Section Reading informative, expressive or aesthetic texts - Questionnaires, forms or other documents relevant to the task Section Writing informative and expressive texts - Written production Authorized Materials Resource Booklet Picture Dictionary Beginner s Dictionary Assessment Tools Assessment will be carried out using a criterion-referenced evaluation rubric based on a fivelevel rating scale. Correction Keys will be included when necessary. Pass Mark The pass mark is 60 % for the examination as a whole. Retakes The adult learner must retake another version of the entire examination. 7